What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Josh Jacobs, GB (1 Viewer)

26 years old. 235 yards rushing in 2 games and a 5ypc so far. Offense will be better when Love is back.

Confirmed still good. Carry on.

Sometimes the answer is just "yes" - If the RB is good and has done it before and then goes to a better offence they will have a chance to show they still have it.

I can confess that I actually took him in the 2nd round of my draft, as RB8 overall.

My plan was to go WR in the mid first and then take whoever fell out of Barkley, Taylor, and Jacobs in the mid 2nd.

Jacobs was the only one of those three left on the board, so I pulled the trigger about 1-2 rounds above ADP. Just had a much higher trust level with him than with Gibbs, Achane, Kyren, Pacheco, Henry, Etienne. While I wouldn't say reaching is generally something to be proud of, the goal is ultimately to draft a team that produces, not the team that looks best on paper in August.

Week 2 is way too early to gloat, but so far so good. Josh Jacobs is who we thought he was!

All the same, I plan to grab Lloyd because he's a talented enough handcuff that I would want to have him in the event of injury.
Think Lloyd got hurt again.
 
26 years old. 235 yards rushing in 2 games and a 5ypc so far. Offense will be better when Love is back.

Confirmed still good. Carry on.

Sometimes the answer is just "yes" - If the RB is good and has done it before and then goes to a better offence they will have a chance to show they still have it.

I can confess that I actually took him in the 2nd round of my draft, as RB8 overall.

My plan was to go WR in the mid first and then take whoever fell out of Barkley, Taylor, and Jacobs in the mid 2nd.

Jacobs was the only one of those three left on the board, so I pulled the trigger about 1-2 rounds above ADP. Just had a much higher trust level with him than with Gibbs, Achane, Kyren, Pacheco, Henry, Etienne. While I wouldn't say reaching is generally something to be proud of, the goal is ultimately to draft a team that produces, not the team that looks best on paper in August.

Week 2 is way too early to gloat, but so far so good. Josh Jacobs is who we thought he was!

All the same, I plan to grab Lloyd because he's a talented enough handcuff that I would want to have him in the event of injury.
Think Lloyd got hurt again.
Ah, thanks for that. I wasn't aware.

Quick Google search makes it sound like a minor thing.
 
26 years old. 235 yards rushing in 2 games and a 5ypc so far. Offense will be better when Love is back.

Confirmed still good. Carry on.

Sometimes the answer is just "yes" - If the RB is good and has done it before and then goes to a better offence they will have a chance to show they still have it.

I can confess that I actually took him in the 2nd round of my draft, as RB8 overall.

My plan was to go WR in the mid first and then take whoever fell out of Barkley, Taylor, and Jacobs in the mid 2nd.

Jacobs was the only one of those three left on the board, so I pulled the trigger about 1-2 rounds above ADP. Just had a much higher trust level with him than with Gibbs, Achane, Kyren, Pacheco, Henry, Etienne. While I wouldn't say reaching is generally something to be proud of, the goal is ultimately to draft a team that produces, not the team that looks best on paper in August.

Week 2 is way too early to gloat, but so far so good. Josh Jacobs is who we thought he was!

All the same, I plan to grab Lloyd because he's a talented enough handcuff that I would want to have him in the event of injury.
One day people will learn that as good as the rookie RB might be coming in they might not be given the reigns right off the start. The shiny new toy looks good until it is game day and you need to rely on them to know the playbook and be where the QB needs them to be.

When GB goes out and signs a previous rushing leader (who is a first round NFL draft pick) maybe they want to actually use him. I'm not saying Lloyd can't be good either once he gets healthy but the team is going to roll with the vet who gives them the best chance to win - a vet who won't make as many mistakes as a rookie.
 
With Loyd now on the IR here's hoping that old body, er, 26 year old body holds up.
It's going to be tough sledding against the TN D in TN.

Hoping Love is back by some miracle to loosen up the D a bit otherwise Jacobs could be running into a brick wall.

Don't think Lafleur can pull a rabbit out of a hat again. TN D is not the INDY D.
 
