What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Star Wars III SPOILERS discussion thread (1 Viewer)

Would it kill you guys to provide some details?
Sorry Cappy...During the water-ballet scene where Darth Sidious tells Anakin the legend of Darth Plagius (sp??) in which Darth Plagius learned how to create life and protect life...and he taught his apprentice.

The audio commentary for this scene has George Lucas saying (not a 100% of the words) "I wanted to convey to the audience how Anakin came to be."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would it kill you guys to provide some details?
During the opera scene, with Palpatine and Anakin, Palpatine tells Anakin the Sith legend of "Darth Plagueis the Wise".
Darth Plagueis was a Dark Lord of the Sith, so powerful and so wise he could use the Force to influence the midi-chlorians to create life ...
At this point, Plapatine gives Anakin a knowing look. The implication being that Anakin was created by Palpatine.Anakin asks what happened to him.

Palpatine continues

He became so powerful . . . the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. (smiles) Plagueis never saw it coming. It's ironic he could save others from death, but not himself.
So. Plagius was Palpatine/Sidious' master. Sidious learned how to create life (which he uses to create Anakin) He also knows how to keep people from dying. But he knows that if he tells Anakin the secret, Anakin will kill him as Palpatine did HIS master.

Another subtle clue is when Yoda is fighting Sidious. Sidious says "You cannot defeat me. Darth Vader shall become more powerful than either of us." He created Anakin to become the most powerful Sith ever in order to take over for him later and cement the Sith's place as rulers of the galaxy forever.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "Within a Minute" documentary about everything that's involved in making just one minute of a movie is also incredibly fascinating.

 
Would it kill you guys to provide some details?
During the opera scene, with Palpatine and Anakin, Palpatine tells Anakin the Sith legend of "Darth Plagueis the Wise".
Darth Plagueis was a Dark Lord of the Sith, so powerful and so wise he could use the Force to influence the midi-chlorians to create life ...
At this point, Plapatine gives Anakin a knowing look. The implication being that Anakin was created by Palpatine.Anakin asks what happened to him.

Palpatine continues

He became so powerful . . . the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. (smiles) Plagueis never saw it coming. It's ironic he could save others from death, but not himself.
So. Plagius was Palpatine/Sidious' master. Sidious learned how to create life (which he uses to create Anakin) He also knows how to keep people from dying. But he knows that if he tells Anakin the secret, Anakin will kill him as Palpatine did HIS master.

Another subtle clue is when Yoda is fighting Sidious. Sidious says "You cannot defeat me. Darth Vader shall become more powerful than either of us." He created Anakin to become the most powerful Sith ever in order to take over for him later and cement the Sith's place as rulers of the galaxy forever.
Very interesting stuff.I was wondering about that "more powerful than either of us" stuff. Did Sidious "know" that Vader would be severely damaged in the volcano, yet would have so much hate inside that he'd become an incredibly powerful (yet subordinate) Sith lord?

 
Sidious did not create Anakin. If you read the new book "The Rise of Darth Vader" it clearly states this. The Emperor is pondering where he could find another apprentice due to some problems Darth Vader is having with his new suit, loss of confidence etc and it specifically touches on this topic. Excellent read for all you Star Wars fans. Also Sidious did not forsee Anakin losing to Kenobi, he expected him to slay him and then come back and attempt to kill the Emperorer.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was wondering about that "more powerful than either of us" stuff. Did Sidious "know" that Vader would be severely damaged in the volcano, yet would have so much hate inside that he'd become an incredibly powerful (yet subordinate) Sith lord?
No. Anakin's fall was not part of the plan. That's why Sidious is so interested in turning Luke - to get a new apprentice.It's also why Anakin turns on his master in the end. He was born a slave, but didn't wish to die as one.

