What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

RB Jordan Mason, SF (6 Viewers)

You guys talked me into it. He went unclaimed in my FAAB last night, so I grabbed him this morning. I certainly am not seeing what you guys are seeing in terms of his value, but we shall see.

I think the value is very easy to see...he is on one of the best offenses/teams in the NFL with a HC that has made many RBs viable, appears to like him, has looked pretty good in limited usage and the two RBs ahead of him (Cmac and Mitchell) that have injury concerns...he is far from a definite (very far) but he is the classic type of RB you stash at the end of your roster, cross your fingers and hope does something as the injuries and bye weeks take their toll on the RB position as they do every year...keep expectations realistic and there is no downside other than a roster spot and if things break right he could be someone who can save your butt as the season drags on.
I have always viewed him as the backup to the backup. Hopefully I am wrong.

He pretty much is and usually that is not something you are in a rush to be part of but San Fran is unique (IMO) because of the reasons I gave above.
 
You guys talked me into it. He went unclaimed in my FAAB last night, so I grabbed him this morning. I certainly am not seeing what you guys are seeing in terms of his value, but we shall see.

I think the value is very easy to see...he is on one of the best offenses/teams in the NFL with a HC that has made many RBs viable, appears to like him, has looked pretty good in limited usage and the two RBs ahead of him (Cmac and Mitchell) that have injury concerns...he is far from a definite (very far) but he is the classic type of RB you stash at the end of your roster, cross your fingers and hope does something as the injuries and bye weeks take their toll on the RB position as they do every year...keep expectations realistic and there is no downside other than a roster spot and if things break right he could be someone who can save your butt as the season drags on.
I have always viewed him as the backup to the backup. Hopefully I am wrong.

He pretty much is and usually that is not something you are in a rush to be part of but San Fran is unique (IMO) because of the reasons I gave above.
Confused why he got first snaps (and scored a TD) when CMC went out? Mitchell was active.
 
You guys talked me into it. He went unclaimed in my FAAB last night, so I grabbed him this morning. I certainly am not seeing what you guys are seeing in terms of his value, but we shall see.

I think the value is very easy to see...he is on one of the best offenses/teams in the NFL with a HC that has made many RBs viable, appears to like him, has looked pretty good in limited usage and the two RBs ahead of him (Cmac and Mitchell) that have injury concerns...he is far from a definite (very far) but he is the classic type of RB you stash at the end of your roster, cross your fingers and hope does something as the injuries and bye weeks take their toll on the RB position as they do every year...keep expectations realistic and there is no downside other than a roster spot and if things break right he could be someone who can save your butt as the season drags on.
I have always viewed him as the backup to the backup. Hopefully I am wrong.

He pretty much is and usually that is not something you are in a rush to be part of but San Fran is unique (IMO) because of the reasons I gave above.
Confused why he got first snaps (and scored a TD) when CMC went out? Mitchell was active.

It is Shanahan…anything is possible when it comes to RBs…the reason why you want a San Fran RB is the reason you don’t want one…outside of McCafferey anything could happen.
 
You guys talked me into it. He went unclaimed in my FAAB last night, so I grabbed him this morning. I certainly am not seeing what you guys are seeing in terms of his value, but we shall see.

I think the value is very easy to see...he is on one of the best offenses/teams in the NFL with a HC that has made many RBs viable, appears to like him, has looked pretty good in limited usage and the two RBs ahead of him (Cmac and Mitchell) that have injury concerns...he is far from a definite (very far) but he is the classic type of RB you stash at the end of your roster, cross your fingers and hope does something as the injuries and bye weeks take their toll on the RB position as they do every year...keep expectations realistic and there is no downside other than a roster spot and if things break right he could be someone who can save your butt as the season drags on.
I have always viewed him as the backup to the backup. Hopefully I am wrong.

He pretty much is and usually that is not something you are in a rush to be part of but San Fran is unique (IMO) because of the reasons I gave above.
Confused why he got first snaps (and scored a TD) when CMC went out? Mitchell was active.
Because Mitchell only got in one day of practice the week before.
 
