What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Small Business Support Group (1 Viewer)

I wish there could have been some kind of vetting process. I hope every company needing help received it in spite of others predictably taking advantage. 
Myself and 2 buddies who own similar businesses are still waiting on Chase - have been since 4/6.  We are all fairly pessimistic at this point.  None of us will have to close but all of us will have to let go of staff.

 
If he's staying home for a qualified reason (looks like he is as there's nobody to watch his kids) he would be covered under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act and be eligible for FMLA. You can keep him on your payroll but will get tax breaks to cover his pay for up to 12 weeks. 
Well this would be perfect. He's a long time employee that I would not want to lose.

Not sure how this will sit with the rest of the employees soon to be working 40 hours a week for the same pay ...hopefully THEY don't suddenly find qualifying reasons to stay home. 

:rolleyes:

 
This has probably already been discussed in here ... but it's just now sinking into my puny brain;

With this unemployment stimulus "bonus $600", there doesn't seem to be much incentive for someone to return to work ... then add in the Covid risk. 

Seems most unemployed workers are making more money collecting than if they were working.

In my state:

Massachusetts has the highest maximum weekly unemployment compensation at $1,192 (the state provides extra funding for people with dependents)

Source: Unemployment $600 weekly bonus

Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This has probably already been discussed in here ... but it's just now sinking into my puny brain;

With this unemployment stimulus "bonus $600", there doesn't seem to be much incentive for someone to return to work ... then add in the Covid risk. 

Seems most unemployed workers are making more money collecting than if they were working.

In my state:

Massachusetts has the highest maximum weekly unemployment compensation at $1,192 (the state provides extra funding for people with dependents)

Source: Unemployment $600 weekly bonus

Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 
They can't esp in jobs like restaurants where waitstaff income fluctuates and with reduced density regulations there will simply be not enough patrons to keep the tips up.

I have a feeling they will remove the extra $600 at some point, they have to. 

The other cluster fudge (from what I understand) is IF you got the PPP, you need to start paying your employees immediately. But what happens if your business is non-essential and cannot open? So you take the risk with the loan, just tp pay your team to stay home? They come off the unemployment system, still not work, but what happens if things last past 8 weeks? You stop paying them again and now they have to go back through the unemployment process??

The assistance is great if you can get it, just seems like a bunch of dudes on a message board can find holes big enough to drive trucks through, yet our business and political leadership didnt even seem to take into account. 

 
This has probably already been discussed in here ... but it's just now sinking into my puny brain;

With this unemployment stimulus "bonus $600", there doesn't seem to be much incentive for someone to return to work ... then add in the Covid risk. 

Seems most unemployed workers are making more money collecting than if they were working.

In my state:

Massachusetts has the highest maximum weekly unemployment compensation at $1,192 (the state provides extra funding for people with dependents)

Source: Unemployment $600 weekly bonus

Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 
That's been the problem literally since they passed it. Republicans were blocking it because many sitting at home would make more by NOT working. 

My wife is one of those. The people laid off at her company are making significantly more (MUCH more) than those who stayed, especially since they received a 25% pay cut. But she's happy to still have a job. 

 
Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 


That's been the problem literally since they passed it. Republicans were blocking it because many sitting at home would make more by NOT working. 

My wife is one of those. The people laid off at her company are making significantly more (MUCH more) than those who stayed, especially since they received a 25% pay cut. But she's happy to still have a job. 
As I digest this I become more and more frustrated .... to the point of just leaving the store closed.

What is the point of the PPP loan? Should have just laid off everyone, including myself, from day one.

Everybody stay home, collect your unemployment, get rich, fat, and happy. See you when unemployment runs out and kids go back to school in September. 

I don't need the revenue. I could stay closed all summer and be fine. It's not "fun" for me to run the store.  I'm reopening next week because I feel a sense of responsibility to my customers who are depending on me and my staff to provide for them. 

