What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Russia May now be able to jam our air to air missiles (1 Viewer)

boots11234

Footballguy
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/12/04/dont-panic-but-pentagon-now-things-russia-can-jam-american-air-to-air-missiles/

Given the Russian Federations blatant efforts to destabilize Europe and present itself as a military threat to the West, an unsettling development revealed via The Daily Beasts Dave Majumdar is only likely to make a dangerous situation in Eurasia worse.

The report revealed that the Pentagon is increasingly worried that the supremely maneuverable F-22s long-range air-to-air missiles could be obsolete in fight against adversaries like Russia and China. They fear that this aircraft anti-air ordnance could be jammed, and American fighters would be almost entirely unable to neutralize enemy aircraft.

The problem is that many potential adversaries, such as the Chinese and the Russians, have developed advanced digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) jammers. These jammers, which effectively memorize an incoming radar signal and repeat it back to the sender, seriously hamper the performance of friendly radars.

Worse, these new jammers essentially blind the small radars found onboard air-to-air missiles like the Raytheon AIM-120 AMRAAM, which is the primary long-range weapon for all U.S. and most allied fighter planes.

That means it could take several missile shots to kill an enemy fighter, even for an advanced stealth aircraft like the Raptor. While exact Pk [probability of kill] numbers are classified, lets just say that I wont be killing these guys one for one, the senior Air Force official said. Its the same issue for earlier American fighters like the F-15, F-16, or F/A-18.

Another Air Force official with experience on the stealthy new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter agreed. AMRAAMs had some great upgrades over the years, but at the end of the day, its old technology and wasnt really designed with todays significant [electronic attack] in mind, this official said.

This is a problem that can be remedied, but, according to The Daily Beasts sources, it would require the development and deployment of an entirely new set of air-to-air projectiles. That is an expensive and onerous prospect, and one which would take years to complete.

Majumdars report adds that Russia is developing its own revolutionary long-range weapon called the K-100 that can outperform anything in the American arsenal.

Right now, the Defense Departmentled by the Navyis working to increase the range of the AIM-9X version of the Sidewinder by 60 percent to give the Pentagons fighter fleet some sort of counter to the jamming problem, Majumdars report read. But even with the extended reach, the modified Sidewinder wont have anywhere close to the range of an AMRAAM.

A few days ago, I took a cursory look at the condition which might rationally lead Russia to determine that it would be a wise course to militarily test NATOs resolve to defend its member states in Eastern Europe. While this would probably be a miscalculation on Russias part, the error of this course may not be readily apparent to policy makers in the Kremlin. Miscalculations, as I wrote, have a habit of leading to conflagrating conflicts.

Nothing is more likely to lead a nation to miscalculate into a war than the logical belief that it could be won. The acknowledgement that Russia could neutralize American air-to-air missile systems is a disturbingly destabilizing development.
The last paragraph scares me the most.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like we better increase Defense spending on a new weapons system - it's a shame what a only a billion or two will get you these days

In April 2006, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) assessed the F-22's cost to be $361 million per aircraft, with $28 billion invested in development and testing; the Unit Procurement Cost was estimated at $178 million in 2006, based on a production run of 181 aircraft.[37][38] It was estimated by the end of production, $34 billion will have been spent on procurement, resulting in a total program cost of $62 billion, around $339 million per aircraft. The incremental cost for an additional F-22 was estimated at about $138 million in 2009.[35][39] In March 2012, the GAO increased the estimated cost to $412 million per aircraft.[40]
 
Russia couldn't even get their sh** together to hold the winter olympics. Anything I hear about them regarding any kind of technology I take with a grain of salt.

 
James Daulton said:
Russia couldn't even get their sh** together to hold the winter olympics. Anything I hear about them regarding any kind of technology I take with a grain of salt.
When's the last time we shot down an enemy jet with one of our own or vice versa? I never hear about this happening.
Us? Probably the first Gulf War. An Israeli F-16 shot down 2 Syrian MiG-29s in 2001.
Sorry, I meant the USA.
We don't fight countries with aircraft anymore.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top