What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Kaleb Johnson, PIT (5 Viewers)

I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
Maybe not between the tackles but overall yes. Don't see Kaleb catching too many passes. Warren played hurt a decent portion of last year, expecting a better year from him this year.
 
Granted this was back in January, but I did a startup SF Best Ball PPR Dynasty Draft (that including drafting draft picks) and the 1.7 pick was used to select Kaleb this week, and that pick was selected at the 6.9 spot during the startup draft. The closest WRs to that 6.9 pick (that just followed) were Jameson Williams, Waddle, Pickens, Worthy, and Jeudy.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
I think so but could very well be oven wrong.
At best this is 50/50 But I think Warren gets more touches this year.
 
Granted this was back in January, but I did a startup SF Best Ball PPR Dynasty Draft (that including drafting draft picks) and the 1.7 pick was used to select Kaleb this week, and that pick was selected at the 6.9 spot during the startup draft. The closest WRs to that 6.9 pick (that just followed) were Jameson Williams, Waddle, Pickens, Worthy, and Jeudy.
Who would you want between Johnson and Pearsall? Aiyuk? Saying you're set at both positions. Are they close in value?
 
Granted this was back in January, but I did a startup SF Best Ball PPR Dynasty Draft (that including drafting draft picks) and the 1.7 pick was used to select Kaleb this week, and that pick was selected at the 6.9 spot during the startup draft. The closest WRs to that 6.9 pick (that just followed) were Jameson Williams, Waddle, Pickens, Worthy, and Jeudy.
Who would you want between Johnson and Pearsall? Aiyuk? Saying you're set at both positions. Are they close in value?
Pearsall
 
He's got Henry and Curtis and others style speed.
No one whatsoever doubts that he can get many chunk plays.
The critics pretend RBs have ever had dozens of 99 yard runs in a season and say he can't hit the corner and take off like the best do. It's common and been a wild exaggeration for decades.
It doesn't matter.
 
I think Kaleb is a capable receiver, they just didn't throw a lot of screens/passes in his offense. Doesn't mean he can't catch. He only had 2 drops in his college career. I have read several times he does have the ability to catch the ball.
The last three years Iowa has had one of the worst passing offenses in all of college football. Kaleb's first two years the Coach's kid was the OC and he was dreadful. Last year Kaleb caught a higher % of his team's completions than Gibbs did for Detroit, Brown for Cincy, and yes, also Warren for the Steelers. Warren has played 48 games in his 3 year pro career. Kaleb missed 1 game last year. Kaleb's catch % last year was also better than Warren's 3 year career numbers.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
I think so but could very well be oven wrong.
At best this is 50/50 But I think Warren gets more touches this year.
I hadn’t even considered this possibility. Warren outsnapped Najee on occasion, but didn’t prevent Najee from getting 300 touches each of the past 3 years. Seems like the Steelers prefer that bruiser type lead back and Kaleb should slide right into that lead role. Also, Warren is a FA in 2026 and it’s looking like he will be moving on.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
Lol.... if you want to draw some comparisons between Kaleb and Charbs situationally, sure I can see that. But if you are in the same breath comparing Jaylen Warren to Ken Walker, I'll reiterate my "the Warren hype is almost out of control at this point" statement. And this is coming from someone who has been low on Walker from the jump.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
The love for Warren is unwarranted. He came in on passing downs and got rushing yards when the defense was "softer", came in after Najee had done heavy lifting, and has never had more than 150 attempts. Add to that the belief that he won't be resigned after this season and there's little chance that Warren's role will increase from his 150ish attempts from 2023. His numbers could even go down if Kenny Gainwell gets some opportunities.
 
