What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Soriano Refuses To Play Outfield (1 Viewer)

Same old story here.  Many people on this board don't seem to think that professional athletes should have the ability to make their own decisions regarding their own careers.  See also:  the thousands of haters who come out of the woodwork whenever an NFL player exercises his right to hold out.  I wonder if its racism or envy, probably a little bit of both.

The Wilkerson/Soriano deal was a favor by MLB (who owns the Nationals) to Tom Hicks, the owner of the Rangers.  They got the Rangers out from under the Soriano contract, which was yet another stupid salary move on their part, while still giving them some serious value in Wilkerson as well as utility man Sledge and a pitching prospect.  No other team would have made that deal for Soriano.  All this to the detriment of Nationals fans who can only sit and wait for real ownership to come along and hope that we don't get somebody like, well, Tom Hicks.

Alfonso Soriano knows what he wants and this isn't it.  If I was him I would suck it up and play but I'm not and I respect his position, especially given that he expressed it so strongly before the trade was made, and the rich white men who made the trade disregarded his position just like many of you are now.  Get out there and lace em up, boy!

I hope you are all asked to clean the crappers by your boss tomorrow afternoon.  Hey you're getting paid, just do it.
:goodposting:
I agree.
 
:confused: My perfect world?

I hope they can get some value for him, but if they can't, I hope they screw him, a la, Terrell Owens.
At the end of the day, Terrell Owens really didn't get too screwed. And I blame the Eagles for that situation as much as I blame the Nats for this one. You got what you paid for in both cases.

 
The clean the toilets analogy is absolutely crazy.
You think?Soriano batted .268 last year, hit 36 home runs and stole 30 bases.

As a second baseman, he is worth $10 million as ruled by an arbitrator.

How much would he be worth as an outfielder? $10 million? #### no.

OK we'll get past the extreme toilet analogy. As an Oracle DBA I make a certain amount of money a year. What if my boss decided he wanted me to be a Windows sys admin, because that's what the company needs more? I would keep my current salary but I would be doing only Windows for an indefinite amount of time. A Windows sys admin might make half of what I make. In the long run my career would be damaged because that's less time I can spend gaining experience and expertise in oracle. So I'd tell him to get bent, and you would to. I might lose my job, and have to get a new one, but that doesn't make me any less of a man, or a selfish #####, or a prima donna, or anything else. It makes me an individual who is looking out for his own best interests.
Zirra is right. Soriano is a baby but he's been up front about his position on playing the OF all along and it does have a direct impact on his future earning potential.Bowden is the idiot here, not Soriano.

 
bagger, you're really missing the point here.
:no: It comes down to people bashing an athlete because he makes millions. You see it in every post.

"He makes millions he should do it."

Money has nothing to do with the issue because what someone makes is relative to his peers.

Someone may think you should do whatever your boss asks because you make more money than them. You don't think so because you see people making more than you.
:thumbup: good fishing today bags

 
bagger, you're really missing the point here.
:no: It comes down to people bashing an athlete because he makes millions. You see it in every post.

"He makes millions he should do it."

Money has nothing to do with the issue because what someone makes is relative to his peers.

Someone may think you should do whatever your boss asks because you make more money than them. You don't think so because you see people making more than you.
I agree with that part of what you're saying. The money doesn't matter here, to me. That's not the issue.
 
The clean the toilets analogy is absolutely crazy.
You think?Soriano batted .268 last year, hit 36 home runs and stole 30 bases.

As a second baseman, he is worth $10 million as ruled by an arbitrator.

How much would he be worth as an outfielder? $10 million? #### no.

OK we'll get past the extreme toilet analogy. As an Oracle DBA I make a certain amount of money a year. What if my boss decided he wanted me to be a Windows sys admin, because that's what the company needs more? I would keep my current salary but I would be doing only Windows for an indefinite amount of time. A Windows sys admin might make half of what I make. In the long run my career would be damaged because that's less time I can spend gaining experience and expertise in oracle. So I'd tell him to get bent, and you would to. I might lose my job, and have to get a new one, but that doesn't make me any less of a man, or a selfish #####, or a prima donna, or anything else. It makes me an individual who is looking out for his own best interests.
:goodposting: It comes down to respect and drawing the line at what you are willing to do at a job and what you aren't. He is a 2B and doesn't want to play anywhere else. He made that clear. Management ignored that.

