What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental, Streaming, Theater etc (11 Viewers)

i think at some point they don’t care about people over 40 liking a movie and concentrate on the younger generations. My sons (25,20) and nephew (11) all loved it. The world is passing us 40 and over people by, it’s just what happens. I remember seeing return of the jedi with my dad and him saying that was the worst movie he’d ever seen, not sure he’s been back to a theater since, i was 8. :shrug:
They certainly don’t care too much for the older crowd though they have a lot of older fans who grew up reading the comics. That said, there’s still some negativity I’m seeing from young people. Letterboxd is a pretty massive sight for film fans, especially younger ones. It’s like a social media movie tracking site. For example I think there are 2 recent Spider-Man movies and 2 Avengers movies in the consensus top 20 most popular movies of all time. Some of the more recent Marvel movies (Thor, Black Widow, Multiverse of Madness and Eternals) are some of the lowest rated Marvel movies made yet. 

 
We saw Deep Water last night.

So you don't have to.
One of the pods I listen to pimp it a bit (I am sure a bit tongue in cheek), but haven't gotten the courage to watch it yet  
my wife found it funny eventually. but that's a reach. it's just... bad. like- how on earth did anybody get involved with this steaming pile of bad, bad. the girl is gorgeous and shows some skin- definitely will survive this one. affleck is like a cockroach, so he'll be fine too. but damn. people got payed to actually write this thing. people who should never- ever- work in the business again, but will probably make super hero movies and buckets of cash next. 

 
They certainly don’t care too much for the older crowd though they have a lot of older fans who grew up reading the comics. That said, there’s still some negativity I’m seeing from young people. Letterboxd is a pretty massive sight for film fans, especially younger ones. It’s like a social media movie tracking site. For example I think there are 2 recent Spider-Man movies and 2 Avengers movies in the consensus top 20 most popular movies of all time. Some of the more recent Marvel movies (Thor, Black Widow, Multiverse of Madness and Eternals) are some of the lowest rated Marvel movies made yet. 
true but opening weekend made $143,000,000 domestically and $305,000,000 world wide so i doubt they care

 
They certainly don’t care too much for the older crowd though they have a lot of older fans who grew up reading the comics. That said, there’s still some negativity I’m seeing from young people. Letterboxd is a pretty massive sight for film fans, especially younger ones. It’s like a social media movie tracking site. For example I think there are 2 recent Spider-Man movies and 2 Avengers movies in the consensus top 20 most popular movies of all time. Some of the more recent Marvel movies (Thor, Black Widow, Multiverse of Madness and Eternals) are some of the lowest rated Marvel movies made yet. 


I think some dip is only natural after the completion of the Infinity Saga or whatever they called that cycle that began with Iron Man.

The MCU films that have come out since then have been all over the multiverse by comparison.

 
We saw Deep Water last night.

So you don't have to.


I read some article that said Deep Water was one of the best adaptations of Patricia Highsmith's novels which is pretty high praise.  I watchlisted it but it's in the same boat as the lesbian nuns.

 
true but opening weekend made $143,000,000 domestically and $305,000,000 world wide so i doubt they care
Oh yeah it crushed. So did the last Jurassic Dominion (900 million) but if people become bored or worn out eventually it may start to become reflected in the box office. Though I agree that seems to be a long ways away.  If they are cranking out 4 of these movies a year and 2 or 3 aren’t good eventually one would think audiences would cool on them. But maybe not?

 
Uh, you forgot a movie! 


"Join the Mobile Infantry and save the Galaxy. Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?"