Fantasy Football: 5 waiver-wire targets before Week 7


Excerpt:

THE SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS LEAN INTO JORDAN MASON OVER ELIJAH MITCHELL ONCE CHRISTIAN MCCAFFREY LEAVES DUE TO INJURY

McCaffrey left the game due to an oblique injury in Week 6 and did not return. Now, as his status remains up in the air, fantasy managers will likely be forced to make a decision between a familiar face in Mitchell or the new jam in Mason. The 49ers let their snap shares do the talking following the injury, sending a clear indication that it might just be Mason to lead the backfield in case of McCaffrey’s absence.

Immediately following the injury, Mason subbed in to finish the drive, which led straight into the fourth quarter.

Following that initial drive, Mason played 66.7% of team snaps to close out the day while Mitchell was in for just 13.3%. Mason closed out Week 6 leading the team with a 75.1 PFF rushing grade on those five attempts, totaling 27 rushing yards that included an eight-yard touchdown in the fourth quarter to give the Niners a lead (even if they did go on to eventually lose it). Mitchell's lack of usage in a critical game situation despite his long tenure with the team is a signal to fantasy managers everywhere that Mason is the one to roster. In limited opportunities this season, Mitchell has averaged just 2.7 yards per attempt for a career-low 51.9 PFF rushing grade.
 
You guys talked me into it. He went unclaimed in my FAAB last night, so I grabbed him this morning. I certainly am not seeing what you guys are seeing in terms of his value, but we shall see.

I think the value is very easy to see...he is on one of the best offenses/teams in the NFL with a HC that has made many RBs viable, appears to like him, has looked pretty good in limited usage and the two RBs ahead of him (Cmac and Mitchell) that have injury concerns...he is far from a definite (very far) but he is the classic type of RB you stash at the end of your roster, cross your fingers and hope does something as the injuries and bye weeks take their toll on the RB position as they do every year...keep expectations realistic and there is no downside other than a roster spot and if things break right he could be someone who can save your butt as the season drags on.
I have always viewed him as the backup to the backup. Hopefully I am wrong.

He pretty much is and usually that is not something you are in a rush to be part of but San Fran is unique (IMO) because of the reasons I gave above.
Confused why he got first snaps (and scored a TD) when CMC went out? Mitchell was active.

It is Shanahan…anything is possible when it comes to RBs…the reason why you want a San Fran RB is the reason you don’t want one…outside of McCafferey anything could happen.
If McCaffrey is out, I would go Mason over Mitchell. Mason has dramatically improved his pass receiving since last year and at this point is better than Mitchell as a receiver. And kidding aside, if Mitchell does get the start, how long before he gets dinged? I hate to predict injury, especially with my favorite team, but can't ignore it either.
 
You guys talked me into it. He went unclaimed in my FAAB last night, so I grabbed him this morning. I certainly am not seeing what you guys are seeing in terms of his value, but we shall see.

I think the value is very easy to see...he is on one of the best offenses/teams in the NFL with a HC that has made many RBs viable, appears to like him, has looked pretty good in limited usage and the two RBs ahead of him (Cmac and Mitchell) that have injury concerns...he is far from a definite (very far) but he is the classic type of RB you stash at the end of your roster, cross your fingers and hope does something as the injuries and bye weeks take their toll on the RB position as they do every year...keep expectations realistic and there is no downside other than a roster spot and if things break right he could be someone who can save your butt as the season drags on.
I have always viewed him as the backup to the backup. Hopefully I am wrong.

He pretty much is and usually that is not something you are in a rush to be part of but San Fran is unique (IMO) because of the reasons I gave above.
Confused why he got first snaps (and scored a TD) when CMC went out? Mitchell was active.

It is Shanahan…anything is possible when it comes to RBs…the reason why you want a San Fran RB is the reason you don’t want one…outside of McCafferey anything could happen.