 
I was wondering about that "more powerful than either of us" stuff.  Did Sidious "know" that Vader would be severely damaged in the volcano, yet would have so much hate inside that he'd become an incredibly powerful (yet subordinate) Sith lord?
No. Anakin's fall was not part of the plan. That's why Sidious is so interested in turning Luke - to get a new apprentice.It's also why Anakin turns on his master in the end. He was born a slave, but didn't wish to die as one.
Very interesting. I thought I remembered the emperor in the 6th Star Wars saying something like "everything that's transpired has been because of me" or something ... so would it be accurate that the only 2 things he didn't predict correctly would be Vader losing to Obi-Wan and Luke not turning to the dark side?
 
Sidious did not create Anakin. If you read the new book "The Rise of Darth Vader" it clearly states this. The Emperor is pondering where he could find another apprentice due to some problems Darth Vader is having with his new suit, loss of confidence etc and it specifically touches on this topic. Excellent read for all you Star Wars fans. Also Sidious did not forsee Anakin losing to Kenobi, he expected him to slay him and then come back and attempt to kill the Emperorer.
My Star Wars world begins at Naboo and ends on Endor. The movies are all that matter.The books are not written by Lucas and are, IMO, not useful for interpreting the actions, intentions, etc. of characters within the univers.

 
Very interesting.  I thought I remembered the emperor in the 6th Star Wars saying something like "everything that's transpired has been because of me" or something ... so would it be accurate that the only 2 things he didn't predict correctly would be Vader losing to Obi-Wan and Luke not turning to the dark side?
"Everything that has transpired has done so according to MY design."Except for Vader losing and Luke not turning that is. Yes, you're correct.

Luke is right when he says "Your overconfidence is your weakness."

The Emperor is wrong when he says "Your faith in your friends is yours."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even though the books are not written by Lucas all the details are carefully controlled by him and all tie into the story line. There are some good insights into all the characters that you just will not find in the movies. They answer a lot of questions people seem to be speculating about in these posts.

 
Even though the books are not written by Lucas all the details are carefully controlled by him and all tie into the story line. There are some good insights into all the characters that you just will not find in the movies. They answer a lot of questions people seem to be speculating about in these posts.
But I'll go with the director's commentary and words from Lucas' mouth before I'll go with an author that is giving his interpretation of what happens next. Even if it is "approved" by Lucas.Still. I AM interested in reading this book. I heard one criticism was that there strangely wasn't enough Vader in it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sidious did not create Anakin. If you read the new book "The Rise of Darth Vader" it clearly states this. The Emperor is pondering where he could find another apprentice due to some problems Darth Vader is having with his new suit, loss of confidence etc and it specifically touches on this topic. Excellent read for all you Star Wars fans. Also Sidious did not forsee Anakin losing to Kenobi, he expected him to slay him and then come back and attempt to kill the Emperorer.
How so???
 
Sidious did not create Anakin.
So it is your word against Lucas' word? I think I am going to go with Lucas on this one.
Read the Book!!!! authorized by LUCAS!
As far as Sidious creating Anakin, are you really going to side with the book even though the book goes against the words coming out of Lucas' mouth?
It clearly states in the book that the Emperor told these things to Anakin to seduce him to the dark side. He exageratted his powers to sway Anakin. I am looking thru the book for the passages to quote from.
 
Would it kill you guys to provide some details?
Sorry Cappy...During the water-ballet scene where Darth Sidious tells Anakin the legend of Darth Plagius (sp??) in which Darth Plagius learned how to create life and protect life...and he taught his apprentice.

The audio commentary for this scene has George Lucas saying (not a 100% of the words) "I wanted to convey to the audience how Anakin came to be."
If Sidious was indeed the one who created Anakin, was his ability to prevent death the reason Vader didn't die in the volcano? (Probably a pretty basic connection, but did they specifically go into it in the commentary?)
 