 
  • Sad
Reactions: Ned
This has probably already been discussed in here ... but it's just now sinking into my puny brain;

With this unemployment stimulus "bonus $600", there doesn't seem to be much incentive for someone to return to work ... then add in the Covid risk. 

Seems most unemployed workers are making more money collecting than if they were working.

In my state:

Massachusetts has the highest maximum weekly unemployment compensation at $1,192 (the state provides extra funding for people with dependents)

Source: Unemployment $600 weekly bonus

Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 
You don't. Because technically, they don't get unemployment if they are offered a job.

 
I'd hope people would prioritize the long lasting security employment provides versus the short term gains in weekly pay they're receiving now.  They probably won't though.  If any of my employees decide not to return there isn't going to be a job waiting for them if/when they do.

We received funding through the PPP last week and will be compensating our employees for the last two weeks of April where they did not work.  I also plan to run a payroll earlier than normal toward the end of my 8 weeks to get it in as part of the forgiveness calculation.

We re-open tomorrow!  Thanks, Governor DeSantis! 

 
I'd hope people would prioritize the long lasting security employment provides versus the short term gains in weekly pay they're receiving now.  They probably won't though.  If any of my employees decide not to return there isn't going to be a job waiting for them if/when they do.

We received funding through the PPP last week and will be compensating our employees for the last two weeks of April where they did not work.  I also plan to run a payroll earlier than normal toward the end of my 8 weeks to get it in as part of the forgiveness calculation.

We re-open tomorrow!  Thanks, Governor DeSantis! 
Kinda what I worry about mid term. Going to be a fair amount of people who are going to decide to just stay home and collect unemployment. But when the extra $600 runs out, there’s going to be no job to go back to. 

 
They can't esp in jobs like restaurants where waitstaff income fluctuates and with reduced density regulations there will simply be not enough patrons to keep the tips up.

I have a feeling they will remove the extra $600 at some point, they have to. 

The other cluster fudge (from what I understand) is IF you got the PPP, you need to start paying your employees immediately. But what happens if your business is non-essential and cannot open? So you take the risk with the loan, just tp pay your team to stay home? They come off the unemployment system, still not work, but what happens if things last past 8 weeks? You stop paying them again and now they have to go back through the unemployment process??

The assistance is great if you can get it, just seems like a bunch of dudes on a message board can find holes big enough to drive trucks through, yet our business and political leadership didnt even seem to take into account. 
THE SALARY/WAGE REDUCTION. Whatever forgiveness is left after the headcount reduction math can be further reduced, dollar-for-dollar, for major reductions in wages. To calculate this you first need to identify all employees during the eight-week period whom you employed at any point during 2019 and “who did not receive, during any single pay period during 2019, wages or salary at an annualized rate of pay in an amount more than $100,000." Call these the below-100 people. For each such employee, determine her average salary/wage rate for the first quarter of 2020. If 1/8th of the total amount of salary/wages paid to her for the eight-week period is at least 75% of her average weekly rate during Q1 of 2020, then there is no further reduction in loan forgiveness. But if she suffered such a major reduction in salary/wages that her pay for the eight-week period went down by more than 25%, then the dollar amount of the portion beyond 25% reduces, dollar-for-dollar, the amount of loan forgiveness.

A COUPLE OF HAIL MARYS. But wait, there’s more.

The statute includes a “fix” for the headcount-related reduction in forgiveness. If by June 30, 2020 you bring your FTE levels back up to where they were at February 15, 2020, then that excuses whatever reduction in forgiveness was attributable to a drop in headcount between February 15, 2020 and April 26, 2020. (The CARES Act wording is that the employer by June 30 “has eliminated” that reduction in the number of FTEs. We await guidance from the SBA on precisely what this means.)