In a 2016 interview, Casper Van Dien spoke about a funny incident when he was picking up his two daughters from school, "I went by the line at school to pick up my kids. You know, you drive up to the school and when I get there and there are these six 10 and 8 year old boys hanging out with my daughters. I pull up in the line and the boys go, 'Johnny Rico! Why didn't you tell us your dad was Johnny Rico?' And I said, 'What are you boys doing watching STARSHIP TROOPERS?' And they said, 'Our dads made us watch it with them!' Then my daughters get in the car and my 10-year-old says, 'Dad, were you really naked in STARSHIP TROOPERS?' And I said, 'Yeah,' and she said, 'How could you do that to me?!' Then my 8-year-old says, 'Wait, like naked naked?' And I said "Yup," and she said, 'Oh my God, my life is ruined!' That was the longest three minute ride home I have had in my life." :lmao:

 
I've had Benedetta in my Hulu queue since it's been streaming but I just haven't found the right night to watch a movie about lesbian nuns.
It’s really good. Well worth bumping up your watchlist. Lesbian nuns are part of it but it’s about a lot more than that. 

 
Epics Continued...

I am on vacation in Chicago but before I left, I forgot to add my last 2 watches.

15. Solaris ('72) 167 mins:  The Russian 2001 is the best way to describe it: Lengthy and methodical movie about a journey to uncover a mystery in space. It fell far short of 2001 for me. Technically, it's nothing anywhere near 2001 (and doesn't try to be). This is an epic that might head to a space station circling a distant planet but the real journey is into the human psyche as a psychologist is sent to a space station after the crew have begun acting strange.  As someone who enjoys long movies and slow paced movies, Solaris was too slow paced for me. I liked the story quite  a bit but it seemed like a good 40 mins could have been trimmed off here. I mean there is a literal 5 minute scene of a car driving through the highway with no dialogue. I guess it is supposed to mean something or have some effect but I couldn't grasp what that was. 

16. Mutiny on the Bounty ('62) 185 mins: I watched this as a tribute to Wikkid. I will turn this over to his thoughts on the Brando led remake:

Forgot to post that my favorite epic, Brando's Mutiny on the Bounty, was on last nite. Used to joke with KP that the difference between us as cinephiles was that my big childhood movie was this and his was BttF. My love for it was only increased last nite because TCM told the details of its making. Apparently, it really is Brando's. The great Carol Reed was originally hired to direct but Brando was given more creative control than he so he quit. The only director who would work under these conditions was Lewis Milestone, who was great in the early talkies but hadn't made a substantial picture in 25 years. So MotB was essentially Brando's Braveheart or Dancing With Wolves, which makes me love it all the more. Its epic quality competes with DeMille and Lean (whose Lawrence of Arabia he turned down to make this) and the intimacy set against the scale of events - especially the "No No Fletcher" love scene and Christian forcing Bligh to order him to boink the chief's daughter joke and, gratuitous as it was, the death scene - that make epics truly great make even more sense with a great actor, rather than director, doing the set-ups. Masterpiece.

Man, they shonuff don't make movies like that anymore. Watched Mutiny on the Bounty - the favorite movie of my youth - yesterday on TCM for the first time in over a decade. Why this isn't mentioned on the same level as Lawrence of Arabia and other epics is beyond me. Every bit the same scope, novelty & drama as any other, two bravura perfromances from Brando and Trevor Howard. And the bit where Fletcher Christian forces Bligh to enter the order to deflower the Tahitian chief's daughter into the log and then cruises affront the shoreward launch like Washington crossing the Delaware to complete his task is one of the most perfect jokes in the history of cinema.

Watching it, I realized I learned the nature of lust and cruelty, the faces of revolt and even death (in the final scene) from this flick. I suppose i could even describe the difference between me and GenXers as the difference between having Mutiny and Back to the Future as biggest kidflix.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Going back to my theory that we are seeing early signs of Marvel’s stranglehold waning, the Cinemascores are indicating something is happening. For those unfamiliar, Cinemascore is a company that randomly surveys moviegoers across the country when they exit a new film. They ask several questions but the big one is to grade the movie. The new Thor got the 2nd lowest score in the history of the MCU. On top of that, 3 of the 4 lowest scored MCU movies ever have came out in the last 7 months. Maybe just a rough patch of poor films, maybe running out of ideas or maybe the audience is starting to feel some fatigue.

 
Andy Dufresne said:
"Join the Mobile Infantry and save the Galaxy. Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?"