Sidious did not create Anakin.
So it is your word against Lucas' word? I think I am going to go with Lucas on this one.
Read the Book!!!! authorized by LUCAS!
As far as Sidious creating Anakin, are you really going to side with the book even though the book goes against the words coming out of Lucas' mouth?
FYI - There's a 54 page discussion on this topic at theforce.net.The discussion is all over the place. Some actually argue, convincingly, that Plagius was the one that created Anakin.

But it really is a moot point as Lucas intentionally left it open to interpretation.

 
If Sidious was indeed the one who created Anakin, was his ability to prevent death the reason Vader didn't die in the volcano?  (Probably a pretty basic connection, but did they specifically go into it in the commentary?)
No. Sidious actually did know the secret to "keeping the one's you care about from dying". He used it to save Anakin.This is my interpretation. I don't think they specifically addressed this in the commentary.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion is all over the place. Some actually argue, convincingly, that Plagius was the one that created Anakin.

But it really is a moot point as Lucas intentionally left it open to interpretation.
Thanks Andy, I guess this argument could be made. But then Plagius would had to have been alive shortly before Phantom Menace, which doesn't seem to add up.
 
It clearly states in the book that the Emperor told these things to Anakin to seduce him to the dark side. He exageratted his powers to sway Anakin. I am looking thru the book for the passages to quote from.
The Emperor influenced the midichlorians to create life. So, splitting hairs, it was the Force that created Anakin, not the Emperor.In that vein of thinking, it follows that that life had a choice as to which path it would choose. The Emperor did a good sell job to move him down the dark path.

 
The discussion is all over the place.  Some actually argue, convincingly, that Plagius was the one that created Anakin.

But it really is a moot point as Lucas intentionally left it open to interpretation.
Thanks Andy, I guess this argument could be made. But then Plagius would had to have been alive shortly before Phantom Menace, which doesn't seem to add up.
Why not? We really don't know where Palpatine came from or how he ended up on Naboo.For my money, it was Sidious, not Plagius that created Anakin.

 
Sidious did not create Anakin.
So it is your word against Lucas' word? I think I am going to go with Lucas on this one.
Read the Book!!!! authorized by LUCAS!
As far as Sidious creating Anakin, are you really going to side with the book even though the book goes against the words coming out of Lucas' mouth?
It clearly states in the book that the Emperor told these things to Anakin to seduce him to the dark side. He exageratted his powers to sway Anakin. I am looking thru the book for the passages to quote from.
The book argument only works for stories told via a book and made into a movie second. In this case, the movie was made first and the book second and more specifically George Lucas created the scene in Revenge of the Sith with Sidious speaking about the legend of Darth Plagius to show the audience how Anakin was created. An argument could be made for Plagius or Sidious I guess.
 
The discussion is all over the place.  Some actually argue, convincingly, that Plagius was the one that created Anakin.

But it really is a moot point as Lucas intentionally left it open to interpretation.
Thanks Andy, I guess this argument could be made. But then Plagius would had to have been alive shortly before Phantom Menace, which doesn't seem to add up.
Why not? We really don't know where Palpatine came from or how he ended up on Naboo.For my money, it was Sidious, not Plagius that created Anakin.
I believe it was Sidious who created Anakin too. But if the argument was that Plagius created Anakin, I would assume Plagius would have to be alive at the time Anakin was concieved, which would have been shortly before Phantom (maybe 7 to 9 years).
 
The discussion is all over the place.  Some actually argue, convincingly, that Plagius was the one that created Anakin.

