What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (6 Viewers)

Too tired to do a search- apologies.

I'm sure Stoker was seen in here... thoughts? We just watched it and I had high hopes, but it felt pretty flat to me. Not enough tension/suspense, IMO and oddly not enough violence. Also felt like some of the scenes were pretty formulaic and cliched. But beautifully filmed.
I felt the same. I still liked the film well enough, but it certainly didn't meet my expectations. Every scene filmed with the high school kids was really bad.

Every male student at this rich kid high school wants to rape this chick? And one dude tries to punch her? WTF?
 
did not care for "bling ring". very much a sofia film in a lot of ways. just not a good script and not strong performances. watson is given very little to do, for example. it needed to be much more a satire - buck henry should have been the fixer on this - but didn't go far enough. it's a pretty in moments but empty film. i say this a fan - mostly - of a lot of her work too.

 
saintfool said:
did not care for "bling ring". very much a sofia film in a lot of ways. just not a good script and not strong performances. watson is given very little to do, for example. it needed to be much more a satire - buck henry should have been the fixer on this - but didn't go far enough. it's a pretty in moments but empty film. i say this a fan - mostly - of a lot of her work too.
you just described every one of her movies.

I kind of enjoy all of them, enjoy her craft, particularly like her soundtracks, but ultimately don't give a ####.

 
saintfool said:
did not care for "bling ring". very much a sofia film in a lot of ways. just not a good script and not strong performances. watson is given very little to do, for example. it needed to be much more a satire - buck henry should have been the fixer on this - but didn't go far enough. it's a pretty in moments but empty film. i say this a fan - mostly - of a lot of her work too.
you just described every one of her movies.

I kind of enjoy all of them, enjoy her craft, particularly like her soundtracks, but ultimately don't give a ####.
and i get that. here's the thing though: i *really* like "lost in translation" and "marie antoinette". i didn't much like "virgin suicides" but then i kind of cherished the book. i have not seen that flick she did with stephen dorf - why would anyone want to really? - but felt like this could have been a terrific film. it could have used something to punch it up. i think she is a very astute observer, especially of disaffection and ennui among the younger set. i was interested in her insight into how today's pop culture creates this "bling ring" because of her background. this, however, fell flat as a caper and as a satire. i wanted it to be different than it was.

 
saintfool said:
did not care for "bling ring". very much a sofia film in a lot of ways. just not a good script and not strong performances. watson is given very little to do, for example. it needed to be much more a satire - buck henry should have been the fixer on this - but didn't go far enough. it's a pretty in moments but empty film. i say this a fan - mostly - of a lot of her work too.
you just described every one of her movies.

I kind of enjoy all of them, enjoy her craft, particularly like her soundtracks, but ultimately don't give a ####.
and i get that. here's the thing though: i *really* like "lost in translation" and "marie antoinette". i didn't much like "virgin suicides" but then i kind of cherished the book. i have not seen that flick she did with stephen dorf - why would anyone want to really? - but felt like this could have been a terrific film. it could have used something to punch it up. i think she is a very astute observer, especially of disaffection and ennui among the younger set. i was interested in her insight into how today's pop culture creates this "bling ring" because of her background. this, however, fell flat as a caper and as a satire. i wanted it to be different than it was.
she has a way with portraying the zetigeist of a particular entitled sub-set of her generation... but I still don't give a ####.

marie antoinette? really? it's like I don't know you any more.

 
Upstream Color

Fans of Tree of Life and Shane Carruth's first flick Primer will like/love Upstream Color, those who don't fall in that category will undoubtedly dislike/hate it. An unabashed perplexing film, with a lot of allusion and subtext; a good deal of which flew over my head I'm sure. Still, I enjoyed trying to wrap my head around it while watching it, and am still enjoying such attempts after the film has completed. I also thought the soundtrack was great, and really elicited some emotion to what would have otherwise been an overly meticulous film. I recommend it.
Finally caught Upstream Color. Went in cold, knowing nothing about it other than "from the dude that made Primer", which I also went into cold. Primer made more sense on the first viewing having known nothing about it. This movie is more complicated, in a different sort of way. I enjoyed Primer more.

