What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stock Thread (41 Viewers)

So you see nothing positive?
Is it positive that there were less SAEs in the Leronlimab arm - yes.

But I read into the results presented and wonder why they’re  presented as they are. I shared my thoughts. So what’s next, try for phase 3? The ball is in CYDY’s court.

 
Mine has not had an update ina while, either. Unsure of it as a source at this point>

https://www.boerse-berlin.com/index.php/Shares?isin=US23283M1018

Note disclaimer on their page:

OTC-QB and OTC-BB are US-American off-exchange trading platforms. The companies listed there are not subject to the regulations of an American exchange but have to fulfil disclosure obligations towards the American exchange supervisory body SEC. Both markets are therefore accepted as “recognized markets” for secondary listings.

Despite the transparency obligations on the home market it cannot be prevented in all cases that disreputable market participants try to influence trade in fraudulent ways. Regarding OTC-QB and OTC-BB Börse Berlin has made the experience that such influencing may not only take place at Börse Berlin alone, but also simultaneously at the American trading venue.
That's what I found too.  Love the disclaimer.

 
Is it positive that there were less SAEs in the Leronlimab arm - yes.

But I read into the results presented and wonder why they’re  presented as they are. I shared my thoughts. So what’s next, try for phase 3? The ball is in CYDY’s court.
I'm not sure what you mean presented as they are...what other way would you have presented them?

I'm not trying to be a ####, just not sure what else they could have done.

I think everyone agrees that the data is not complete, want to see detailed efficacy results.  Based on usual timelines for this to be completed is it not unreasonable to expect those results over a weekend?

Are you saying that they should have released nothing at this point?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure what you mean presented as they are...what other way would you have presented them?

I'm not trying to be a ####, just not sure what else they could have done.

I think everyone agrees that the data is not complete, want to see detailed efficacy results.  Based on usual timelines for this to be completed is it not unreasonable to expect those results over a weekend?

Are you saying that should have released nothing at this point?
If the death had been in the placebo group I'm sure the press release would be different.

 
CytoDyn’s (OTCMKTS: CYDY) Strong Safety Data in Mild to Moderate Smokes Gilead (NASDAQ: GILD) & Crushes Endpoint Leading to the First Potential COVID-19 Approval

ByChris Sandburg

Posted on July 21, 2020

CytoDyn Inc. (OTCMKTS: CYDY) announced groundbreaking safety results from its phase 2 Mild to Moderate COVID-19 trial today.  The company reported a statistically significant reduction in Severe Adverse Events (SAEs) over placebo.  In Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ: GILD) SIMPLE Trial, remdesivir had Adverse Events as high as 55% versus 45% in the Standard of Care (SOC).  In April, this paltry trial data earned remdesivir an emergency use authorization.   In comparison to leronlimab, remdesivir had significantly worse safety data and only a 4 day reduction in the time to recovery.  In the active arm, leronlimab only had 14% SAEs versus 39% SAEs in the placebo group. Dissecting the data even more there is an even more powerful finding.  The press release stated “none of the SAEs in leronlimab arm were deemed related to study drug administration by the investigators.”

One of the biggest hurdles of regulatory approval is the safety section.  These results earn leronlimab exceptionally high marks with respect to safety, but should come as no surprise because over 750 HIV patients have taken the drug without any safety issues.  In the coming days or weeks the company plans on following up with the efficacy part of the trial and reveals whether or not it met its primary endpoint of clinical improvement assessed on a 12 point scale.  The reason for optimism that leronlimab will crush its primary endpoint lies in the huge statistical reduction in SAEs.  Scott Kelly, M.D., CytoDyn’s Chief Medical Officer, commented,

“We believe the significant reduction in SAEs in the leronlimab group ultimately translates into improved patient clinical outcomes.  Prior drugs in clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19 have resulted in an increase in SAEs in the drug treated arm versus placebo.  We are extremely proud of these results.”

In a disease plagued with complications a severe reduction in the number of those complications is anecdotal evidence that the drug works.  To quote Dr. Bruce Patterson of IncellDX, “anecdotes don’t come off of life support.”

