I don't. My plan is to play him at flex if he is activated. If not I will flex Foreman.What a matchup but feels like you have to sit him if you have a comparable RB or flex due to unknown usage in first game back.
Hopefully he takes over next week.
Looking more and more like Warren!I’m starting him, Mitchell or Warren as my 2nd RB hope there’s something more definite regarding Herbert soon given it’s the Thurs game.
11 | @Det (30th) | 10:00 AM | 1.22 | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
12 | @Min (26th) | 5:15 PM | 1.27 | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
13 | BYE | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
14 | Det (30th) | 10:00 AM | 1.29 | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
15 | @Cle (28th) | 10:00 AM | 1.27 | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
16 | Ari (3rd) | 1:25 PM | 1.36 | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
17 | Atl (27th) | 10:00 AM | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Schedule going fwd is ****e. Even if the Bewhs move entirely away from Foreman, which would be idiotic, their running game faces the following:
11 @Det (30th) 10:00 AM 1.22 0.00 - - - - - - - - 12 @Min (26th) 5:15 PM 1.27 0.00 - - - - - - - - 13 BYE - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Det (30th) 10:00 AM 1.29 0.00 - - - - - - - - 15 @Cle (28th) 10:00 AM 1.27 0.00 - - - - - - - - 16 Ari (3rd) 1:25 PM 1.36 0.00 - - - - - - - - 17 Atl (27th) 10:00 AM 1.33 0.00
#NoBuenos
So do we drop him? Not sure what your point is.Schedule going fwd is ****e. Even if the Bewhs move entirely away from Foreman, which would be idiotic, their running game faces the following:
11 @Det (30th) 10:00 AM 1.22 0.00 - - - - - - - - 12 @Min (26th) 5:15 PM 1.27 0.00 - - - - - - - - 13 BYE - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Det (30th) 10:00 AM 1.29 0.00 - - - - - - - - 15 @Cle (28th) 10:00 AM 1.27 0.00 - - - - - - - - 16 Ari (3rd) 1:25 PM 1.36 0.00 - - - - - - - - 17 Atl (27th) 10:00 AM 1.33 0.00
#NoBuenos
Kevin Fishbain
The Bears will activate RB Khalil Herbert on Saturday, per Matt Eberflus.
Roschon has looked rather pedestrian, uncertain, and awkward running the ball. He's not the guy with the 3 down skillset that we heard so much about in the preseason. I'm hoping they just give Khalil the majority of snaps again. But I know I'll be parking him on my bench and need a prove it game before putting him in the lineup.Foreman listed as doubtful for MNF.
How confident are we in Herbert, assuming he’ll still likely be splitting with Roschon?
Agree for the most part re: Roschon, but he seems to be playing more and more on passing downs in particular. Guessing it’s because he’s the best in pass pro or catching the ball, or both.Roschon has looked rather pedestrian, uncertain, and awkward running the ball. He's not the guy with the 3 down skillset that we heard so much about in the preseason. I'm hoping they just give Khalil the majority of snaps again. But I know I'll be parking him on my bench and need a prove it game before putting him in the lineup.Foreman listed as doubtful for MNF.
How confident are we in Herbert, assuming he’ll still likely be splitting with Roschon?
The bears coaches are dumb. That is what you are missing....2021 - Herbert leads all CHI RB's with 4.2 YPC
2022 - Herbert leads all CHI RB's with 5.7 YPC
2023 - Herbert leads all CHI RB's with 4.6 YPC
Entering 2024, Herbert's lifetime YPC is 4.9. In the 16 games where he got double digit carries, his average is 5.1 YPC.
Am I missing something here?
The bears coaches are dumb. That is what you are missing....2021 - Herbert leads all CHI RB's with 4.2 YPC
2022 - Herbert leads all CHI RB's with 5.7 YPC
2023 - Herbert leads all CHI RB's with 4.6 YPC
Entering 2024, Herbert's lifetime YPC is 4.9. In the 16 games where he got double digit carries, his average is 5.1 YPC.
Am I missing something here?
I am not so sure. I think they can be that stupid.The Bears can't be SO stupid to neither use him, nor trade him to the first team coming to his rescue offering a 4th/5th round pick, right? Right?????
Reclaimed the roster spot in dynasty earlier this season when he got mothballed, but planning to add him in my kicker spot and hope a trade happens this week. But no, not holding if the trade doesn't happen, even though I would like to until free agency.Healthy scratch yesterday. Whilst my value opinion of him has definitely receded this year, he is too good to be scratched. I guess they are thinking of moving him so I will keep holding until trade deadline in dynasty. If nothing happens then, hes getting cut by me in multiple leagues.