With Loyd now on the IR here's hoping that old body, er, 26 year old body holds up.
It's going to be tough sledding against the TN D in TN.

Hoping Love is back by some miracle to loosen up the D a bit otherwise Jacobs could be running into a brick wall.

Don't think Lafleur can pull a rabbit out of a hat again. TN D is not the INDY D.
Need to get him involved in passing game
 
26 years old. 235 yards rushing in 2 games and a 5ypc so far. Offense will be better when Love is back.

Confirmed still good. Carry on.

Sometimes the answer is just "yes" - If the RB is good and has done it before and then goes to a better offence they will have a chance to show they still have it.

I can confess that I actually took him in the 2nd round of my draft, as RB8 overall.

My plan was to go WR in the mid first and then take whoever fell out of Barkley, Taylor, and Jacobs in the mid 2nd.

Jacobs was the only one of those three left on the board, so I pulled the trigger about 1-2 rounds above ADP. Just had a much higher trust level with him than with Gibbs, Achane, Kyren, Pacheco, Henry, Etienne. While I wouldn't say reaching is generally something to be proud of, the goal is ultimately to draft a team that produces, not the team that looks best on paper in August.

Week 2 is way too early to gloat, but so far so good. Josh Jacobs is who we thought he was!

All the same, I plan to grab Lloyd because he's a talented enough handcuff that I would want to have him in the event of injury.
I agree. was pretty sure Jacobs would be good in his new home. he can still play. had a bit of bad luck with the goal line fumble last week but not worried about that. Jacobs is not known for being much of a fumbler. pretty sure hands that way i think.

but hes a solid top 12 RB who we got at a bit of a discount this year.
 
Just wish he would get some touchdowns and receptions…I guess wheels up when love returns
Jacobs won't put up the same numbers when Love returns. Love prefers to throw, and Jayden Reed will be the one to watch.
Jacobs had 19 touches in game 1 with Love including 16 rushes for 84 yards and 3 targets. He had 73% of the snap share which is very very good. Anything above 65% is good for a starting RB.

Jacobs isn't going anywhere as long as he is healthy. Love has also said he wants to get Jacobs a passing TD so I bet it happens at some point.

Reed and Jacobs don't really take away from each other so you don't have to be worried there.
 
Just wish he would get some touchdowns and receptions…I guess wheels up when love returns
If Love misses this week it looks like he last week he'll miss and I for one can't wait to see him back before they run Jacobs into the ground.

Jacobs without Love is similar to when SF has to turn to Deebo at RB. I hate it for both of them. People see volume but it's to much wear and tear for low value touches and it comes at sake of receptions.
 
J. Love back at practice. Even if limited on Wednesday that's a good sign.

Less of a chance Jacobs is running into a brick wall @TN.
 
Just wish he would get some touchdowns and receptions…I guess wheels up when love returns
Yeah I wouldnt count on much while Love is out. If I were a DC facing this offense I'd stack the box and double cover who I felt was the most dangerous WR (likely Reed) and force that backup QB (whoever it may be) to throw to his second read as often as possible and hope to get some INT's out of the deal.
 
Brian Baldinger
.@packers @iAM_JoshJacobs not many RB's are willing to "press the hole" like this knowing you have the bounce, the explosion; the contact balance to escspe #gopackgo #BaldysBreakdowns
 
I'm worried. The fears some posted about him being washed look almost warranted.
That and the play calling could not be more vanilla in the red zone.
 
I'm worried. The fears some posted about him being washed look almost warranted.
That and the play calling could not be more vanilla in the red zone.
E. Wilson got too many carries for my touches, but I think they probably took the foot off the gas with Jacobs since they were up so big. He probably needed a break after the previous week getting 30+ touches.
 
Not loving this matchup. Especially if Love can't go.

MN's D looks downright nasty.

And E. Wilson is picking up touches.

Hard to bench Jacobs, but my expectations are not high. Only hope is for Love to be active and Lafluer to work more magic.
 
Man, my RB room would have to be pretty rich to bench Jacobs right now.

The Vikings have had big leads in most of their games. If this one is closer, GB will have more rushes (probably more than any other MIN opponent so far) against backup LBs because Pace and some other guy I've never heard of are DNP so far this week.
 