The statute also includes a separate “fix” for the salary/wage-related reduction in forgiveness. If by June 30, 2020 you have restored the salary/wage levels of the below-100 people to at least the level existing on February 15, 2020, then that excuses any salary/wage level reductions which occurred between February 15, 2020 and April 26, 2020. (Again, the statutory wording is that the employer “has eliminated” the reduction in salary/wage.)

 
Well this would be perfect. He's a long time employee that I would not want to lose.

Not sure how this will sit with the rest of the employees soon to be working 40 hours a week for the same pay ...hopefully THEY don't suddenly find qualifying reasons to stay home. 

:rolleyes:
fmla won't be full pay.   been awhile, but i think it's 55% pretax

 
This has probably already been discussed in here ... but it's just now sinking into my puny brain;

With this unemployment stimulus "bonus $600", there doesn't seem to be much incentive for someone to return to work ... then add in the Covid risk. 

Seems most unemployed workers are making more money collecting than if they were working.

In my state:

Massachusetts has the highest maximum weekly unemployment compensation at $1,192 (the state provides extra funding for people with dependents)

Source: Unemployment $600 weekly bonus

Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 
i'm not clear on MA, but here in CA, the max is 450 a week.   but that is based the highest 2 quarters of earnings, off of last years W2.  not everyone qualifies for the max.  and there's no bonus for kids.

 
You don't. Because technically, they don't get unemployment if they are offered a job.
covid 19 loophole, they don't have to jump through the usual hoops to get or keep unemployment.  for now.
Let's hope that goes away fast. I'm all for helping people. I'm not for sitting around collecting $ when the job you had (or comparable) comes calling. 

 
I got a random 1K in my checking account this morning from the SBA. Can't be the PPP so I guess it's the EIDL? Saw last week they are only giving 1K per employee and I'm self-employed so has to be that?

 
From a fellow small business owner, not sure how accurate:

"I just got off the phone with my bookkeeper who has a very big book of business.  From what he experiencing, most all the big banks (especially Chase) are not funding their small loans…banks are getting 5% on any loans that get approved and funded…small banks are getting approved in with hours because the personal bankers can go straight to SBA and move up the que to get funded instantly.  so it appears banks have the power to get funding fast for any one client if you know the right people…

He did say that if you got that email that your loan has been sent to the SBA for approval, that’s a very good sign.  He has yet to see anyone from Chase get any funding..."

 
This has probably already been discussed in here ... but it's just now sinking into my puny brain;

With this unemployment stimulus "bonus $600", there doesn't seem to be much incentive for someone to return to work ... then add in the Covid risk. 

Seems most unemployed workers are making more money collecting than if they were working.

In my state:

Massachusetts has the highest maximum weekly unemployment compensation at $1,192 (the state provides extra funding for people with dependents)

Source: Unemployment $600 weekly bonus

Add in the $600 weekly bonus ... almost $1800 a week? Can this be right? That's $45 an hour .... TO STAY HOME!

I'm so confused. How do we as employers compete with that? 
You don’t have to compete with it. If you have work available employees must report or lose eligibility for unemployment 

 
You don’t have to compete with it. If you have work available employees must report or lose eligibility for unemployment 
That's how I understand it here in Kansas. If we call a worker back because we have employment for them, we can then deny their unemployment benefits since we actually need them to work.

 
You don’t have to compete with it. If you have work available employees must report or lose eligibility for unemployment 


That's how I understand it here in Kansas. If we call a worker back because we have employment for them, we can then deny their unemployment benefits since we actually need them to work.
in CA, there is currently a covid exemption from having to do any of the usual, mandatory job searches, etc., in order to keep your unemployment rolling.  we haven't come up against the reopening yet. we'll see if the leniency continues.   :shrug:   

 
in CA, there is currently a covid exemption from having to do any of the usual, mandatory job searches, etc., in order to keep your unemployment rolling.  we haven't come up against the reopening yet. we'll see if the leniency continues.   :shrug:   
Pretty sure the job search exemptions are nationwide.