Carruth certainly likes to just film people looking at nothing in particular. I think there's an entire act without dialogue. I agree, if you hated Primer, you can probably skip this one.

Don't get me wrong, I didn't hate this movie, but I just wasn't as blown away as I was with Primer. Can't say I loved it, either.
I had the opposite experience with Carruth's 2 movies, mostly due to my expectations I guess. In Primer I wasn't prepared for a plot that challenges the viewer so much, so I had a real hard time following along, though I still enjoyed the ride even though I was pretty clueless. For Upstream Color I assumed a similar challenging plot so I was way more mentally active in my viewing and I was able to make some decent sense of it, I think..

 
Bronson

Was really looking forward to this one since I thought the story would be interesting and I loved Winding Refn's most recent film Drive, but I came away pretty disappointed with this one. An hour and a half showcase of a self-destructive, narcissistic, psychopath acting psychotically turned out to be a lot more dull than I thought it'd be. The film desperately needed a supporting character(s) to display some semblance of character development, as the Bronson character was completely static throughout which made the film a pretty pointless exercise imo; the movie could have been a 10-20min short film and lost nothing. The acting and cinematography was pretty good, and there were a few funny scenes I guess, but this film just felt like a giant waste of time.
I didnt realize he directed that. Really, the only reason to watch Bronson is for Tom Hardy's performance. Like you said, it really has nothing else going on for its entirety.

 
Warm Bodies:

Interesting concept that could have landed in my sweet spot if it wasn't so clearly geared for the Twilight/Hunger Games demographic. Very surprised at the 80% on RT, although I guess it was original enough that I would probably tell people to watch it that I think it's targeted for. Need to look at Metacritic more - I think the 59 on there is more accurate to what this movie was. 5/10
I ended up really liking this one. I was sort of avoiding it I guess because of what you mentioned with target audience, but I thought the concept was intriguing and the writing was really good. Its really almost all just the 1 guy's thoughts the entire movie, yet remained interesting the whole time, for me at least. I even sort of got a Romeo & Juliet vibe from it, not sure if they were going for that or not. Maybe Im just a sucker for zombie movies, but I really liked this one.

 
Not a great string of movies this past week:

Silver Linings Playbook:

Posted in the other thread, but thought this one fell flat after the first 1/2. Seemed to gloss over serious mental stuff they focused on in the beginning and went more for the rom/com angle. 6/10
Dead on for me too. If they wanted to go mental-illness "ha-ha", they should have gone with more funny. I would have preferred a bit/lot more of the darker aspects of being something like bipoloar to be tied into the funny, rather than a "they're crazy" prologue with a rom-com follow-through.
Agreed that they turned what started off as a thoughtful film about mental disorder into something less than that. Still it was my favorite of the Oscar nominated films from last year.
:goodposting:

I saw it in theaters with my mom who is a psychiatrist and she thought Cooper and Lawrence were spot on.

 
Behind the Candelabra

I couldn't make it past the 15 minute mark here. Michael Douglas' Liberace accent is too affected. Felt very forced. No thanks
It didn't get much better. The scene where Damon is screwing Douglas is something I could have done without.
Who would have thought that Douglas' affected accent was more awkward than gay sex.
Not a Liberace fan but wasn't his whole persona an affect? I thought Douglas was the lone bright-spot in this one. Super famous gay-showman who is adored by older woman and dies of AIDS in the mid-80's. On paper sounds like a lot to work with. Thought they would have explored more how Liberace was able to stay closeted and how the public just had blinders on at the time. Similar to Freddie Mercury.

