What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Jonathan Taylor, IND (1 Viewer)

I'm definitely a playoff team this year but partly due to being in a weak division. Five other teams in the league have scored more points than I have. If rest of schedule plays out like it should my pick should be between 9 - 12 next year.  The team offering Taylor to me is a potential playoff team this year.
I think a couple of the replies misunderstood who’s offering Taylor.

That said, I’d stick with Taylor, even though it’s a good offer and one that I’d take if I wasn’t contending.   Life is too short to sell out on a season when you’re still in the hunt.

 
I take that offer and don’t worry about rule changes. Williams and dobbins seem to be better than average players but next years draft doesn’t look all that great to worry about losing that pick and missing out on trading for Taylor. 
take Taylor and don’t look back. He’s only 22YO so there’s that too
Sounds like such good advice, until you find out that the guy's league's proposed rule change is that whoever owns Jonathan Taylor has to eat an entire live muskrat each hour of every day. Muskrats are not supplied by commish and must be acquired by Taylor owner himself.

 
eighsse said:
Sounds like such good advice, until you find out that the guy's league's proposed rule change is that whoever owns Jonathan Taylor has to eat an entire live muskrat each hour of every day. Muskrats are not supplied by commish and must be acquired by Taylor owner himself.
I’d still take that trade😆

 
The Future Champs said:
I think a couple of the replies misunderstood who’s offering Taylor.

That said, I’d stick with Taylor, even though it’s a good offer and one that I’d take if I wasn’t contending.   Life is too short to sell out on a season when you’re still in the hunt.


I'm the one that had Taylor offered to me and already have a playoff spot assured due to the weak division I'm in. The team offering Taylor to me is the team that is contending for a playoff spot in the other division.

 
I'm the one that had Taylor offered to me and already have a playoff spot assured due to the weak division I'm in. The team offering Taylor to me is the team that is contending for a playoff spot in the other division.
I’m not sure what the difficult decision is here take the trade and it’ll work for you. Taylor in the off-season will become (as if he hadn’t already) the number 1 dynasty asset in fantasy while the guys you trade away will be mired in the late 30’s-early 40’s and you’ll be kicking yourself for not making the trade. 
 

Do yourself a favor and do the trade immediately so when when you’re on your deathbed you’re not regretting not trading for the next Henry and stop overthinking it 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’m not sure what the difficult decision is here take the trade and it’ll work for you. Taylor in the off-season will become (as if he hadn’t already) the number 1 dynasty asset in fantasy while the guys you trade away will be mired in the late 30’s-early 40’s and you’ll be kicking yourself for not making the trade. 
 

Do yourself a favor and do the trade immediately so when when you’re on your deathbed you’re not regretting not trading for the next Henry and stop overthinking it 


I was just trying to clear up who was offering Taylor to whom.

 
What are the possible rule changes that could possibly keep you from making this trade?


The league is currently standard scoring and is likely making a gradual shift to PPR scoring. There are also roster limits for each position, so we can currently only carry 7  RBs and 9 WRs. Those limits may change because we are also likely reducing roster size by 2 spots and instituting a 2 player taxi squad for rookies only. Lots of moving pieces.

My main concern is that I'm thin at RB and would potentially be giving up 2 starting RBs to get 1 starting RB. Granted the 1 I'd be getting is a stud and the 2 I'd be giving up are not (at least yet). The owner who offered Taylor to me also has N. Hines so I'm trying to see if there is some way to have him included in the deal without me adding much of anything. I feel like getting Hines would give me a little more depth at RB (especially with the league moving to PPR scoring) and some protection if something happening to Taylor.

 
I'd take this trade in a heartbeat.  I always love trades where I'm getting the best player in the deal and JT is the #1 dynasty RB out there.  Not every day you get offers with pieces like Taylor involved.

 
The league is currently standard scoring and is likely making a gradual shift to PPR scoring. There are also roster limits for each position, so we can currently only carry 7  RBs and 9 WRs. Those limits may change because we are also likely reducing roster size by 2 spots and instituting a 2 player taxi squad for rookies only. Lots of moving pieces.

