ConnSKINS26
Footballguy
What's even crazier about McCaffrey breaking Barry Sanders' record at Stanford is that he basically beat out the guy's own son, a hyped recruit in his own right, in order to do it.
That's a cool fact. I remember reading about Barry's son in high school and being excited about following him in college but then never really hearing about him much since. Now I know why.What's even crazier about McCaffrey breaking Barry Sanders' record at Stanford is that he basically beat out the guy's own son, a hyped recruit in his own right, in order to do it.
He made the kid transfer (to his father's school, but still). Sanders Jr. was drafted in some devy drafts I saw, as a freshman I think, and McCaffrey ended up being the real prize.That's a cool fact. I remember reading about Barry's son in high school and being excited about following him in college but then never really hearing about him much since. Now I know why.
It's not necessarily a lot to gain for a 20 year old though.10 pounds is a lot to add to a guy with an already muscular frame. You have to wonder if more weight is actually a negative.
At 202 pounds, i don't see him as a feature back. And I don't care. There are few featured backs around the league and there is a place, in the NFL and fantasy, for guys who have a piece of the load. McCaffrey can put up points rushing, receiving and returning. He can be productive in limited touches and be spared the beating of a 20+ carry guy? I'd take that trade-off. If this guy who If he goes to the right offense, his stock could take off.
I remember really liking his high school clips! He looked really good back then.He made the kid transfer (to his father's school, but still). Sanders Jr. was drafted in some devy drafts I saw, as a freshman I think, and McCaffrey ended up being the real prize.
Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey tested in the 70th percentile at the NFL Combine.
McCaffrey's best scores were the forty (4.48), broad jump (10'1") and a stunning 3-cone (6.57 seconds). At 202 pounds, this composite score placed McCaffrey fourth among running backs who went through a full workout. Many still question if McCaffrey can "hold up between the tackle," despite the Cardinal shining in that area while at Stanford. He's also a dynamic player when matched up one on one against a linebacker in space.
Source: 3 Sigma Athlete
- Dalvin Cook had a pretty mediocre combine which is causing GMs to reevaluate him as the combine performance did not match his tape at all. I think he likely added weight for the combine which zapped his explosion numbers.Obviously his size is not ideal for a featured back role but he would not be the first to become one in spite of it. He weighed in at 8lbs less and 1 inch taller than Dalvin Cook whom no one questions at all. His size is the same as Chris Johnson and LeSean McCoy weighed in at the combine (McCaffrey is actually a little heavier) and he certainly handled a feature workload in college.
Gun to my head I'd bet on him not ending up a feature back rather than him being one, but it's not at all outside the realm of reasonable possibility like some people here are implying. 5'11" 202lbs with elite athleticism and room to put on a few pounds (McCaffrey is only 20) has given us feature backs before.
- Shady McCoy had the flu at his combine and DNP in anything other than bench. His playing weight has always been around 210 or better. That is where his body naturally is, not what he was trying to achieve.
Shady had the flu leading up to the combine, lost weight because of that fact......He plays at 210+ and has since his 2nd year in the league. What are your questions? Sure seems like you are really attached to a 202 lb RB who runs 4.5....good luck with that.Great call! Always great to see an expurt busting out the facts and nowlij.
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/lesean-mccoy?id=79607
LeSean McCoy ()
HT: 5'10" WT: 198LBS.
POSITION: RB
SCHOOL: Pittsburgh
And I especially like the thought that a RB won't be able to beat the DB that is assigned to cover him on defense. You just can't get enough if this kind of incredible insight!
Via trade I will have the choice of Davis, Mixon, and CM. I'm leaning towards Davis but not totally ruling out CM or Mixon but right now Davis is #1 and is probably the safest pick out of the three.Between him and Corey Davis for 1.1. Mixon right there as well.
3 best in class, just a matter of where they land in the draft.Via trade I will have the choice of Davis, Mixon, and CM. I'm leaning towards Davis but not totally ruling out CM or Mixon but right now Davis is #1 and is probably the safest pick out of the three.
Tex
I'm really in love with Davis as a prospect and I do see a little of TO in his game after the catch but I see a younger version of Jordy Nelson.3 best in class, just a matter of where they land in the draft.