But if your employer calls you back and you refuse he can deny your claim. Then if you want , it will go to “unemployment court” for a decision 

 
Main Street Lending Program

The Federal Reserve has announced that it is establishing a Main Street Lending Program (Program) to support lending to small and medium-sized businesses that were in sound financial condition before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Program will operate through three facilities: the Main Street New Loan Facility (MSNLF), the Main Street Priority Loan Facility (MSPLF), and the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility (MSELF). Term sheets for each facility and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) providing more information regarding eligibility and conditions can be found below.

Structure. To implement the Program, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston will set up a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to purchase participations in loans originated by eligible lenders. Lenders will retain a percentage of the loans. As detailed further in the term sheets, U.S. businesses may be eligible for loans if they meet either of the following conditions: (1) the business has 15,000 employees or fewer; or (2) the business had 2019 revenues of $5 billion or less. Loans issued under the Program would have a four year maturity, and principal and interest payments on the loans will be deferred for one year. Eligible lenders may originate new loans (under MSNLF and MSPLF) or increase the size of (or “upsize”) existing loans (under MSELF) made to eligible businesses.

Operational Status. The Federal Reserve is currently working to create the infrastructure necessary to operationalize the Program. More information will be posted here as it becomes available regarding Program terms and how eligible lenders can sell eligible loan participations to the SPV. Once the Program is operational, small and medium-sized businesses interested in the Program should seek to apply for Program loans from an eligible lender.

 
facook said:
From a fellow small business owner, not sure how accurate:

"I just got off the phone with my bookkeeper who has a very big book of business.  From what he experiencing, most all the big banks (especially Chase) are not funding their small loans…banks are getting 5% on any loans that get approved and funded…small banks are getting approved in with hours because the personal bankers can go straight to SBA and move up the que to get funded instantly.  so it appears banks have the power to get funding fast for any one client if you know the right people…

He did say that if you got that email that your loan has been sent to the SBA for approval, that’s a very good sign.  He has yet to see anyone from Chase get any funding..."
thats good to hear, thanks. I ended up going through Kabbage after CapitalOne screwed me, and I got an email (and my dashboard) that says this. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
take this for what it's worth...........

had a chat with my buddy, who is processing ppp loans for bofa.  he told me, that people who cancel their loan apps with bofa, to go with a smaller bank, are often funded by the smaller bank, before he can officially cancel their bofa loan app.  

good times

 
jwb said:
Let's hope that goes away fast. I'm all for helping people. I'm not for sitting around collecting $ when the job you had (or comparable) comes calling. 
I have a family member who declined to go back to his job when called back due to COVID fears. They told him that because they wanted him back and were allowed to reopen he would lose his job and they’d decline unemployment. So maybe businesses do have that choice.  He decided he didn’t want to risk getting sick and no longer has a job to go back to. TBD if the employment really drops to 0. 

 
Bossman said:
Well this would be perfect. He's a long time employee that I would not want to lose.

Not sure how this will sit with the rest of the employees soon to be working 40 hours a week for the same pay ...hopefully THEY don't suddenly find qualifying reasons to stay home. 

:rolleyes:
His pay would be 2/3rds what it normally is. Then when you submit your payroll to the IRS you take what you paid him, dollar for dollar, and deduct that amount from your taxes. 
 

He’ll need to fill out a form and provide documentation of why he can’t work. 
 

Google the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act.” There’s all kinds of information on it. Good luck!

 
I have a family member who declined to go back to his job when called back due to COVID fears. They told him that because they wanted him back and were allowed to reopen he would lose his job and they’d decline unemployment. So maybe businesses do have that choice.  He decided he didn’t want to risk getting sick and no longer has a job to go back to. TBD if the employment really drops to 0. 
Seriously? What was his job?

 
This intrigues me because I think it’s going to be somewhat common. Is he in a high risk group? What he is going to do when his unemployment runs out?
Ya I brought it up mainly because I think it’s an extra variable and I’m a little curious how many will do it and how companies will handle it. 
 