Is there a landing spot that provides him 20 carries/game on a consistent basis? I feel that is what he needs to be fantasy relevant on a week-to-week basis.Reclaimed the roster spot in dynasty earlier this season when he got mothballed, but planning to add him in my kicker spot and hope a trade happens this week. But no, not holding if the trade doesn't happen, even though I would like to until free agency.Healthy scratch yesterday. Whilst my value opinion of him has definitely receded this year, he is too good to be scratched. I guess they are thinking of moving him so I will keep holding until trade deadline in dynasty. If nothing happens then, hes getting cut by me in multiple leagues.
I have heard they might not trade him because of his special teams contributions. I guess that reputation helps him in his next contract, but what an absolute waste of his best years as a ball carrier (and what should have been decent depth piece in fantasy). Since the Vikings had interest before settling on Akers, I would love to see him on Minnesota next season sticking it to his current team twice per year. Really feel like they've done him dirty, unless his pass protection is just truly horrific to the point of telegraphing run. I would like him more at the top of some team's depth chart starting next week, but that's probably too much to hope for at this point.
Is there a landing spot that provides him 20 carries/game on a consistent basis? I feel that is what he needs to be fantasy relevant on a week-to-week basis.Reclaimed the roster spot in dynasty earlier this season when he got mothballed, but planning to add him in my kicker spot and hope a trade happens this week. But no, not holding if the trade doesn't happen, even though I would like to until free agency.Healthy scratch yesterday. Whilst my value opinion of him has definitely receded this year, he is too good to be scratched. I guess they are thinking of moving him so I will keep holding until trade deadline in dynasty. If nothing happens then, hes getting cut by me in multiple leagues.
I have heard they might not trade him because of his special teams contributions. I guess that reputation helps him in his next contract, but what an absolute waste of his best years as a ball carrier (and what should have been decent depth piece in fantasy). Since the Vikings had interest before settling on Akers, I would love to see him on Minnesota next season sticking it to his current team twice per year. Really feel like they've done him dirty, unless his pass protection is just truly horrific to the point of telegraphing run. I would like him more at the top of some team's depth chart starting next week, but that's probably too much to hope for at this point.
These spots really don't make any sense at this point. I don't see what he would add to either team but I suppose if the cost is cheap enough he would be an upgrade over Moss in Cincy as a runner. But Brown is doing quite fine so I don't see why they would bring in HerbertIndy and Bengals are two others I have seen as potential interest.
These spots really don't make any sense at this point. I don't see what he would add to either team but I suppose if the cost is cheap enough he would be an upgrade over Moss in Cincy as a runner. But Brown is doing quite fine so I don't see why they would bring in HerbertIndy and Bengals are two others I have seen as potential interest.
Was reading article from Brad Briggs(Tribune) this morning and his thinking is that he means more to the Bears as injury insurance for Swift and Roschon then anything he'd get back in a trade. Hope he's wrong, but it makes sense. Just not a big RB market right now.
Wouldn't be surprised at all if he stays put. But considering that Roschon didn't get his first of two carries until the 4th quarter as the BACKUP, let's just hope they cut this poor guy a break and get him to anywhere else that will at least get him some carries to put on tape heading into free agency.
Multiple coaching staffs with the Bears did not seem to view him as having a lot of skills in the passing game so probably not that part of Moss role.x.com
x.com
Khalil Herbert to the Bengals.
I wonder if he’ll take the Zack Moss early season role? Or will he just provide depth behind an ascending Chase Brown?
I can think of a lot of better landing spots.x.com
x.com
Khalil Herbert to the Bengals.
I wonder if he’ll take the Zack Moss early season role? Or will he just provide depth behind an ascending Chase Brown?
Herbert is a good running back when given 10 carries a game against a tired D. He's not a lead back that can shoulder a load. He more of a solid RB 1B type of guy. Decent in receiving game, average to below avg pass blocker.Herbert had some nice production as a rookie, and seems to run the ball well, but I think the fantasy community wish casted him into being something well beyond a JAG. Easy to say it's coaches that don't know how to use talent, but that's two regimes I believe that pushed Roschon and then Swift over him.
I picked up Herbert in advance of the trade deadline in my redraft league to see where he'd go, but I'm probably dropping him since I have to waive someone with CMC returning from IR. My bench is very handcuff heavy, and I'd rather keep my current batch of Corum, Vidal, Allgeier and Wright than him, unless someone could convince me he's a better "one injury away" handcuff. I don't think he is above the obvious ones, like the Allen's of the world.Worth a stash? Curious if he's a pickup that deserves to be in the tier of B. Corum, B. Allen, etc. where he's one injury away (i.e. C. Brown) from becoming a lead dog.
I had Z. Moss thinking similar until his injury.
For sure.Worth a stash?