In a 2016 interview, Casper Van Dien spoke about a funny incident when he was picking up his two daughters from school, "I went by the line at school to pick up my kids. You know, you drive up to the school and when I get there and there are these six 10 and 8 year old boys hanging out with my daughters. I pull up in the line and the boys go, 'Johnny Rico! Why didn't you tell us your dad was Johnny Rico?' And I said, 'What are you boys doing watching STARSHIP TROOPERS?' And they said, 'Our dads made us watch it with them!' Then my daughters get in the car and my 10-year-old says, 'Dad, were you really naked in STARSHIP TROOPERS?' And I said, 'Yeah,' and she said, 'How could you do that to me?!' Then my 8-year-old says, 'Wait, like naked naked?' And I said "Yup," and she said, 'Oh my God, my life is ruined!' That was the longest three minute ride home I have had in my life." :lmao:


That is freakin' epic.

 
Going back to my theory that we are seeing early signs of Marvel’s stranglehold waning, the Cinemascores are indicating something is happening. For those unfamiliar, Cinemascore is a company that randomly surveys moviegoers across the country when they exit a new film. They ask several questions but the big one is to grade the movie. The new Thor got the 2nd lowest score in the history of the MCU. On top of that, 3 of the 4 lowest scored MCU movies ever have came out in the last 7 months. Maybe just a rough patch of poor films, maybe running out of ideas or maybe the audience is starting to feel some fatigue.


Not sure if you've listened to the newest episode of The Big Picture, but they had some ideas on this.  IMO the ones that I had had been thinking before this and they also mentioned:

1.  Oversaturation of product with the TV series.  People are hitting their wall with Marvel a bit.   

2.  They are getting to lesser and lesser books/stories/characters to draw from for their ideas and movies.   They made the point that they had to keep going with stuff like The Eternals without knowing what the deal for the rights to Spidey and XMen were going to look like.   

That is where I am personally.   I would say about 5 years ago or so I was right there with really digging almost everything they did.   Mostly they lose me when it's gets more galactic and chasing glowing orbs.     Then they lose 2 of the best characters in the series.  Then the shows I've watched and Phase 4 have been average to terrible.  

 
Is it just me or did a lot of movies have really poor dialog mixes - as in it's too low compared to the musical score and often even the ambient noises?

I think I turn subtitles on about a third of the time these days.

No, I don't need a hearing aid! 🦻

 
Is it just me or did a lot of movies have really poor dialog mixes - as in it's too low compared to the musical score and often even the ambient noises?

I think I turn subtitles on about a third of the time these days.

No, I don't need a hearing aid! 🦻
agree.  also, scenes are too damn dark.

 
Is it just me or did a lot of movies have really poor dialog mixes - as in it's too low compared to the musical score and often even the ambient noises?

I think I turn subtitles on about a third of the time these days.

No, I don't need a hearing aid! 🦻
Yeah I assume the mixes are meant for theaters. I don't notice the problem when I am watching on my atmos set-up but for the living room TV we just use the built-in speakers and it can be an issue. 

agree.  also, scenes are too damn dark.
I think that is to hide the budget/save money. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ilov80s said:
I am wondering we are going to see some fatigue in these franchises anytime soon. Or is the built in audience just so high that they will always make money?
There was some conversation about this in the marvel thread. I have totally hit my wall with those movies and shows and don’t plan to go back for a long while. We went to the Thor movie last weekend with friends and I fell asleep 45 minutes in. I’m just done. 

 
KarmaPolice said:
That is where I am personally.   I would say about 5 years ago or so I was right there with really digging almost everything they did.   Mostly they lose me when it's gets more galactic and chasing glowing orbs.     Then they lose 2 of the best characters in the series.  Then the shows I've watched and Phase 4 have been average to terrible.  
Spot on. The shows are especially bad, some of them look like they were shot with a camcorder. Can’t believe they even released the Moon Knight show, one of the worst things I’ve ever seen in my life. The talking bird thing had to be parody, I bailed after episode 2. 