He is not high risk in this particular case but has a pregnant wife which is playing a role in how much he cares if he catches it. All I know about “what is he going to do” is he says he will look for a job when it’s safe. As for unemployment, that may have ended for him already based on what his employer told him. He is essentially choosing to scrape by if it comes to that rather than work in current COVID situation.
 

I am not saying any of this to bash him or his employer or the system or anyone else. It’s simply a case study. All parties are acting in their own interest based on their own priorities. We’ll see. 

 
Ya I brought it up mainly because I think it’s an extra variable and I’m a little curious how many will do it and how companies will handle it. 
 

He is not high risk in this particular case but has a pregnant wife which is playing a role in how much he cares if he catches it. All I know about “what is he going to do” is he says he will look for a job when it’s safe. As for unemployment, that may have ended for him already based on what his employer told him. He is essentially choosing to scrape by if it comes to that rather than work in current COVID situation.
 

I am not saying any of this to bash him or his employer or the system or anyone else. It’s simply a case study. All parties are acting in their own interest based on their own priorities. We’ll see. 
I think people are naive if they think waiting a few more weeks to go back to work is going to make a difference.

I've come to the conclusion that THIS is the new normal ... face masks, sanitizing wipes, sneeze guards at checkout counters ...

It's time to get out from under our rock and deal with the hand we've been dealt.

 
Myself and 2 buddies who own similar businesses are still waiting on Chase - have been since 4/6.  We are all fairly pessimistic at this point.  None of us will have to close but all of us will have to let go of staff.
All three of us received the approval email overnight, and should be funded by Wednesday.  I'm sure we were all about in the same place in the queue due to our loans being of similar size.  Huge relief!

 
All three of us received the approval email overnight, and should be funded by Wednesday.  I'm sure we were all about in the same place in the queue due to our loans being of similar size.  Huge relief!
Wow, funds deposited within 16 hours of approval email.  Sweet!

 
Still waiting here. My latest update states my bank has sent my loan to the SBA for approval and once they get approval they'll send over the documents.

 
I was reading that we may have had upwards of 70,000 applications registered by the SBA.  A whole boatload were registered yesterday.

I spent the better part of the last 2 weeks actually calling customers, trying to obtain missing info and to clean up incorrect applications.  Almost all of these customers appear to have been registered.  Maybe i get a thanks somewhere.  Highly doubtful.  People like to complain about us big banks, but when something goes right, poof.

 
I was reading that we may have had upwards of 70,000 applications registered by the SBA.  A whole boatload were registered yesterday.

I spent the better part of the last 2 weeks actually calling customers, trying to obtain missing info and to clean up incorrect applications.  Almost all of these customers appear to have been registered.  Maybe i get a thanks somewhere.  Highly doubtful.  People like to complain about us big banks, but when something goes right, poof.
You've got my thanks. I haven't even received word from the SBA that my loan has been approved but the only reason I have any hope of because of the advice you shared here. Led me to contact a smaller, local bank which led to actually having a PPP loan application ready to go and submitted on day one of round two. Hopefully a loan application submitted on day one is a good bet to be funded at some point.

 
I was reading that we may have had upwards of 70,000 applications registered by the SBA.  A whole boatload were registered yesterday.

I spent the better part of the last 2 weeks actually calling customers, trying to obtain missing info and to clean up incorrect applications.  Almost all of these customers appear to have been registered.  Maybe i get a thanks somewhere.  Highly doubtful.  People like to complain about us big banks, but when something goes right, poof.
Sincerely, thank you.  I can't imagine how hard you've been working.  It's appreciated.  

FWIW I emailed a thank you to my business banker, even though she wasn't personally involved, as a representative of my bank coming through.  You all were thrown into a very complicated, tough situation.  Thanks again for navigating.