Instead we get a depiction of Liberace as a shallow man who follows his johnson around wherever it leads. The real burdens of living a closeted life and contracting HIV were just an afterthought.
Speaking of Freddie Mercury, I hope Sacha Baron Cohen's Mercury movie will be good.
So is that still actually happening? Based on what I saw from Cohen in Hugo, Im fairly convinced he could do great things with this role.

 
I thought Cloud Atlas was pretty good and well directed. I think I would have preferred that they stayed with the structure of the book though. Also, I didn't feel the fear Zachary had in the book either and it was hard to understand what people were saying at times. I'm not sure if anybody who hadn't read the book would have followed at all.

 
When it came out in theaters I thought there was no way I would watch it but after some decent reviews, I decided to give Gangster Squad a shot. I wish I would have stuck with my initial impression because this was beyond bad. Typical generic Hollywood version of a mob story. The acting was horrid. It's hard to think of a worse performance by Sean Penn and Ryan Gosling was just laughable. The dialogue was silly, with all the clichés squeezed into every line. "Who's the tomato?" "I'm gonna go bend an elbow while you guys bend your ears" This is to The Godfather what network television is to cable shows now a days. Some people might like this but I want more realism in a mob movie. This had none. .5/5 only because I like to look at Emma Stone.

eta: only made it an hour in before shutting it off.
I had fun with it. It is definitely over the top on the 50's style and schtick but if you view it as a comic book gangster movie I think it works. Almost all of the characters from Brolin to Gosling to Mackie to Robert Patrick are over the top, and Sean Penn is so over the top its a joke, but I enjoyed Gangster Squad. You'll never confuse it with LA Confidential, but I thought it was entertaining.

Also there is much less schtick and much more action in the 2nd half of the movie so you missed the best part.

 
Some that Ive seen recently

Mama...for a PG13 horror film, I thought this was surprisingly good. Jessica Chastain plays one of the leading characters that I wouldnt have recognized had I not known it was her, and didnt even realize it was her at first. An atypical character for her that I thought she did well with. Decent suspense and soundtrack, its strongest aspect may be that the suspense really builds throughout the movie. I thought the feral kid(s) aspect gave it something interesting as well. The backstory sort of felt conflicting to me, especially at the end, but it didnt bother me too much since they at least fleshed it out...6/10

The Purge...Interesting premise, but this fell flat for me for the most part. I typically enjoy Ethan Hawke, but thought he was weak here. Lots of plot holes, and unless I missed it, they dont even explain why all of the "criminals" are after the black guy the family lets in their house which is the major reason of the entire storyline occurring. Meh...3/10

Stand Up Guys...This was basically Pacino and Walken bull####ting each other for an hour and a half. A movie version of Seinfeld, a movie about nothing, if you will. With that said, its Al ####ing Pacino and Christopher ####ing Walken going back and forth, so its worth the watch. They were both great, and this had a good amount of laughs. I was surprised how small of a role Alan Arkin had, he was basically useless and couldve added a nice third wheel. This one didnt take itself seriously, it felt like Pacino and Walken felt the same way, and because of that its one of Pacino's most enjoyable - not best - films/performances I recall seeing...7/10

 
I thought Cloud Atlas was pretty good and well directed. I think I would have preferred that they stayed with the structure of the book though. Also, I didn't feel the fear Zachary had in the book either and it was hard to understand what people were saying at times. I'm not sure if anybody who hadn't read the book would have followed at all.
I saw this recently and it was better than I expected. It wasn't confusing or boring at all.The artwork in it was excellent and it had a better cast than I knew with Hanks, Broadbent, Berry, Weaving, Sarandon, Sturgess, etc.). I do agree that the language every so often was hard to understand.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kenny Powers said:
Behind the Candelabra

I couldn't make it past the 15 minute mark here. Michael Douglas' Liberace accent is too affected. Felt very forced. No thanks
It didn't get much better. The scene where Damon is screwing Douglas is something I could have done without.
Who would have thought that Douglas' affected accent was more awkward than gay sex.
Not a Liberace fan but wasn't his whole persona an affect? I thought Douglas was the lone bright-spot in this one. Super famous gay-showman who is adored by older woman and dies of AIDS in the mid-80's. On paper sounds like a lot to work with. Thought they would have explored more how Liberace was able to stay closeted and how the public just had blinders on at the time. Similar to Freddie Mercury.

