What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rosetta spacecraft achieves orbit with comet 67P (3 Viewers)

Do we know if it landed right-side up, or if just shot the harpoons out into space - hurting back to earth ready to destroy cities like an alien missile?

 
So maybe feats like this will convince us to invest more money in NASA?

Or is that too political for this thread?
at this point, is there a nationalistic need for the proprietary research that comes out of this to keep it just with NASA? Or can we do these things more... dare I say... communally with other countries, similar to what's going on with the Space Station?

 
So maybe feats like this will convince us to invest more money in NASA?

Or is that too political for this thread?
at this point, is there a nationalistic need for the proprietary research that comes out of this to keep it just with NASA? Or can we do these things more... dare I say... communally with other countries, similar to what's going on with the Space Station?
This is not a NASA project is it? I though this was a multi-country effort based in Europe.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So maybe feats like this will convince us to invest more money in NASA?

Or is that too political for this thread?
at this point, is there a nationalistic need for the proprietary research that comes out of this to keep it just with NASA? Or can we do these things more... dare I say... communally with other countries, similar to what's going on with the Space Station?
I think so. There were some obvious benefits to the exploration of the moon and near orbit as you can see by the technology we have today. I just don't know if the return is so great as we venture further out with such increasingly expensive missions. Not enough that we have to take the cost on ourselves.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So maybe feats like this will convince us to invest more money in NASA?

Or is that too political for this thread?
at this point, is there a nationalistic need for the proprietary research that comes out of this to keep it just with NASA? Or can we do these things more... dare I say... communally with other countries, similar to what's going on with the Space Station?
This is not a NASA project is it? I though this was a multi-country effort based in Europe.
ESA.

I was answering Tim.

 
Can't we enjoy something without bringing in politics or religion, both of which are going to bring angry people on both sides? They landed a spacecraft on a comet. That's awesome.

 
NASA and JPL are both pretty heavily involved in this. I mentioned before my mom's friend, Claudia Alexander, who was featured in the LA Times/ she's been working on this for over 10 years.

 
NASA and JPL are both pretty heavily involved in this. I mentioned before my mom's friend, Claudia Alexander, who was featured in the LA Times/ she's been working on this for over 10 years.
Yeah, pretty awesome feat by Claudia!
She didn't do it by herself, but she deserves SOME of the credit, just a little:

http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-c1-rosetta-alexander-20141110-story.html#page=1

Claudia Alexander has spent the last 15 years of her life waiting for this moment: landing a spacecraft the size of a washing machine on the surface of a speeding comet.

She knows it won't be easy. The comet is hurtling through space at 84,000 mph, and its icy surface appears to be strewn with large boulders and steep slopes. She doesn't know whether the comet's nucleus has the consistency of talcum powder or whether parts of it are hard as diamond.

On Wednesday, the NASA scientist will be with her counterparts at the European Space Agency's operations center in Darmstadt, Germany, waiting to hear whether the spacecraft has made it to the comet's surface, and whether it's still functioning.

 
"landing a spacecraft the size of a washing machine on the surface of a speeding comet."

Yeah, even just saying that out loud sounds awesome. Great work, Claudia!

 
a laser goes 186,000 miles per second
That's a beam of light, though, right? Not a device. How fast does a bullet travel?
:shrug: laser is a man made device.

The speed of rosetta is due to the gravity assist around earth and mars
That's a space ship though. How fast does a bullet travel?
If a bullet leaves Chicago at 6:00 PM and Superman leaves Cleveland at 6:02 PM, where will they meet?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you guys missed my point, lol. I wrote that I was having trouble imagining the speed of a comet at 84,000 miles an hour. A bullet travels at around 1,500 miles per hour, and I can't see a bullet traveling through the air- too fast. So trying to imagine 84,000 miles an hour, much less trying to land a spacecraft on that- it boggles the mind.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you guys missed my point, lol. I wrote that I was having trouble imagining the speed of a comet at 84,000 miles an hour. A bullet travels at around 1,500 miles per hour, and I can't see a bullet traveling through the air- too fast. So trying to imagine 84,000 miles an hour, much less trying to land a spacecraft on that- it boggles the mind.
it is amazing. as is the entire 4-billion mile journey and then top it off by landing on a comet. C'mon this is all just insane, unbelievable achievements.

 
a laser goes 186,000 miles per second
That's a beam of light, though, right? Not a device. How fast does a bullet travel?
:shrug: laser is a man made device.

The speed of rosetta is due to the gravity assist around earth and mars
That's a space ship though. How fast does a bullet travel?
If a bullet leaves Chicago at 6:00 PM and Superman leaves Cleveland at 6:02 PM, where will they meet?
Newark. That's where their layover is.

 
I think you guys missed my point, lol. I wrote that I was having trouble imagining the speed of a comet at 84,000 miles an hour. A bullet travels at around 1,500 miles per hour, and I can't see a bullet traveling through the air- too fast. So trying to imagine 84,000 miles an hour, much less trying to land a spacecraft on that- it boggles the mind.
Satellites travel 17,000 mph and I can see them move across the sky. :shrug:

 
I think you guys missed my point, lol. I wrote that I was having trouble imagining the speed of a comet at 84,000 miles an hour. A bullet travels at around 1,500 miles per hour, and I can't see a bullet traveling through the air- too fast. So trying to imagine 84,000 miles an hour, much less trying to land a spacecraft on that- it boggles the mind.
Satellites travel 17,000 mph and I can see them move across the sky. :shrug:
Because of distance, right? If the satellite were moving at that speed directly in front of you, would you see it? (You'd feel it for sure, but would you actually SEE it?)

 
I think you guys missed my point, lol. I wrote that I was having trouble imagining the speed of a comet at 84,000 miles an hour. A bullet travels at around 1,500 miles per hour, and I can't see a bullet traveling through the air- too fast. So trying to imagine 84,000 miles an hour, much less trying to land a spacecraft on that- it boggles the mind.
Satellites travel 17,000 mph and I can see them move across the sky. :shrug:
Because of distance, right? If the satellite were moving at that speed directly in front of you, would you see it? (You'd feel it for sure, but would you actually SEE it?)
I would. But I have pretty good vision.

 
Would love to see a probe sent to Europa next. Find out if there really is a sub-surface ocean
I think our next stop is Uranus
Fry: Oh, man, this is great! Hey, as long as you don't make me smell Uranus.

[He laughs.]

Leela: I don't get it.

Farnsworth: I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all..

Fry: Oh. What's it called now?

Farnsworth: Urectum.

 
I'm trying to imagine 84,000 miles an hour, What is the fastest speed that a man-made device has been able to travel?
Voyager 1 is going about half that
Juno became the fastest man-made object last year when it slingshot around Earth on the way to Jupiter
Scratch that. Helios 2 was faster. Should've known better than to click on a foxnews link.
There we go. Shoot a bullet and use the suns gravitation and you can really really fast

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top