But it really is a moot point as Lucas intentionally left it open to interpretation.
Thanks Andy, I guess this argument could be made. But then Plagius would had to have been alive shortly before Phantom Menace, which doesn't seem to add up.
Why not? We really don't know where Palpatine came from or how he ended up on Naboo.For my money, it was Sidious, not Plagius that created Anakin.
I believe it was Sidious who created Anakin too. But if the argument was that Plagius created Anakin, I would assume Plagius would have to be alive at the time Anakin was concieved, which would have been shortly before Phantom (maybe 7 to 9 years).
The commentary and the look Palp gives Anakin alone is enough for me to see it was Palp who created Anakin. If you see how detailed and micromanaging Lucas was in his direction, teh arguement is even stonger on the body language.
 
from the "Rise of Darth Vader" pg 133"He recalled thinking: What if Anakin should die?How many years would he have to search for an apprentice even half as powerful in the force, let alone one created by the force itself to restore balance, by allowing the dark side to percolate fully to the surface after a millenium of being stifled?None would be foundSidious would have had to discover a way to compel midichlorians to do his bidding, and bring into being one as powerful as Anakin. As it was, Sidious and a host of medical droids had merely restored Anakin to life, which-while no small feat-was a far cry from returning someone from death. For thousands of years, the ability to survive death had been pursued by Sith and Jedi alike, and no one had been succesful at discovering the secret."

 
Having read the book, seen all the movies...i think anakin was created by the force, not palpatine nor plagious.
That's a good argument too. And splitting hairs, I believe it is more accurate to say that Palpatine INFLUENCED the midichlorians (in essence The Force itself) to create Anakin. So technically he was created by The Force, not Palpatine.

 
from the "Rise of Darth Vader" pg 133

"He recalled thinking: What if Anakin should die?

How many years would he have to search for an apprentice even half as powerful in the force, let alone one created by the force itself to restore balance, by allowing the dark side to percolate fully to the surface after a millenium of being stifled?

None would be found

Sidious would have had to discover a way to compel midichlorians to do his bidding, and bring into being one as powerful as Anakin. As it was, Sidious and a host of medical droids had merely restored Anakin to life, which-while no small feat-was a far cry from returning someone from death. For thousands of years, the ability to survive death had been pursued by Sith and Jedi alike, and no one had been succesful at discovering the secret."
That is pretty compelling stuff there. Makes you think all the Plagius (sp?) stories he told Anakin were BS. But I think again we have to go with the movie.
 
from the "Rise of Darth Vader" pg 133

"He recalled thinking: What if Anakin should die?

How many years would he have to search for an apprentice even half as powerful in the force, let alone one created by the force itself to restore balance, by allowing the dark side to percolate fully to the surface after a millenium of being stifled?

None would be found

Sidious would have had to discover a way to compel midichlorians to do his bidding, and bring into being one as powerful as Anakin. As it was, Sidious and a host of medical droids had merely restored Anakin to life, which-while no small feat-was a far cry from returning someone from death. For thousands of years, the ability to survive death had been pursued by Sith and Jedi alike, and no one had been succesful at discovering the secret."
It could be that the Jedi have found away to block the Sith from creating life, given Yoda's revelation that he has failed to evolve as a Jedi and the Sith have become to powerful.
 
Is the new book "rise to power"..good? Right now im towards of the new jedi order series.
It is an excellent read. I finished it in one day on a flight. It picks up a few weeks after the end of Revenge of the Sith with a few other Jedi besides Yoda and Obi-Wan having survived.
 
For some reason I have enjoyed the books more than some of the movies. I loved the written version of revenge of the sith.

 
The books give you a look into the mind of the character. They tell you how they are feeling at crucial times. In a movie you really cant do this. Like for example at the end of Revenge Anakin looks into himself and see's that there was nothing other than himself, his selfishness was the cause of what had happened. In the movie I dont really feel like you saw the termoil. Not to say the movies aren't awesome..Obvisouly i love them if not i wouldnt read the books.

