What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ran a 10k - Official Thread (12 Viewers)

Yes I signed up for Strava.
Would I upload to both or would all my Garmin data copy over?
Et tu Brute?
:potkettle:
Yeah, I guess I did create an account too. How did you know? :bag:
You had already demonstrated your sluttiness:

Currently, I'm on #teamgarmin #teamnikeplus #teammapmyrun. I get around. :oldunsure:
It's funny, I had no idea what strava was back when we were trying to add garmin contacts. I wish I'd had known we could just join over there too months ago.

 
One thing that "worries" me about strava - it could quiet down a lot of the chatter here since we'll be seeing real time flow of workouts and can have discussions on the team page.

 
One thing that "worries" me about strava - it could quiet down a lot of the chatter here since we'll be seeing real time flow of workouts and can have discussions on the team page.
I don't think that will be a problem. People will still like to talk about key workouts, progress made and races. May even cause more discussion when you see a workout from another FBG and want to ask about it.

 
Nice races, Chaos and Mac. Impressive miles, Ned, Jux. 2Young, Chief, feel better soon.

2Young, several of us in here have had the meniscus scoped. I've got 12 marathons since mine. It was not a big deal. Good luck.

I'm up to three whopping miles per run now. Feeling pretty good. Hoping to actually be training by the end of the month.

 
Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?

 
One thing that "worries" me about strava - it could quiet down a lot of the chatter here since we'll be seeing real time flow of workouts and can have discussions on the team page.
Ok, I googled this, but I'm hoping you users can tell me more about this too.

 
Nice races, Chaos and Mac. Impressive miles, Ned, Jux. 2Young, Chief, feel better soon.

2Young, several of us in here have had the meniscus scoped. I've got 12 marathons since mine. It was not a big deal. Good luck.

I'm up to three whopping miles per run now. Feeling pretty good. Hoping to actually be training by the end of the month.
Thanks. When you get a chance, I'd love to have some feedback on your recovery; milestone stuff like weeks post surgery when you could run, rehab exercises you liked/hated, etc. I have been told to be patient, but I am not very good at this. I had my first PT visit today and the therapist seemed very excited to be working with an athlete, but did say she would be conservative at the start to keep me from re injuring myself. So today was just measuring my range of motion, gauging my strength and a whopping 12 minutes on the bike (which felt awesome).

 
Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?
If your goal is to BQ, in my opinion your best chance to get there is to put in the miles. You have plenty of speed and talent to BQ, you don't have the endurance yet. You say "I don't mind putting in the work", but for the marathon the work is the miles.

 
Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?
If your goal is to BQ, in my opinion your best chance to get there is to put in the miles. You have plenty of speed and talent to BQ, you don't have the endurance yet. You say "I don't mind putting in the work", but for the marathon the work is the miles.
I was afraid you were going to say that. So you think Pfitzinger 18/70 is the way to go? 18/55 not enough?

 
Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?
If your goal is to BQ, in my opinion your best chance to get there is to put in the miles. You have plenty of speed and talent to BQ, you don't have the endurance yet. You say "I don't mind putting in the work", but for the marathon the work is the miles.
I was afraid you were going to say that. So you think Pfitzinger 18/70 is the way to go? 18/55 not enough?
Have to agree with pbm. I think all 3 of us are cut from similar cloths (fast twitchers). You train to improve on your weakness(es). As pbm said, you have more than enough speed; you need the endurance. The mileage is crucial since we're not as aerobically gifted as someone like Juxt.

18/55 might be enough, but if I was forced to bet on it - I'd say it's not enough. I think you need to average 55+ to get there (not peak at 55).

On your injury concerns - I'm willing to place good money you were getting hurt because you ran most of your mileage faster than you are today.