 
KarmaPolice said:
Not sure if you've listened to the newest episode of The Big Picture, but they had some ideas on this.  IMO the ones that I had had been thinking before this and they also mentioned:

1.  Oversaturation of product with the TV series.  People are hitting their wall with Marvel a bit.   

2.  They are getting to lesser and lesser books/stories/characters to draw from for their ideas and movies.   They made the point that they had to keep going with stuff like The Eternals without knowing what the deal for the rights to Spidey and XMen were going to look like.   

That is where I am personally.   I would say about 5 years ago or so I was right there with really digging almost everything they did.   Mostly they lose me when it's gets more galactic and chasing glowing orbs.     Then they lose 2 of the best characters in the series.  Then the shows I've watched and Phase 4 have been average to terrible.  
I 100% got my little factoid from that pod. The funniest part was the one guest who said he realized he was just a crypto bro but instead of holding the line for Elon Musk and Etherium online, he was out there caping for Disney and Dr. Strange. He said he’s done, can’t do it anymore. 

 
There was some conversation about this in the marvel thread. I have totally hit my wall with those movies and shows and don’t plan to go back for a long while. We went to the Thor movie last weekend with friends and I fell asleep 45 minutes in. I’m just done. 


You never even made it through all the Brosnan Bonds. You're hardly representative of movie franchise nerds.

 
Watched A Bridge Too Far for the first time a few nights ago. It's a really interesting film covering WWII's Operation Market Garden. It's long, 3 hours long, be ready for that. The cast is pretty incredible. I don't know of too many other films that contain the sheer volume of A list actors this one had. Too many to list here. Beyond the A listers you get guys like John Ratzenburger (yes Cliff from Cheers) and several other notable supporting character actors as well. They all turn in good to very good performances, though no particularly great ones. I think James Caan (there's that guy again) and Liv Ullman stood out the most to me in a positive way. On the other side of the coin Ryan O'Neil wasn't very good, and Gene Hackman's attempt at a Polish accent was comically bad (when he remembered to attempt it).

To me, the movie played closer to a documentary than a drama. Even at 3 hours, the scope of what they tried to cover made it impossible to spend much time with any one character or group of characters, thus it was tough to get too involved in any of them. This lead to the film feeling a bit disjointed too often as they had to jump from place to place to try and keep things in sync chronologically. You experience the tragedy, horror, violence and waste of war, but definitely at a safe remove, not through a sense of investment in any particular character. Also there were a few storylines that really didn't have anything to do with the main thrust of the story or the outcome of the operation. James Caan's storyline in particular was completely irrelevant to the overall film, but coincidentally contained the best scenes IMO. The film was difficult that way - and kept me from liking it as much as I wanted to given the people involved and the subject material.

This one could have been a 10 one hour episode series if made today and probably held more dramatic tension and impact, a la Band Of Brothers. I appreciated the treatment they gave the Germans in this. Just the fact that there is a German perspective is notable, many WWII films and shows from the U.S. don't give you much more than caricatures. Here we do spend time with some of the German command, and though some are played to comic effect, most come across as actual humans, even if you aren't rooting for their team. Maximilian Schell was a good get here.

The best part of the film are the visuals, sound track, and complete devotion to realism and attention to detail in all things. It's practical effects all the way, possibly one of the last films to do so to this extent. Real planes, real artillery, real tanks, real rounds, accurate uniforms, etc. It's a beautifully rendered ode to the terribly destructive power of war machines. It's worth a watch just for that. The air drop scene, the artillery duel scene - just fantastic, I can't express how blown away I was by those. Much of the credit goes to Richard Attenborough as director. He never deviated from or compromised his vision and it shows in the end result (and the outrageous budget it took to complete the film). I can't describe this well enough, you just have to watch it.