 
Got an email from my bank this morning stating my loan application has been processed and approved by the SBA.  Supposedly in the next few days I'm to get a Docusign closing package then I would be added to the disbursement list.  Hopefully I'm past the bottleneck part.

 
Got an email from my bank this morning stating my loan application has been processed and approved by the SBA.  Supposedly in the next few days I'm to get a Docusign closing package then I would be added to the disbursement list.  Hopefully I'm past the bottleneck part.
Good to hear they are finally getting you done, hope everyone is hanging in there! Hopefully we are trending towards opening up to the new normal in the next couple weeks. 

 
Be aware, the target is moving on forgiveness.  I would like to tell you how but constantly changing.
That’s concerning, isn’t it mostly showing payroll hasn’t changed and up to 25% if it didn’t go to payroll could go to rent expense/mortgage interest?

 
Bank recognizes the complexities of the Paycheck Protection Program and wants to support our PPP borrowers by providing timely and accurate information. Even though round 2 of PPP is still in progress, we want to provide you important information pertaining to the potential forgiveness of your PPP loan. The SBA has not yet released all of the details, nor has the SBA distributed any approved worksheet, and we are weeks away from  borrowers having the ability to submit a loan forgiveness request, but we want to make sure you are aware of what is currently known about the forgiveness process.

We encourage you to review the information found on the SBA website (www.sba.gov), including the FAQ section (https://www.sba.gov/document/support--faq-lenders-borrowers), as well as consult with your tax advisor and attorney.

We show below some pertinent sections from the Interim Final Rule (IFR) and SBA FAQ and urge you to understand what is presented in them so you can prepare now for those circumstances as it may apply to your own loan forgiveness situation.

As a reminder, the amount of loan forgiveness can be up to the full principal amount of the loan and any accrued interest. The actual amount of loan forgiveness will depend, in part, on the total amount of payroll costs, payments of interest on mortgage obligations, rent payments and utility payments under service agreements dated before February 15, 2020, over the eight-week period which begins on the date you received the first disbursement of your PPP loan. 

The amount of loan forgiveness can be up to the full principal amount of the loan and any accrued interest. That is, the borrower will not be responsible for any loan payment if the borrower uses all of the loan proceeds for forgivable purposes described below and employee and compensation levels are maintained. The actual amount of loan forgiveness will depend, in part, on the total amount of payroll costs, payments of interest on mortgage obligations incurred before February 15, 2020, rent payments on leases dated before February 15, 2020, and utility payments under service agreements dated before February 15, 2020, over the eight-week period following the date of the loan.

However, not more than 25 percent of the loan forgiveness amount may be attributable to non-payroll costs. While the Act provides that borrowers are eligible for forgiveness in an amount equal to the sum of payroll costs and any payments of mortgage interest, rent, and utilities, the Administrator has determined that the non-payroll portion of the forgivable loan amount should be limited to effectuate the core purpose of the statute and ensure finite program resources are devoted primarily to payroll.

The Administrator has determined in consultation with the Secretary that 75 percent is an appropriate percentage in light of the Act's overarching focus on keeping workers paid and employed. Further, the Administrator and the Secretary believe that applying this threshold to loan forgiveness is consistent with the structure of the Act, which provides a loan amount 75 percent of which is equivalent to eight weeks of payroll (8 weeks / 2.5 months = 56 days / 76 days = 74 percent rounded up to 75 percent). Limiting non-payroll costs to 25 percent of the forgiveness amount will align these elements of the program, and will also help to ensure that the finite appropriations available for PPP loan forgiveness are directed toward payroll protection. SBA will issue additional guidance on loan forgiveness. 

 
Got an email from my bank this morning stating my loan application has been processed and approved by the SBA.  Supposedly in the next few days I'm to get a Docusign closing package then I would be added to the disbursement list.  Hopefully I'm past the bottleneck part.
PPP cash hit the bank this morning

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top