Split time the first couple months with an established veteran in Warren who WILL NOT explode and become a Top 10-12 RB, that's not happening IMHO
KJ on the other hand will have an opportunity to get more and more touches as the season unfolds
Does anyone think the Steelers are going anywhere this season? Honestly, they have no QB and the prospects out there are only band aids until they settle on a franchise type
I'm sorry but anyone that thinks the STeelers are a PLayoff lock is fooling themselves

-Once they figure out they are not going very far, WC playoff chase at best but they are not assembled for a deep run and once that's clear I think you will see KJ be the RB1 Nov/Dec
And that's when many want to peak in FF, Johnson was a RB at Iowa which has a hard time finding the end zone most weeks, he was much of the offense and opposing teams in the B10
knowing he was the offense and basically who they needed to stop and he still had an outstanding year by most measurements. Fail to see the down side with him
But I hope everyone is on the Warren train, will make it easier to either draft KJ or trade for him when it's 50/50 split week 1 or worse
Kaleb Johnson will be the starting RB in Pittsburgh by Week 6-8 and won't look back

-Early May hot take on the Steelers ground game
 
Last edited:
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
Lol.... if you want to draw some comparisons between Kaleb and Charbs situationally, sure I can see that. But if you are in the same breath comparing Jaylen Warren to Ken Walker, I'll reiterate my "the Warren hype is almost out of control at this point" statement. And this is coming from someone who has been low on Walker from the jump.
I can see how you read that, but not what I meant at all.
First, you must not be aware that I am the self-appointed President of the K9 fan club. I have defended him since day 1.
I think he an elite talent and, in no way, saying Warren is on the same level. But the point remains. Teams draft depth all the time.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
Lol.... if you want to draw some comparisons between Kaleb and Charbs situationally, sure I can see that. But if you are in the same breath comparing Jaylen Warren to Ken Walker, I'll reiterate my "the Warren hype is almost out of control at this point" statement. And this is coming from someone who has been low on Walker from the jump.
I can see how you read that, but not what I meant at all.
First, you must not be aware that I am the self-appointed President of the K9 fan club. I have defended him since day 1.
I think he an elite talent and, in no way, saying Warren is on the same level. But the point remains. Teams draft depth all the time.
If you think Kaleb Johnson was drafted as depth, then I don't know what to say to you.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
Lol.... if you want to draw some comparisons between Kaleb and Charbs situationally, sure I can see that. But if you are in the same breath comparing Jaylen Warren to Ken Walker, I'll reiterate my "the Warren hype is almost out of control at this point" statement. And this is coming from someone who has been low on Walker from the jump.
I can see how you read that, but not what I meant at all.
First, you must not be aware that I am the self-appointed President of the K9 fan club. I have defended him since day 1.
I think he an elite talent and, in no way, saying Warren is on the same level. But the point remains. Teams draft depth all the time.
Fair enough. IMO drafting depth in the third round is typically the exception much more so than the rule. Especially when looking at individual circumstances and seeing that team's current "lead back" was an UDFA, has to this point only played second fiddle at best, has a contract expiring at the end of this year, has never exceeded 150 touches on a season, and has exceeded a 60% snap share in only 2 games over 3 seasons. IOW, if my grandmother had two wheels, she'd be a bicycle.

If Steelers invest in another RB in the first 3 rounds in next years draft, then I'll start to worry about KJ's outlook and production ceiling. And if I was a dynasty team that needed the higher likelihood of immediate 70%+ weekly touch count production to push a 'ship this year, I can see a case about passing over KJ (for who I don't know though since he's going after the big 4, and I think Harvey arguably has just as much/more competition in Denver's backfield). But based on the information/measurables/tape we have on both him and Warren; I'll maintain it's some circus level acrobatics someone has to do to make the case Warren is the better/more talented overall RB and that the Steelers plan on Hampton being some depth piece behind him.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
Lol.... if you want to draw some comparisons between Kaleb and Charbs situationally, sure I can see that. But if you are in the same breath comparing Jaylen Warren to Ken Walker, I'll reiterate my "the Warren hype is almost out of control at this point" statement. And this is coming from someone who has been low on Walker from the jump.
I can see how you read that, but not what I meant at all.
First, you must not be aware that I am the self-appointed President of the K9 fan club. I have defended him since day 1.
I think he an elite talent and, in no way, saying Warren is on the same level. But the point remains. Teams draft depth all the time.
If you think Kaleb Johnson was drafted as depth, then I don't know what to say to you.
Not what I meant. I didn't word that properly. I'm sure Pittsburg drafted him for a reason.
However, realistically, we really don't know. The same argument happened when Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd round.
Truth is, Seattle had ZERO depth behind Walker. Same could be said here. Pittsburg had Gainwell behind Warren.

