What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB/WR Ty Montgomery, NE (1 Viewer)

Thing of it is, he's learning as he goes here. IMO with what he's shown, there's no reason not to see how good he could be. He needs reps reading the defense and learning the nuances of the position, but even without that he's putting up great numbers. The ceiling is enormous here...

@Dr. Brew called this first a couple weeks ago, and I echoed his season changer stance after seeing Montgomery play last Sunday.  He just might be this year's king maker. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm no expert but this offense is much more electric with him at tailback than its been with Lacey all season.

I assume McCarthy can see this too.
Montgomery has taken this opportunity and made a very good case for himself to stay in the RB conversation. 

Starks has always been JAG. Honestly Cobb and Montgomery look better than he would running the ball this game.

I don't know what gb does moving forward and I'm excited to find out but for now those who started montgomery got a great game and might have a hidden gem

 
are you pimpin knile davis? I have always been intrigued by him, seemed to do well enough in KC, but switching teams the odds are against him.
How many RB have switched teams and been successful and how many WR have switch positions and been successful?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many RB have switched teams and been successful and how many WR have switch positions and been successful?
The difference is that Montgomery was always a potential tweener with an NFL RB body and limited down field receiving ability. 

Why can't he be what people want Procise and Dwayne Washington to be?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many RB have switched teams and been successful and how many WR have switch positions and been successful?
your argument is so bogus. you're taking EVERY RB who has EVER been traded to another team and has had success and comparing that to how many wrs who have switched to rb and been successful? I don't even know of any. so maybe ty is the first. either way that's ridiculous. how about we talk about PLAYERS who switch positions and are succesful. plenty of examples of those. heck, Cobb was a qb and is doing quite well at wr. Shields switched from wr to cb and has done quite well when not on ir

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many RB have switched teams and been successful and how many WR have switch positions and been successful?
switching teams is one thing, switching teams in season is another. Ty isn't special but hes getting an opportunity to score FF points, not everyone can be special.

 
Lol whatever bro. TY is nothing special. 
It's painfully obvious that you're invested in his failure somehow. Starks, Don, Knile, I don't know who. But you're biased to not see the potential (key word) here. No one is saying he's a special stud.

 
The difference is that Montgomery was always a potential tweener with an NFL RB body and limited down field receiving ability. 

Why can't he be what people want Procise and Dwayne Washington to be?
Conn seriously? He's no Dwyane Washington. Not even close. 

 
It's painfully obvious that you're invested in his failure somehow. Starks, Don, Knile, I don't know who. But you're biased to not see the potential (key word) here. No one is saying he's a special stud.
No. I called his success today. Maybe not on this board though. Sell high guys. I'll leave now so you guys can celebrate your big day. Happy for you guys. 

 
It's painfully obvious that you're invested in his failure somehow. Starks, Don, Knile, I don't know who. But you're biased to not see the potential (key word) here. No one is saying he's a special stud.
He does hours and hours of film study and knows everything about every player that us mere mortals cannot see. 

 
Conn seriously? He's no Dwyane Washington. Not even close. 
Are you kidding me? Montgomery is an NFL athlete at the RB position, and was a 3rd round pick. 

He's already shown more than Dwayne Washington has at the position in the NFL, and he's not even a RB. Where are you getting the idea that Dwayne Washington is some kind of great prospect that's ridiculous to put in the same sentence as Montgomery? One was a premium pick, one was barely drafted. 

 
It's not sitting well with me that Montgomery had opportunities to put points on the board tonight, and didn't. Not stretching out at the goal line showed his lack of awareness as an RB. And, I think that missed opportunity to catch the ball in the flats and get it in to the end zone disappointed Rodgers as well.

 
A TD or two would have been nice but I'm not going to be greedy, it's nice when it plays out right.
Don't know if that was in reference to my post, but what I meant was that he's not really showing the play-making ability to stick to one of the top targets. Either that, or he's just running out of gas from all of the work :-)

 
Don't know if that was in reference to my post, but what I meant was that he's not really showing the play-making ability to stick to one of the top targets. Either that, or he's just running out of gas from all of the work :-)
No just a random thought. Was just thinking of how close he was to a monster game.

 
It's not sitting well with me that Montgomery had opportunities to put points on the board tonight, and didn't. Not stretching out at the goal line showed his lack of awareness as an RB. And, I think that missed opportunity to catch the ball in the flats and get it in to the end zone disappointed Rodgers as well.
his goal line carry he made the most of what he could to be honest. went to him at least one other time in the red zone. passing play. I'm encouraged by the looks he got

 
his goal line carry he made the most of what he could to be honest. went to him at least one other time in the red zone. passing play. I'm encouraged by the looks he got
Any way you slice it, it sure was fun tonight, right?

And, I'm fairly certain that will be better than what I would have gotten out of Nuk.

 
his goal line carry he made the most of what he could to be honest. went to him at least one other time in the red zone. passing play. I'm encouraged by the looks he got
And they designed a little pick play for him early on in the endzone as well, but Rodgers moved on to his next read before he broke open. They want to get him involved in the red zone, he was open momentarily in the endzone while Rodgers was scrambling in the 4th quarter, too.

