QBBC Article/Strategy (1 Viewer)

[gdub]

Not sure if this would work, if anyone has tried to implement it, or if it is already part of the draft dominator application to a certain extent...

Would it be beneficial to have rb's paired or grouped in 3's based on matchups/SOS similar to how Chase organizes the QBBC article/strategy?

For example, if you draft Portis...who are some favorable backs in lower tiers that match up favorably when Portis has to face a top 5 run defense certain weeks. This isn't to say you would bench a player like Portis, but rb2's and rb3's that have the potential to score well to offset a sub par week by a stud runner. I wouldn't go as far to draft a player solely on SOS within a pair/trio, but if the projections are close, it could be a determining factor of who to draft.

It is probably too much work, with many flaws, and endless permutations, but I wanted to see what others thought.

 

[Buffaloes]

One of the problems you are gioing to run into (especially in a flex league) is that you are still going to have to make a run at the lower tiered RBs in rounds 4-7 just to get ones that will be starters or get reps on a consistent basis. From that standpoint, I would still rather choose the RB who is in the better situation to score week to week rather than try and prognosticate potential SOS. I think the reason you can work a QBBC is due top the fact most leagues start only 1 and most teams wait to get a backup meaning there are still decent options to pick from in the value rounds of 8-10. Just my

 

[Ministry of Pain]

Most of the top tier RB that are being projected top10 right now...with the exception of Joseph Addai, most of the other top RB have juicy schedules or nothign that would make you shy away from them.

My point is if the top RB have the best schedules to boot...this theory is not going to work too well.