It's a must watch for the production quality and epic scope of the various engagement scenes, if nothing else. The cast is also a big draw. Definitely check it out if you haven't seen it. Be sure to block out enough time and have a full supply of snacks - big screen and primo sound system recommended.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watched A Bridge Too Far for the first time a few nights ago. It's a really interesting film covering WWII's Operation Market Garden. It's long, 3 hours long, be ready for that. The cast is pretty incredible. I don't know of too many other films that contain the sheer volume of A list actors this one had. Too many to list here. Beyond the A listers you get guys like John Ratzenburger (yes Cliff from Cheers) and several other notable supporting character actors as well. They all turn in good to very good performances, though no particularly great ones. I think James Caan (there's that guy again) and Liv Ullman stood out the most to me in a positive way. On the other side of the coin Ryan O'Neil wasn't very good, and Gene Hackman's attempt at a Polish accent was comically bad (when he remembered to attempt it).

To me, the movie played closer to a documentary than a drama. Even at 3 hours, the scope of what they tried to cover made it impossible to spend much time with any one character or group of characters, thus it was tough to get too involved in any of them. This lead to the film feeling a bit disjointed too often as they had to jump from place to place to try and keep things in sync chronologically. You experience the tragedy and waste of war, but definitely at a safe remove, not through a sense of investment in any particular character. Also there were a few storylines that really didn't have anything to do with the main thrust of the story or the outcome of the operation. James Caan's storyline in particular was completely irrelevant to the overall film, but coincidentally contained the best scenes IMO. The film was difficult that way - and kept me from liking it as much as I wanted to given the people involved and the subject material.

This one could have been a 10 one hour episode series if made today and probably held more dramatic tension and impact, a la Band Of Brothers. I appreciated the treatment they gave the Germans in this. Just the fact that there is a German perspective is notable, many WWII films and shows from the U.S. don't give you much more than caricatures. Here we do spend time with some of the German command, and though some are played to comic effect, most come across as actual humans, even if you aren't rooting for their team. Maximilian Schell was a good get here.

The best part of the film are the visuals, sound track, and complete devotion to realism and attention to detail in all things. It's practical effects all the way, possibly one of the last films to do so to this extent. Real planes, real artillery, real tanks, real rounds, accurate uniforms, etc. It's a beautifully rendered ode to the terribly destructive power of war machines. It's worth a watch just for that. The air drop scene, the artillery duel scene - just fantastic, I can't express how blown away I was by those. Much of the credit goes to Richard Attenborough as director. He never deviated from or compromised from his vision and it shows in the end result (and the outrageous budget it took to complete the film). I can't describe this well enough, you just have to watch it.

It's a must watch for the production quality and epic scope of the various engagement scenes, if nothing else. The cast is also a big draw. Definitely check it out if you haven't seen it. Be sure to block out enough time and have a full supply of snacks - big screen and primo sound system recommended.
Good timing, that’s on my list of epics to watch. Especially after Caan’s passing. 

 
Good timing, that’s on my list of epics to watch. Especially after Caan’s passing. 
A thing that strikes me about it now, that I hadn't really acknowledged until just now is that it holds up. I didn't at any point feel myself sitting there thinking how much better it would look, sound, etc. if it were made today. The subject material itself is a foundation for that, but its also a testament to the production approach and quality - it looks sounds and feels how a WWII engagement probably looked sounded and felt.

 
Watched A Bridge Too Far for the first time a few nights ago. It's a really interesting film covering WWII's Operation Market Garden. It's long, 3 hours long, be ready for that. The cast is pretty incredible. I don't know of too many other films that contain the sheer volume of A list actors this one had. Too many to list here. Beyond the A listers you get guys like John Ratzenburger (yes Cliff from Cheers) and several other notable supporting character actors as well. They all turn in good to very good performances, though no particularly great ones. I think James Caan (there's that guy again) and Liv Ullman stood out the most to me in a positive way. On the other side of the coin Ryan O'Neil wasn't very good, and Gene Hackman's attempt at a Polish accent was comically bad (when he remembered to attempt it).

To me, the movie played closer to a documentary than a drama. Even at 3 hours, the scope of what they tried to cover made it impossible to spend much time with any one character or group of characters, thus it was tough to get too involved in any of them. This lead to the film feeling a bit disjointed too often as they had to jump from place to place to try and keep things in sync chronologically. You experience the tragedy, horror, violence and waste of war, but definitely at a safe remove, not through a sense of investment in any particular character. Also there were a few storylines that really didn't have anything to do with the main thrust of the story or the outcome of the operation. James Caan's storyline in particular was completely irrelevant to the overall film, but coincidentally contained the best scenes IMO. The film was difficult that way - and kept me from liking it as much as I wanted to given the people involved and the subject material.