 
Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?
If your goal is to BQ, in my opinion your best chance to get there is to put in the miles. You have plenty of speed and talent to BQ, you don't have the endurance yet. You say "I don't mind putting in the work", but for the marathon the work is the miles.
I was afraid you were going to say that. So you think Pfitzinger 18/70 is the way to go? 18/55 not enough?
I would go with the 18/70 over the 18/55. What I have done in the past is follow the last 12 weeks of Pfitz 18/70 plan. The six weeks prior to starting the plan I have built up my base up to 70 miles a week.

 
One thing that "worries" me about strava - it could quiet down a lot of the chatter here since we'll be seeing real time flow of workouts and can have discussions on the team page.
Ok, I googled this, but I'm hoping you users can tell me more about this too.
There's a ton going on at that website. I'm still discovering things after being on it for a year. Off the top of my head:

  • follow friends - when their workouts are uploaded, it shows up on your activity feed
  • can give kudos (likes) and comment on workouts
  • can create segments on your routes and the site will automatically track your performances and give you PRs, CRs, etc. If the segment is public, it'll rank everyone that's run on it.
  • the ability to store all of your races/PRs is awesome
  • tracks cycling/running together, if that's your thing
Lots of stuff on there... I know I'm missing a lot of it.

 
2Young, I had a very easy time with my rehab. I threw away my crutches the second day post surgery, in part because adding length to my already-sizable wingspan was a hazard to pets, furniture and much of humanity. But I felt good. I walked quite a bit and began cycling I believe it was a week post surgery.

Exactly two weeks afterward, I was called by my softball team asking if there was any way I could play, since my replacement (I was the pitcher) had bailed. I felt good, so I played and had no issues (it swelled up, but no problem). My running speed, which was already glacial, had slowed to the speed of continental drift, but I played.

As to exercise, I just biked and walked for about a month. I was able to ride an actual bike (rather than a stationary) about ten days after the surgery. After a visit to the doc, he cleared me for general leg strengthening with the exception of no squats or lunges. This was four or five weeks post.

I was not a runner when I had my surgery, but became one by accident 7 weeks after. I trained for and finished my first marathon in seven months.

 
One thing that "worries" me about strava - it could quiet down a lot of the chatter here since we'll be seeing real time flow of workouts and can have discussions on the team page.
Ok, I googled this, but I'm hoping you users can tell me more about this too.
There's a ton going on at that website. I'm still discovering things after being on it for a year. Off the top of my head:

  • follow friends - when their workouts are uploaded, it shows up on your activity feed
  • can give kudos (likes) and comment on workouts
  • can create segments on your routes and the site will automatically track your performances and give you PRs, CRs, etc. If the segment is public, it'll rank everyone that's run on it.
  • the ability to store all of your races/PRs is awesome
  • tracks cycling/running together, if that's your thing
Lots of stuff on there... I know I'm missing a lot of it.
That's a great start, thank you.

I'll experiment on some of my shorter runs, but I need to see if I can use this and mapmyfitness simultaneously. Mapmyfitness links to my health insurance, which puts free money in my wallet, so I need to use that. It's limited though, so I'd rather use something with more bells and whistles (that I'll use) to better track my running and this may fit.

 
Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?
If your goal is to BQ, in my opinion your best chance to get there is to put in the miles. You have plenty of speed and talent to BQ, you don't have the endurance yet. You say "I don't mind putting in the work", but for the marathon the work is the miles.
I was afraid you were going to say that. So you think Pfitzinger 18/70 is the way to go? 18/55 not enough?
Have to agree with pbm. I think all 3 of us are cut from similar cloths (fast twitchers). You train to improve on your weakness(es). As pbm said, you have more than enough speed; you need the endurance. The mileage is crucial since we're not as aerobically gifted as someone like Juxt.

18/55 might be enough, but if I was forced to bet on it - I'd say it's not enough. I think you need to average 55+ to get there (not peak at 55).

On your injury concerns - I'm willing to place good money you were getting hurt because you ran most of your mileage faster than you are today.
I agree that 55 doesn't seem like enough, especially since I'm basically already there. I don't know that I want to live in the 60+ range during the heat of summer either though. I think somewhere in the middle would be a nice compromise. Like peak at 65 maybe?

