Crazy people running california played a big part in this. Cut the fire dpt budgets down and diverted rivers to save some fish.
Uh no.
This is what the bots on X are spreading.
Millions of views spreading lies about the Palisades firefighters lacking water because of regulations, the boring truth comes late like usual and wont be shared.
Here it is:
1 - Reservoirs and water tanks were at normal levels and completely full before the fire.
2 - All 114 city water supply tanks were fully stocked pre-fire.
3 - A 15-hour surge at four times normal demand reduced water pressure.
4 - High demand at lower elevations slowed refilling tanks at higher elevations.
5 - This unprecedented fire was fueled by 8 months of no rain and 85 MPH winds. Water is being brought in continuously.
6 - Even if, the protection of the Delta Smelt caused over regulation by California, it's the FEDERAL Endangered Species Act that requires the protection of endangered species like the Delta Smelt and their habitats, not Gavin Newsom or California.
Why automatically misinformation? You don't have to answer that but I wanted to share because there are many different story arcs being passed around online, I stand with you that there's always a lot of misinformation so let me share with someone I feel is quite rational and then you can systematically point out the errors because many of us don't know what to believe
-I hope what we hear in other parts of the country is not true. It's being reported that 1 home in the Palisades caught fire, not hearing that this fire started in the trees/forests initially and that when the fire department showed up and turned the fire hydrants on that there was no water...I didn't even know that was a possibility when the fire hydrant caps are taken off.
This important fact/fiction story that is getting passed around, where did anyone come up with that if its false?
Did the media talk/interview the first responders or the very first firefighters that showed up?
My guess is they did not because most of the firefighters have just been battling the fires and I doubt they have had time or the energy to speak with people trying to place blame
But I would like to know who has the real answers to these questions.
30,000 people right now are homeless. Sure, some of the people that own homes there have the independent ability to relocate or rebuild, they might not be homeless but not everyone in the Palisades is bathing in money. Some folks moved in there a long long time ago and have lost everything. Even if they have insurance it will be nothing above the materials to rebuild, highly doubt insurance companies will cut checks for full market value of these homes. Billions of dollars went up in flames and a lot of dreams and memories for many
I don't think its fair the media is quick to place blame but I would like to know if the fire started with 1 or 2 homes and then some lack of water for "whatever" reasons wasn't there when the fire department went to extinguish the flames. It's kind of important and we might not get the answers for a while.
By the time the truth is actually revealed, most folks will have already taken a position on who is to blame for all of this, right or wrong