This one could have been a 10 one hour episode series if made today and probably held more dramatic tension and impact, a la Band Of Brothers. I appreciated the treatment they gave the Germans in this. Just the fact that there is a German perspective is notable, many WWII films and shows from the U.S. don't give you much more than caricatures. Here we do spend time with some of the German command, and though some are played to comic effect, most come across as actual humans, even if you aren't rooting for their team. Maximilian Schell was a good get here.

The best part of the film are the visuals, sound track, and complete devotion to realism and attention to detail in all things. It's practical effects all the way, possibly one of the last films to do so to this extent. Real planes, real artillery, real tanks, real rounds, accurate uniforms, etc. It's a beautifully rendered ode to the terribly destructive power of war machines. It's worth a watch just for that. The air drop scene, the artillery duel scene - just fantastic, I can't express how blown away I was by those. Much of the credit goes to Richard Attenborough as director. He never deviated from or compromised his vision and it shows in the end result (and the outrageous budget it took to complete the film). I can't describe this well enough, you just have to watch it.

It's a must watch for the production quality and epic scope of the various engagement scenes, if nothing else. The cast is also a big draw. Definitely check it out if you haven't seen it. Be sure to block out enough time and have a full supply of snacks - big screen and primo sound system recommended.
One of the great things about A Bridge Too Far is the Germans speak German and not English 

with ridiculous accents.  

Edit to add-This movie is good even if your not a war buff. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watched A Bridge Too Far for the first time a few nights ago. It's a really interesting film covering WWII's Operation Market Garden. It's long, 3 hours long, be ready for that. The cast is pretty incredible. I don't know of too many other films that contain the sheer volume of A list actors this one had. Too many to list here. Beyond the A listers you get guys like John Ratzenburger (yes Cliff from Cheers) and several other notable supporting character actors as well. They all turn in good to very good performances, though no particularly great ones. I think James Caan (there's that guy again) and Liv Ullman stood out the most to me in a positive way. On the other side of the coin Ryan O'Neil wasn't very good, and Gene Hackman's attempt at a Polish accent was comically bad (when he remembered to attempt it).

To me, the movie played closer to a documentary than a drama. Even at 3 hours, the scope of what they tried to cover made it impossible to spend much time with any one character or group of characters, thus it was tough to get too involved in any of them. This lead to the film feeling a bit disjointed too often as they had to jump from place to place to try and keep things in sync chronologically. You experience the tragedy, horror, violence and waste of war, but definitely at a safe remove, not through a sense of investment in any particular character. Also there were a few storylines that really didn't have anything to do with the main thrust of the story or the outcome of the operation. James Caan's storyline in particular was completely irrelevant to the overall film, but coincidentally contained the best scenes IMO. The film was difficult that way - and kept me from liking it as much as I wanted to given the people involved and the subject material.

This one could have been a 10 one hour episode series if made today and probably held more dramatic tension and impact, a la Band Of Brothers. I appreciated the treatment they gave the Germans in this. Just the fact that there is a German perspective is notable, many WWII films and shows from the U.S. don't give you much more than caricatures. Here we do spend time with some of the German command, and though some are played to comic effect, most come across as actual humans, even if you aren't rooting for their team. Maximilian Schell was a good get here.

The best part of the film are the visuals, sound track, and complete devotion to realism and attention to detail in all things. It's practical effects all the way, possibly one of the last films to do so to this extent. Real planes, real artillery, real tanks, real rounds, accurate uniforms, etc. It's a beautifully rendered ode to the terribly destructive power of war machines. It's worth a watch just for that. The air drop scene, the artillery duel scene - just fantastic, I can't express how blown away I was by those. Much of the credit goes to Richard Attenborough as director. He never deviated from or compromised his vision and it shows in the end result (and the outrageous budget it took to complete the film). I can't describe this well enough, you just have to watch it.

