Interseptopus
Footballguy
If he fails and you want to be a tool about it, I'm sure itll give you a tingle down the leg.This will be a fun thread to bump
if hes successful it wont need to be bumped
If he fails and you want to be a tool about it, I'm sure itll give you a tingle down the leg.This will be a fun thread to bump
I think this is a very reasonable approach to his potentialYep. I like Henderson. Took him 7th in ffpc after Jacob's, Sanders, hockenson, harry, montgomery, Fant. I actually had him ranked 7th and my entire top 6 went before my pick. That never happens.
Will be fun if Gurley has issues. Otherwise he will just be a COP backup. That's just the truth of it.
Uh, no idea why the word "tool" was used. There are widely varying opinions in this thread, expressed in somewhat arrogant and inflexible ways at times. Those types of threads are the most interesting to revisit.If he fails and you want to be a tool about it, I'm sure itll give you a tingle down the leg.
if hes successful it wont need to be bumped
Same. I'm not expecting a lot. Just felt he was worth reaching for a little, within my range.I think this is a very reasonable approach to his potential
Lots of threads would be a joy to revisit. Actually, all the Henderson discussion has given me flashbacks of last season's Aaron Jones/Jamaal Williams and Alex Collins debates. You want arrogant and inflexible? Ah, those were the good old days!Uh, no idea why the word "tool" was used. There are widely varying opinions in this thread, expressed in somewhat arrogant and inflexible ways at times. Those types of threads are the most interesting to revisit.
A lot of experts that get paid to do fantasy analysis and are on networks like ESPN disagree with you.Yep. I like Henderson. Took him 7th in ffpc after Jacob's, Sanders, hockenson, harry, montgomery, Fant. I actually had him ranked 7th and my entire top 6 went before my pick. That never happens.
Will be fun if Gurley has issues. Otherwise he will just be a COP backup. That's just the truth of it.
What is being disagreed with? I didn't say Gurley is gonna get 90% of the touches or something.A lot of experts that get paid to do fantasy analysis and are on networks like ESPN disagree with you.
Many expect Henderson might carry more of the load because they anticipate it McVay will want to better manage Gurley's workload.
Astonishing how overlooked the Gurley situation is by some of the anti-Henderson crowd. It's as if the playoffs didn't happen.
You made this statementWhat is being disagreed with? I didn't say Gurley is gonna get 90% of the touches or something.
you assume that Henderson will only be a "COP backup" if Gurley doesn't have issues.Will be fun if Gurley has issues. Otherwise he will just be a COP backup. That's just the truth of it.
If Gurley is totally healthy. I can see 30-40% touches. No more. Maybe less.You made this statement
you assume that Henderson will only be a "COP backup" if Gurley doesn't have issues.
A lot of people disagree with that assumption.
And that contradicts your statementIf Gurley is totally healthy. I can see 30-40% touches. No more. Maybe less.
How far off base am I?
Will be fun if Gurley has issues. Otherwise he will just be a COP backup. That's just the truth of it.
You could simply ask me to elaborate further, or ask me a specific question. It helps sometimes.And that contradicts your statement
Not trying to do a "gotcha" here...just trying to keep the narrative straight.
Not a big deal...I think your stance is more clear now.You could simply ask me to elaborate further, or ask me a specific question. It helps sometimes.
Assuming Gurley will come remotely close to his touches this year is an even worse assumption IMHO.I mean, I am VERY confident the Rams will scale back gurleys workload quite a bit even if he is 100% healthy, but let's not act like he wont be the "starter" who gets most of the work.
Assuming it's a split is a bad assumption IMO.
McVay is basically confirming the obvious after the team somewhat surprisingly matched RFA Malcolm Brown's offer sheet and used the No. 70 overall pick on Darrell Henderson. More two-back looks would be a major departure for McVay, who has deployed "11" personnel almost exclusively in Los Angeles. McVay has also alluded to giving Gurley more rest. "As far as managing the workload, those are things that we talk about with Todd and as you continue to get educated on, is that something that we should do for the long haul or something that is or isn’t going to affect Todd most importantly and how does that affect our team." It sounds like Gurley's knee woes down the stretch last season were a wake-up call for his coach. We might not get the same sort of league-winning usage we saw in 2017 and most of 2018.
What does "get his numbers" mean? Let's be precise.Also do you think McVay is going to pull Gurley from the goal line carries? NO WAY. Gurley is still going to get his numbers people. And yes Henderson can play a really nice role too.
Be the lead back, get at least 1500+ combined yards, get double digit TDs.What does "get his numbers" mean? Let's be precise.
Who assumes Gurley gets the same touches?Assuming Gurley will come remotely close to his touches this year is an even worse assumption IMHO.
I said "remotely close" not "same"Who assumes Gurley gets the same touches?
I would take the under on yards although 10 TDs is doable.Be the lead back, get at least 1500+ combined yards, get double digit TDs.
LIke I said, I would definitely take the under on 1500 yards...we really don't know what's up with the knee.I never said same touches, but he's good enough with his touches to still put up double digit TDs and involved in the passing game enough to get 1500 total yards. Unless you really believe he suddenly is in a 50/50 time share. I just don't believe that will happen. And I like Henderson, and have him in MULTIPLE leagues. But I didn't draft him with the expectation that he comes in and Gurley is suddenly Ingram.
Based on multiple reports I read Gurley could have put himself in the games late last year if he wanted. If you recall he had no issue letting CJ Anderson operate goal line touches, even on some series that Gurley helped get them down the field. He did not strike me as the kind of player who has to get the TD's, does not seem wired that way.Also do you think McVay is going to pull Gurley from the goal line carries? NO WAY. Gurley is still going to get his numbers people. And yes Henderson can play a really nice role too.
He cant even juke anybody though.Henderson is downright explosive, he's not a JAG...and he does several things better than Gurley. He's going to get his right away IMHO.
He cant even juke anybody though.
He has an amazing jump cut in space. Think Matt Forte.He cant even juke anybody though.
Reminds a bit of Breida, but bigger.This play (0:25) against UCF is a nice example of how Henderson can beat defenders in space. He doesn't use any fancy ankle-breaking jukes, but he gets by 2 guys.
There is nice blocking on the play which gives Henderson a relatively clean lane to run through at the line of scrimmage, and Henderson shows good burst through the hole. UCF #25 closes fast to fill the lane and looks to be in great position to meet Henderson 3 yards past the line of scrimmage. Henderson cuts to his left while continuing downhill with speed, putting #25 out of position. When they meet, #25 is mostly moving sideways, leaning to his right and turning to try to get his left arm around to contribute to the tackle. By that point, Henderson has gotten his feet squarely back under him, lowered his shoulder, and is headed straight downhill with power. He's able to run right through the attempted tackle while keeping his balance and his downhill momentum. A yard later his head is back up and he is eyeing the next defender. This time there is much more space to maneuver, and Henderson uses that space plus his speed to turn left and basically just run around the defender.
He does sometimes show more of a juke, like against the Georgia State safety here (1:37, replay at 1:54).
Everyone knows he's talking about triple D, Darrell Darwin Darrion Henderson.Who?
Darnell as well. That makes it quads.Everyone knows he's talking about triple D, Darrell Darwin Darrion Henderson.
Now here is a legit reason to smoke up Dylan's fantasy prospects:Faust said:
"McVay is the kind of head coach that players dream of playing for since his offensive mindset helps bring out the best in players, and just looking at some players on the team from the last two years will back that up.
One can only imagine the level of excitement surrounding McVay when discovering that he would have a new weapon to work with in Henderson thanks to the draft, and it’s safe to assume the head coach is going to utilize the rookie in the best way possible "
BB, you are too funny. But I'll leave it at that, don't need a reprimand you know.Bronco Billy said:I don’t understand you at times and wonder if you’ve ever watched the players you address when you make comments like the one above, which you seem to do with regularity.
I have yet to see a scouting report that doesn’t list elusiveness as one of Henderson’s greatest attributes, if not the greatest. He’s been ranked by scouting team after scouting team as one of the top 2 most elusive RBs in this class. You can watch all sorts of film that shows tons of evidence of his ability to jump cut or to change his angle of attack and then blow by tacklers.
This isn’t a matter of opinion. This is posting something that is completely contrary to a plethora of well documented and easily accessed facts. You may want to take a look at some of his game films and then perhaps reconsider this post.