Okay, boys, I need your help. I'm just under 19 weeks until my goal marathon and I have no plan. Last month I ran an average of 46 miles a week and peaked last week at 52 miles. I'm not sure how much more mileage I want than that honestly. I looked at Pfitzinger 18/70 and that seems a bit more than I'm willing to commit to. I don't mind putting in the work but I'm trying to get to the start line healthy. Any suggestions?
If your goal is to BQ, in my opinion your best chance to get there is to put in the miles. You have plenty of speed and talent to BQ, you don't have the endurance yet. You say "I don't mind putting in the work", but for the marathon the work is the miles.
I was afraid you were going to say that. So you think Pfitzinger 18/70 is the way to go? 18/55 not enough?
I would go with the 18/70 over the 18/55. What I have done in the past is follow the last 12 weeks of Pfitz 18/70 plan. The six weeks prior to starting the plan I have built up my base up to 70 miles a week.
You definitely make some fair points. Still not sold on getting to 60+ miles this soon though. I need to give this some thought.

 
Always amazed by some of the training you guys are doing when I come in here. My updates seem so ordinary by comparison.

I'm still mostly in weight loss mode. Down 47 lbs now - still carrying an extra 25 lbs (and I feel it on my runs). I'm gradually upping my running mileage while I'm not allowed in the pool - I did about 20 miles last week - up from 0 miles in January. :)

Just finished doing 30 minutes of weights and then 60 minutes on the indoor bike trainer. Should be able to swim in another week or so.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know if it's the carrying boxes or less running but my legs have been cramping at night more this week than even after the ironman. Not quite as severe when they do but it's more frequent.

 
I don't know if it's the carrying boxes or less running but my legs have been cramping at night more this week than even after the ironman. Not quite as severe when they do but it's more frequent.
Same here. On my end I relate it to cutting back on diet soda and increasing my water consumption.

 
2Young2BBald said:
worrierking said:
Nice races, Chaos and Mac. Impressive miles, Ned, Jux. 2Young, Chief, feel better soon.

2Young, several of us in here have had the meniscus scoped. I've got 12 marathons since mine. It was not a big deal. Good luck.

I'm up to three whopping miles per run now. Feeling pretty good. Hoping to actually be training by the end of the month.
Thanks. When you get a chance, I'd love to have some feedback on your recovery; milestone stuff like weeks post surgery when you could run, rehab exercises you liked/hated, etc. I have been told to be patient, but I am not very good at this. I had my first PT visit today and the therapist seemed very excited to be working with an athlete, but did say she would be conservative at the start to keep me from re injuring myself. So today was just measuring my range of motion, gauging my strength and a whopping 12 minutes on the bike (which felt awesome).
Do what they tell you and take it slow. I realize you have a goal race in mind but be prepared mentally to adjust expectations if rehab isn't going according to plan. That said, what you had done is fairly routine and the recovery has been, in my experience, about a month off the hard stuff, ease back into routine and you are good to go.

 
I don't know if it's the carrying boxes or less running but my legs have been cramping at night more this week than even after the ironman. Not quite as severe when they do but it's more frequent.
Same here. On my end I relate it to cutting back on diet soda and increasing my water consumption.
The good news is I did my first good workout here this morning. A: 1 minute air squats (be sure to go slightly below 90°), easy minute, 2 minutes at 5k pace, repeat until reaching 200 air squats. Took me 7 iterations. Then easy to 30 minutes

B: 45 seconds pushups (be sure to go slightly below 90°), easy 1:15, try to go 2 minutes at 5k pace, repeat until reaching 200 pushups. Took me 7 iterations.

During set B, I could barely get my heart rate under 150 during the easy walk and wasn't able to go under 7 minute pace for the last few hard intervals. hr was in the low 170s though, and that's probably more important. The goal is to run on tired legs, which was definitely accomplished.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ran 2 miles this morning. woo hoo!

