Mudhoney Tshirt, 11 month mullet and no pants.I don't know about you guys, but I'm wearing all black and have my hat on backwards.
BS.....I was very clear about this. I was asked a question by @Leroy Hoardfor new investors what should we do. I flat out said stay out.So were we to expect flat out market manipulation?
Come on. This is "I told you so" talk seems to miss the point.
Sell on the news.Apple just released great numbers. Why are they down?
I know, it sucks.#### for the first time ever I'm on Barstool's side
So did you expect flat out market manipulation?BS.....I was very clear about this. I was asked a question by @Leroy Hoardfor new investors what should we do. I flat out said stay out.
So yeah I told you so.
There is nothing wrong with taking small shots. I do that too with certain stocks (BLDP cough cough, BLMN and MGM when they were slaughtered and we made doubles inside of 4-5 months). As long as your willing to lose every cent of those "small shots”.Agree completely and I stayed out of this mania. Though it is complete, utter bull#### that these trades were throttled.
Funny enough the link earlier to the Ofdollarsanddata twitter story on Piggly Wiggly in 1919 played out almost exactly here. He fought the short sellers and the rules got changed on him, driving him bankrupt.
-----
I am, however, taking a bunch of small shots with some SPACs. A Taleb anti-fragile investment method. Odds are well in my favor to come out with a good ROI if just one or two of them hit reasonably well. And if the names you're betting on are Chamath, Thiel, etc. chances are pretty good that will happen.
Who didn’t, honestly. Whole thing has been manipulated from the beginning.So did you expect flat out market manipulation?
It's a whipsaw, be careful. It's only going to decay into close and will only cause more paranoia to owners as its values creep in AH, imo.GME moving again.....
That was good TV. They didn't get the charge call on that interview.The Winkle Voss brothers are getting ripped into right now, it’s hilarious. They are extremely unlikable. Similar to every big goofy white guy that plays for Duke.
The proliferation of retail trader social media/internet communication in combination with free trade/ improved ease of use trading platforms has changed market dynamics.I have no idea what's happening here, but find it completely fascinating
Old man thought - Why can't you youngsters buy quality companies and be happy with a 10-15% yearly return?I’m going down with the ship if needed on these, but once this is over I’m out of the stock market. Clear to me it’s more corrupt than any other place I could put money. I think the timing of this right when a bunch of us casuals were funding accounts for the first time is going to do long term damage to young people ever wanting to do stocks.
They made one really poor point where they blamed government to some extent for lack of regulation on the hedgies but didn't articulate it well and the host kind of took it as if they were implying the government ordered the Robinhood shutdown and went off on them.The Winkle Voss brothers are getting ripped into right now, it’s hilarious. They are extremely unlikable. Similar to every big goofy white guy that plays for Duke.
It has but to be as obvious as limiting buys. Then again what's a 1 billion dollar fine vs insolvency.Who didn’t, honestly. Whole thing has been manipulated from the beginning.
Sure but own up to the poor point and move on.They made one really poor point where they blamed government to some extent for lack of regulation on the hedgies but didn't articulate it well and the host kind of took it as if they were implying the government ordered the Robinhood shutdown and went off on them.
Other than that I think they made some great points. I loved their intro when asked if they own any of these stocks and they replied something like "we specifically made sure we don't have any open positions on these stocks when we came on to talk about it because we did not want to have any conflicts of interest, unlike the people you typically interview who almost always have a monetary stake in what they're saying".
There were basically saying "who convinced RH to stop trading those stocks?"That was good TV. They didn't get the charge call on that interview.![]()
There is 100% a concentrated effort to kill GME by the call tomorrow, lol. It's honestly amazing to see the process in place when you fly too close to the sun....and halted again.....lol
Saw this on twitter last night - investing in "quality companies" made me think of it.Old man thought - Why can't you youngsters buy quality companies and be happy with a 10-15% yearly return?
Lots of accumulation right now. Should be interesting to see how it ends the day.Was it halted? Something doesn't look right.
I'm up 30% on BLDP (very small position, sadly). So thanks for that.There is nothing wrong with taking small shots. I do that too with certain stocks (BLDP cough cough, BLMN and MGM when they were slaughtered and we made doubles inside of 4-5 months). As long as your willing to lose every cent of those "small shots”.
Absolutely. Seen this so many times in my life it is hard to even keep count anymore.So did you expect flat out market manipulation?
Didn't they mention government involvement as well?There were basically saying "who convinced RH to stop trading those stocks?"
I think we now know that the hedge funders (who do 60% of RH business) pressured them to do so. And the doofus twins were trying to get CNBC to find that story. And they should.
If that CNBC always follows up like that I wish he were a big time regular anchor. That was great.They made one really poor point where they blamed government to some extent for lack of regulation on the hedgies but didn't articulate it well and the host kind of took it as if they were implying the government ordered the Robinhood shutdown and went off on them.
Other than that I think they made some great points. I loved their intro when asked if they own any of these stocks and they replied something like "we specifically made sure we don't have any open positions on these stocks when we came on to talk about it because we did not want to have any conflicts of interest, unlike the people you typically interview who almost always have a monetary stake in what they're saying".
they aren't going to change the rules against themselves.I don't see how this doesn't trigger regulatory action and/or lawsuits.
I’m sure it will but I doubt they dig too deep. The groups that made the most money on this aren’t the Reddit kids.I don't see how this doesn't trigger regulatory action and/or lawsuits.
It will. Lawyers are already lining up.I don't see how this doesn't trigger regulatory action and/or lawsuits.
AgreedI’m sure it will but I doubt they dig too deep. The groups that made the most money on this aren’t the Reddit kids.
People have got to understand this has happened forever. Just because it's being exposed on social platforms to be more transparent doesn't mean it's a new thing.Absolutely. Seen this so many times in my life it is hard to even keep count anymore.
I'm talking about RobinHood, based on the Twitter quote above from above:He definitely is not siding with the hedge funds.