Eephus
Footballguy
I strenuously object.
Seconded. I search for this thread using CTRL F-"rental".
I strenuously object.
I can’t tell if you guys are being serious or notI strenuously object.
Seconded. I search for this thread using CTRL F-"rental".
I can’t tell if you guys are being serious or notI strenuously object.
Seconded. I search for this thread using CTRL F-"rental".
Guess we could keep rental in there.I can’t tell if you guys are being serious or notI strenuously object.
Seconded. I search for this thread using CTRL F-"rental".
I am serious but I suppose I could eventually adapt to a different title
l still see people post in threads sometimes asking if there is a new movie thread sometimes but fair enough it might be a pointless changeI think the confusion it causes is funny, but also am fine if the title changes if that's what people want. I thought we all pretty much knew it was a general movie thread now.
don't we already kinda use it for that? I use this thread to post (most of my) movie reviews) and you guys make new threads for other movies. I sort of just like having one movie review thread but I could see some value in one thread combined. I'm mostly a no.What do the regular posters in this thread think about changing the title to just a general movie thread? It’s kind of been that in practice just not in name?
Yeah it is how it's used, just thought it would make sense for the thread title to match what's really in going on here. I think some people don't post about movies at the theater for example because of the rented part in the thread title.don't we already kinda use it for that? I use this thread to post (most of my) movie reviews) and you guys make new threads for other movies. I sort of just like having one movie review thread but I could see some value in one thread combined. I'm mostly a no.What do the regular posters in this thread think about changing the title to just a general movie thread? It’s kind of been that in practice just not in name?
Yeah it is how it's used, just thought it would make sense for the thread title to match what's really in going on here. I think some people don't post about movies at the theater for example because of the rented part in the thread title.don't we already kinda use it for that? I use this thread to post (most of my) movie reviews) and you guys make new threads for other movies. I sort of just like having one movie review thread but I could see some value in one thread combined. I'm mostly a no.What do the regular posters in this thread think about changing the title to just a general movie thread? It’s kind of been that in practice just not in name?
Most of Adrien Brody's scenes were cut from the film and he wasn't aware of these changes until he saw the film at the premiere. Brody came to the premiere expecting to see himself as the lead character and was shocked when he saw that he was barely featured in the film, especially since Cpl. Fife was the central character in the novel on which the movie was based.
Just watched this and it was a ton of fun. Mashup of Back to the future, Halloween and Scream.Totally Killer
Malick has a very unique movie making style. He films a ton of stuff and the movie really comes together in the edit. I don’t think he cares much what the script was or anything like that, he’s more capturing what interests him at the moment and then figures out the movie later. He’s the anti-Hitchcock in that way. It produces widely varying results and a lot of people are allergic to his movie style.So...I don't really think that The Thin Red Line was that good. It's just an anti war film that's not as good as the other more popular ones, and with good reason. This movie was a slog and the last 50 minutes were especially brutal and (mostly) unnecessary, IMO.
The triva states
Most of Adrien Brody's scenes were cut from the film and he wasn't aware of these changes until he saw the film at the premiere. Brody came to the premiere expecting to see himself as the lead character and was shocked when he saw that he was barely featured in the film, especially since Cpl. Fife was the central character in the novel on which the movie was based.
How much of the movie, if at all, deviated from the authors original intent?
Nick Nolte's cartoonish villain was ok and serves its purpose. There were some decent scenes and it LOOKS good but this isn't really for me.
He's hit or miss for me but I'm glad he exists and I've never felt watching his films are a waste, if that makes any sense.Malick has a very unique movie making style. He films a ton of stuff and the movie really comes together in the edit. I don’t think he cares much what the script was or anything like that, he’s more capturing what interests him at the moment and then figures out the movie later. He’s the anti-Hitchcock in that way. It produces widely varying results and a lot of people are allergic to his movie style.
80s kid here who liked it. https://forums.footballguys.com/thr...ious-streaming-platforms.723607/post-25177588Just watched this and it was a ton of fun. Mashup of Back to the future, Halloween and Scream.Totally Killer
If you were an 80s teen (which I most certainly was not) you'll probably hate it, but I thought it was a hoot.