Rhythmdoctor
Footballguy
Stud. Will be a top RB for years to come.
I couple see him as a three down "Player" as a slot receiver/running back hybrid (maybe 5-10 carries a game and 8-12 passing targets a game). He'd be great in a hurry up offense where they could split him out in an empty backfield or line him up in the backfield. I'm sure Belichick would love this guy but I don't see the Patriots willing to draft him as high as some others will.I expect the team drafting him to not even attempt to make him a 3 down back. I see him getting Reggie Bush'ed.
Still 25 lbs heavier than McCaffrey.I believe Bell played at about 225 this past year.
You are probably right. He was 230 at the combine but was listed at 244 during the season as a rookie by the Steelers. His weight is all over the place. McCaffrey obviously doesn't have his frame but at 6', a RB likely needs to carry 225 lbs plus to be an effective runner between the tackles or have sub 4.4 speed and good lateral quickness to avoid hits. McCaffrey is closer to Chris Johnson and Jamaal Charles in terms of height / weight than he is to Bell. If he runs a 4.24 - 4.36, I'll be a believer.I believe Bell played at about 225 this past year.
Have you watched McCaffrey? All his brilliance comes in tight spaces. To say he isn't shifty and only has long speed is way off, imo. When you return KOs for TDs, that's more of a display of quickness and shiftiness than long speed. As I read your post I found myself doubting your ability to evaluate.Shady was battling the flu at the time and didn't participate in any running/movement events at the combine, which would also explain his 198. I think he benched and that was it. All of his times and and explosive measurables in '09 were done at his pro day where he weighed in at 204, but he played closer to 209 - 210 that year and has stayed mostly in that weight range, if not a bit heavier. The thing with weight is that it matters where on the body that weight is located. Shady looks thick where I think RBs should be thick, lower body.
What Shady also has, which I think differs from McCaffery, are very quick feet which he uses right out of the blocks in that first 10 to 20 yds and he's a very elusive and shifty runner in tight spaces. McCaffery has different speed to me. He looks like more of a long speed guy. That's not a bad thing, it's just different than Shady. I think he'll probably run mid to low 4.5s and maybe even tip into the high 4.4s but it looks like it's more of a build-up speed than immediate.
BTW, you can count me as an immediate believer in McCoy. I bought and drafted him everywhere I could in dynasty because of how he looked on tape at Pitt and that he was inline to be Westy's replacement in Andy Reid's scheme. He was clearly a dynamic player with a well rounded skill set and landed in the perfect spot to feature that. Maybe McCaffrey lands in the ideal scenario as well, in which case you have to bump him a bit. I just don't think he's a "can't miss" prospect as a pure / featured RB.
You mean these? http://draftbreakdown.com/players/christian-mccaffrey/ Yeah, I watched the '16 games. I do my best to just watch and take notes as unbiasedly as I can but we all see things differently.Rhythmdoctor said:Have you watched McCaffrey? All his brilliance comes in tight spaces. To say he isn't shifty and only has long speed is way off, imo. When you return KOs for TDs, that's more of a display of quickness and shiftiness than long speed. As I read your post I found myself doubting your ability to evaluate.
I agree with a lot of what you're saying but not this. There are lots of long striders with good speed that are good kick returners. Cordarrelle Patterson, for instance.Rhythmdoctor said:Have you watched McCaffrey? All his brilliance comes in tight spaces. To say he isn't shifty and only has long speed is way off, imo. When you return KOs for TDs, that's more of a display of quickness and shiftiness than long speed. As I read your post I found myself doubting your ability to evaluate.
Fair enough. Thanks for the additional comments.You mean these? http://draftbreakdown.com/players/christian-mccaffrey/ Yeah, I watched the '16 games. I do my best to just watch and take notes as unbiasedly as I can but we all see things differently.
You wouldn't be alone if you doubted me and that's ok. I'm really not saying the guy is hot garbage, just not an elite talent for a RB at that height/weight. 6', 202 lbs is an uphill climb as a RB in the NFL without some special athletic qualities and his lateral skills just are not jumping off the screen at me. If they are to you, well ok. He moves more like I expect from a 215-225 lb back. If he were 225 with that quickness and speed I would be a buyer because his mass would move piles, wear down defenses, and make DBs and LBs pay for hitting him. At that weight, he is the one who pays the price in a collision. Believe me though, I am not writing the guy off at all. I'm a big fan of his dad and hope he has as much or more success than Eddie. I just think he is a good athlete without a definitive position in the NFL which isn't really a good thing in terms of fantasy football.
Link?There was a video posted on Twitter of McCaffrey running the 40. I have him at 4.60 with 1.63 10-yard split. McCaffrey didn't have great form. Looked too upright, not relaxed. He could probably hit 4.50 with better form.
The original tweet was deleted, but I have it uploaded here: http://www.mediafire.com/file/hot1qfc93xh5vx3/McCaffrey+40.mp4Link?
I have him at 4.68. And he was way slower in the 10-yard split. 1.74. Super upright.There was a video posted on Twitter of McCaffrey running the 40. I have him at 4.60 with 1.63 10-yard split. McCaffrey didn't have great form. Looked too upright, not relaxed. He could probably hit 4.50 with better form.