This is the best way for Soriano to negotiate playing him at the position he wants. If he gets stuck in the OF he may be miserable and his long term career earnings could suffer. Why would he just accept that?

Oh that's right...because he makes millions.

:rolleyes:

 
bagger, you're really missing the point here.
:no: It comes down to people bashing an athlete because he makes millions. You see it in every post.

"He makes millions he should do it."

Money has nothing to do with the issue because what someone makes is relative to his peers.

Someone may think you should do whatever your boss asks because you make more money than them. You don't think so because you see people making more than you.
:thumbup: good fishing today bags
:confused: What part is fishing? You see this on these boards time and time again.

Boo hoo he makes millions so he should do it because I would.

I am sure Jerry Rice would have had no issue with being converted to TE halfway through his career.

 
bagger, you're really missing the point here.
:no: It comes down to people bashing an athlete because he makes millions. You see it in every post.

"He makes millions he should do it."

Money has nothing to do with the issue because what someone makes is relative to his peers.

Someone may think you should do whatever your boss asks because you make more money than them. You don't think so because you see people making more than you.
:thumbup: good fishing today bags
:confused: What part is fishing? You see this on these boards time and time again.

Boo hoo he makes millions so he should do it because I would.

I am sure Jerry Rice would have had no issue with being converted to TE halfway through his career.
So no one can ever question anything an athlete does becuase they make less? :lmao:
 
Yeah, because getting paid millions for playing the OF is so demeaning compared to getting paid millions for playing 2B.

:rolleyes:
What does salary have to do with anything?If you had to clean your company's toilets somebody living below the poverty line probably thinks you shouldn't complain because you are making $50k.

It's all relative.

Don't be so ####### stupid.

TIA
:hifive: I bet the dude who cleans our ####ters would call me a big baby for not filling the Windows admin position too. No difference at all to him.

 
The clean the toilets analogy is absolutely crazy.
You think?Soriano batted .268 last year, hit 36 home runs and stole 30 bases.

As a second baseman, he is worth $10 million as ruled by an arbitrator.

How much would he be worth as an outfielder? $10 million? #### no.

OK we'll get past the extreme toilet analogy. As an Oracle DBA I make a certain amount of money a year. What if my boss decided he wanted me to be a Windows sys admin, because that's what the company needs more? I would keep my current salary but I would be doing only Windows for an indefinite amount of time. A Windows sys admin might make half of what I make. In the long run my career would be damaged because that's less time I can spend gaining experience and expertise in oracle. So I'd tell him to get bent, and you would to. I might lose my job, and have to get a new one, but that doesn't make me any less of a man, or a selfish #####, or a prima donna, or anything else. It makes me an individual who is looking out for his own best interests.
There are a couple of problems with your position. I'll assume that you are a pretty good Oracle DBA. By all accounts, that is not true of Mr. Soriano and 2B. If your company had a better Oracle DBA than you, they would certainly be within their rights to ask you to change jobs. You would also be within your rights to quit.However, I would hope that you would notify the company if you were not going to show up for work.

To simply not take the field is a prima donna move. On that, I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

 
So no one can ever question anything an athlete does becuase they make less? :lmao:
Where did I say that?There is a difference between questioning and straight out bashing, which is due to jealously of making less and complete ignorance of negotiating tactics.

 
BTW, not only to I agree with JerkZilla re: Soriano's right to refuse to play and not get paid, I agree that the politics of baseball had something to do with the Wilkerson deal.

Hicks had been trying to move Soriano for over a year - no one will give him a ham sandwich b/c Soriano is a butcher at 2B and his stats mean he'll get paid far more than he's worth because of the lack of offensive stars in MLB at 2B.