Here's my update:

Ran a 5K late April and felt a little twinge in the same old spot in the afternoon post race. Rested a couple of days and then went for a run and while I didn't do a full tweak, I could feel some of those familiar micro strains happening. I went to chiropractic physician that specializes in biomechanics. After lengthy discussion and examination, the thinking is that my peroneal muscles (not perineal - big difference) on my right side are over worked. In terms of feel, the tendon was extremely rope-like and knotty. His hypothesis matched the findings from my gait analysis done by separate office done last year. (encouraging).

So the proposed fix was/is to (1) rehab that muscle via massage, stim, and echo. DONE. (2) get custom orthotics to reduce the strain on that muscle when I do run. DONE. (3) Slowly introduce running and have my body adjust to the orthotic. IN PROGRESS.

I'm on week 2 with the orthotic and new running shoes with better cushion/support - Brooks Glycerin 13. Week 1 was walking only and breaking in the orthotics, so I've only run three times with it; building up each time. While I have orthotics on both left and right shoes, the injured leg (right side) is going through the same paces that I would expect if I was not wearing orthotics: fine while running, soreness and pain for hours/days after running. I'm so used to that calf aching after running that it would be more surprising if it did not hurt when running again.

Having the orthotics in is definitely 'different' and not a minor change. I'm happy for this as all other things I was doing haven't really affected the injury - doing the same old same old would be discouraging.

This link has a write-up on peroneal tendonitis that matches up with my injury pretty well, so I'm also adding in these stretches and strengthening exercises.

That's about it. Anyone else have experience with orthotics and what to expect as you begin running again? Also, when I went back for new running shoes, the Hokas were recommended but they felt like running with moon boots on. Whereas the Brooks Glycerin felt great. Anyone have experience breaking in Hokas and how they felt the first time vs. months out?

 
2Young2BBald said:
worrierking said:
Nice races, Chaos and Mac. Impressive miles, Ned, Jux. 2Young, Chief, feel better soon.

2Young, several of us in here have had the meniscus scoped. I've got 12 marathons since mine. It was not a big deal. Good luck.

I'm up to three whopping miles per run now. Feeling pretty good. Hoping to actually be training by the end of the month.
Thanks. When you get a chance, I'd love to have some feedback on your recovery; milestone stuff like weeks post surgery when you could run, rehab exercises you liked/hated, etc. I have been told to be patient, but I am not very good at this. I had my first PT visit today and the therapist seemed very excited to be working with an athlete, but did say she would be conservative at the start to keep me from re injuring myself. So today was just measuring my range of motion, gauging my strength and a whopping 12 minutes on the bike (which felt awesome).
Do what they tell you and take it slow. I realize you have a goal race in mind but be prepared mentally to adjust expectations if rehab isn't going according to plan. That said, what you had done is fairly routine and the recovery has been, in my experience, about a month off the hard stuff, ease back into routine and you are good to go.
Yeah, the mantra around the house if "take it slow" with my wife and kids on me to slow down and, for the most part, I am obeying. While there is a goal race in late September, my real focus in on being able to sprint around XC courses watching my son this fall.

 
That's about it. Anyone else have experience with orthotics and what to expect as you begin running again? Also, when I went back for new running shoes, the Hokas were recommended but they felt like running with moon boots on. Whereas the Brooks Glycerin felt great. Anyone have experience breaking in Hokas and how they felt the first time vs. months out?
Which model did you try? They used to all be pretty "moon boot-y" and the Bondi and Stinson lines definitely still are very cushioned, but a lot of the newer models are really light and don't have that "squishy" feel. I rotate between the Stinson ATRs (most cushioned, use on long trail runs or focused downhill work), the Conquest (medium cushioning, more of a road shoe), the Mafate Speed (medium cushioning, good grip for muddy/technical trails), and my new favorite the Challenger ATR (really light but enough grip for trail running).