They had a need for depth and they took a player to fill that need. Who starts or gets the majority of carries remains to be seen.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Why not? Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd when they already had a superior back on their roster.
Lol.... if you want to draw some comparisons between Kaleb and Charbs situationally, sure I can see that. But if you are in the same breath comparing Jaylen Warren to Ken Walker, I'll reiterate my "the Warren hype is almost out of control at this point" statement. And this is coming from someone who has been low on Walker from the jump.
I can see how you read that, but not what I meant at all.
First, you must not be aware that I am the self-appointed President of the K9 fan club. I have defended him since day 1.
I think he an elite talent and, in no way, saying Warren is on the same level. But the point remains. Teams draft depth all the time.
If you think Kaleb Johnson was drafted as depth, then I don't know what to say to you.
Not what I meant. I didn't word that properly. I'm sure Pittsburg drafted him for a reason.
However, realistically, we really don't know. The same argument happened when Seattle took Charbonnet in the 2nd round.
Truth is, Seattle had ZERO depth behind Walker. Same could be said here. Pittsburg had Gainwell behind Warren.

They had a need for depth and they took a player to fill that need. Who starts or gets the majority of carries remains to be seen.
Greetings Payne,
-I think you might have a blind spot here so I wanted to speak up If I read your posts right, lot of apprehension about Kaleb Johnson being the RB1 in Pittsburgh
Warren had 120 carries last year, 149 year prior, he is not a workhorse style/type RB. At worse, Johnson will see half the carries and I think it's easy to see a path to RB1 for him
And I only say 50/50 the first few weeks of the season as he is eased into the starting role. It's not like he's gotta pass protect for Josh Allen or Patrick Mahomes

Fantasy Pros has Warren at RB25 right now which is not someone you want to wheel out every week in FF, same site has Kaleb Johnson RB31
The only reason they are ranked like that IMHO is folks for some reason think KJ is a carbon copy of Harris and think Warren is starting because he's entering Year 4.
As soon as camp reports start surfacing and especially in August/Preseason, I expect proj for Johnson to rise much higher than RB31, He could easily land Top 20 as a rookie

-Tomlin is starting to concern me. Would happily take him down here in Miami but he's not forward thinking/scheming on offense.
Overall I think the needle points up on Johnson for redraft this year

Cheers!
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Right on!
I’m a Steelers fan and Bestball FF Joe.
Warren is on less than 3% of the 179 pre draft underdog teams in my portfolio.

Last season, Warren was more effective than Najee and a better fit in the wide zone scheme, yet Najee was the CLEAR RB1.
Fast forward to this offseason Steelers let Naj walk and only sign Warren for a year? Tells me they are moving on quickly.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
Right on!
I’m a Steelers fan and Bestball FF Joe.
Warren is on less than 3% of the 179 pre draft underdog teams in my portfolio.

Last season, Warren was more effective than Najee and a better fit in the wide zone scheme, yet Najee was the CLEAR RB1.
Fast forward to this offseason Steelers let Naj walk and only sign Warren for a year? Tells me they are moving on quickly.
And one of the only worries I read in multiple pre-draft analysis write ups on Johnson (nope, it wasn't about receiving haha) was that he could be scheme dependent and therefore could be a bit landing spot dependent to reach his ceiling. The scheme they all identified; wide zone. I'm not too worried about him in that offense. I may be jinxing us by saying this, but I believe even Arthur Smith can't mess this up!

Now his line probably won't be as relatively good as it was at Iowa; but he was also the ONLY weapon on that team, so he was still facing stacked boxes and defenses that were selling out to stop the run. I'd like to think Pickens, Friermuth, and now DK present enough of a threat that NFL defenses can't ignore the passing game all together.
 