Shady had the flu leading up to the combine, lost weight because of that fact......He plays at 210+ and has since his 2nd year in the league. What are your questions? Sure seems like you are really attached to a 202 lb RB who runs 4.5....good luck with that.
The illness caused McCoy to lose 10 pounds -- he weighed in at 198 at the combine -- and likely will prevent him from taking part in the 225-pound bench-press drill because he feels so weak. But he said he wants to compete in all the other drills when the running backs work out with the quarterbacks and wide receivers tomorrow at Lucas Oil Stadium.Hey, like I said, you are the expurt busting out the fax on us.
He must have had a really bad flu. The 2009 combine weigh in was on Feb 20th +/-. Here are the results from his pro day:
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=70862&draftyear=2009&genpos=RB
Dates: 03/17/09 Height: 5103Weight: 198
The illness caused McCoy to lose 10 pounds -- he weighed in at 198 at the combine -- and likely will prevent him from taking part in the 225-pound bench-press drill because he feels so weak. But he said he wants to compete in all the other drills when the running backs work out with the quarterbacks and wide receivers tomorrow at Lucas Oil Stadium.
http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/2009/02/21/NFL-Scouting-Combine-Former-Pitt-star-McCoy-sick-at-wrong-time-wrong-place/stories/200902210111
Google is your friend....![]()

Believe me, I keep track of results...lol...good luck with your 202 lb. Is that you Eddie? Are you here pimping your son?Ummmm, yeah. I posted the link you ignored that shows all the results from his pro day, including his weigh in.
Reading is your friend...![]()
Good luck to your son Eddie. I loved your game when you played with the Broncos. How is that leg anyway? Ouch!Obviously
Hells yes.Take this offline already, and quit mucking up the thread.
On behalf of everyone else, TIA.
Take this offline already, and quit mucking up the thread.
On behalf of everyone else, TIA.
Tiki's an interesting comp. He went in the top of the second round, which is a possibility for McCaffrey, wound up splitting time with less-talented running backs for most of his career, but wound up with a pretty solid career. Didn't have his first good fantasy season until his fourth year in the league, though.It seems that most of the skepticism about CM is because of his weight/height. There was a pretty damn good back with similar measurements in the recent past: Tiki Barber.
I won a lot of money riding TB!
It's his weight. You just CANT be a feature back at 202 pounds. Its impossible. Look, I think McCaffrey is a special player, but I just dont see a work-horse back. When I see him play, I see someone like... I dont know... Danny Woodhead. Mostly a pass catching back. Yeah, I think that would work for him. Another alternative for him is to switch to being a slot receiver. Someone like... Julian Edelman! That would be a good route for him. Maybe Danny Amendola, but I think McCaffrey is a better player, and I hope he can stay healthier then Amendola. But yeah, its the weight. Thats it. 100%.Seriously what's the difference between McCaffrey and Cook based on the combine? 8 pounds lighter and 1 inch taller for McCaffrey and yet Cook can carry a workload, but McCaff can't? It's ridiculous. If (and highly imagine when) an NFL team says "Hey Christian, we want you to play at 210 or something" I can't imagine him being as poor athletically as Cook was. I don't understand why Cook is being touted as a "feature back" but he's smaller and very slightly heavier than McCaffrey is. If anything McCaffrey can grow into that frame at 21 years old by kickoff, and play at a stronger weight. Cook has proven to be a poor athlete at a higher weight so why aren't there questions regarding his ability to carry the load?
It's his weight. You just CANT be a feature back at 202 pounds. Its impossible. Look, I think McCaffrey is a special player, but I just dont see a work-horse back. When I see him play, I see someone like... I dont know... random white guy. Mostly a pass catching back. Yeah, I think that would work for him. Another alternative for him is to switch to being a slot receiver. Someone like...random white guy ! That would be a good route for him. Maybe random white guy, but I think McCaffrey is a better player, and I hope he can stay healthier then random white guy. But yeah, its the weight. Thats it. 100%.