I don't think this is true. He has been fairly consistent about running with one guy for the bulk of usage. His "shenanigans" have been based on injuries forcing him to mix and match. Mostert/Wilson was all injury driven. You knew who the guy was going into every game and it held until and injury happened. Then the other guy would take over until he got injured then rinse and repeat.
 
I believe this quote from Shanahan gives us the best indication of which RB will take the lead. When asked about Mason potentially being the starter, he immediately pivots to Elijah Mitchell. That alone is very telling.

“Yeah, we’ll see. Elijah's earned a ton with us over these years. I think Elijah, when he has been healthy, has been as good of a back as there is. …”

A coach doesn’t say something like that then not give a player what they’ve “earned.” So what has Mitchell earned a ton of? Presumably, carries, and the role of starting RB.

He does follow that up with some praise for Mason, so I’m thinking Mitchell is the starter/lead RB and Mason also gets work.
 
Last edited:
I believe this quote from Shanahan gives us the best indication of which RB will take the lead. When asked about Mason potentially being the starter, he immediately pivots to Elijah Mitchell. That alone is very telling.

“Yeah, we’ll see. Elijah's earned a ton with us over these years. I think Elijah, when he has been healthy, has been as good of a back as there is. …”

A coach doesn’t say something like that then not give a player what they’ve “earned.” So what has Mitchell earned a ton of? Presumably, carries, and the role of starting RB.

He does follow that up with some praise for Mason, so I’m thinking Mitchell is the starter/lead RB and Mason also gets work.
This is everything. Mitchell has not done anything for the coaches to lose confidence in him if he is healthy. Obviously nobody is starting Mason this week, but the very best you could hope for is 50% of the 1st and 2nd down reps. I could see the Niners using predominantly Mitchell and Juice on 3rd. Again, I could be way off.
 
I'd hold if possible. Mitchell didn't impress in limited snaps last night. Handcuff dart throw that could pay off later this season.
 
I'd hold if possible. Mitchell didn't impress in limited snaps last night. Handcuff dart throw that could pay off later this season.

I like that you made a definite conclusion on Mitchell's performance based on his 1 carry and zero targets. What does it say that Mason didn't even get that?
 
I'd hold if possible. Mitchell didn't impress in limited snaps last night. Handcuff dart throw that could pay off later this season.

I like that you made a definite conclusion on Mitchell's performance based on his 1 carry and zero targets. What does it say that Mason didn't even get that?
Lol, Mitchell owner huh?

Just stating a case for Mason owners to hold while Mitchell didn't inspire last night. Not a referendum on Mitchell's value ROS
 
I'd hold if possible. Mitchell didn't impress in limited snaps last night. Handcuff dart throw that could pay off later this season.

I like that you made a definite conclusion on Mitchell's performance based on his 1 carry and zero targets. What does it say that Mason didn't even get that?
Lol, Mitchell owner huh?

Just stating a case for Mason owners to hold while Mitchell didn't inspire last night. Not a referendum on Mitchell's value ROS

Nope...don't own either but you stated "Mitchell didn't impress last night" and I'm pointing out that's an odd statement because he got 1 carry and no targets and Mason got zero carries and zero targets. So it's weird to write off who the actual backup is (no matter your impressions on his one carry). Hold both for sure but the conclusion that Mitchell isn't going to get carries because of his performance seems off to me...

As much as you LOLd me on your response it sounds like the response of someone who needs mason to be the guy when he clearly is not the guy
 
Last edited:
I'd hold if possible. Mitchell didn't impress in limited snaps last night. Handcuff dart throw that could pay off later this season.

I like that you made a definite conclusion on Mitchell's performance based on his 1 carry and zero targets. What does it say that Mason didn't even get that?
Lol, Mitchell owner huh?

Just stating a case for Mason owners to hold while Mitchell didn't inspire last night. Not a referendum on Mitchell's value ROS


As much as you LOLd mean on your response it sounds like the response of someone that needs mason to be the guy when he clearly is not the guy
Nope. Just giving a comment on a forum like everyone else here
 
It is insanity to roster a backup of a backup. Not telling anyone how to run their team but can someone give one example of when this strategy worked? Where we rostered the backup of a backup the entire season and it paid off.
 