Why in the world would Bowden give up value for Soriano? Given the leverage of the situation, Bowden should have sent a prospect or two and a bad salary to offset the impact of Soriano's #. Instead, he deals his best offensive weapon, a servicable OF (Sledge), and a prospect.

The only explanation is that Bowden is a temp who cares nothing about the long range future of the the franchise and helped out his buddy Hicks.

 
BTW, not only to I agree with JerkZilla re: Soriano's right to refuse to play and not get paid, I agree that the politics of baseball had something to do with the Wilkerson deal.

Hicks had been trying to move Soriano for over a year - no one will give him a ham sandwich b/c Soriano is a butcher at 2B and his stats mean he'll get paid far more than he's worth because of the lack of offensive stars in MLB at 2B.

Why in the world would Bowden give up value for Soriano? Given the leverage of the situation, Bowden should have sent a prospect or two and a bad salary to offset the impact of Soriano's #. Instead, he deals his best offensive weapon, a servicable OF (Sledge), and a prospect.

The only explanation is that Bowden is a temp who cares nothing about the long range future of the the franchise and helped out his buddy Hicks.
:confused: :(
 
BTW, not only to I agree with JerkZilla re: Soriano's right to refuse to play and not get paid, I agree that the politics of baseball had something to do with the Wilkerson deal.

Hicks had been trying to move Soriano for over a year - no one will give him a ham sandwich b/c Soriano is a butcher at 2B and his stats mean he'll get paid far more than he's worth because of the lack of offensive stars in MLB at 2B.

Why in the world would Bowden give up value for Soriano? Given the leverage of the situation, Bowden should have sent a prospect or two and a bad salary to offset the impact of Soriano's #. Instead, he deals his best offensive weapon, a servicable OF (Sledge), and a prospect.

The only explanation is that Bowden is a temp who cares nothing about the long range future of the the franchise and helped out his buddy Hicks.
:confused: :(
just f'n with you gb.
 
To simply not take the field is a prima donna move.
:lmao: Please tell me what other leverage he has? Negotiating is all about leverage. The one constant power ballplayers can use to leverage their position is not playing.

One of the best negotiating tactics is saying you will quit if the other side does not come off their position and following through if they don't.

That's not being a prima donna.

 
Why in the world would Bowden give up value for Soriano? Given the leverage of the situation, Bowden should have sent a prospect or two and a bad salary to offset the impact of Soriano's #. Instead, he deals his best offensive weapon, a servicable OF (Sledge), and a prospect.

The only explanation is that Bowden is a temp who cares nothing about the long range future of the the franchise and helped out his buddy Hicks.
The other explanation is that Bowden is a total idiot who is only good at going on TV and blathering about how great he is. But I like your explanation just as much.The guy who is getting totally disrespected here isn't Soriano, but Frank Robinson, who has to try to manage this bunch of losers. The Nats of 2006 will be lucky to win 65 games.

 
The clean the toilets analogy is absolutely crazy.
You think?Soriano batted .268 last year, hit 36 home runs and stole 30 bases.

As a second baseman, he is worth $10 million as ruled by an arbitrator.

How much would he be worth as an outfielder? $10 million? #### no.

OK we'll get past the extreme toilet analogy. As an Oracle DBA I make a certain amount of money a year. What if my boss decided he wanted me to be a Windows sys admin, because that's what the company needs more? I would keep my current salary but I would be doing only Windows for an indefinite amount of time. A Windows sys admin might make half of what I make. In the long run my career would be damaged because that's less time I can spend gaining experience and expertise in oracle. So I'd tell him to get bent, and you would to. I might lose my job, and have to get a new one, but that doesn't make me any less of a man, or a selfish #####, or a prima donna, or anything else. It makes me an individual who is looking out for his own best interests.
There are a couple of problems with your position. I'll assume that you are a pretty good Oracle DBA. By all accounts, that is not true of Mr. Soriano and 2B. If your company had a better Oracle DBA than you, they would certainly be within their rights to ask you to change jobs. You would also be within your rights to quit.
It's hard to compare the situations. Soriano was FORCED to come to DC, where the "better DBA" was already in place. Obviously I can't be FORCED to take a job.Soriano made his position clear in December regarding playing the outfield. His refusing to take the field should not have been a surprise to anyone.