Man, my RB room would have to be pretty rich to bench Jacobs right now.

The Vikings have had big leads in most of their games. If this one is closer, GB will have more rushes (probably more than any other MIN opponent so far) against backup LBs because Pace and some other guy I've never heard of are DNP so far this week.

Im thinking of sitting him for mason and aaron jones
 
I'm worried. The fears some posted about him being washed look almost warranted.
That and the play calling could not be more vanilla in the red zone.
I’m not seeing washed at all watching him play this year. He’s just got unlucky with tds, including fumbling one away at the one yard line.

He’s averaging 4.5 ypc right now. If he had two rushing tds nobody would be batting an eye.
 
I'm worried. The fears some posted about him being washed look almost warranted.
That and the play calling could not be more vanilla in the red zone.
I’m not seeing washed at all watching him play this year. He’s just got unlucky with tds, including fumbling one away at the one yard line.

He’s averaging 4.5 ypc right now. If he had two rushing tds nobody would be batting an eye.
Agree 100%. He's had a couple of explosive runs already this year that I didn't see all last season.

Not concerned for the season. Concerned about this matchup.

At home, I wonder if that MN D, without a home crowd, isn't as beastly.
 
I'm worried. The fears some posted about him being washed look almost warranted.
That and the play calling could not be more vanilla in the red zone.
I’m not seeing washed at all watching him play this year. He’s just got unlucky with tds, including fumbling one away at the one yard line.

He’s averaging 4.5 ypc right now. If he had two rushing tds nobody would be batting an eye.

He's also tied for the NFL lead in long runs (20+ yards) with Henry, Kyler, Barkley, Dobbins, and Taylor.

Not bad company.
 
Man, my RB room would have to be pretty rich to bench Jacobs right now.

The Vikings have had big leads in most of their games. If this one is closer, GB will have more rushes (probably more than any other MIN opponent so far) against backup LBs because Pace and some other guy I've never heard of are DNP so far this week.
Benched him for Singletary. Ugh.
 
Man, my RB room would have to be pretty rich to bench Jacobs right now.

The Vikings have had big leads in most of their games. If this one is closer, GB will have more rushes (probably more than any other MIN opponent so far) against backup LBs because Pace and some other guy I've never heard of are DNP so far this week.
Benched him for Singletary. Ugh.
I had considered benching him for Dowdle. 13 points. A bit fluky since without that TD he would have done squat.
 
Man, my RB room would have to be pretty rich to bench Jacobs right now.

The Vikings have had big leads in most of their games. If this one is closer, GB will have more rushes (probably more than any other MIN opponent so far) against backup LBs because Pace and some other guy I've never heard of are DNP so far this week.
Benched him for Singletary. Ugh.

Ouch
Tell me about it. I was actually struggling between starting two of Singletary, Jacobs or Charbonet.
 
I don't know... These GB-MIN games rarely go as expected. On paper, after watching three weeks, I would expect the MIN defense to wreak havoc on whichever QB plays for the Pack. That's why I lean towards the opposite happening. I think the MIN defense will struggle a bit this week, mainly with play action, which will in turn open up some room for Jacobs on the ground in the second half. Meanwhile, I think it will actually be the Packers D that dictates the game, pressure-wise, making things uncomfortable for Darnold. Just a gut feeling.

I'm still cautiously optimistic that the Vikes can keep it close and possibly win the game. I just think the script will end up being much different than most would expect. Bottom line... I wouldn't bench Jacobs unless I had some absolute no-brainer studs in front of him.
 
Man, my RB room would have to be pretty rich to bench Jacobs right now.

The Vikings have had big leads in most of their games. If this one is closer, GB will have more rushes (probably more than any other MIN opponent so far) against backup LBs because Pace and some other guy I've never heard of are DNP so far this week.
Benched him for Singletary. Ugh.

Ouch
Tell me about it. I was actually struggling between starting two of Singletary, Jacobs or Charbonet.
So if you can start 2 of those 3 can you not still start Jacob's over Charbonet?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top