I wouldn’t take that either. Is 3 to 6 points a week going to really make or break his season this year? Probably not and by next year there is a good chance Lamb and MJH could be even from a redraft perspective. So if he accepted that there is a good chance next season he has an equal WR that is 3 years older and given away Jonathan Brooks for free. If I were a contender I might look for other trades I could utilize Brooks to shore up any weaknesses I have but MHJ is the type of asset you hold onto whether contending or rebuilding.
Kind of depends on your take on MHJ. He has really disappointed this year and not lived up to expectations. Obviously I think like you which is why I offered up the trade but there are a ton of disgruntled MHJ owners around that I figured what the hell and threw it out there.
Just as you have said they could be awesome next year they could also do nothing. We know nothing about Brooks to date and there has been talks of him not even being activated at all. They may not actually live up to expectations. It is in the realm of possibilities.
Yeah if I am a contender and have a need somewhere at RB, Brooks is definitely the type of player I see if I can utilize in a trade. For example, what can I add to him to get say Saquon Barkley, Jonathan Taylor, or AJ Brown? Can Brooks plus a projected 2025 late 1st get me Barkley or Brown or in a league? That's the type of trade I would make with a rebuilder if I was a contender.
I've been playing in a dynasty league since 2010 and the hit rate on 2nd/3rd round RBs isn't that great. There are a lot of them that don't really hit such as Ben Tate, Shane Vereen, Ameer Abdullah, Kendre Miller (probably not hitting), Ke'Shawn Vaughn, or Trey Sermon or only hit for one year such as Dameon Pierce.
However, the possible upside of Brooks is still alluring to most rebuilders and he could end up being very productive but it's far from a certainty. Chubba Hubbard could very well resign with the Panthers next season which I think would hurt Brooks's production and there's no certainty Brooks would even be the 1A.
I do feel pretty strongly it's a losing move long term if you trade assets such as Marvin Harrison Jr. away though. The likely of players with his pedigree hitting is very high and the ceiling for players like him is very high.
I don't think that's the case with assets on the caliber of Brooks though. Players like Brooks should be expendable in dynasty in certain situations.
Full disclosure I play in two dynasty leagues and own Harrison and Brooks in one of my two leagues. That team is not a contender but I would certainly consider something like Brooks + a 2025 2nd for a young player that I think has a better pedigree and likelihood of becoming a difference maker such as Rome Odunze.