 
Why in the world would Bowden give up value for Soriano?  Given the leverage of the situation, Bowden should have sent a prospect or two and a bad salary to offset the impact of Soriano's #.  Instead, he deals his best offensive weapon, a servicable OF (Sledge), and a prospect.

The only explanation is that Bowden is a temp who cares nothing about the long range future of the the franchise and helped out his buddy Hicks.
The other explanation is that Bowden is a total idiot who is only good at going on TV and blathering about how great he is. But I like your explanation just as much.The guy who is getting totally disrespected here isn't Soriano, but Frank Robinson, who has to try to manage this bunch of losers. The Nats of 2006 will be lucky to win 65 games.
GB Frank. Poor guy.
 
To simply not take the field is a prima donna move.
:lmao: Please tell me what other leverage he has? Negotiating is all about leverage. The one constant power ballplayers can use to leverage their position is not playing.

One of the best negotiating tactics is saying you will quit if the other side does not come off their position and following through if they don't.

That's not being a prima donna.
I agree, but I wonder how the whole not taking the field thing came about. Someone was obviously playing hardball. If Soriano didn't warn the Nats that he wouldn't physically take the field if his name was on the lineup card, that's pretty bush.However, if Soriano told the Nats ahead of time that he wouldn't take the field if he was on the lineup card as an OF, and the Nats did so anyway, they're the baffoons.

My money is on the Nats being the baffoons.

 
It's hard to compare the situations. Soriano was FORCED to come to DC, where the "better DBA" was already in place. Obviously I can't be FORCED to take a job.

Soriano made his position clear in December regarding playing the outfield. His refusing to take the field should not have been a surprise to anyone.
See, I don't think Soriano was FORCED to do anything. He wants to play major league baseball, he needs to abide by the rules of the league. I know it's not about the money, but I bet he would get plenty to play in Japan.I'll liken this to a QB refusing to switch to a WR in the NFL. It is certainly their right, but more often than not, the player will end up out of the league.

 
I agree, but I wonder how the whole not taking the field thing came about. Someone was obviously playing hardball. If Soriano didn't warn the Nats that he wouldn't physically take the field if his name was on the lineup card, that's pretty bush.

However, if Soriano told the Nats ahead of time that he wouldn't take the field if he was on the lineup card as an OF, and the Nats did so anyway, they're the baffoons.

My money is on the Nats being the baffoons.
:goodposting: And if that was the case, I still wouldn't agree with his position, but I wouldn't consider it a prima donna move.

 
I know it's not about the money, but I bet he would get plenty to play in Japan.
Soriano has already played in Japan. That's where he started.From Wikipedia:

Soriano's career began in Japan with the Hiroshima Carp, training at their Carp Academy for Dominican players. In 1997, he was promoted briefly to the varsity team, and, wearing uniform number 74, he appeared in nine games, batting .181 (2 for 17) with two walks.

He signed as a free agent with the New York Yankees in 1998 and played in New York for five seasons.

 
bagger, you're really missing the point here.
:no: It comes down to people bashing an athlete because he makes millions. You see it in every post.

"He makes millions he should do it."

Money has nothing to do with the issue because what someone makes is relative to his peers.

Someone may think you should do whatever your boss asks because you make more money than them. You don't think so because you see people making more than you.
I agree with that part of what you're saying. The money doesn't matter here, to me. That's not the issue.
From a legal/contractual standpoint the money doesnt mean anything.From the be a ####### man and accept a position move when you are making 10 million to play a boy's game perspective... that is another story.