Your start is too early.kOOk said:I have him at 4.68. And he was way slower in the 10-yard split. 1.74. Super upright.
There was a video posted on Twitter of McCaffrey running the 40. I have him at 4.60 with 1.63 10-yard split. McCaffrey didn't have great form. Looked too upright, not relaxed. He could probably hit 4.50 with better form.
Jeff Legwold Verified account kOOk said:I have him at 4.68. And he was way slower in the 10-yard split. 1.74. Super upright.
I tend to agree with this and I'll add that he displays elite patience, particularly for a young RB. Reminds me a bit of Le'Veon Bell in that regard. Sometimes he will just kind of stand behind his offensive lineman waiting for a hole to open up but when it does he hits it with extreme precision and burst and a lot of times what looks like a pretty unspectacular run will still go for five six or seven yards.I don't think 'speed' when I watch McCaffrey. I won't be shocked if he's in the upper 4.5s and it won't discourage me from drafting him either. McCaffrey's strengths are his ELITE vision and rushing angles. He's also very quick in a cluster of people. When I watch him run he always takes THE best angles. His vision might be the best I've seen. He's like Anakin Skywalker in that he sees holes and angles a second or 2 before they open up. THAT is what separates him from the pack, imo. He doesn't make a lot of ankle breaking cuts because he's 2 seconds ahead of everyone else. That's why he might not 'pop' on tape for some because he makes it look so effortless.
My $.02
This sums up my views perfectly. If he can bulk up to 212-215 without losing any short area qickness, that would be ideal.This guy is not a 4.6 guy
Beautiful patience and vision along with burst and more than enough speed. Elite hands. Want him a little bigger than 200lbs if he's really 6'0, but that's the only knock. Will be interesting to see his height/weight at the combine. Don't really need to see anything else, honestly.
ETA -- Sick moves and some top level speed
You're exactly right.Jeff Legwold Verified account @Jeff_Legwold
NFL GM just asked me if I knew what C. McCaffrey ran in 40 at Combine rehearsal Thurs. - I told him in 4.4s & he really liked sound of that.
To what? The 1.0?Trying to figure out how to trade back from the 1.01 - might have to just trade up instead.
In leagues that give points for return yardage, he's gonna be especially money.1.5 pick is starting to look pretty delicious in PPR dynasty leagues....
I'm sure he meant "from 2.1 to 1.x" but I thought the same thing you did at first...To what? The 1.0?
Thanks.Arodin said:I'm sure he meant "from 2.1 to 1.x" but I thought the same thing you did at first...
Maybe he meant "to the 2016 draft." -1.1?
That's a load of crock.Jeff Legwold Verified account @Jeff_Legwold
NFL GM just asked me if I knew what C. McCaffrey ran in 40 at Combine rehearsal Thurs. - I told him in 4.4s & he really liked sound of that.
Toby Gerhart? LOL. Is this going to end up like the Jameis Winston thread?Hmmmm, likened to Toby gerhart.
ESPN's Mel Kiper Jr. wrote that he views Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey as an every-down back.
McCaffrey's draft position is one of the hardest to gauge in this 2017 pool. There is no denying his statistical production at Stanford, but as one AFC personnel director said near the end of December, some teams are likely going to view him as more of a complimentary or third-down cog rather than a bellcow. Kiper, for one, is all in on McCaffrey as a centerpiece in the NFL. On his most recent Big Board, the longtime ESPN draft analyst slots the 6-foot, 202-pounder in at No. 16.
Source: ESPN Insider
Feb 11 - 2:50 PM
That's a load of crock.
The quote that struck me as odd:
That McCaffrey ran a 4.4 in the video I posted.What's a load of crock? That he turned a sub 4.5 40, that a GM liked that, or that Legwold talked to a GM?
McCaffrey is already on record with a laser timed 4.50 40 last year, so I'd have to guess it's one of the latter two.
So the scout was talking about that exact 40? You don't think the possibility exists that McCaffrey has run more than one 40 while training for the combine? And that it's possible for him to have run a 4.Xue in one 40 while running a 4.4X in another?That McCaffrey ran a 4.4 in the video I posted.
An AFC senior personnel executive described Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey as a bigger, faster version of Los Angeles Chargers RB Danny Woodhead.
"He has some tools (catching and return skills) that I like, so that will help his value," he said. "He is more of a balance, body-control type of runner. He's not really a dynamic slasher. He has some shake and wiggle, but I don't know if he has that special pitter pat." NFL.com analyst Bucky Brooks gives New England Patriots RB Dion Lewis as his comparison for McCaffrey, while an NFC senior personnel executive warned Brooks not to comp C-Mac to Reggie Bush. "I don't think he is nearly as explosive or as dynamic as Bush was when he came out of USC," the exec said. "With that being said, I think we saw how NFL teams used Bush as a pro. I think you do the same thing with McCaffrey. ... I don't see him carrying the load. I see him catching the ball out of the backfield or getting the ball on some gadgets. I might be wrong, but I just don't see him as a full-time guy."
Source: NFL.com