Instead we get a depiction of Liberace as a shallow man who follows his johnson around wherever it leads. The real burdens of living a closeted life and contracting HIV were just an afterthought.
Speaking of Freddie Mercury, I hope Sacha Baron Cohen's Mercury movie will be good.
So is that still actually happening? Based on what I saw from Cohen in Hugo, Im fairly convinced he could do great things with this role.
He's still attached to the project.

 
Trouble with the Curve - I love Clint and try to catch all of his films. This was typical a Hollywood feel good film. Decent acting. I only fast-forwarded a bit at the end as it was dragging a bit. Not something I'd really recommend. 2/5

As soon as the peanut kid threw the bag with that pitchers motion, the entire ending was obvious. I said right away to my wife that the kid would wind up proving that Gentry has "Trouble with the Curve" Thought it might be in a game situation though.
 
Caught Battleship on HBO yesterday. I know I'm going to catch some heat for this, but it's not THAT bad. I actually sat through the whole thing.

 
Caught Battleship on HBO yesterday. I know I'm going to catch some heat for this, but it's not THAT bad. I actually sat through the whole thing.
I was entertained. When I go into a movie like that, that's all I'm looking for.
One of the most insultingly bad films ever.

What convinced Liam Neeson to attach his name to this film (and those almost equally horrific Titans films) is mind boggling.

 
Caught Battleship on HBO yesterday. I know I'm going to catch some heat for this, but it's not THAT bad. I actually sat through the whole thing.
I was entertained. When I go into a movie like that, that's all I'm looking for.
One of the most insultingly bad films ever.

What convinced Liam Neeson to attach his name to this film (and those almost equally horrific Titans films) is mind boggling.
Who cares if it is insulting? I enjoyed it for what it was, mindless entertainment. Not one damn thing in that movie was within the scope of reality, but sometimes that is ok. Lighten up on the snobbery a bit.

 
Caught Battleship on HBO yesterday. I know I'm going to catch some heat for this, but it's not THAT bad. I actually sat through the whole thing.
I was entertained. When I go into a movie like that, that's all I'm looking for.
One of the most insultingly bad films ever.

What convinced Liam Neeson to attach his name to this film (and those almost equally horrific Titans films) is mind boggling.
Who cares if it is insulting? I enjoyed it for what it was, mindless entertainment. Not one damn thing in that movie was within the scope of reality, but sometimes that is ok. Lighten up on the snobbery a bit.
Jeez. Lighten up in general. Did you produce the movie or something?

Not everybody who doesn't like fighting robots is a movie snob, just like not everybody who doesn't like arty movies is a mouth breather. How about a compromise in here - the snobs will lighten up if some of care about what you put in front of your eyes a little more. :) Just find it interesting that you didn't disagree with it being insultingly stupid.

 
jamny said:
Trouble with the Curve - I love Clint and try to catch all of his films. This was typical a Hollywood feel good film. Decent acting. I only fast-forwarded a bit at the end as it was dragging a bit. Not something I'd really recommend. 2/5

As soon as the peanut kid threw the bag with that pitchers motion, the entire ending was obvious. I said right away to my wife that the kid would wind up proving that Gentry has "Trouble with the Curve" Thought it might be in a game situation though.
Agree 100%. Telegraphed the whole way. For me grumpy Clint in front of the camera has lost his appeal as well.

Not sure when it started, but I have been noticing some type of seal on the cover of movies, maybe "Heartland Truly Moving" or something like that. Seen a couple and they are seemingly the same movie. At least it gives me something to look for so I know to stay away.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.

