Get ready for a ride, brotherSierra Madre next.

I watched the first few minutes last night to get a feel for it and already saw a Bugs Bunny reference when Bogey asks for money. Great start!Get ready for a ride, brotherSierra Madre next.![]()
Re-watched Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri for the first time since seeing it in the theater.
For my money, not the greatest story, but the characters and performances make it worth watching.
Frances McDormand and Sam Rockwell just make you sit up and pay attention every second they're on screen.
And there's this character actress named Sandy Martin (she plays Rockwell's mother); she's brilliant!
I’m curious what you think. I absolutely despised that movie.Re-watched Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri for the first time since seeing it in the theater.
For my money, not the greatest story, but the characters and performances make it worth watching.
Frances McDormand and Sam Rockwell just make you sit up and pay attention every second they're on screen.
And there's this character actress named Sandy Martin (she plays Rockwell's mother); she's brilliant!
I recorded it off of TCM last week but haven't watched it yet (because I'm trapped in a month of tv series). I'm curious to see how Martin McDonagh tackles America.
Oof. Just watched this last night. Awful movie. And I really like Gerard Butler tooWife and I enjoyed Greenland quite a bit.Greenland on Prime. I enjoyed this considerably more than I thought I would. For an end of the world disaster movie they focused only on regular old human stuff, no massive special effects like 2012 just a father and his family. Even the dramatic and violent parts were....kinda real? In a Hollywood way.
Eh, like I said. Emjoyed it.
Then I watched Damsal on Netflix. Millie Bobbie Brown is pretty good and will probably end up being this generations Meryl Streep. The dragon wasn't too stupid. Most of the other acting was. No complaints on this one. Not a 5 star movie by any stretch but for the genre was entertaining enough.![]()
You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.Not sure if this goes here or in the Streaming thread but since it was a movie I decided to go with it here.
Juror #2.
I had never heard of it but stumbled upon it while poking around the Max streaming service. I thought the set up and concept was really good and could have been very interesting. It was an interesting cast with a lot of surprising people in it that was enjoyable. I think it was worth the watch but thought it could have been quite a bit better. It also ended in an interesting way that wasn't all that satisfying but I could see what they were going for.
That could be said for almost any movie. I mean they have to have some of that to make a movie.You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.
I believe Hitchcock was asked once why a character didn’t do some sort of obvious action that would have resolved all the issues early on. He said something to the effect of, because then we wouldn’t have had a very interesting movie.That could be said for almost any movie. I mean they have to have some of that to make a movie.You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.
What stupid choice are you referring to? I don't think his original actions were wrong. He hits something. Gets out. Checks the car and surrounding areas. Sees nothing. Assumes it's a deer and goes on with his life. I don't see there being anything wrong with that. No bad choice there. I have been there (hit a deer) and that was in a non-rainy situation where I could see the deer. If the visibility was bad and in an area that is common for deer being hit his actions were acceptable. There was no malice or ill intentions. I wouldn't consider what he did a hit and run.
I believe Hitchcock was asked once why a character didn’t do some sort of obvious action that would have resolved all the issues early on. He said something to the effect of, because then we wouldn’t have had a very interesting movie.That could be said for almost any movie. I mean they have to have some of that to make a movie.You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.
What stupid choice are you referring to? I don't think his original actions were wrong. He hits something. Gets out. Checks the car and surrounding areas. Sees nothing. Assumes it's a deer and goes on with his life. I don't see there being anything wrong with that. No bad choice there. I have been there (hit a deer) and that was in a non-rainy situation where I could see the deer. If the visibility was bad and in an area that is common for deer being hit his actions were acceptable. There was no malice or ill intentions. I wouldn't consider what he did a hit and run.
Never heard of it. Sounds interesting."We Beat The Dream Team" documentary was decent for basketball fans.
Olympics Basketball 1992 when we sent the Hall of Fame stars (Jordan, Magic, Bird, Barkley, etc) to represent the USA. Story of the practice team (sacrificial lamb) college kids that beat them (the college kids all went on to the NBA and had good careers).

Companion - the guy from The Boys (Dennis Quaids kid) takes his girlfriend (the girl from that movie where the Mormon girls go to Hugh Grants) to meet his friends. Hijinks ensue.
Lotta cool concepts in this one, don’t want to spoil too much
The movie could have (and should have) been over after the first vote. Why he did what he did was stupid.That could be said for almost any movie. I mean they have to have some of that to make a movie.You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.
What stupid choice are you referring to? I don't think his original actions were wrong. He hits something. Gets out. Checks the car and surrounding areas. Sees nothing. Assumes it's a deer and goes on with his life. I don't see there being anything wrong with that. No bad choice there. I have been there (hit a deer) and that was in a non-rainy situation where I could see the deer. If the visibility was bad and in an area that is common for deer being hit his actions were acceptable. There was no malice or ill intentions. I wouldn't consider what he did a hit and run.
I posted a similar comment a few above yours. Go into it knowing as little as possible.Watched these the last 2 nights
Companion - the guy from The Boys (Dennis Quaids kid) takes his girlfriend (the girl from that movie where the Mormon girls go to Hugh Grants) to meet his friends. Hijinks ensue.