 
While this thread's resurrected, two more questions I had (I have read the entire thread, but that was back in May!).1) Regarding the prophecy about Anakin "bringing balance to the force", does he fulfill this at the end of Ep.III (since the Sith and Jedi are technically "equal" in numbers) or Ep.VI (when he ends the Sith threat)? I always thought it was Ep.VI, and the story of his redemption proved the prophecy was right. Is this something that's generally accepted or is anything disputed?2) It really just seems sad to me that the whole reason Anakin seemed to turn (fear of loss of Padme), it turns out the Jedi figured it out ... almost at the exact moment that Anakin was lost (when Qui-Gon contacted Yoda at the end). How intentional was this connection? One one hand, it feels so tragic that it really had to be intentional, given the detail Lucas has put into these stories. On the other hand the whole "Qui-Gon is not gone forever" thing seemed really tacked on and they didn't go into it as much as I would have liked. This "light side" way of preventing death (being "more powerful than you can possibly imagine") sure contrasts with the "dark side" way of preventing death (Vader's suit) ... any other instances or connections?

 
While this thread's resurrected, two more questions I had (I have read the entire thread, but that was back in May!).

1) Regarding the prophecy about Anakin "bringing balance to the force", does he fulfill this at the end of Ep.III (since the Sith and Jedi are technically "equal" in numbers) or Ep.VI (when he ends the Sith threat)?  I always thought it was Ep.VI, and the story of his redemption proved the prophecy was right.  Is this something that's generally accepted or is anything disputed?

2) It really just seems sad to me that the whole reason Anakin seemed to turn (fear of loss of Padme), it turns out the Jedi figured it out ... almost at the exact moment that Anakin was lost (when Qui-Gon contacted Yoda at the end).  How intentional was this connection?  One one hand, it feels so tragic that it really had to be intentional, given the detail Lucas has put into these stories.  On the other hand the whole "Qui-Gon is not gone forever" thing seemed really tacked on and they didn't go into it as much as I would have liked.  This "light side" way of preventing death (being "more powerful than you can possibly imagine") sure contrasts with the "dark side" way of preventing death (Vader's suit) ... any other instances or connections?
I think he fulfills it at the end of Retunr of the Jedi when he finally does fulfil the prophecy and destroys the sith.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The books give you a look into the mind of the character. They tell you how they are feeling at crucial times. In a movie you really cant do this. Like for example at the end of Revenge Anakin looks into himself and see's that there was nothing other than himself, his selfishness was the cause of what had happened. In the movie I dont really feel like you saw the termoil. Not to say the movies aren't awesome..Obvisouly i love them if not i wouldnt read the books.
Basically. If we are going to allow two story-tellers to tell the same story and we let one story-teller (the director) tell the story over 2 hours and let the other story-teller (an author) tell the same story but give him any where between 9 to 14 hours to tell the story (read the book), it should be no shock which story would be better.A better comparison would be to allow Lucas to create 6 two-hour movies to tell the story of Revenge of the Sith for the comparison to be fair.

 
The books give you a look into the mind of the character. They tell you how they are feeling at crucial times. In a movie you really cant do this. Like for example at the end of Revenge Anakin looks into himself and see's that there was nothing other than himself, his selfishness was the cause of what had happened. In the movie I dont really feel like you saw the termoil. Not to say the movies aren't awesome..Obvisouly i love them if not i wouldnt read the books.
Basically. If we are going to allow two story-tellers to tell the same story and we let one story-teller (the director) tell the story over 2 hours and let the other story-teller (an author) tell the same story but give him any where between 9 to 14 hours to tell the story (read the book), it should be no shock which story would be better.A better comparison would be to allow Lucas to create 6 two-hour movies to tell the story of Revenge of the Sith for the comparison to be fair.
Oh i completely agree. But todays society has an attention span of about 2 hours.
 
While this thread's resurrected, two more questions I had (I have read the entire thread, but that was back in May!).

1) Regarding the prophecy about Anakin "bringing balance to the force", does he fulfill this at the end of Ep.III (since the Sith and Jedi are technically "equal" in numbers) or Ep.VI (when he ends the Sith threat)? I always thought it was Ep.VI, and the story of his redemption proved the prophecy was right. Is this something that's generally accepted or is anything disputed?