So are you in favor of Cook being a feature back? Whats the absolute minimum to be a "feature back" like you so call it?It's his weight. You just CANT be a feature back at 202 pounds. Its impossible. Look, I think McCaffrey is a special player, but I just dont see a work-horse back. When I see him play, I see someone like... I dont know... Danny Woodhead. Mostly a pass catching back. Yeah, I think that would work for him. Another alternative for him is to switch to being a slot receiver. Someone like... Julian Edelman! That would be a good route for him. Maybe Danny Amendola, but I think McCaffrey is a better player, and I hope he can stay healthier then Amendola. But yeah, its the weight. Thats it. 100%.
An anonymous NFL scout speaking to Packers' beat writer Bob McGinn assured him that Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey is a far superior prospect to Ty Montgomery.
"This guy is a better runner than Montgomery, a better catcher, he’s more explosive, more agile and he’s probably faster," said the scout. "Montgomery is more of a straight-line guy." McCaffery, of course, was once Montgomery's teammate at Stanford. "He’s a jack-of-all-trades guy," another scout said. "He can be your returner and give you 15 snaps a game (at RB). Once he tests and runs 4.38 (he ran 4.49) guys will fall in love with his personality and his genetics."
Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Mar 14 - 12:31 PM
Fox Sports' Joel Klatt ranks Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey as the No. 7 overall prospect in the 2017 class.
"The most NFL ready offensive player in the draft, McCaffrey is a great running back but also has the ability to be used as a wide receiver and kick returner," Klatt writes. "Expect him to get 18-25 touches per game." We hear what Klatt is saying about McCaffrey, as Stanford's offense certainly prepares a running back for an NFL style and workload. However, many still question McCaffrey's ability to handle a full workload due to standing 5-foot-11 and 205-pounds. McCaffrey produced highlight runs along with difficult yards between the tackles thanks to vision and patience. Leonard Fournette is Klatt's No. 2 running back at No. 9 overall.
Source: Fox Sports
Mar 14 - 10:47 AM
Recently moved up to 1.02 in one league specifically so I can get McCaffrey. Super-high floor due to pass-catching skills, coupled with a high ceiling.McCaffrey 6.57-second 3-cone is second best in the last fourteen years. That coupled with his on field track record has me seriously considering taking him at 1.2
i see a big 7. Fournette/Cook/McAffrey/C.Davis/M.Williams/Mixon/KamaraThe big 4 have become the big 5
Id replace Kamara with Rossi see a big 7. Fournette/Cook/McAffrey/C.Davis/M.Williams/Mixon/Kamara
Samei see a big 7. Fournette/Cook/McAffrey/C.Davis/M.Williams/Mixon/Kamara
I can see that. Kamara and Ross might be in 2nd grouping a bit below the other 6.Id replace Kamara with Ross
Draft insider Tony Pauline pushed a connection between the Broncos and Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey as one he heard throughout the NFL Combine.
Pauline says the buzz is so strong "in large part due to the Elway/McCaffrey family relationship dating back to Stanford." We don't think John Elway would make the pick for that reason alone, but McCaffrey is a very talented runner and receiver, and we would not be surprised if he is the top rated running back on at least a few boards.
Source: Draft Analyst
Unless he goes to the Patriots and they cut all their other RBs and enter the season with only McCaffrey at the position, I think you'll be fine.Ugh now I'm starting to worry I'm not going to get McCaffrey at 1.2. Especially if he winds up in a good landing spot
I wouldn't worry about that. I'm not saying that flippantly, it's just that WR is usually valued higher in dynasty. Cook and Fournette have pretty big hype. Mixon and Ross could both jump into FF stardom is some analyst "loves this situation for him" the could be vault up draft boards too.Ugh now I'm starting to worry I'm not going to get McCaffrey at 1.2. Especially if he winds up in a good landing spot
I wouldn't worry if I was you.Ugh now I'm starting to worry I'm not going to get McCaffrey at 1.2. Especially if he winds up in a good landing spot
So for people who love McCaffrey with 1.2, do you risk trading down a spot or two? Given that there is the hype with Fournette and Cook. I do think McCaffrey in a good landing spot could be the best of them all.Borden said:I wouldn't worry about that. I'm not saying that flippantly, it's just that WR is usually valued higher in dynasty. Cook and Fournette have pretty big hype. Mixon and Ross could both jump into FF stardom is some analyst "loves this situation for him" the could be vault up draft boards too.