It is insanity to roster a backup of a backup. Not telling anyone how to run their team but can someone give one example of when this strategy worked? Where we rostered the backup of a backup the entire season and it paid off.

You would need some serious deep benches for sure. There are a lot of teams that run the ball very well and trying to carry the back up of the back up is going to cost you valuable roster space
 
Teamed Mason up with Keontay Ingram in my backfield this week as I scuffled through injuries and bye weeks. That's right...0 combined snaps.

Too bad I didn't have Zach Evans rostered to put in the flex
 
It is insanity to roster a backup of a backup. Not telling anyone how to run their team but can someone give one example of when this strategy worked? Where we rostered the backup of a backup the entire season and it paid off.
I'm currently doing it as a CMC owner. We have decent sized rosters and Mitchell is less than reliable health-wise. The waiver wire is always picked thin, and I'd rather go into a week having a SF RB than anyone else I could get. If I need the spot, I'll cut Mason if needed. But there's really no downside to keeping him right now as I have a couple other spots to churn for a bye week TE or defense.

ETA
We had a guy rostering Khalil Herbert, Roschon, and Foreman earlier this year. He cut Foreman before the Washington game. Lol and behold, his opponent this week won the bid on Foreman two weeks ago and started him this week. Meanwhile the guy who had Foreman had Breece on bye, both his Chicago RBs out, and had to start Clyde Edwards-Hellno at RB.

Ya never know.
 
Last edited:
It is insanity to roster a backup of a backup. Not telling anyone how to run their team but can someone give one example of when this strategy worked? Where we rostered the backup of a backup the entire season and it paid off.
I'm currently doing it as a CMC owner. We have decent sized rosters and Mitchell is less than reliable health-wise. The waiver wire is always picked thin, and I'd rather go into a week having a SF RB than anyone else I could get. If I need the spot, I'll cut Mason if needed. But there's really no downside to keeping him right now as I have a couple other spots to churn for a bye week TE or defense.

ETA
We had a guy rostering Khalil Herbert, Roschon, and Foreman earlier this year. He cut Foreman before the Washington game. Lol and behold, his opponent this week won the bid on Foreman two weeks ago and started him this week. Meanwhile the guy who had Foreman had Breece on bye, both his Chicago RBs out, and had to start Clyde Edwards-Hellno at RB.

Ya never know.
I can see rostering him in your instance. A tad shortsighted of me to not consider very large and deep-benched leagues. Makes sense.
 
It is insanity to roster a backup of a backup. Not telling anyone how to run their team but can someone give one example of when this strategy worked? Where we rostered the backup of a backup the entire season and it paid off.
Kyren Williams
What? When was Kyren Williams the backup to the backup and sat on someone’s bench for a season?
Folks who had Jeff Wilson stashed on IR in sf a couple years ago as the pretty clear #3 got some real nice late-season production out of that
 
@Wingnut I always loved the way this kid ran the ball and thought for sure he would get some more field time last season. What is your opinion on why he seems to not get any run (pass pro, receiving, not as good as I think he is…etc)?
 
@Wingnut I always loved the way this kid ran the ball and thought for sure he would get some more field time last season. What is your opinion on why he seems to not get any run (pass pro, receiving, not as good as I think he is…etc)?

I feel like I have picked him up and cut him once a month for the past two years.
Same. Every time I have seen him play he seems look like a very efficient and natural runner, never understood what is holding him back and always seemingly falling down the depth chart.
 
@Wingnut I always loved the way this kid ran the ball and thought for sure he would get some more field time last season. What is your opinion on why he seems to not get any run (pass pro, receiving, not as good as I think he is…etc)?

I feel like I have picked him up and cut him once a month for the past two years.
Same. Every time I have seen him play he seems look like a very efficient and natural runner, never understood what is holding him back and always seemingly falling down the depth chart.
I've thought he's looked better than Elijah Mitchell when he's been used and would be very surprised if the Louisville guy looked better. but yeah, SF seems to feel different. Kyle Shanahan (and/or John Lynch) kinda sucks at scouting RBs.
 