If you're mostly road running I'd try out the Huakas or the Cliftons - the Clifton in particular is a long way from the early Hokas and comes in at under 8 oz (M9). They also don't really need to be broken in and don't change too much over time. While the more maximalist pairs like the Stinson and Bondi will compress a little over time and lose a little squishiness, I'll typically put 400-600 miles into them before worrying about replacing them.

 
I bought some hoka cliftons a few weeks ago and love them. They had a bit of a narrow fit on one of my feet but after I get going it's not really a problem. They main downside to them though is that they've completely ruined me for all other road shoes. I wear them on my easy runs, my long runs, my speed work and even my races! I'm going to need to buy a new pair soon.

 
That's about it. Anyone else have experience with orthotics and what to expect as you begin running again? Also, when I went back for new running shoes, the Hokas were recommended but they felt like running with moon boots on. Whereas the Brooks Glycerin felt great. Anyone have experience breaking in Hokas and how they felt the first time vs. months out?
Which model did you try? They used to all be pretty "moon boot-y" and the Bondi and Stinson lines definitely still are very cushioned, but a lot of the newer models are really light and don't have that "squishy" feel. I rotate between the Stinson ATRs (most cushioned, use on long trail runs or focused downhill work), the Conquest (medium cushioning, more of a road shoe), the Mafate Speed (medium cushioning, good grip for muddy/technical trails), and my new favorite the Challenger ATR (really light but enough grip for trail running).

If you're mostly road running I'd try out the Huakas or the Cliftons - the Clifton in particular is a long way from the early Hokas and comes in at under 8 oz (M9). They also don't really need to be broken in and don't change too much over time. While the more maximalist pairs like the Stinson and Bondi will compress a little over time and lose a little squishiness, I'll typically put 400-600 miles into them before worrying about replacing them.
For my particular needs (normal foot, under pronation, need for cushion), they recommended Bondi and that's what I tried out. I can appreciate that not all shoes are created equal, but given that my symptoms can arise after a 1/2 mile jog, I'm very skeptical that a shoe will be the magic bullet for my particular condition.

How long did it take to get used to the Hoka feel vs. typical running shoe (if at all)?

 
Glad to see you back in the saddle, Brony! It's quite admirable you keep coming back at it despite all of the troubles you've had. :thumbup:

----------

Today's 10/5 LT sucked. I felt like dog crap the moment I stepped off the driveway and had to convince myself a number of times to not quit, but ultimately succumbed to the devil on my shoulder and tucked tail at mile 5. My times were good for the 3 LT miles I managed to get in (6:40/171), but damn I couldn't get my legs moving and the HR was getting out of control. I tried to hit the restart button after a quick walk, but it was already over at that point. I jogged back home and called it a day at 7.8.

I need a good dose of HTFU.

 
Ned the conditions were tough around here this morning with the suck index in the high 140s. With the quick ramp up in mileage you got to listen to your body and in your case your HRM.

 
Ned the conditions were tough around here this morning with the suck index in the high 140s. With the quick ramp up in mileage you got to listen to your body and in your case your HRM.
Yep

running above 140si is bad enough. Doing LT would be brutal.

 
That's about it. Anyone else have experience with orthotics and what to expect as you begin running again? Also, when I went back for new running shoes, the Hokas were recommended but they felt like running with moon boots on. Whereas the Brooks Glycerin felt great. Anyone have experience breaking in Hokas and how they felt the first time vs. months out?
Which model did you try? They used to all be pretty "moon boot-y" and the Bondi and Stinson lines definitely still are very cushioned, but a lot of the newer models are really light and don't have that "squishy" feel. I rotate between the Stinson ATRs (most cushioned, use on long trail runs or focused downhill work), the Conquest (medium cushioning, more of a road shoe), the Mafate Speed (medium cushioning, good grip for muddy/technical trails), and my new favorite the Challenger ATR (really light but enough grip for trail running).