My main concern is that I'm thin at RB and would potentially be giving up 2 starting RBs to get 1 starting RB. Granted the 1 I'd be getting is a stud and the 2 I'd be giving up are not (at least yet). The owner who offered Taylor to me also has N. Hines so I'm trying to see if there is some way to have him included in the deal without me adding much of anything. I feel like getting Hines would give me a little more depth at RB (especially with the league moving to PPR scoring) and some protection if something happening to Taylor.
If something happens to Taylor this season Marlon Mack is probably the backup to own.

They're not keeping him off the field for lack of ability. 

Next year's backup probably isn't on the roster.

 
The league is currently standard scoring and is likely making a gradual shift to PPR scoring. There are also roster limits for each position, so we can currently only carry 7  RBs and 9 WRs. Those limits may change because we are also likely reducing roster size by 2 spots and instituting a 2 player taxi squad for rookies only. Lots of moving pieces.

My main concern is that I'm thin at RB and would potentially be giving up 2 starting RBs to get 1 starting RB. Granted the 1 I'd be getting is a stud and the 2 I'd be giving up are not (at least yet). The owner who offered Taylor to me also has N. Hines so I'm trying to see if there is some way to have him included in the deal without me adding much of anything. I feel like getting Hines would give me a little more depth at RB (especially with the league moving to PPR scoring) and some protection if something happening to Taylor.
Sorry, my reading comprehension fail there.

That said, I’d take Taylor.  The possible rule changes either increase his value or are neutral.   PPR gives WRs a boost over 2 down RBs.  Smaller rosters and reduced keepers increases the value of the top players.

 
Taylor.......this kid is the real deal. I realize he has high milage. But he can have 3-4 elite years as a RB with the Colts.

He would be my 1.01 rookie pick. Perfect situation. 
If only the Dolphins were smart enough to draft. 

Grier is hack.

Instead of taking Justin Herbert (who we pounded the table for) and Jonathan Taylor.

We got Tua, Austin Jackson and Noah Iggobonee. 

Just brilliant front office work here.

 
I can't believe how stupid NFL coaches are sometimes. After a horrid 3rd quarter with no touches they finally fight bac in on Taylor's back lol. 

Eagles equally as stupid - Sanders and Hurts both look better running every time Sanders on the field and then they keep giving Scott the ball and lose. 

I don't get it at all.

 
The Colts were up 24-14 and received the 2nd half kickoff.   Here are their next 3 possessions:

1st Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Sacked and fumbled

2nd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Interception

3rd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass - Punt

Now down 28-24

 
The Colts were up 24-14 and received the 2nd half kickoff.   Here are their next 3 possessions:

1st Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Sacked and fumbled

2nd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Interception

3rd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass - Punt

Now down 28-24
Now do their game tying drive!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Colts were up 24-14 and received the 2nd half kickoff.   Here are their next 3 possessions:

1st Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Sacked and fumbled

2nd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Interception

3rd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass - Punt

Now down 28-24
Wow. How does Reich even begin to explain that?

 
The Colts were able to tie the game with a 75-yard drive that included 58 rushing yards by Jonathan Taylor, the NFL's leading rusher. Prior to that drive, Indianapolis had surprisingly called 26 straight passing plays.

 
The Colts were up 24-14 and received the 2nd half kickoff.   Here are their next 3 possessions:

1st Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Sacked and fumbled

2nd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Interception

3rd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass - Punt

Now down 28-24
looks like a typical scenario where a team is likely stacking the box so the "smart coach" says..."they're stacking the box and now we have a mismatch so lets pass!" even though running the ball has gotten you to where you are today.  So, of course you do what the defense is dictating and you pass (even though you aren't good at it) and then fail.  BRILLIANT!!

 
TB was correct in stacking the box, and they were correct that Reich can be a moron and stubborn. He fell right into their trap

Even if boxes are stacked...FORCE the defense to make a play vs. your execution and using your talented back to make defenders miss. TB makes one false play and Taylor takes it to the house 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually it was a "Run the Damn Ball" hat.
It has become the mantra of suffering Colts fans. There is also a #firereich trending in game threads.  
 