It's a must watch for the production quality and epic scope of the various engagement scenes, if nothing else. The cast is also a big draw. Definitely check it out if you haven't seen it. Be sure to block out enough time and have a full supply of snacks - big screen and primo sound system recommended.
My cousin Dave was a corporal in the 504th PIR 82nd AB, and was in the canvas boats that crossed the Waal River while under brutal attack by the Germans, which was depicted in the film. This was the real ####. Two weeks later he went MIA  near the Black Forest in Holland and our family never recovered his body. The film does an admirable job in trying to recreate this unbelievable feat. The Dutch have recreated this crossing annually for many years in remembrance.

Over the last decade plus, I have been in constant contact with two Dutch researchers now that have spent the better parts of their lives searching for all the missing men of the 504th PIR. I and my father and Dave's only other living nephew have all supplied our DNA in order that hopefully someday they will find a match and find Dave's remains and we can bring him home. I've stood in the exact spot where he went missing.  Truly an emotional experience. RIP Dave and the rest of those from the 504th and all other men that have given the ultimate sacrifice. 

 
My cousin Dave was a corporal in the 504th PIR 82nd AB, and was in the canvas boats that crossed the Waal River while under brutal attack by the Germans, which was depicted in the film. This was the real ####. Two weeks later he went MIA  near the Black Forest in Holland and our family never recovered his body. The film does an admirable job in trying to recreate this unbelievable feat. The Dutch have recreated this crossing annually for many years in remembrance.

Over the last decade plus, I have been in constant contact with two Dutch researchers now that have spent the better parts of their lives searching for all the missing men of the 504th PIR. I and my father and Dave's only other living nephew have all supplied our DNA in order that hopefully someday they will find a match and find Dave's remains and we can bring him home. I've stood in the exact spot where he went missing.  Truly an emotional experience. RIP Dave and the rest of those from the 504th and all other men that have given the ultimate sacrifice. 


Hey!  Your assistance is requested here.

 
@Gr00vus

You weren't kidding about this cast: Sean Connery, James Caan, Gene Hackman, Ryan O'Neal, Robert Redford, Michael Caine, Liv Ullman,  Laurence Olvier, Anthony Hopkins, Elliot Gould. I wonder how this was received at the time? This is around the same time as Deer Hunter, Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now. This feels out of style, more like a movie from 1960 than 1977. It looks and sounds great, but just the style of it seems very old fashioned for the 70s. Feels like a spiritual sequel to The Longest Day. Have you seen that?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Gr00vus

You weren't kidding about this cast: Sean Connery, James Caan, Gene Hackman, Ryan O'Neal, Robert Redford, Michael Caine, Liv Ullman,  Laurence Olvier, Anthony Hopkins, Elliot Gould. I wonder how this was received at the time? This is around the same time as Deer Hunter, Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now. This feels out of style, more like a movie from 1960 than 1977. It looks and sounds great, but just the style of it seems very old fashioned for the 70s. Feels like a spiritual sequel to The Longest Day. Have you seen that?
I don't think it made its budget back at the box office, and I don't think it grabbed the average movie goer as much as it did history buffs. From my understanding it is the spiritual sequel to The Longest Day - the source books for both films were written by the same author I believe. I haven't seen that yet because it hasn't come up for free yet on any of my streaming services. I put it in the queue a few months back when I was on my Richard Burton kick, maybe I'll just pony up the 3.99  for it, but I've heard it isn't really as good as Bridge Too Far.

 
My cousin Dave was a corporal in the 504th PIR 82nd AB, and was in the canvas boats that crossed the Waal River while under brutal attack by the Germans, which was depicted in the film. This was the real ####. Two weeks later he went MIA  near the Black Forest in Holland and our family never recovered his body. The film does an admirable job in trying to recreate this unbelievable feat. The Dutch have recreated this crossing annually for many years in remembrance.