 
Not a great string of movies this past week:

Silver Linings Playbook:

Posted in the other thread, but thought this one fell flat after the first 1/2. Seemed to gloss over serious mental stuff they focused on in the beginning and went more for the rom/com angle. 6/10
Dead on for me too. If they wanted to go mental-illness "ha-ha", they should have gone with more funny. I would have preferred a bit/lot more of the darker aspects of being something like bipoloar to be tied into the funny, rather than a "they're crazy" prologue with a rom-com follow-through.
Agreed that they turned what started off as a thoughtful film about mental disorder into something less than that. Still it was my favorite of the Oscar nominated films from last year.
:goodposting:

I saw it in theaters with my mom who is a psychiatrist and she thought Cooper and Lawrence were spot on.
A fair point that I didn't consider while watching the movie and might require a rewatch - I read/head somebody say, and it makes perfect sense, that the director purposely shot it like that to reflect the mood of Cooper throughout the movie. It turned into a rom/com after he started to balance out. Don't think that will help my annoyance with DeNiro and the parlay, but will watch it again with a different eye.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.

 
jamny said:
Trouble with the Curve - I love Clint and try to catch all of his films. This was typical a Hollywood feel good film. Decent acting. I only fast-forwarded a bit at the end as it was dragging a bit. Not something I'd really recommend. 2/5

As soon as the peanut kid threw the bag with that pitchers motion, the entire ending was obvious. I said right away to my wife that the kid would wind up proving that Gentry has "Trouble with the Curve" Thought it might be in a game situation though.
Agree 100%. Telegraphed the whole way. For me grumpy Clint in front of the camera has lost his appeal as well.

Not sure when it started, but I have been noticing some type of seal on the cover of movies, maybe "Heartland Truly Moving" or something like that. Seen a couple and they are seemingly the same movie. At least it gives me something to look for so I know to stay away.
Hmmm, looks like they award movies that fit their criteria.

Monster University being the newest one.

Still get a kick out of angry old Clint. Loved the clip they used of young Clint for the fight in the barn. Gonna continue to enjoy the legend while I can.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.
I watched parts of it over the weekend. Absolutely terrible. I can't stand movies where the characters behave neither rationally nor interestingly, and this is one of those. Some cute girls in swimsuits for the entire movie - perhaps the only redeeming quality.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.
I watched parts of it over the weekend. Absolutely terrible. I can't stand movies where the characters behave neither rationally nor interestingly, and this is one of those. Some cute girls in swimsuits for the entire movie - perhaps the only redeeming quality.
If you only watched parts, then you have absolutely no frame of reference for what is going on. It is heady, and difficult at best to grasp even if you watch the whole thing. I can't imagine trying to piece together what's happening while only seeing parts.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.
I watched parts of it over the weekend. Absolutely terrible. I can't stand movies where the characters behave neither rationally nor interestingly, and this is one of those. Some cute girls in swimsuits for the entire movie - perhaps the only redeeming quality.
If you only watched parts, then you have absolutely no frame of reference for what is going on. It is heady, and difficult at best to grasp even if you watch the whole thing. I can't imagine trying to piece together what's happening while only seeing parts.
Fair enough. Just my impression...it never drew me in enough for me to focus on it. I even enjoyed Burt Wonderston more....and that was pretty brutal as well.

 
Caught Battleship on HBO yesterday. I know I'm going to catch some heat for this, but it's not THAT bad. I actually sat through the whole thing.
I was entertained. When I go into a movie like that, that's all I'm looking for.
One of the most insultingly bad films ever.