 
I still don't really see Ty as a RB, but I'm happy with what he showed. Even dating back to his rookie year, he's looked like a guy who belongs in the NFL and who will make good things happen when the ball is in his hands. I hope they treat him like a Cobb/Edelman/Woodhead type of weapon and just get him 10-12 touches per game.

 
I still don't really see Ty as a RB, but I'm happy with what he showed. Even dating back to his rookie year, he's looked like a guy who belongs in the NFL and who will make good things happen when the ball is in his hands. I hope they treat him like a Cobb/Edelman/Woodhead type of weapon and just get him 10-12 touches per game.
I didn't either but I see what JFS is saying. I can see some rb in him but he's clearly not polished. nor should he be at this point. he played his position best he could... didn't blow any pass protection and ran well 

 
Can you explain? Game hasn't start yet. Did announcers say something? Appreciate it.
Just a feeling. I had gone back and forth all night and was basically  a coun flip in my mind.  Wish i had pulled Meredith instead of Fitz.  But that was unexpected 

 
He will never be a traditional RB IMO but he can make a living in this in this tweener role if they decide to feature it.

 
So will this guy remain a WR for ROS?  He's obviously playing RB, and in tiered PPR leagues .5 RB/1.0WR/1.5TE, those catches out of the backfield add up.  It's great and all if you are reaping the benefits, but in leagues like this it's somewhat of an unfair advantage.

 
In this thread we can tell who missed out on TyMo.
Not sure if directed at me, but I own him for what it's worth.  I'm also the commissioner, and try to keep the league fair.  I won't override his position or anything, however it seems like he should be classified as a RB?

 
Not sure if directed at me, but I own him for what it's worth.  I'm also the commissioner, and try to keep the league fair.  I won't override his position or anything, however it seems like he should be classified as a RB?
That's up to your league host.

Colston spent his rookie yr listed as a TE and never played a snap there

 
Not sure if directed at me, but I own him for what it's worth.  I'm also the commissioner, and try to keep the league fair.  I won't override his position or anything, however it seems like he should be classified as a RB?
I wish he was listed as an RB. I think he'd be more valuable there, to be honest.

 
I wish he was listed as an RB. I think he'd be more valuable there, to be honest.
If it's Yahoo he'll gain dual eligibility which is even better.

Value for one position is just based on each individual's roster needs. Me being a Lacy owner would jump with joy if he got RB or dual eligibility. 

 
If it's Yahoo he'll gain dual eligibility which is even better.

Value for one position is just based on each individual's roster needs. Me being a Lacy owner would jump with joy if he got RB or dual eligibility. 
ESPN will not change any position but Yahoo may

his value at rb would put him at Woodhead status. I hope they give him eligibility

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I remember that. biggest load of BS ever (I did not own him)
Wrong! It was the second biggest load after Joe Webb.  :)

There are only two reasons these things matter: roster flexibility and stat differentials. The flexibility is a nice thing to have, but doesn't really have a huge impact (especially for RB/WR, since most leagues have flex spots), but the Webb thing was huge because in many leagues QBs put up significantly more points (and with a higher floor) than other positions.

FWIW, Matthew Berry said on his podcast the other day that ESPN's policy is that they will add a position designation to a player mid-season but will never take one away. So Montgomery could potentially become a RB/WR, but he will never just become an RB even if he's locked in as the team's starter.

 
I still don't really see Ty as a RB, but I'm happy with what he showed. Even dating back to his rookie year, he's looked like a guy who belongs in the NFL and who will make good things happen when the ball is in his hands. I hope they treat him like a Cobb/Edelman/Woodhead type of weapon and just get him 10-12 touches per game.
This is what I think they will do. They should use him in the mold of Woodhead, Riddick, and White. He's not quite Dion Lewis yet as he doesn't run between the tackles as well but he might become that. Starks has been plowing ahead for less than 2 ypc this year, I'm not concerned about him coming back and taking over anything.

I'd like to add something very important. From what I saw, the man blocks too. He threw a couple good ones and made some good chips on his blocks and releases.

 
Glad I played him last night, but I still can't help feel that he just looks average.  Idk, maybe it's just learning the nuances of the RB position.  Things like chip blocking and still getting into his route quickly, not getting hung up with lineman, etc.  He just doesn't look smooth in these plays.  Nor does he look good in/out of his breaks or in running routes in general ( doesn't set up defenders).  Right now he is benefiting from a crazy amount of touches and a soft schedule.  Should benefit next week in a high scoring game against Atl,and then plays my horrendous Colts team.  I may try to sell high at that point.

 
He should be a solid PPR play next week against Atlanta. I can see GB playing from behind and forced to pass.

Long term, they'll probably....just speculation here....go back to having a traditional RB with that being Davis or Jackson. Montgomery would then be the pass catching back/wr and I can see his touches ease up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's funny is that he had point fantasy points in that game in PPR format (and last week too) than Lacy did all year long.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top