Chaka
Footballguy
Never heard of that one, this is the one I thought about (Richard Gere & Andy Garcia).Apparently. I've only seen the first one.aren't there 3?You guys would like Infernal Affairs.
Never heard of that one, this is the one I thought about (Richard Gere & Andy Garcia).Apparently. I've only seen the first one.aren't there 3?You guys would like Infernal Affairs.
I was actually thinking that wouldn't have been a bad choice for that 90's forgotten crime movies, although its a notch or 2 below most of that list.Never heard of that one, this is the one I thought about (Richard Gere & Andy Garcia).Apparently. I've only seen the first one.aren't there 3?You guys would like Infernal Affairs.
Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.
Ah... that's it. I did think it was supposed to be Citizen Kane. That's the only possible explanation of why I didn't like it.Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.
Very cool trivia there.Definitely one of the greatest black comedies and nuttiest films on the machinations behind potential nuclear holocaust ever.The fact that, when he became president, Reagan asked to see the War Room when there is no War Room speaks volumes about the awesomeness of Dr. Strangelove.One of the top films, ever. Seriously.The exchange between Hayden and Sellers where Hayden talks about denying his precious fluids and Sellers realizes he is dealing with an insane person is priceless.
NO FIGHTING IN THE WAR ROOM!![]()
Kubrick probably had a great sense of humor, but a lot must have come from screen writer Terry Southern and Sellers ad libs. He rarely laughed again, cinematically, in ruthlessly probing the dark corners of man's soul.
Hayden was also great in Kubrick's first mature work, The Killing. The underrated noir's fractured narrative likely influenced Tarantino movies such as Reservoir Dogs (another caper/heist movie), Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown.
LOL at Dr. Strangelove pointing out the doomsday device had no deterrent value if it was a secret, and the Soviet ambassador saying the were saving it for an upcoming birthday party for the Soviet Premier because he liked surprises.
Financing was contingent on Sellers playing four roles. He was also scripted to play Slim Pickens part, but was reluctant due to concerns he would be spread too thin. His role was scrapped when he sprained his ankle and couldn't work in the cramped cockpit set.
Another one of the greatest black comedies was Kind Hearts and Coronets, which also involved an actor doing a tour de force multi-role performance. Dennis Price needs to bump off seven distant relatives to inherit a titled lineage. Alec Guiness played all seven relatives (including one female), receding deeper and deeper into each successive role.
Not a bad movie at all - nice premise. But the /filmcast said it well: Jodie Foster's talents were wasted in this movie.Elysium - I want to say that this wasn't completely terrible, and I like Blomkamp's directorial style & vision quite a bit even if this film misses on most levels. While had some solid action moments the story was just too simple and obviously told (pretty sure it was by design). All rich people = bad all the time, yeah we got it. And WTF with Jodie Foster's accent? Seriously what was that supposed to be? It was bad to the point of distraction.
While I don't want to nit-pick an average, at best, film to death...
Uhhhhh...where are the friggin' defenses for the giant space station where all the rich people are? They have to rely on a single unstable psychotic dude to be close to his GD van to grab his rocket launcher and shoot missiles TOWARDS THE PLACE WITH ALL THE RICH PEOPLE to blow up the ships full of illegal immigrants, and hopefully not miss? DOUBLE WTF?!?!?! They better hope no asteroids are headed their way.
Well, you couldn't have disliked it because the giant robot and monster action sucked. So we must dig deeper into a film that was about as transparently shallow as a movie could be.Ah... that's it. I did think it was supposed to be Citizen Kane. That's the only possible explanation of why I didn't like it.Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.
Those effects do hold up remarkably well even today.Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
Elysium - I want to say that this wasn't completely terrible, and I like Blomkamp's directorial style & vision quite a bit even if this film misses on most levels. While had some solid action moments the story was just too simple and obviously told (pretty sure it was by design). All rich people = bad all the time, yeah we got it. And WTF with Jodie Foster's accent? Seriously what was that supposed to be? It was bad to the point of distraction.
While I don't want to nit-pick an average, at best, film to death...
Uhhhhh...where are the friggin' defenses for the giant space station where all the rich people are? They have to rely on a single unstable psychotic dude to be close to his GD van to grab his rocket launcher and shoot missiles TOWARDS THE PLACE WITH ALL THE RICH PEOPLE to blow up the ships full of illegal immigrants, and hopefully not miss? DOUBLE WTF?!?!?! They better hope no asteroids are headed their way.
Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO.Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
well, if you bothered to read my post, most of my beefs with the movie were how the action looked.Well, you couldn't have disliked it because the giant robot and monster action sucked. So we must dig deeper into a film that was about as transparently shallow as a movie could be.Ah... that's it. I did think it was supposed to be Citizen Kane. That's the only possible explanation of why I didn't like it.Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.

T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
I thought pacing and flow sucked. Dialogue too. As I said. And I dont' think the fighting was particularly interesting- didn't suck, but wasn't enough to make me think.. wow, great movie if that's all I'm going to get.Well, you couldn't have disliked it because the giant robot and monster action sucked. So we must dig deeper into a film that was about as transparently shallow as a movie could be.Ah... that's it. I did think it was supposed to be Citizen Kane. That's the only possible explanation of why I didn't like it.Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.
I love it how when the Terminators first teleport in it burns a perfect circle around them. Very effective.Those effects do hold up remarkably well even today.Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
Add in Predator and I'm there.T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
as well as Aliens and we've almost rounded out the Top 5Add in Predator and I'm there.T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
Source for Scorcese's The Departed.It is a great movie.You guys would like Infernal Affairs.
as well as Aliens and we've almost rounded out the Top 5Add in Predator and I'm there.T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
Yep. Before Segal got ####### fat and weirdas well as Aliens and we've almost rounded out the Top 5Add in Predator and I'm there.T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.![]()
I vote for Under Siege as honorable mention.
I think mine would go to true lies.as well as Aliens and we've almost rounded out the Top 5Add in Predator and I'm there.T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.![]()
I vote for Under Siege as honorable mention.
Hard to argue against that.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO.Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.
Also top-5 for me (Raiders, that is).Can't forget about Indiana Jones.
Elysium - I want to say that this wasn't completely terrible, and I like Blomkamp's directorial style & vision quite a bit even if this film misses on most levels. While had some solid action moments the story was just too simple and obviously told (pretty sure it was by design). All rich people = bad all the time, yeah we got it. And WTF with Jodie Foster's accent? Seriously what was that supposed to be? It was bad to the point of distraction.
While I don't want to nit-pick an average, at best, film to death...
Uhhhhh...where are the friggin' defenses for the giant space station where all the rich people are? They have to rely on a single unstable psychotic dude to be close to his GD van to grab his rocket launcher and shoot missiles TOWARDS THE PLACE WITH ALL THE RICH PEOPLE to blow up the ships full of illegal immigrants, and hopefully not miss? DOUBLE WTF?!?!?! They better hope no asteroids are headed their way.
Elysium - I want to say that this wasn't completely terrible, and I like Blomkamp's directorial style & vision quite a bit even if this film misses on most levels. While had some solid action moments the story was just too simple and obviously told (pretty sure it was by design). All rich people = bad all the time, yeah we got it. And WTF with Jodie Foster's accent? Seriously what was that supposed to be? It was bad to the point of distraction.
While I don't want to nit-pick an average, at best, film to death...
Uhhhhh...where are the friggin' defenses for the giant space station where all the rich people are? They have to rely on a single unstable psychotic dude to be close to his GD van to grab his rocket launcher and shoot missiles TOWARDS THE PLACE WITH ALL THE RICH PEOPLE to blow up the ships full of illegal immigrants, and hopefully not miss? DOUBLE WTF?!?!?! They better hope no asteroids are headed their way.Not a bad movie at all - nice premise. But the /filmcast said it well: Jodie Foster's talents were wasted in this movie.
And that is #5 on the greatest action films of all time list.Source for Scorcese's The Departed.It is a great movie.You guys would like Infernal Affairs.
Though my hands down favorite movie like that in Hong Kong action cinema (with an undercover cop but no police department mole counterpart) is John Woo's Hard Boiled. The hospital scene was ridiculous.![]()
I'm always fascinated by fat movie stars (Segal, Kilmer, etc.) Like, your job is looking good on screen, you have the money to hire a personal trainer. So what up?Yep. Before Segal got ####### fat and weirdas well as Aliens and we've almost rounded out the Top 5Add in Predator and I'm there.T2 and Die Hard neck and neck for that title for me.Top 5 all-time and best action movie ever, IMO."Who's the dip#### now you jock ########?"Terminator 2: Judgement Day
One of my all-time favorite action flicks. Linda Hamilton kicks ###, Arnold is perfect, and the effects still look cool.![]()
I vote for Under Siege as honorable mention.