2) It really just seems sad to me that the whole reason Anakin seemed to turn (fear of loss of Padme), it turns out the Jedi figured it out ... almost at the exact moment that Anakin was lost (when Qui-Gon contacted Yoda at the end). How intentional was this connection? One one hand, it feels so tragic that it really had to be intentional, given the detail Lucas has put into these stories. On the other hand the whole "Qui-Gon is not gone forever" thing seemed really tacked on and they didn't go into it as much as I would have liked. This "light side" way of preventing death (being "more powerful than you can possibly imagine") sure contrasts with the "dark side" way of preventing death (Vader's suit) ... any other instances or connections?
Point 1 is confirmed with the audio commentary with George Lucas, Anakin fulfills the prophecy in Return of the Jedi.2 Not sure I understand your question, but the book touches more on the Qui-Gon thing than the movie. The movie had to be edited down for time contraints so it was left out.

 
While this thread's resurrected, two more questions I had (I have read the entire thread, but that was back in May!).

2) It really just seems sad to me that the whole reason Anakin seemed to turn (fear of loss of Padme), it turns out the Jedi figured it out ... almost at the exact moment that Anakin was lost (when Qui-Gon contacted Yoda at the end).  How intentional was this connection?  One one hand, it feels so tragic that it really had to be intentional, given the detail Lucas has put into these stories.  On the other hand the whole "Qui-Gon is not gone forever" thing seemed really tacked on and they didn't go into it as much as I would have liked.  This "light side" way of preventing death (being "more powerful than you can possibly imagine") sure contrasts with the "dark side" way of preventing death (Vader's suit) ... any other instances or connections?
2 Not sure I understand your question, but the book touches more on the Qui-Gon thing than the movie. The movie had to be edited down for time contraints so it was left out.
I definitely didn't phrase it well. Basically ... there's a real contrast between the way the Jedi and Sith learn how to "prevent death" -- which was a huge reason for Anakin's turn to the dark side, between losing his mother and fearing losing Padme.The Jedi learn it as soon as Padme is dead, with the whole Qui-Gon thing. The Sith (supposedly) use it when Sidious keeps Vader from dying in the volcano. So hypothetically, the Jedi could have saved Padme, not in the traditional sense, but she could have reappeared through the force like Jedi did later, right? (I understand that she wasn't a Jedi, and all that, but let's not let facts get in the way! :) )

Any discussions on to what extent this was planned all along, and to what extent it was "uh oh ... how do we explain to the viewers why Obi-Wan and Yoda can come back through the force?"

 
While this thread's resurrected, two more questions I had (I have read the entire thread, but that was back in May!).

1) Regarding the prophecy about Anakin "bringing balance to the force", does he fulfill this at the end of Ep.III (since the Sith and Jedi are technically "equal" in numbers) or Ep.VI (when he ends the Sith threat)? I always thought it was Ep.VI, and the story of his redemption proved the prophecy was right. Is this something that's generally accepted or is anything disputed?
He brought balance in an unintended way. He destroyed the Jedi. Then he destroyed the Sith. However, his offspring was a balance of both - a Jedi that can remain on the light side while still retaining his human passions.
 
While this thread's resurrected, two more questions I had (I have read the entire thread, but that was back in May!).

2) It really just seems sad to me that the whole reason Anakin seemed to turn (fear of loss of Padme), it turns out the Jedi figured it out ... almost at the exact moment that Anakin was lost (when Qui-Gon contacted Yoda at the end).  How intentional was this connection?  One one hand, it feels so tragic that it really had to be intentional, given the detail Lucas has put into these stories.  On the other hand the whole "Qui-Gon is not gone forever" thing seemed really tacked on and they didn't go into it as much as I would have liked.  This "light side" way of preventing death (being "more powerful than you can possibly imagine") sure contrasts with the "dark side" way of preventing death (Vader's suit) ... any other instances or connections?
2 Not sure I understand your question, but the book touches more on the Qui-Gon thing than the movie. The movie had to be edited down for time contraints so it was left out.
I definitely didn't phrase it well. Basically ... there's a real contrast between the way the Jedi and Sith learn how to "prevent death" -- which was a huge reason for Anakin's turn to the dark side, between losing his mother and fearing losing Padme.The Jedi learn it as soon as Padme is dead, with the whole Qui-Gon thing. The Sith (supposedly) use it when Sidious keeps Vader from dying in the volcano. So hypothetically, the Jedi could have saved Padme, not in the traditional sense, but she could have reappeared through the force like Jedi did later, right? (I understand that she wasn't a Jedi, and all that, but let's not let facts get in the way! :) )

