This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Funny he doesn't hold himself to the same standard when he makes nonsense calls like going for it on 4th and 5 at midfield, or Brady for that matter when he fumbled on a sack. That aside Ridley better cut the crap out, seems like more and more RB's are considered plug and play and if he hasn't cost himself playing time yet he soon will.
Please explain?
In dynasty maybe but in redraft, I think that would be even straight up if not the Richardson owner throwing something in at this point.
Draft positions are meaningless now. and "ouch".
I'd trade him him straight up for Richardson in a heartbeat I think. I think.
What do you mean ouch? I thought I got a good deal. Martin has rb2 upside. And JJ is a huge upgrade over SJ. Charles is my RB1
Better than T-Rich Megastar? That's unpossible!You think that Ridley has more value than Richardson in redraft?'Insein said:
I would rather have Richardson but it's close. As long as the fumbling issue subsides, Ridley is in a great situation IMO. Richardson still plays for a crap team and is in a very tough division with strong defenses. In a dynasty, nobody can touch Richardson.You think that Ridley has more value than Richardson in redraft?'Insein said:
Those have to be older rankings, he's certainly ahead of them all right now.
Yuck. Good luck with that. I love how everyone is jumping ship. Does anyone realize this is the most talented RB the Pats have had since Dillon? Top 5 RB by the end of the season..yes bold and I'm aware of the fumbling issue and Bolden/Vereen/Woody.
Forgot to add, I also got RG3 thrown in from owner with Newton and Luck.I know he's concussed and I have Rodgers but I like the insurance.
Not sure of the point here....just swapping RB's and GB WR's. Weird trade.I could see jumping ship on Ridley, but would assume it is for another guy who is more of a sure thing. I don't see Mathews as a sure thing.
Wow I loved the original trade, and you got RG3 as a throw-in? Well done sir!
I would rather have Richardson but it's close. As long as the fumbling issue subsides, Ridley is in a great situation IMO. Richardson still plays for a crap team and is in a very tough division with strong defenses. In a dynasty, nobody can touch Richardson.You think that Ridley has more value than Richardson in redraft?'Insein said:
To me its all about situation. Ridley, despite the backfield company, is in a by far better offense. Cleveland is in a very inept offense. For redraft, I think Ridley is more valuable.
Ridley 13 carries, Woodhead 3 (so far with 7 minutes left in the 4th). Yes Woodhead is going to get his 3-5 rushes and 3-5 receptions in that Kevin Faulk role. Ridley also just got 3 carries in a row from the 25 yard line (couldn't convert 3rd and 2, but still....). Clearly the doghouse-fumble concerns were premature. It's a tough Seattle D, but Ridley is still the 1A back in this offense.Also, what's with the Bolden injury?
Ridiculous. They played Seattle in Seattle.'ponchsox said:
think he hurt a knee on special teams in the 2nd q.'karmarooster said:'ponchsox said:
Also, what's with the Bolden injury?
Still gonna end up a top 10 RB. Perfect time to get him now. I wouldn't sell unless blown away. With the Jets on tap next week, I smell another 100 yard game'ponchsox said:
yeah, and coming out of their wk9 bye BUF IND @NYJStill gonna end up a top 10 RB. Perfect time to get him now. I wouldn't sell unless blown away. With the Jets on tap next week, I smell another 100 yard game'ponchsox said:
This probably isn't the best thread to ask, but does anybody have anu idea as to the extent of Bolden's injury?
Speculation is a tweak of the already existing injury. I didn't see him go out but he appeared to be running with the same capability he had in previous weeks before he exited.
I'm big on Ridley but I don't get posts like this. Of course you have to count the Bal game; him being unpredictably out of the game plan is probably the biggest risk about Ridley. You can't look at strengths and rationalize away weaknesses when you make evaluations.
I sure hope so!!No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
Me too, but he's too inconsistent for me to start. Hope he goes off so I can move himFull disclosure: he's sitting behind DMC/Martin/Dez'devouredbychaos said:I sure hope so!!'scrumptrulescent said:No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
Now that I read what I wrote, they are ALL inconsistent. Oh well. Go Bears.Me too, but he's too inconsistent for me to start. Hope he goes off so I can move himFull disclosure: he's sitting behind DMC/Martin/Dez'devouredbychaos said:I sure hope so!!'scrumptrulescent said:No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
I have Martin as well and am starting Ridley with confidence over him. Although maybe its the Pats homer in me, and the fact that I'll be at the gameMe too, but he's too inconsistent for me to start. Hope he goes off so I can move himFull disclosure: he's sitting behind DMC/Martin/Dez'devouredbychaos said:I sure hope so!!'scrumptrulescent said:No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
In the Martin/Ridley boat, as we'll. I'm leaning Martin. PPR.I have Martin as well and am starting Ridley with confidence over him. Although maybe its the Pats homer in me, and the fact that I'll be at the gameMe too, but he's too inconsistent for me to start. Hope he goes off so I can move himFull disclosure: he's sitting behind DMC/Martin/Dez'devouredbychaos said:I sure hope so!!'scrumptrulescent said:No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
So far, it was the right call. But really hoping Ridley picks it up here.In the Martin/Ridley boat, as we'll. I'm leaning Martin. PPR.I have Martin as well and am starting Ridley with confidence over him. Although maybe its the Pats homer in me, and the fact that I'll be at the gameMe too, but he's too inconsistent for me to start. Hope he goes off so I can move himFull disclosure: he's sitting behind DMC/Martin/DezI sure hope so!!No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
I have Martin as well and am starting Ridley with confidence over him. Although maybe its the Pats homer in me, and the fact that I'll be at the gameMe too, but he's too inconsistent for me to start. Hope he goes off so I can move himFull disclosure: he's sitting behind DMC/Martin/DezI sure hope so!!No practice all week for Bolden. That's a shame. You better take some time off Bolden and make sure that knee is better than 100% before hitting the field again.
