Cheesedawg
Footballguy
Everybody just keeps talking about his PPR value, but he is a stud in any format right now.
Very true. Previously he held most value in PPR, but now all formats can start him with confidence.Everybody just keeps talking about his PPR value, but he is a stud in any format right now.
Go Bears.Rodgers coming back, Vereen looking like a stud... It's all coming together for me (just to watch it all crash and burn knowing my luck for playoffs)
Ridley could very well be the big dog next year too. However, I think it was clear from day 1 that BB wanted Vereen's abilities on the field. If everyone is injury free and Ridley is competent, Vereen is still a fantasy starter next season. If Ridley poops his pants, Vereen should be a stud.if you were able to weather the storm while he was hurt, and your first 4 or 5 picks stayed healthy he was a great add in round 5 or 6.
so where is his value next year, obviously with wild bill as the coach you never know what will happen but
fair to say defintely in first 2 rounds?
If you mean the FBG lists, I bet he moves up them in the next couple days. I never put much stock in the Tues/Wed rankings.I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
Yea I was surprised he was so low here, and I usually don't look at them until later in the week/weekend if necessary.If you mean the FBG lists, I bet he moves up them in the next couple days. I never put much stock in the Tues/Wed rankings.I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
Cool, much easier decision in a PPR. My league isn't so that's why I'm a little more hesitant to give him a go.In over Andre Brown (again), MJD (even if healthy), PPR
Paired with Charles: starting over Morris and Mathews in a 0.5 PPR.I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
Starting him as my RB2 in standard with extreme confidence over Fred Jackson and Montee Ball (and Gerhart, who I could grab from the WW).I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
I just looked at Dodd's PPR rankings and he is up there pretty high. I have him paired up with Moreno with LeVeon Bell on the bench.Hoss Style said:If you mean the FBG lists, I bet he moves up them in the next couple days. I never put much stock in the Tues/Wed rankings.Billy Bats said:I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
I'm starting him this week, but think the Dolphin D will do a decent job containing him and have tempered expectations. I also have Levean Bell and I can see him having a strong game against the Bengal D at home. That said, I'm going with Vereen as well.I just looked at Dodd's PPR rankings and he is up there pretty high. I have him paired up with Moreno with LeVeon Bell on the bench.Hoss Style said:If you mean the FBG lists, I bet he moves up them in the next couple days. I never put much stock in the Tues/Wed rankings.Billy Bats said:I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
I went Bell last week and benched Vereen and he blew up. So naturally, the exact opposite should happen this week. <_<I'm starting him this week, but think the Dolphin D will do a decent job containing him and have tempered expectations. I also have Levean Bell and I can see him having a strong game against the Bengal D at home. That said, I'm going with Vereen as well.I just looked at Dodd's PPR rankings and he is up there pretty high. I have him paired up with Moreno with LeVeon Bell on the bench.Hoss Style said:If you mean the FBG lists, I bet he moves up them in the next couple days. I never put much stock in the Tues/Wed rankings.Billy Bats said:I assume a lot of you are starting him with confidence this week? He's pretty low on the rb lists but I assume his value at flex is off the charts. Who are you guys starting over him, specifically at RB? I'm not sure what to do with him just yet. (no flex option)
I'm not saying he'll jump to 30ppg, but I do think he'll see a consistently higher amount of snaps/targets/carries and his opportunity to hit 30 is might brighter.They may rely on Verreen more but as far as PPR's go I'd expect his points to stay pretty much where they are. I'm not expecting his PPG to jump from 20 to 30.
He did well week1 with no gronkOk. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
True but that was week 1 and they might not have game planned against him as the true number 1 target in that game.He did well week1 with no gronkOk. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
Not too worried about that because of his versatility and his QB. Brady knows where he wants him and can change the play to move Vereen wherever he can create a mismatch. I like those odds....True but that was week 1 and they might not have game planned against him as the true number 1 target in that game.He did well week1 with no gronkOk. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
He felt safer to me with gronk around but it's hard to say. Patrots slow starts all the time are a bigger concern.Ok. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
No.Ok. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
Its one thing to trust the go to wr that has proven themselves for a long period of time. Vereen is unproven as the go to. Some folks get that type of attention and cant produce being doubled on a regular basis. Just playing devils advocate amongst all the jock riding up in here. I just dont think folks should anoint him as a top 5 option just because hes the only option. tread carefully.No.Ok. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
I want the guy who is the offensive go-to.
It's funny...if the guy isn't the go-to, people poo-poo that he is second fiddle or isn't guaranteed targets or carries. But then if he's #1, they say " but defenses will gameplan to stop him ". You can't have it both ways.
I prefer guys who are expected to have a prominent role in their offense
I also owned Gronk on this team, and I loved having both of them...I'm hurting without Gronk (And Welker....#### injuries), but what are you gonna do?
Agreed, not sure how I'm going to approach him this week.Its one thing to trust the go to wr that has proven themselves for a long period of time. Vereen is unproven as the go to. Some folks get that type of attention and cant produce being doubled on a regular basis. Just playing devils advocate amongst all the jock riding up in here. I just dont think folks should anoint him as a top 5 option just because hes the only option. tread carefully.No.Ok. i get that he is now the main target. But, with him being the top option, teams can now game plan to stop him. Previously they needed to focus on Gronk. Now, they cant do that. Noone is concerned about that?
I want the guy who is the offensive go-to.
It's funny...if the guy isn't the go-to, people poo-poo that he is second fiddle or isn't guaranteed targets or carries. But then if he's #1, they say " but defenses will gameplan to stop him ". You can't have it both ways.
I prefer guys who are expected to have a prominent role in their offense
I also owned Gronk on this team, and I loved having both of them...I'm hurting without Gronk (And Welker....#### injuries), but what are you gonna do?
I hope this is non-PPR, but even so, not getting this. You must have benched him last week as well. In 5 games in my PPR + bonus for 100, he is averaging 21.8 in PPR to Bernard's 13.3. That means Vereen's worst game of 14 is above Gio's average. Even Allen minus his first 2 games is averaging 18.3 (15.8 including the first 2 weeks). In PPR, especially with the 1.5 games without Gronk, he has been better than both Gio and Allen and considerably better than Gio. Heck, only Charles is averaging better than Vereen in my league, but 0.6 ppg.I'm not too sure I'm starting him. If I did, I might bench Gio (RB) or Allen (WR/RB Flex). He caught 12 passes last week. He couldn't possibly do the same this week could he?