Any discussions on to what extent this was planned all along, and to what extent it was "uh oh ... how do we explain to the viewers why Obi-Wan and Yoda can come back through the force?"
Interesting...and probably doing some speculating here.I believe preventing someone from dying was considered un-natural. The Jedi consider death a very natural process of life, so even if they could keep someone in the physical world, theoritically I don't think they would.

 
Hey, this is good stuff:

With regards to Padme, her death and the meaning of her name, here is my take on it (I posted this in the Padme thread previously, so if you have read it before, apologies, but I felt it fitted in nicely here):

I believe that George's choice of showing how Padme dies, forces us to try to think about what the reasons are for her not having the 'will' to live.

It's significant, IMO, that this line is spoken by a droid:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICAL DROID: Medically, she is completely healthy. For reasons we can't explain, we are losing her.

OBI-WAN: She's dying?

MEDICAL DROID: We don't know why. She has lost the will to live.

-- Revenge of the Sith, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George could have chosen to have a Polis Massan be the one to give this information to Kenobi, but he makes the decision for it to be a droid - a robotic being that would have little to no comprehension of what human sacrifice means, or adds up to.

I believe that there are also hints throughout the PT that Padme has a far more Taoist understanding of her path, and life, than her husband does. She is 'not afraid to die'. She has the enlightenment that he does not, in this regard. When Anakin tells her that he has seen that she will die in childbirth, all she cares about; her instant thought; is whether the child survives.

I also believe that George has given us plenty of other clues, too.

Just her name for example: Padme

Padme is Sanskrit for Lotus flower. You may well have heard, on these boards, how it only blossoms for 3-4 days, but leaves behind a seed pod - that it's life is short and that it gives birth as it dies. What you may not have heard is that the Lotus also represents purity of body, speech, and mind, floating above the muddy waters of attachment and desire. The very things which bring Anakin down but which Padme is, in the end, not interested in; all she wants is Anakin's love, but when she realises that he has gone down a path that she cannot follow, she lets go of her attachment. This in itself shows the reasearch that George does, but even more interesting, I think, is the fact that 'Padme' is also one part of a great Buddhist chant: Om Mani Padme Hum. This chant is recited to help integrate all aspects of a person to move them along on the path to enlightenment.

I believe that Padme's dying words are SO important with regard to this. Because IMHO, they help bring enlightenment to Kenobi, Luke and finally Anakin, too. By letting go of her life, and telling Obi-Wan that she KNOWS that there is still good in Anakin as she dies, she is not only protecting her children from the man that her husband has become, but she is also ensuring that they will be able to help Anakin become the man he could have been.

Like the Lotus flower, Padme creates life as she dies.

But as she touches the eternal - becomes one with the Force - she also leaves behind the seed of truth, aswell.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The interesting thing about Star Wars - and I didn’t ever really push this very far, because it’s not really that important - but there’s a lot going on there that most people haven’t come to grips with yet. But when they do, they will find it’s a much more intricately made clock than most people would like to imagine.

-- George Lucas, quoted in J. Windolf, “Star Wars: The Last Battle,” Vanity Fair, 2005-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is still some really good stuff.
 
Anyone here seen the Clone Wars DVDs? What do you think of them?I only saw the first season (picked up the 2nd season last night) but I thought it was pretty good stuff.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top