If you're mostly road running I'd try out the Huakas or the Cliftons - the Clifton in particular is a long way from the early Hokas and comes in at under 8 oz (M9). They also don't really need to be broken in and don't change too much over time. While the more maximalist pairs like the Stinson and Bondi will compress a little over time and lose a little squishiness, I'll typically put 400-600 miles into them before worrying about replacing them.
For my particular needs (normal foot, under pronation, need for cushion), they recommended Bondi and that's what I tried out. I can appreciate that not all shoes are created equal, but given that my symptoms can arise after a 1/2 mile jog, I'm very skeptical that a shoe will be the magic bullet for my particular condition.

How long did it take to get used to the Hoka feel vs. typical running shoe (if at all)?
I'm not a big believer in "shoes can fix it" mentality typically, as they don't address whatever actually is causing the problem. But if impact force is the problem, then I think Hokas could help.

I honestly don't remember how long it took me to get used to them, as I've been rocking them for about 4 years now I think. Like Hang said the bigger problem for many is that you like them so much that you stop running in other shoes. I was pretty good up until last year at running at least once a week in a "normal" shoe, but after straining my calf last Thanksgiving in a pair of Solomon's I can count on one hand the number or times I've hit the trail with something other than Hokas.

But they're not for everybody, no doubt. There are other brands that have come out with maximalist cushioning as well in response to Hoka's growing popularity - Brooks Transcend, Altra Paradigm and Olympus come to mind.

 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.

 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.
And look at all of those people that got stress fractures and other injuries from minimalist shoes!

It just goes to show that there is no one right shoe for everybody, and shoes aren't magic bullets by any means.

 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.
The heal drop on hokas is only 5mm, so running with proper form isn't a problem.

 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.
The heal drop on hokas is only 5mm, so running with proper form isn't a problem.
Didn't realize that. I'm still not inclined to pay over $100 for shoes but if they help prevent injury, they'd be worth it.Eta: I hadn't heard much about people getting stress fractures from the minimalist shoes. I'll presume they weren't using good form.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:bye:

Two workouts so far in the last week here. I think I've turned into a blimp. Hopefully my legs remember what a bike is in a few days.

 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.
The heal drop on hokas is only 5mm, so running with proper form isn't a problem.
Didn't realize that. I'm still not inclined to pay over $100 for shoes but if they help prevent injury, they'd be worth it.Eta: I hadn't heard much about people getting stress fractures from the minimalist shoes. I'll presume they weren't using good form.
Yeah, that's probably one of the biggest downsides with the hokas. The sales don't seem to be as great for them as other shoe brands. Probably because they are so popular these days. The clifton is one of the cheaper shoes they sell though and IMO it's their best. Full price is $130 but they can be had for right around a $100.

 
Brony - glad you can get in a couple miles! I'd had a problem with my peroneal tendon back in Feb/March ...while it's better, I still feel a twinge every now and then when I bump my foot wrong.

 
Eta: I hadn't heard much about people getting stress fractures from the minimalist shoes. I'll presume they weren't using good form.
Oh yeah, there were even studies done on it: Study: Vibram FiveFingers Lead to Greater Risk of Foot Bone Injury. And a class action lawsuit:- Shoes Are Not Magic: Vibram Agrees To $3.75 Million Class Action Settlement

This Vibram legal saga began in March of 2012, when a customer filed a class action lawsuit against the company. She alleged that the Five Fingers shoes she had purchased a year before didn’t provide the advertised benefits, and that Vibram made a lot of money off their claims that the shoes provided a superior, more natural footwear experience. The company’s marketing, she claimed, said that the shoes would help prevent injuries and strengthen their muscles more than walking around in regular shoes.