REMDESIVIR VS LERONLIMAB

Leronlimab’s safety data shows a statistically significant reduction in SAEs of 32% between the active and placebo arm.  In most clinical trials a reduction of 30% or more represents an approvable endpoint.  Drilling down on the data we uncover that none of the SAEs were due to leronlimab, and that there was practically speaking a 100% reduction in SAEs.  Remdesivir’s SIMPLE trial didn’t have a control arm, but it’s worth noting that the standard of care had a lower number of SAE’s than the active arm with remdesivir.  What accounts for this anomaly is that remdesivir has 23% SAE’s (e.g. multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, hypotension) in the patients that take it.  Remdesivir is not a drug you want to give prophylactically.  In layman’s terms the remdesivir cure could be worse than the disease, albeit not by much. 

 APPROVABLE DRUG

Fauci called remdesivir “the standard of care” and if we hold Fauci to his word then a 32% reduction in the SAEs is an approvable drug.  With respect to efficacy leronlimab must beat a median recovery time of 11 days.  Anecdotal results from the UCLA study on critical patients showed that the average time of hospitalization was 5 days.  The anecdotal data using a patient population more severe shows that leronlimab could really make a dent in the length of hospital stays.  In fact, leronlimab could turn the tide in this war against COVID-19.  If the FDA sees fit to approve a very safe drug on the verge of HIV approval then the world will have a drug that arrests the disease progression, prevents people from dying, gets people out of the hospital, and could eventually turn this economy around.

The next readout is in the CD12 trial for severe COVID-19 patients.  CytoDyn has requested the Drug Safety Monitoring Committee to review the progress.  If these mild to moderate results translate to the severe group there is a very real chance that they will pull a “Fauci” and deem it unethical to continue with the placebo arm.  In the severe group mortality is being measured, and if the placebo group closely resembles the SOC there will be deaths.  The number of deaths in the control arm will be compared to the number of deaths in the active drug arm.  

It seems abundantly clear there is a statistically significant reduction in SAEs in the mild to moderate group.  Assuming there is also a significant reduction in SAEs in the severe group there will be a corresponding reduction of death in the active arm. It’s important to highlight that SAEs in the severe group are more likely to translate into death so lowering the number of SAEs is tantamount to lowering the death rate.  Based on this logic investors should be prepared for an FDA decision on approval, Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD), or a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) leading to approval.        

 INVESTMENT SUMMARY

It’s very clear from these trial results that leronlimab is on the pathway to expedited FDA approval.  Within weeks it’s possible if not probable that leronlimab will be the first drug approved in COVID-19.  The worldwide pandemic has necessitated the development of a treatment for COVID-19 while the race for vaccine candidates continues as Moderna (NASDAQ: MRNA), Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), and AstraZeneca (NYSE: AZN) jockey for position.  Leronlimab has the ability to get people out of the hospital.  It is a simple subcutaneous shot that is very easily administered.  Overall it’s a game changer in the war against COVID-19, and is a much more viable treatment than remdesivir.  After the STAT News report, $10 billion of market cap flowed into GILD on news that they had a viable therapeutic.  Using this same benchmark for valuation it is anticipated that CYDY will gravitate to the $25 price target as the market anticipates approval.  CYDY is not a one trick pony and has a platform technology that would likely expand indications in HIV, cancer, NASH, Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and other immunological diseases.  Many of these indications overlap GILD’s current pipeline, perplexing many CYDY shareholders who thought GILD was going to purchase CYDY.  It seems clear that CYDY has intentions to develop its own pipeline, forge licensing deals, pursue a NASDAQ listing in the coming weeks, and compete head to head against GILD starting with remdesivir.      

From Insider Financial, whoever tf that is.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it positive that there were less SAEs in the Leronlimab arm - yes.

But I read into the results presented and wonder why they’re  presented as they are. I shared my thoughts. So what’s next, try for phase 3? The ball is in CYDY’s court.
I don’t think any realistic investor anticipated an EUA after a 75 patient trial.

i do believe once we see efficacy here and positive interim on the Critical group, in a perfect world it is possible, especially with a POTUS desperate for a win.

 
There was lots of pressure to release something today. This may have been the best they could do in a short time frame. It's topline after all. 

If I'm a short, Trump's tweet coupled with the restart of the WH briefings would scare the crap out of me.

 
Balakrishna Bhat Divana

16m  · 

Safety: None of the SAEs in the leronlimab arm were deemed related to study drug administration by the investigators. So, there is absolutely no safety issues.

Efficacy: Significantly less AE/ASEs in the treatment arm compared to placebo arm indicates that the drug is very efficacious. The real efficacy number is determined based on condition of patients on days 0, 3, 7, and 14. We will have to wait.