That 3rd quarter play calling left me speechless.  Wentz can only be asked to do “just enough”.  As soon as he feels pressured to take the game over, he does stupid things.  I sure hope the “kill kill” audibles weren’t him switching away from JT.  I heard it alot yesterday. So frustrating. 

 
The Colts were up 24-14 and received the 2nd half kickoff.   Here are their next 3 possessions:

1st Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Sacked and fumbled

2nd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass - Interception

3rd Possession:
Pass
Pass
Pass - Punt

Now down 28-24
It felt like they were passing a lot but wow that is inexcusable. 

 
 I hate when I see this thread posted to the top of the page…I’m always thinking he’s been added to the list.  This is the craziest season ever.  No joke if Kelce is out I’ll have 6 of 9 players that I picked up this week in my lineup.  

 
Jonathan Taylor rushed  27 times for 108 yards in the Colts' Week 16 win over the Cardinals.

The Colts' offensive line was down three starters entering Week 16. They then lost starting LT Eric Fisher to a knee injury and fill-in G Chris Reed to a back injury. Taylor definitely felt the effect of the Colts' diminished offensive line. He was frequently bottled up in the second half. Taylor was also targeted twice but didn't catch either. However, Taylor also busted loose for a 47 yard run on the Colts' first play of the game, and he was often too much for even a pile of Cardinals to stop. The Cardinals did hold Taylor out of the end zone, but just barely. Taylor took a carry from the five-yard line down to the one. Carson Wentz threw a TD to T.Y. Hilton on the following play. Taylor gets the Raiders run-funnel defense in Week 17. If his offensive line has more than one starter in action, he looks poised to carry fantasy managers to 2021 championships.

Dec 25, 2021, 11:49 PM ET

 
Marlon Mack put on the COVID list.  Hopefully Taylor hasn't been hanging out with Mack in the RB room.  Owners beware and look to cover yourself (not that you can) if Taylor catches the COVID.

 
Incredible season. Feels like he wore down down the stretch or the matchups got stingy with the O-lineman issues. He's gotten a ton of touches this year- I'd be happy if they reduced the workload a bit.

Was kind of disappointed the last few weeks. The receiving work vanished.

He's a popular 1.01 pick next year. 

 
He'll be unanimous as 1.01.  Even if he regresses a bit who is even close to him at RB right now? He's young, no injury history like virtually every other 1st round back, still low tread on the tires, good situation, good O-line.  Auto pick

 
Incredible season. Feels like he wore down down the stretch or the matchups got stingy with the O-lineman issues. He's gotten a ton of touches this year- I'd be happy if they reduced the workload a bit.

Was kind of disappointed the last few weeks. The receiving work vanished.

He's a popular 1.01 pick next year. 
He averaged 132 yds/gm and 4.9 ypc his last 4 games, and that was without several offensive linemen.

The only thing missing during that stretch was work in the passing game, and once again that falls on Reich. Baffling.

 
He'll be unanimous as 1.01.  Even if he regresses a bit who is even close to him at RB right now? He's young, no injury history like virtually every other 1st round back, still low tread on the tires, good situation, good O-line.  Auto pick
He actually has a ton of miles for his age, which makes his durability and production even more impressive. He has 1590 touches (1475 carries) across his three college and two pro seasons.

 
He actually has a ton of miles for his age, which makes his durability and production even more impressive. He has 1590 touches (1475 carries) across his three college and two pro seasons.
I hear you. Factor in dynasty.  Zero in redraft for next year

 
Idk how many times this needs to be gone over but having a ton of carries in college is not only good, but is one of the best predictors that a RB will be able to handle a bellcow role in the NFL. The more carries a guy has, the more likely he is to be able to handle a ton of carries going forward. I believe it’s Harstad who has done a lot of work and posting about this over the years. The NFL RB cliff is almost entirely age-related, not touch-related, other than some red flags with extreme single-season overuse. But career touches? College touches? Nah. The more the merrier, in terms of being a predictor of future success. Coming into the league with “more tread” left on the tires is really not a thing in terms of predicting health or effectiveness at the next level. In fact it’s more often a sign that they weren’t trusted with the load in college for a reason. Until they hit the age cliff, the more bellcow seasons a RB has behind him, the more likely he is to keep racking up high-touch seasons going forward. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think most people can agree that he is going to see a dip in touches and production, but still is worthy of the #1 pick. He's safe. And you're satisfied if you use the #1 pick on a guy that finishes in the top 5 at his position.
 
