xrayveggin
Footballguy
It's a great thought, except that it's nearly always the opposite. How many fugly Thursday trainwrecks have we had to endure because there's no time to install an offensive gameplan? Many of us have a pretty steadfast "don't play Thursday RB's rule because of how predictable it is. Hyde was on a couple of my benches because I expected another. It's very rare for the offense to be considered at an advantage due to the short week.
I am a Seahawks Homer. This colors my perception. I tend to be an optimist , and it also colors my perception.Indeed a well thought out post. That being said, the difference at face value is the size of Texas, so yeah...maybe it's just Kentucky..but's still a loooong way. And you are assuming that the offenses are 100% rested on the short week, but the defenses are not?
I think that both offenses and defenses can be affected by short weeks. There's no reason that one should be consistently depressed over the other, but if you look at the 2013 and 2014 seasons, the week after opponents played the Seahawks, they performed horribly on both sides of the because of the physical philosophy that Pete Carroll embraces. It's not unreasonable to think that Seahawks offensive players will be hit-or-miss over the rest of the season, but if the offensive line does improve progressively to even an average performance, Wilson should perform better, and the primary running back should perform considerably better. I'm invested in the running game with Carson, but there are too many potential targets for me to invest heavily in a single target. This week, traveling West Coast to East Coast, with a likely Right Guard change, I'd be cautious about starting Carson and I will probably start Golden Tate over Carson in my half PPR League, but I think it's a coin flip.
Last edited by a moderator: