No, don't say IR.This is the same thing that happened with him in 2020. He was "day to day" for like 4 weeks straight before he finally ended up on IR.
I always hate starting a RB or WR coming off a multiple week injury
me too, but sometimes you have no choiceI always hate starting a RB or WR coming off a multiple week injury
Mixon's last multiple week injury was 2 years ago. He ran for 96 yards when he returned,I always hate starting a RB or WR coming off a multiple week injury
IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
I think Texans will be fine no matter how much they blitz and I doubt Cam Akers is active.IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
They don't blitz which is the point and no reason to de-activate Akers. Odd take.I think Texans will be fine no matter how much they blitz and I doubt Cam Akers is active.IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
I get it, but each injury is somewhat unique too. depending on type and severity, it is hard to figure. obviously you would think the team wouldnt play him unless hes ready but that doesnt always happen in real lifeMixon's last multiple week injury was 2 years ago. He ran for 96 yards when he returned,
They don't blitz which is the point and no reason to de-activate Akers. Odd take.I think Texans will be fine no matter how much they blitz and I doubt Cam Akers is active.IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
They don't blitz which is the point and no reason to de-activate Akers. Odd take.I think Texans will be fine no matter how much they blitz and I doubt Cam Akers is active.IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
Preseason and prior to week 1 is irrelevant and Pierce would have been cut if he wasn't a high draft pick he sucks in Bobby Slowik's system. That's a fact not even disputable. Ryans' scheme isn't blitz oriented that's well known so not sure why you are unsure regarding blitzing.They don't blitz which is the point and no reason to de-activate Akers. Odd take.I think Texans will be fine no matter how much they blitz and I doubt Cam Akers is active.IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
They don't blitz which is the point and no reason to de-activate Akers. Odd take.I think Texans will be fine no matter how much they blitz and I doubt Cam Akers is active.IF that's a BIG IF Texans blitz as they finally did vs Bears they should be fine and hopefully score early enough then just run the ball with Pierce, Cam, and Dare. Who knows if Mixon plays perhaps he gets early TD and good enough if started in your league.
Think he’s a start this weekend vs New England. A little risk with the injury but the matchup and script seem quite ideal
Odd take?
Akers was not active week one and he's likely to never be active this year, if he's even on the roster, weeks the top 3 RB's are healthy.
I have no idea what you are talking about regarding blitzing. Your post was as confusing as your reply.
You sir have zero idea what you are talking about.Preseason and prior to week 1 is irrelevant and Pierce
I had no idea what you were talking about is not remotely the same thing as saying I'm unsure about the blitzing.Ryans' scheme isn't blitz oriented that's well known so not sure why you are unsure regarding blitzing.
Week 1 has nothing to do with today as I stated. Pierce should have NEVER been active over Cam. He has stunk since Bobby came aboard. This isn't even debatable or a hot take so assume you're just trolling and don't watch Texans or own Pierce. Chill kid.You sir have zero idea what you are talking about.Preseason and prior to week 1 is irrelevant and Pierce
I said zero about preseason or week one.
Week one, of the actual season, the only week that Pierce was active, Cam Akers was not active.
I had no idea what you were talking about is not remotely the same thing as saying I'm unsure about the blitzing.Ryans' scheme isn't blitz oriented that's well known so not sure why you are unsure regarding blitzing.
But speaking of people who don't know what they are talking about. The Texans are mid in blitz rate, 14th in the NFL.
You are the thickest headed person I've encountered on these boards in months.
Ditto. I have so many injuries that I have no choice.I'm starting him.
I have him in the lineup too. My only other options are WR Tre Tucker vs PIT or RB Justice Hill vs WASI'm starting him.
All I know is -Please help!
PUBLISHED SUN OCT 13 11:37:20 A.M. ET 2024 | ||
---|---|---|
(Rotowire) Mixon (ankle) is listed as active for Sunday's game against the Patriots. Analysis: After logging back-to-back limited practices Thursday and Friday, Mixon -- who is bouncing back from what Aaron Wilson of KPRC 2 Houston previously described as a less severe high-ankle sprain -- was listed as questionable for the contest. With his return from a three-game absence confirmed, Mixon should have an opportunity to reclaim his lead role in Houston's backfield versus New England, but if he's limited at all or suffers any in-game setbacks, Dameon Pierce (who is also in the mix after missing four games), as well as Dare Ogunbowale and Cam Akers are available to contribute to the Texans' Week 6 rushing game. |
Even with limitations an active mixon is still top 20Please help!
Wow, he's looked better than expected. He's out there trucking DBs and not going down on first contact - especially that TD.
looked to me like they were playing a hurry up style and hes not in that pkg. still another great gameHis usage in the 2nd half last night against the Jets was puzzling. Preservation technique?
His usage in the 2nd half last night against the Jets was puzzling. Preservation technique?