Over the last decade plus, I have been in constant contact with two Dutch researchers now that have spent the better parts of their lives searching for all the missing men of the 504th PIR. I and my father and Dave's only other living nephew have all supplied our DNA in order that hopefully someday they will find a match and find Dave's remains and we can bring him home. I've stood in the exact spot where he went missing.  Truly an emotional experience. RIP Dave and the rest of those from the 504th and all other men that have given the ultimate sacrifice. 
Hope you find him. 

 
I don't think it made its budget back at the box office, and I don't think it grabbed the average movie goer as much as it did history buffs. From my understanding it is the spiritual sequel to The Longest Day - the source books for both films were written by the same author I believe. I haven't seen that yet because it hasn't come up for free yet on any of my streaming services. I put it in the queue a few months back when I was on my Richard Burton kick, maybe I'll just pony up the 3.99  for it, but I've heard it isn't really as good as Bridge Too Far.
It’s not as good. Worth watching if you like history but the set pieces aren’t anywhere like A Bridge Too Far.

 
Epic Epic Film Fest continued...

17. Underground ('95) 170 mins: I've raved about this Serbian film before so I will keep it short. Palm D'Or winner at Cannes, covers about 50 years in the history of Yugoslavia from NAZI rule to Communist rule to the dissolution of the country all through the eyes of 2 profiteers who bounce around from war hero to war criminal to fugitives in hiding. It's ether an extremely dark comedy or extremely slapstick war epic. I've never seen anything quite like it. 

18. The Leopard ('63) 186 mins: Pace and tone here couldn't be farther from Underground. It's slow, it's all about soaking in the details of the period of the Italian unification. The costumes, production design and regal beauty of Alan Delon, Claudia Cardinale and Burt Lancaster are what shines here. All about the little details. It's only for a very patient viewer. If you liked Barry Lyndon or Malick movies then this might be for you. 

19. A Bridge Too Far ('77) 175 mins:  It is especially slow at the start. Hackman and O’Neal are poorly cast. Despite those flaws, this has some truly grand fight scenes that clearly informed Apocalypse Now, Saving Private Ryan and Band of Brothers. This wasn’t afraid to get dark either. A Bridge Too Far might start like a 60's Hollywood war movie but it’s ending is firmly planted in the 70's. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Caught a few that I had never seen.

The Talented Mr. Ripley

Wasn't expecting much however my low expectations were not low enough because it sucked. 

Flimsy premise on top of ridiculous coincidences with ham fisted scenes that everyone could see coming a mile away which made them excruciating to watch.

Fantastic locations, great wardrobes, beautiful people, loved the period jazz music, and decent acting but the story was just gawd awful.  Can't believe it is rated as high as it is on IMBD.

The Wages of Fear

An older film from the 50s.  Part of the Criterion Collection.

I love to see old films shot on real gritty locations to get a feel for the time and place and this film is one of the most unique I have ever seen. 

It is supposed to set at some remote South American hellhole but was actually shot at Bouches-du-Rhône France which blew me away because it looks so real that I was convinced it was filmed on location.

It is gritty, a foreign film, black and white, so it isn't a 'clean' watch and won't be for everyone so I can't give it a high recommendation, but I got caught up in the characters and loved that I had never seen anything like it.

 
The Talented Mr. Ripley

Wasn't expecting much however my low expectations were not low enough because it sucked. 

Flimsy premise on top of ridiculous coincidences with ham fisted scenes that everyone could see coming a mile away which made them excruciating to watch.

Fantastic locations, great wardrobes, beautiful people, loved the period jazz music, and decent acting but the story was just gawd awful.  Can't believe it is rated as high as it is on IMBD.
I felt the same way. And the first hour was obscenely slow.

 
Elvis was tremendous. Loved everything about it except Tom Hanks who gave a performance so bizarre it would have ruined a weaker movie.

 
I really like The Talented Mr.Ripley. Maybe the first hour is slow but the people and locales are so beautiful, who cares? The original version of the Patty Highsmith novel was Purple Noon with Alan Delon. It's quite good (IMO) as well. 

Funny enough, Wages of Fear was a movie I was really hyped to see. Finally watched it last year and was disappointed.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top