 
In all fairness he made it clear BEFORE the trade he would not play another position. They should move vidro anyway. OF would not be a good career move..
:goodposting: Bowden is an idiot. I'm not sure what he was expecting to happen here. Soriano was very clear what he thought before hand.
The contract is also pretty clear that if Soriano doesnt get his ### out there, the TEN FREAKING MILLION HE IS PAID TO PLAY A GAME is held back, and he loses any service time.Yeah, poor guy under a TEN MILLION DOLLAR contract let the new team know he wouldnt move positions. Rough life there.
Don't let $$ envy cloud the issue.If you moved and made it clear of your expectations of your new job before that move and upon arrival your new boss moved you from sales to accounting, you'd be pissed too.

Just because he makes more than you doesn't change the issue.
As I noted, from a contractual standpoint the money means nothing. But Sori has NOTHING to stand on contractually.If I am under contract and the terms of that contract are I report for work and take the position my boss tells me to take, then regardless what we discussed beforehand, I have to abide by my employer's will. I might be pissed, but if I dont show up, I dont get paid.

Same for Sori.

But for people to ignore that these are men playing a boys game for millions is to ignore something that may not mean something legally, but sure as hell means something as to what type of person we are talking about.

 
The clean the toilets analogy is absolutely crazy.
You think?Soriano batted .268 last year, hit 36 home runs and stole 30 bases.

As a second baseman, he is worth $10 million as ruled by an arbitrator.

How much would he be worth as an outfielder? $10 million? #### no.

OK we'll get past the extreme toilet analogy. As an Oracle DBA I make a certain amount of money a year. What if my boss decided he wanted me to be a Windows sys admin, because that's what the company needs more? I would keep my current salary but I would be doing only Windows for an indefinite amount of time. A Windows sys admin might make half of what I make. In the long run my career would be damaged because that's less time I can spend gaining experience and expertise in oracle. So I'd tell him to get bent, and you would to. I might lose my job, and have to get a new one, but that doesn't make me any less of a man, or a selfish #####, or a prima donna, or anything else. It makes me an individual who is looking out for his own best interests.
There are a couple of problems with your position. I'll assume that you are a pretty good Oracle DBA. By all accounts, that is not true of Mr. Soriano and 2B. If your company had a better Oracle DBA than you, they would certainly be within their rights to ask you to change jobs. You would also be within your rights to quit.However, I would hope that you would notify the company if you were not going to show up for work.

To simply not take the field is a prima donna move. On that, I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA. Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.

 
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA.

Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.
he's going to cost himself a lot. A LOT!
 
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA.

Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.
he's going to cost himself a lot. A LOT!
How so?
 
I agree with Soriano in this situation, though he could have handled it better and tried to sit down with management first (if he didn't).

The fact that people are trying to shove the fact that he makes a lot of money in his face means nothing.

 
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA.

Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.
he's going to cost himself a lot. A LOT!
How so?
1. He's now labeled a pain in the ###. Not a team player.2. He's exposing his weaknesses at 2B. He might as well get used to playing outfield now.

3. He will never get $10M a year in his next contract.

 
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA.

Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.
he's going to cost himself a lot. A LOT!
chump change to you... :mellow:
 
I would love to read Soriano's contract. According to a lot of people in this thread it must be a second base only contract because I was under the assumption that most players were signed by a club to meet the needs of the club. Unless his contract says second base only he should get his ### on the field wherever his manager puts him. BTW, if my boss tells me to clean the can you bet I would unless I had another job lined up so I could quit immediately. Do you really think anyone is going to sign this wuss after this latest stunt? Sure the Yankees or Red Sox might, but no one else.

 
I would love to read Soriano's contract. According to a lot of people in this thread it must be a second base only contract because I was under the assumption that most players were signed by a club to meet the needs of the club. Unless his contract says second base only he should get his ### on the field wherever his manager puts him. BTW, if my boss tells me to clean the can you bet I would unless I had another job lined up so I could quit immediately. Do you really think anyone is going to sign this wuss after this latest stunt? Sure the Yankees or Red Sox might, but no one else.
You answered your own question. OF COURSE a team will sign him to play 2B. Here's what's going to happen:1) Nats will trade him to a team he'll play 2b

2) He'll get a big FA contract from a team to play 2B

And the difference with your analysis of your boss and his situation is that there are other places you can work. MLB has a monopoly in the US.