The only knock I see so far on Kaleb is receiving.
He had 22 recs last year, the leading WR in Iowa had 35. Seems like he might be a decent receiver.
Gotta think some folks are out here trying to be NFL GMs and blowing smoke screens. I get it. But outright stupidity, like saying Warren is a better RB than Kaleb, is just obvious, and not even close to be realistic. Warren is a fine RB2, and under contract 1 year in Pittsburgh.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
I think so but could very well be oven wrong.
At best this is 50/50 But I think Warren gets more touches this year.
i dont bet, but if I did, i'd let you call the stakes, Kaleb out touches Warren 2:1 this year, barring injury.
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
I think so but could very well be oven wrong.
At best this is 50/50 But I think Warren gets more touches this year.
i dont bet, but if I did, i'd let you call the stakes, Kaleb out touches Warren 2:1 this year, barring injury.
:shrug: Ok
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
You think Warren is a better RB than Kaleb? I know he's a really good receiving back, but not so sure he's a better pure runner than Kaleb....
I think so but could very well be oven wrong.
At best this is 50/50 But I think Warren gets more touches this year.
i dont bet, but if I did, i'd let you call the stakes, Kaleb out touches Warren 2:1 this year, barring injury.
Totally agree. Kaleb is a perfect fit for the Steelers and they are going to continue to run the ball. This kid is going to have a big season.
 
Am I crazy to consider him at 1.04? He may have a lower ceiling than the other backs but think he has a safer floor. Pitt is going to run the ball and he has less competition than most of the others too. My other option is Hunter but worry about how much CB he ends up playing.
Been trying to trade down to 6-8 but no luck so far.
 
Am I crazy to consider him at 1.04? He may have a lower ceiling than the other backs but think he has a safer floor. Pitt is going to run the ball and he has less competition than most of the others too. My other option is Hunter but worry about how much CB he ends up playing.
Been trying to trade down to 6-8 but no luck so far.
Out of curiosity, which of the following four RBs would you pass on in favor of Johnson?
Jeanty, Hampton, Henderson, Judkins
 
Am I crazy to consider him at 1.04? He may have a lower ceiling than the other backs but think he has a safer floor. Pitt is going to run the ball and he has less competition than most of the others too. My other option is Hunter but worry about how much CB he ends up playing.
Been trying to trade down to 6-8 but no luck so far.
Not crazy and only thing I might see different is ceiling/floor. I'm kind of the opposite and out of the competition of Harvey, Judkins and Henderson grouping I have him as the lowest floor and highest ceiling.
 
Am I crazy to consider him at 1.04? He may have a lower ceiling than the other backs but think he has a safer floor. Pitt is going to run the ball and he has less competition than most of the others too. My other option is Hunter but worry about how much CB he ends up playing.
Been trying to trade down to 6-8 but no luck so far.
Out of curiosity, which of the following four RBs would you pass on in favor of Johnson?
Jeanty, Hampton, Henderson, Judkins
Would've been Henderson and Judkins but managed to trade down.
Traded 1.04 for 1.07 and 2.04
 
I still don't know why some people are drafting Harvey before Kaleb. 3 years age difference is a BIG deal in dynasty, and it just seems like the Steelers and Kaleb are a perfect fit. Now in a redraft, absolutely no issue with those drafting Harvey before Johnson, but no way in a dynasty format.
Opportunity, Kaleb's not even the best RB on his own team. I do not think the age difference it a BIG deal, one factor yes.
This feels like a wild take, sorry. Obviously the Steelers disagree otherwise they would not have used their second pick in this draft, a third rounder, on a RB in a class incredibly deep at the position and when they had 5 later picks they could have used to take a swing at lesser RBs. You don't do what they did if you're just looking for a backup/complementary piece. The Warren hype is almost out of control at this point. And this is coming from a Steelers fan. Will he get more usage this year than previous years; sure I can see that while onboarding a rookie. But to claim a UDFA with basically 0 pedigree, worse in nearly every measurement/scale/grading system compared to Johnson, who's already had 3 years and plenty of chances to take a starting role in the NFL, is better then Johnson is... a take.
The love for Warren is unwarranted. He came in on passing downs and got rushing yards when the defense was "softer", came in after Najee had done heavy lifting, and has never had more than 150 attempts. Add to that the belief that he won't be resigned after this season and there's little chance that Warren's role will increase from his 150ish attempts from 2023. His numbers could even go down if Kenny Gainwell gets some opportunities.
People love underdogs, and the media hypes Warren up as a zero-RB darling. He's a nice COP back, nothing more.
 