You make some very good points. I'd feel better about Henderson if he had outstanding speed instead of just good speed. His good speed is going to be matched MUCH more often in the NFL which is why escapability traits (especially in traffic) are so crucial for smaller (lighter) feature backs.BB, you are too funny. But I'll leave it at that, don't need a reprimand you know.
I have watched a few of his games, the cut ups on YouTube, along the way forming my own opinion. Consensus be damned. I thought you'd be proud of me BB.
Elusive? Yeah, I dont know. It's such a buzz word. Semantics really. Henderson does have a knack for using a defender's trajectory against him. And he forces a lot of bad angles to get by them, like the video zwk posted above. Nobody questions his burst. I've seen him run right past a guy, like the guy couldnt even react fast enough. Pretty amazing.
Jukes though? Nah. Change of direction, fluidity or whatever, not one of his strengths. He's sort of straight line-ish when he gets going. Ask ebf if you dont believe me.
Henderson has a lot of things to like, but I question whether he makes hay in the open field against NFL defenders. How well does his style translate when hes not the fastest guy they've ever seen? They will be taking better angles than the guys at SMU. I'd really feel better about it if he had some Chris Johnson speed, or even Jerick McKinnon.
Thats about the best I've seen out of him, as far as making a move. I say impressive. Henderson makes easy work of defenders approaching at an angle. Hes savvy about it.ZWK said:He does sometimes show more of a juke, like against the Georgia State safety here (1:37, replay at 1:54).
Not to mention some guy named Todd Gurley. That alone caps his upside for the first few years even assuming he's all he's cracked up to be.You make some very good points. I'd feel better about Henderson if he had outstanding speed instead of just good speed. His good speed is going to be matched MUCH more often in the NFL which is why escapability traits are so crucial for smaller (lighter) RBs.
My concern with Henderson isn't nearly as much about his ability to be a quality COP as it is being a legit feature back (which is what he's being drafted as by many FFers).
Prior to 2019, was Kamara a feature back?You make some very good points. I'd feel better about Henderson if he had outstanding speed instead of just good speed. His good speed is going to be matched MUCH more often in the NFL which is why escapability traits (especially in traffic) are so crucial for smaller (lighter) feature backs.
My concern with Henderson isn't nearly as much about his ability to be a quality COP as it is being a legit feature back (which is what he's being drafted as by many FFers).
BB, you are too funny. But I'll leave it at that, don't need a reprimand you know.
I have watched a few of his games, the cut ups on YouTube, along the way forming my own opinion. Consensus be damned. I thought you'd be proud of me BB.
Elusive? Yeah, I dont know. It's such a buzz word. Semantics really. Henderson does have a knack for using a defender's trajectory against him. And he forces a lot of bad angles to get by them, like the video zwk posted above. Nobody questions his burst. I've seen him run right past a guy, like the guy couldnt even react fast enough. Pretty amazing.
Jukes though? Nah. Change of direction, fluidity or whatever, not one of his strengths. He's sort of straight line-ish when he gets going. Ask ebf if you dont believe me.
Henderson has a lot of things to like, but I question whether he makes hay in the open field against NFL defenders. How well does his style translate when hes not the fastest guy they've ever seen? They will be taking better angles than the guys at SMU. I'd really feel better about it if he had some Chris Johnson speed, or even Jerick McKinnon.
The guy in these vids that actually ran with forward lean and made a sharpe cut was Miles Sanders. Meanwhile the Donovan Henderson highlight shows one lateral move over five minutes of big runs, and if you compare the two you can easily see how much sharper Sanders' move was.I suppose it’s just way too much to hope just once you’d admit you were wrong.
https://mobile.twitter.com/obee1ne/status/1092791781022928902
check the second run on the video here
https://www.google.com/amp/s/theramswire.usatoday.com/2019/04/28/rams-highlights-darrell-henderson-draft/amp/
I can find lots more
No way. Schtick right?The guy in these vids that actually ran with forward lean and made a sharpe cut was Miles Sanders. Meanwhile the Donovan Henderson highlight shows one lateral move over five minutes of big runs, and if you compare the two you can easily see how much sharper Sanders' move was.
You could start with actual clip of Henderson, not Miles Sanders. And not a highlight video either.I can find lots more