 
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA.

Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.
he's going to cost himself a lot. A LOT!
How so?
1. He's now labeled a pain in the ###. Not a team player.2. He's exposing his weaknesses at 2B. He might as well get used to playing outfield now.

3. He will never get $10M a year in his next contract.
I think you are wrong about this. He can rake and his offensive compensates for his defense. The fact that he can play 2B at least adequately means his value is much higher than a LF with the same numbers.
 
That's the problem and that's why Soriano's position is perfectly reasonable. You could quit and go get another job at another company as an Oracle DBA.

Baseball, however, has an antitrust exemption. Because of this, they are a monopoly. Soriano has no other choice to go and play 2b like he wants.

Soriano is making a very reasonable decision and, in doing so, not going to cost himself $20MM (at least).

The Nats are boneheads.
he's going to cost himself a lot. A LOT!
How so?
1. He's now labeled a pain in the ###. Not a team player.2. He's exposing his weaknesses at 2B. He might as well get used to playing outfield now.

3. He will never get $10M a year in his next contract.
I think you are wrong about this. He can rake and his offensive compensates for his defense. The fact that he can play 2B at least adequately means his value is much higher than a LF with the same numbers.
And that's why no one else wanted him.
 
Actually, there was no contract - Soriano was arbitration eligible and Hicks (Rangers) knew he'd command ~ 10MM in a hearing, so he dealt Alfonso.

Washington got Soriano, went to arbitration, and Soriano was awarded a $10MM, 1 year deal.
OK, good info but it doesn't really change anything.The fact is that the Rangers got what they got for someone they wanted to dump.

Why did the Nationals want Alfonso Soriano, especially after his statement that he would not play outfield? Why did they give up their best player for him anyway?

Brad Wilkerson as an outfielder is arguably more valuable than Alfonso Soriano as an outfielder, does anyone debate this?

Why make the trade, why force it down Soriano's throat, why give Soriano $10 million at all?
I dunno man. Jim Bowden is a godawful GM, and it's mind-blowing to me that he still has a job. But why would he risk his reputation as a GM, or lack thereof, by leaving his handprints all over what will likely turn out to be a horrendous trade for the Nationals? What obligation does he have to MLB to risk his reputation like that? Not trying to be a ##### here, just curiuos about your point of view. It's much easier to just write it off to Bowden being a bonehead.

 
Update: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Alfonso Soriano said he had no knowledge that he was supposed to start in left field on Monday. He hasn't decided whether or not he'll play Wednesday.Two baseball sources told MLB.com that bench coach Eddie Rodriguez wrote two lineups on Monday. Amazingly enough, the one without Soriano's name in the lineup was on the clubhouse bulletin board for most of the afternoon. If possible, the Nationals are handling this whole situation worse than Soriano. It should become clear tomorrow whether or not Soriano will be placed on the restricted list. "I'm going to think about (playing left field). I'm going to talk it over with his wife and agent, [Diego Bentz]," Soriano said. "I want to play, but they have [Jose] Vidro at second base. I will make a decision [on Wednesday morning]."
 
It's hard to compare the situations.  Soriano was FORCED to come to DC, where the "better DBA" was already in place.  Obviously I can't be FORCED to take a job.

Soriano made his position clear in December regarding playing the outfield.  His refusing to take the field should not have been a surprise to anyone.
See, I don't think Soriano was FORCED to do anything. He wants to play major league baseball, he needs to abide by the rules of the league. I know it's not about the money, but I bet he would get plenty to play in Japan.I'll liken this to a QB refusing to switch to a WR in the NFL. It is certainly their right, but more often than not, the player will end up out of the league.
Uh, soriano won't end up out of the league, no matter what position he plays. Your talking about a perennial 30/30 guy
 
So how does Yahoo handle eligibility? If you have him do you get to put him in at 2B the whole season or do they ever change it?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top