The idea came from a form of the naturalistic fallacy: that since our ancestors ran barefoot, that it’s a good idea for everyone. Most people who can afford a few hundred dollars for running shoes learned to walk and run wearing stuff on their feet, and barefoot-ish running doesn’t give us those benefits. Neither does barefoot-ish walking around.
 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.
The heal drop on hokas is only 5mm, so running with proper form isn't a problem.
Didn't realize that. I'm still not inclined to pay over $100 for shoes but if they help prevent injury, they'd be worth it.Eta: I hadn't heard much about people getting stress fractures from the minimalist shoes. I'll presume they weren't using good form.
Yeah, that's probably one of the biggest downsides with the hokas. The sales don't seem to be as great for them as other shoe brands. Probably because they are so popular these days. The clifton is one of the cheaper shoes they sell though and IMO it's their best. Full price is $130 but they can be had for right around a $100.
They've been in the 60-80 range on running warehouse for months.

 
The only time I think shoes have helped me fix anything is vibrams and other minimalist shoes which just help train proper foot strike.

maybe the max shoes would help too but I haven't tried those, others swear by them.
The heal drop on hokas is only 5mm, so running with proper form isn't a problem.
Didn't realize that. I'm still not inclined to pay over $100 for shoes but if they help prevent injury, they'd be worth it.Eta: I hadn't heard much about people getting stress fractures from the minimalist shoes. I'll presume they weren't using good form.
Yeah, that's probably one of the biggest downsides with the hokas. The sales don't seem to be as great for them as other shoe brands. Probably because they are so popular these days. The clifton is one of the cheaper shoes they sell though and IMO it's their best. Full price is $130 but they can be had for right around a $100.
They've been in the 60-80 range on running warehouse for months.
Not the Cliftons unfortunately though. They are still full price there.

 
Brony - glad you can get in a couple miles! I'd had a problem with my peroneal tendon back in Feb/March ...while it's better, I still feel a twinge every now and then when I bump my foot wrong.
Thanks Tri. I do have my share of experience with running pulls and tears from years ago and whatever I got, doesn't seem to be garden variety injury (not that yours is either!). Not giving up hope yet, but starting to run out of potential solutions. I plan to give the orthotics a few months to do their thing.

 
Knew about the vibram lawsuit based on the faulty claims, but then any time a product claims to be best for everyone (except things like water and air) it should raise suspicion. Just didn't recall the first study. Interesting, though I still think there are benefits for many runners. And frankly, I just like them.

 
Might need to check out the cheaper hokas on running Warehouse, thanks.

Eta: bought a pair of the conquests. Seem like a good shoe, with a 10% off code ended up bring $62.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm astonished they can make those things so friggin big and keep them under 8oz. That's incredible.

 
I took a week off for a 4-day boys golf trip. Took me another 2 days to recover. So with a week between runs, I went out and ran the same route Wednesday and today:

Mile 1 - 9:21 wed 9:23 Friday

Mile 2 - 9:21. 9:16

Mile 3 - 9:31. 9:33

Mile 4 - 9:32. 9:24

Last .82 - 9:11. 8:32 !! ETA: These are mile paces. Actual times 7:29 and 6:58

45:14. 44:34 cut 40 seconds off!
ran this route yesterday for the first time in awhile and was trying to push it a little harder.

Mile 1 - 9:15

Mile 2 - 8:54

Mile 3 - 9:06

Mile 4 - 8:55

.82 - 6:59 (8:37 pace)

Total - 43:08

1:26 off my previous best time. :)

I'd been running a lot of slower miles over the last few weeks. felt good to run a little faster

 
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,

And sorry I could not travel both

And be one traveler, long I stood

And looked down one as far as I could

To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair

And having perhaps the better claim,

Because it was grassy and wanted wear;

Though as for that the passing there

Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay

In leaves no step had trodden black.

Oh, I kept the first for another day!

Yet knowing how way leads on to way,

I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh

Somewhere ages and ages hence:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.
Frost may well have been talking about cycling. I miss my old route - roads less traveled. Went out today to find a route, no matter which way I go there will be more traffic. I can probably do alright going north after the first few miles but I'll cross US-72 / Lee highway (go confederacy!) Which sucks.

1:15 / 24.3 miles / 138bpm

with a lot of off / on clip training

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top