Should be....the 5th might be open for debate because I cant think of another movie that is quite up to snuff with T2, Aliens, Die Hard, and Predator at least by a major consensus.KarmaPolice said:are those 4 action movies another thing the ffa could agree on?
First blood if you consider that actionShould be....the 5th might be open for debate because I cant think of another movie that is quite up to snuff with T2, Aliens, Die Hard, and Predator at least by a major consensus.KarmaPolice said:are those 4 action movies another thing the ffa could agree on?
Hey. If you're looking for trouble, you've come to the right place buddy.First blood if you consider that actionShould be....the 5th might be open for debate because I cant think of another movie that is quite up to snuff with T2, Aliens, Die Hard, and Predator at least by a major consensus.KarmaPolice said:are those 4 action movies another thing the ffa could agree on?
As awesome as First Blood is, I dunno...there's not much action/shooting.
If Hard Boiled had been broadly released in America I can't imagine it not being in the conversation for #5. Such an awesome action film.The book is fantastic.The Book Thief
Great movie. To me it's an inspirational movie. Terrific acting.
The book has to be great, right?
totally agree. Was just throwing it out there.As awesome as First Blood is, I dunno...there's not much action/shooting.
Problem is that a lot of the people that loved Pacific Rim as escapist robot fun hated Transformers because...I dunno...hating those movies is the cool thing to do and liking Del Toro is the cool thing to do.Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.
I agree to point. Pacific rim's action is a little easier to follow and bay's humor us very juvenile: dogs #######, body fluid humor, etc.. but both are similar. I guess robots vs robots isn't as cool as robots vs monsters.Problem is that a lot of the people that loved Pacific Rim as escapist robot fun hated Transformers because...I dunno...hating those movies is the cool thing to do and liking Del Toro is the cool thing to do.Props for the effort, but you're never going to win over the people who critique each movie as if it's supposed to be Citizen Kane. Any script that revolves around Giant Monsters and Robots is going to seem trite to them. I agree with your assessment that this movie definitely delivered on what it promised, escapist fun with giant robots and monsters. Nothing else matters to me.Now those are some criticisms that I can understand. Del Toro does increase expectations and for the most part I thought he delivered. I had a similar concern when it became apparent that the fights were always taking place at night but I had zero trouble following the action, which is where I thought del Toro did an excellent job. I didn't really note any discrepancies with monster size.Again I don't fault the plot or dialogue, in fact I appreciated that the McGuffin was so simple. For no reason an inter-dimensional hole opens on the bottom of the Pacific and giant monsters start popping out. BAM! Accept it and move on.pacific rim:
I will weigh in a again. sure, I expected monsters and robots fighting. however, with del toros name attached to it, I did expect something more. the dialogue and plot were horrible, but yeah, that's not why we were watching. visually I was disappointed too. too many fights in the dark/rain/ocean and I thought it made it a mild mess to watch. also the scale seemed inconsistent too- sometimes everything was huge and impressive: girl and monster in the street, robot collapsing on the beach. sometimes I felt they looked no bigger than a couple story building.
I get why people had fun with it and I didn't love it, but I still thought it was a slightly better looking transformers movie without the racist stereotypes and body fluid humor.
The dialogue was weak and a lot of the characters were caricatures of stereotypes, whatever, that is what I expect from a film like that.
I probably could have done without the Charlie Day, Ron Perlman & Burn Gordon sequences but I am a huge fan of It's Always Sunny so perhaps that makes me more forgiving of Day's mostly superfluous role in the film.
And I want to be clear that I don't think this is great cinema but it is an awesome delivery of giant robots fighting giant monsters. It felt like a graphic novel brought to life and it scratched an itch.
I'm sorry, but they're the same thing. If anything Pacific Rim had worse dialogue, less funnies, more corny parts, and way more stupid plot oversights (wait, we've had a sword the whole time and you're just telling me now?). It just smells to me like people wanting to cry out "see I can enjoy stupid fun action flicks too!" as long as the director has done something else in the past and they can keep hating on the guy who only does those kind of movies. I'm pretty sure if you flipped the directors around but kept the movies exactly the same their stance on the matter would change 180 degrees.