What convinced Liam Neeson to attach his name to this film (and those almost equally horrific Titans films) is mind boggling.
Who cares if it is insulting? I enjoyed it for what it was, mindless entertainment. Not one damn thing in that movie was within the scope of reality, but sometimes that is ok. Lighten up on the snobbery a bit.
I love mindless entertainment as much as anyone (I love the fact that The Core seems to be permanently running on cable) but that doesn't mean I have to enjoy a hopelessly bad film. I tried to enjoy Battleship, I really did, but it is so horrifically awful that I can't find even one redeeming quality. One of the worst films of the last decade. Jon Carter was more entertaining.

Negative stars out of 5

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.
I watched parts of it over the weekend. Absolutely terrible. I can't stand movies where the characters behave neither rationally nor interestingly, and this is one of those. Some cute girls in swimsuits for the entire movie - perhaps the only redeeming quality.
If you only watched parts, then you have absolutely no frame of reference for what is going on. It is heady, and difficult at best to grasp even if you watch the whole thing. I can't imagine trying to piece together what's happening while only seeing parts.
Fair enough. Just my impression...it never drew me in enough for me to focus on it. I even enjoyed Burt Wonderston more....and that was pretty brutal as well.
Wait, which movie did you "watch parts of", Upstream Color or Spring Breakers?

 
Enlightened

Weird promos prevented me from watching this Laura Dern / Mike White HBO series for awhile. But I just rented season 1, and it's outstanding. Highly recommened.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.
I watched parts of it over the weekend. Absolutely terrible. I can't stand movies where the characters behave neither rationally nor interestingly, and this is one of those. Some cute girls in swimsuits for the entire movie - perhaps the only redeeming quality.
If you only watched parts, then you have absolutely no frame of reference for what is going on. It is heady, and difficult at best to grasp even if you watch the whole thing. I can't imagine trying to piece together what's happening while only seeing parts.
Fair enough. Just my impression...it never drew me in enough for me to focus on it. I even enjoyed Burt Wonderston more....and that was pretty brutal as well.
Wait, which movie did you "watch parts of", Upstream Color or Spring Breakers?
Spring breakers. I watched the beginning bit of Upstream Color as well - it looks pretty interesting and will definitely watch the whole thing at some point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Spring Breakers - 2/10 - 1 for boobs and the other point for James Francos role. The movie was horrible but his role was pretty funny. Specifically, when he is jumping on his bed saying "look at all my s***" while walking around his room talking about all of his posessions and holding his guns.

 
I watched Steel Dawn with Patrick Swayze last night. How had I not seen this before? It came out my senior year in HS and I used to eat up all that horribly Sci Fi flicks back then. It must have not gotten a widespread release.

Anyway, this is horribly, wonderfully bad. The storyline is essentially Roadhouse meets Mad Max (seriously, the plot is almost exactly Roadhouse). Highly recommend for Swayze cheesiness.

 
I know Upstream Color has been discussed a couple of times. As mentioned, it's not for everyone. However, if you are into David Lynch (as I am), you will most likely like this. If you are into Michael Bay or Tyler Perry, probably not so much. I thought it was beautiful and fantastic, and it seared itself into my brain, causing me to think about it days after. That's always the sign of a good film, for me.
Wanted to see this one - is it still in theaters?

Also, did anybody catch Spring Breakers? I am morbidly curious considering the director and what I have heard about Franco's role in the movie. I think I get to watch this one over the weekend.
Upstream is on Netflix streaming. I hope to watch it this week. Kinda geeked for it.

 
Trance - Danny Boyle's newest movie. It started to drag in the first half and but then Rosario Dawson walked in completely naked... The last 3rd of the movie is a total mind #### so if you're into that you'll like it. 7.5/10.

42 - a well-acted, well-made, paint by numbers biopic. 6/10 to me but maybe 7/10 for someone who doesn't know much about Jackie Robinson.

Olympus Has Fallen - after you get past the implausibility of the plot it's a fun ride. Nothing special but worth a watch. 6.5/10.

 
Side Effects-

Very good movie. A thriller that was full of suspense and had some nice twists involved.

Best movie I've seen in quite some time and I would watch it again. 8.5/10

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top