I've said this earlier, but I'll say it again. He has Derrick Henry upside, but that doesn't mean he will be. Once he gets up a head of steam he is a beast. Getting up to the head of steam is the question probably.
 
Kaleb Johnson was the last truly quality RB left in the draft and the Steelers needed a running back and drafted him. Dallas, on the other hand, failed two years in a row to get a good RB. Basically what I'm saying is Stephen Jones sucks and I quit being a Cowboys fan because they don't know what they're doing. Cowboys are the NFC team that hasn't been to an NFC Championship game the longest of all the teams in the NFC, 1995. OK, back to Steelers talk and Kaleb Johnson talk.
 
He's going to get what's blocked for him and depending on how many dogs you have in your second level he might get a lot more than that.

You want to get him 1 on 1 against defensive backs. He's even big enough to clown on some of the better safeties in this league. He checks a lot of boxes.
 
Picking at 1.05 and strong Kaleb consideration over the inevitable leftovers of Hunter, Hendo and Judkins.

He just seems like the perfect fit for the Steelers and I don't respect Warren the way many seem to. If Warren couldn't take the job from Najee (3.9 career ypc) then I definitely don't see him taking it from Kaleb Johnson.
 
He's so good he was picked at the end of the 3rd round.
Third round is solid draft capital for a RB. Especially considering the Stillers didn’t have a 2nd and a lot of teams passed on Kaleb because he didn’t fit the profile. But maybe you are right and he’s another Amos Zeroue. Worth 1.7 or so to find out in my opinion.
 
He was picked at the end of the third round....in an incredibly deep RB class. He was the 5th guy picked, and 6 more were selected by the end of the 4th round. Pretty clear teams were waiting on runners, likely at least in part because of the depth of the class and probably also because the league has devalued the position the last decade-ish.

I'm not even that big of a fan, but what round he was selected in this particular draft probably isn't as indicative as it might be most years (plus it's not like teams don't draft guys that they view as starters in the third round anyway.).

Certainly, he could totally bomb. So could Jeanty, or Hampton, or Henderson. His 40 was his 40. His game tape is also his game tape. He went to a near perfect scheme for his strengths with a coaching staff in place that's ready, willing, and horny to play "dinosaur ball."

He just seems like the perfect fit for the Steelers and I don't respect Warren the way many seem to. If Warren couldn't take the job from Najee (3.9 career ypc) then I definitely don't see him taking it from Kaleb Johnson.

Warren has some juice, there is no real denying that if you watch him run. However...he puts it on the ground. Guy is in, what, year three or four now and local beats say that last year he was still carrying around a water filled football everywhere at the facility. Mike Tomlin detests turnovers, and I would happily wager someone else's money that it's the main reason Warren wasn't given more run as the "1a" to Naj's "1b."

He's also gotten banged up a pretty decent bit for a guy who isn't the "go to" so far, which limited his availability/effectiveness when he was dealing with those. That'd be a pretty big concern for me if I were a Warren Truther. I think the Steelers intend to give him a shot to be the lead guy, but it's easy for me (and likely them) to envision him playing well until he gets a nagging soft tissue injury, or two, and see his productivity drop/the rookie get more run after that. If that happens, I don't see Kenneth Gainwell being inserted as the presumptive starter long-term, so Johnson's path to meaningful carries is probably pretty broad.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top