Lotta cool concepts in this one, don’t want to spoil too much
Sorry To Bother You - a black guy uses his “white voice” to get a leg up on his telemarketer job. Hijinks ensue
This movie is like a fever dream and some absolute WTF did I just see moments
I guess it’s an allegory for capitalism or something
I was pretty baked for this FWIW
Highly recommend, had been on my list for awhile
Edit: the rap song![]()
Except the guy was trying to do the right thing at the first vote which was not convict an innocent man. That was the turmoil for him.The movie could have (and should have) been over after the first vote. Why he did what he did was stupid.That could be said for almost any movie. I mean they have to have some of that to make a movie.You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.
What stupid choice are you referring to? I don't think his original actions were wrong. He hits something. Gets out. Checks the car and surrounding areas. Sees nothing. Assumes it's a deer and goes on with his life. I don't see there being anything wrong with that. No bad choice there. I have been there (hit a deer) and that was in a non-rainy situation where I could see the deer. If the visibility was bad and in an area that is common for deer being hit his actions were acceptable. There was no malice or ill intentions. I wouldn't consider what he did a hit and run.
It kept him from being where he really wanted to be.....home. AND opened himself up for everything else that happened in the movie.
Fair enough.Except the guy was trying to do the right thing at the first vote which was not convict an innocent man. That was the turmoil for him.The movie could have (and should have) been over after the first vote. Why he did what he did was stupid.That could be said for almost any movie. I mean they have to have some of that to make a movie.You have to look past the fact the movie could have been over 30 minutes in had he not made such a stupid choice.
What stupid choice are you referring to? I don't think his original actions were wrong. He hits something. Gets out. Checks the car and surrounding areas. Sees nothing. Assumes it's a deer and goes on with his life. I don't see there being anything wrong with that. No bad choice there. I have been there (hit a deer) and that was in a non-rainy situation where I could see the deer. If the visibility was bad and in an area that is common for deer being hit his actions were acceptable. There was no malice or ill intentions. I wouldn't consider what he did a hit and run.
It kept him from being where he really wanted to be.....home. AND opened himself up for everything else that happened in the movie.
The fact that he ended up caving at the end went against his good guy intentions and was kind of abrupt. It took away from the overall movie. This is the part where this could have been a lot better of a movie.
I am also not sure what exactly he could have done more at the time of the accident. He stopped. Looked around. Didn't see anything. He wasn't drunk. He didn't do anything wrong. The only wrong thing was not coming forward once the body was discovered. If he did I am not sure what he really would have been guilty of. A drunk lady stumbling on the road in the pouring rain in low visibility without a real walking path gets hit. Also, what did they really have on him? There was no way to prove he hit her unless there was blood somewhere up under the car. Just because he had some body work done on the car doesn't mean it was anywhere near that accident. I don't see how they could have got him for anything that much after the event if he just held to his story. So even sticking with the not guilty or hung jury I am not sure how he would have been at risk.
I haven’t seen too many blaxploitation films of the 70s but just watched Black Caesar and that has to be the best I’ve seen yet. Even better than Coffey and Shaft. I am loving this James Brown soundtrack. I hadn’t realized some of these songs were just from a movie.
110th Street is a good movie, no matter what genre it gets assigned to and damned if that dirtbag Bobby Womack didn't make one of the best theme songs of the early '70s.I haven’t seen too many blaxploitation films of the 70s but just watched Black Caesar and that has to be the best I’ve seen yet. Even better than Coffey and Shaft. I am loving this James Brown soundtrack. I hadn’t realized some of these songs were just from a movie.
Across 110th Street and Trouble Man are pretty decent. The latter has a Marvin Gaye soundtrack.
Cotton Comes to Harlem is played a little more for laughs than the Chester Himes source material but it's a fun watch.
A complete waste of film imo. The awful ending seemed fitting imoI like Pete Davidson so I watched Bodies Bodies Bodies. Don't make the same mistake.
Love that movie so muchWas looking for something to watch and saw Uncut Gems on Tubi. Been wanting to watch it for a while now and in a way I really didn't like it but that ending...so I think it was worth it.
It might be streaming elsewhere but it's expiring today on Tubi so if you have 2 hours to kill...
I liked Bodies.
A complete waste of film imo. The awful ending seemed fitting imoI like Pete Davidson so I watched Bodies Bodies Bodies. Don't make the same mistake.
Couldn't disagree more. I had a blast with this one.I like Pete Davidson so I watched Bodies Bodies Bodies. Don't make the same mistake.
I thought it was ok but I did appreciate the humor poking fun at Gen ZI don't think Bodies 3x was the worst film I've ever seen or anything. I know it was a dark comedy which are sometimes not "ha ha" funny but they did try to make some jokes but they came off as more cringe than funny. I get the ending and I could see why some people think it's great but it was just kinda aggravating to me. In hindsight I did think that maybe the true intent of the movie was to make fun of gen z and this but I'm not sure that makes it much of a better movie.
You can rent it on Prime but it's not free streaming anywhere yetits prob too new to be streaming yet, right?
She did a solid job directing.Woman of the Hour
Solid move and worth a watch. Had it been a longer movie it would have gotten repetitive but they got it right.