I think most people can agree that he is going to see a dip in touches and production, but still is worthy of the #1 pick. He's safe. And you're satisfied if you use the #1 pick on a guy that finishes in the top 5 at his position.
I got the 1.1 in my main redraft league and he’s locked in (barring injury) and am only looking at the 2nd round onward. 1.1 is the absolute best draft spot if you really want a “no question marks” RB in the 1st round. (Najee actually fits that bill for me as well in the mid-1st fwiw)
 
I think most people can agree that he is going to see a dip in touches and production, but still is worthy of the #1 pick. He's safe. And you're satisfied if you use the #1 pick on a guy that finishes in the top 5 at his position.
I got the 1.1 in my main redraft league and he’s locked in (barring injury) and am only looking at the 2nd round onward. 1.1 is the absolute best draft spot if you really want a “no question marks” RB in the 1st round. (Najee actually fits that bill for me as well in the mid-1st fwiw)
Ya he's still the safest pick at the 1.01 and I wouldn't think twice about it. Just don't expect him to end as the RB1.
 
I think most people can agree that he is going to see a dip in touches and production, but still is worthy of the #1 pick. He's safe. And you're satisfied if you use the #1 pick on a guy that finishes in the top 5 at his position.
I got the 1.1 in my main redraft league and he’s locked in (barring injury) and am only looking at the 2nd round onward. 1.1 is the absolute best draft spot if you really want a “no question marks” RB in the 1st round. (Najee actually fits that bill for me as well in the mid-1st fwiw)
Ya he's still the safest pick at the 1.01 and I wouldn't think twice about it. Just don't expect him to end as the RB1.
So exactly who should I expect to end up as RB1? Weird statement. We’re all freakin guessing.
 
I think most people can agree that he is going to see a dip in touches and production, but still is worthy of the #1 pick. He's safe. And you're satisfied if you use the #1 pick on a guy that finishes in the top 5 at his position.
I got the 1.1 in my main redraft league and he’s locked in (barring injury) and am only looking at the 2nd round onward. 1.1 is the absolute best draft spot if you really want a “no question marks” RB in the 1st round. (Najee actually fits that bill for me as well in the mid-1st fwiw)
Ya he's still the safest pick at the 1.01 and I wouldn't think twice about it. Just don't expect him to end as the RB1.
So exactly who should I expect to end up as RB1? Weird statement. We’re all freakin guessing.
He has the best bet to end RB1 but he probably won't be. Odds are fairly high that he won't be, so I said don't expect him to end as the RB1.

If you draft a guy at 1.01 and he ends up the RB2 on the year, you're thrilled.
 
I think most people can agree that he is going to see a dip in touches and production, but still is worthy of the #1 pick. He's safe. And you're satisfied if you use the #1 pick on a guy that finishes in the top 5 at his position.
I got the 1.1 in my main redraft league and he’s locked in (barring injury) and am only looking at the 2nd round onward. 1.1 is the absolute best draft spot if you really want a “no question marks” RB in the 1st round. (Najee actually fits that bill for me as well in the mid-1st fwiw)
Ya he's still the safest pick at the 1.01 and I wouldn't think twice about it. Just don't expect him to end as the RB1.
So exactly who should I expect to end up as RB1? Weird statement. We’re all freakin guessing.
He has the best bet to end RB1 but he probably won't be. Odds are fairly high that he won't be, so I said don't expect him to end as the RB1.

If you draft a guy at 1.01 and he ends up the RB2 on the year, you're thrilled.
Exactly. I feel like I’m living a real life Fantasy 101 episode here though :)
 
Pretty much every coach would love to "save" their stud RB, especially when they have SB aspirations. He'll probably give him a breather here and there in blowouts, but when push comes to shove and it's a 1 score game in the 2nd half, he isn't going to put the game in the hands of Ryan or Hines.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top