@Wingnut I always loved the way this kid ran the ball and thought for sure he would get some more field time last season. What is your opinion on why he seems to not get any run (pass pro, receiving, not as good as I think he is…etc)?
IMO its because Shanahan thinks hes smarter than everyone else. Just look as their drafts, there's usually a consensus best player available, yet they always take a different player. Its the same with player usage. Everyone has been wanting Mason to get more carries, yet here we are wondering why he doesn't. It's frustrating and mind boggling.
 
@Wingnut I always loved the way this kid ran the ball and thought for sure he would get some more field time last season. What is your opinion on why he seems to not get any run (pass pro, receiving, not as good as I think he is…etc)?
IMO its because Shanahan thinks hes smarter than everyone else. Just look as their drafts, there's usually a consensus best player available, yet they always take a different player. Its the same with player usage. Everyone has been wanting Mason to get more carries, yet here we are wondering why he doesn't. It's frustrating and mind boggling.

Those bad talent evaluators are ruining the team too, i am not sure why they have not been fired yet.
 
@32BeatWriters
"Young player on the rise (offense): RB Jordan Mason -- Mason has tantalized with his potential in the past but never been able to seize a larger role (in part because CMC is the focal point). But Mason looks like he's going to grab the top backup role"
 
He may or not eventually be listed as the #2 running back. But IF CMC went down for an extended period I still see Mitchell(assuming he's not hurt) as getting a good share of the touches at the position.
 
He may or not eventually be listed as the #2 running back. But IF CMC went down for an extended period I still see Mitchell(assuming he's not hurt) as getting a good share of the touches at the position.
Agreed. But Mitchell is a pretty reasonable bet to miss time as well.

Isn't he out of practice with something ATM?
 
He may or not eventually be listed as the #2 running back. But IF CMC went down for an extended period I still see Mitchell(assuming he's not hurt) as getting a good share of the touches at the position.
Agreed. But Mitchell is a pretty reasonable bet to miss time as well.

Isn't he out of practice with something ATM?
Every running back on the team has been out for one thing or another.
 
He may or not eventually be listed as the #2 running back. But IF CMC went down for an extended period I still see Mitchell(assuming he's not hurt) as getting a good share of the touches at the position.
Agreed. But Mitchell is a pretty reasonable bet to miss time as well.

Isn't he out of practice with something ATM?
Every running back on the team has been out for one thing or another.
I just think if CMC goes down long term it'll be rbbc. So any rb's left standing will all get a piece of the pie.
 
Something has prevented Mason from seeing carries the last few seasons. Pass protection, understanding of the playbook…who knows. IMO he is by far the best runner of the football below CMC and it is not that close. Hopefully he is shoring up whatever the issue is and locks in the number two spot. Otherwise I will be keeping an eye on him when he becomes a FA, guy is a talented RB.
 
Something has prevented Mason from seeing carries the last few seasons. Pass protection, understanding of the playbook…who knows. IMO he is by far the best runner of the football below CMC and it is not that close. Hopefully he is shoring up whatever the issue is and locks in the number two spot. Otherwise I will be keeping an eye on him when he becomes a FA, guy is a talented RB.
There have been some videos posted recently with Mason and the RB Coach admitting Mason didn't come into the league understanding what it took to be a professional.

Per the coach, Mason has grown a lot since then. He purchased a jugs machine to practice his receiving skills at home and sounds like the 49ers have seen him take the next step he needed to.
 
@32BeatWriters
Check your WW for him; still available in some leagues.

"- RB Jordan Mason also was prominently involved again today and had his much improved hands on display. He had a couple of catches from Purdy but the most impressive came on a throw that was high and behind him. Mason adjusted in air, turned his body and caught it it while still getting his momentum going forward. He's had a good camp. Paired with the other injuries, he's definitely positioned himself well for a larger role this year."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top