Judge Smails
Footballguy
In most mocks he’s been there for me in the 8th but I think I have to jump on round 7 if I really want him.Trying to walk away from every draft with Charbs on my roster, tbh.
In most mocks he’s been there for me in the 8th but I think I have to jump on round 7 if I really want him.Trying to walk away from every draft with Charbs on my roster, tbh.
Not to hijack the thread but would you do Charbs for the likes of a low-end WR1 such as DJ Moore or Ridley? Or are you staying pat of an elite RB or WR regardless.In other words, unless I was offered like Chase Brown for him (in really any format), I'm probably not selling. I'd consider a 2026 first in dynasty but I'm rejecting a 2026 2nd.
Pittman was offered to me in a Dynasty format straight up for CharbsNot to hijack the thread but would you do Charbs for the likes of a low-end WR1 such as DJ Moore or Ridley? Or are you staying pat of an elite RB or WR regardless.In other words, unless I was offered like Chase Brown for him (in really any format), I'm probably not selling. I'd consider a 2026 first in dynasty but I'm rejecting a 2026 2nd.
Not to nitpick, but I don't have Ridley as a low end WR1. I'm also not high on Moore.Not to hijack the thread but would you do Charbs for the likes of a low-end WR1 such as DJ Moore or Ridley? Or are you staying pat of an elite RB or WR regardless.In other words, unless I was offered like Chase Brown for him (in really any format), I'm probably not selling. I'd consider a 2026 first in dynasty but I'm rejecting a 2026 2nd.
In all seriousness, did you watch the game? I went back and watched every Seattle possession. "Heavily leaned" is a pretty drastic statement.Thoughts on Seattle's backfield ROS? I know week one heavily leaned Charbonnet and K9 owners are not happy to say the least. Do you believe this will continue to be the case or should one "sell high" on Charbs? K9 is injury prone and Charbonnet has shown to be an RB1 when it's fully his backfield.
Add a -6 rushing to thatAm I reading this right. 12 carries for 11 yards???
15 carries for 10 actually RAOAm I reading this right. 12 carries for 11 yards???
It’s pretty clearly KW3I don’t have a clue what to say about this backfield
Sure you do. Same as it's always been. When Walker is healthy, he is the guy. That has never changed.I don’t have a clue what to say about this backfield
Think of it like this … you’ve got a Ferrari in the garage, but you’ve also got an Audi in that same garage.Look I kind of agree but those are strange comments to make after Charb got more carries than KW3 for the 2nd week in a row
… you sound like a guy that was wishing KW3 was toast.This is setting up as a "do over" (fantasy wise) of last season. The guy in my league with KWIII is happy and thinks he doesn't need to trade with me to get Charbs. "Why would I need him? I have the guy. I'm set." - until he misses time. At that point, I'm starting Charbs and not responding to his trade requests.
Sure you do. Same as it's always been. When Walker is healthy, he is the guy. That has never changed.I don’t have a clue what to say about this backfield
Honestly, he may not be 100%. They have stated they will manage him.Sure you do. Same as it's always been. When Walker is healthy, he is the guy. That has never changed.I don’t have a clue what to say about this backfield
so is he not healthy now? because he's getting 50/50