 
Remember this is our primary measure:

Clinical Improvement as assessed by change in total symptom score (for fever, myalgia, dyspnea and cough) [ Time Frame: Day 14 ]

Note: The total score per patient ranges from 0 to 12 points. Each symptom is graded from 0 to 3. [0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe]. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Primary outcome measure

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.

 
I saw BLMN is back up to $10.60 pre-market so I was thinking I'd dump my $10.27 cost shares today.  I wonder if Trump's news conference, and promotion of therapeutics will give the restaurant biz a boost though?

 
Ronnie Smsn· 

The shorts are doing their best to kill this report on Twitter. I’m trying to refute their claims and politely explain the science but I am a lone voice...

 
Ronnie Smsn· 

The shorts are doing their best to kill this report on Twitter. I’m trying to refute their claims and politely explain the science but I am a lone voice...
Does someone have access to the current short percentage?

 
My bottom line is no chance I’m selling on this.
I'd push back by claiming that a pull back is likely if/when CYDY sniffs $10. If you believe in the drug then just hold, of course. But if you believe that this thing is manipulable (and I do), then the $10 mark seems to be a fine place to sell a fraction with the intention of buying back when it pulls back into the 7s or 8s. See also: chet.

 
CytoDyn’s (OTCMKTS: CYDY) Strong Safety Data in Mild to Moderate Smokes Gilead (NASDAQ: GILD) & Crushes Endpoint Leading to the First Potential COVID-19 Approval

ByChris Sandburg

Posted on July 21, 2020

CytoDyn Inc. (OTCMKTS: CYDY) announced groundbreaking safety results from its phase 2 Mild to Moderate COVID-19 trial today.  The company reported a statistically significant reduction in Severe Adverse Events (SAEs) over placebo.  In Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ: GILD) SIMPLE Trial, remdesivir had Adverse Events as high as 55% versus 45% in the Standard of Care (SOC).  In April, this paltry trial data earned remdesivir an emergency use authorization.   In comparison to leronlimab, remdesivir had significantly worse safety data and only a 4 day reduction in the time to recovery.  In the active arm, leronlimab only had 14% SAEs versus 39% SAEs in the placebo group. Dissecting the data even more there is an even more powerful finding.  The press release stated “none of the SAEs in leronlimab arm were deemed related to study drug administration by the investigators.”

One of the biggest hurdles of regulatory approval is the safety section.  These results earn leronlimab exceptionally high marks with respect to safety, but should come as no surprise because over 750 HIV patients have taken the drug without any safety issues.  In the coming days or weeks the company plans on following up with the efficacy part of the trial and reveals whether or not it met its primary endpoint of clinical improvement assessed on a 12 point scale.  The reason for optimism that leronlimab will crush its primary endpoint lies in the huge statistical reduction in SAEs.  Scott Kelly, M.D., CytoDyn’s Chief Medical Officer, commented,

“We believe the significant reduction in SAEs in the leronlimab group ultimately translates into improved patient clinical outcomes.  Prior drugs in clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19 have resulted in an increase in SAEs in the drug treated arm versus placebo.  We are extremely proud of these results.”

In a disease plagued with complications a severe reduction in the number of those complications is anecdotal evidence that the drug works.  To quote Dr. Bruce Patterson of IncellDX, “anecdotes don’t come off of life support.”

REMDESIVIR VS LERONLIMAB

Leronlimab’s safety data shows a statistically significant reduction in SAEs of 32% between the active and placebo arm.  In most clinical trials a reduction of 30% or more represents an approvable endpoint.  Drilling down on the data we uncover that none of the SAEs were due to leronlimab, and that there was practically speaking a 100% reduction in SAEs.  Remdesivir’s SIMPLE trial didn’t have a control arm, but it’s worth noting that the standard of care had a lower number of SAE’s than the active arm with remdesivir.  What accounts for this anomaly is that remdesivir has 23% SAE’s (e.g. multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, hypotension) in the patients that take it.  Remdesivir is not a drug you want to give prophylactically.  In layman’s terms the remdesivir cure could be worse than the disease, albeit not by much. 

 APPROVABLE DRUG

Fauci called remdesivir “the standard of care” and if we hold Fauci to his word then a 32% reduction in the SAEs is an approvable drug.  With respect to efficacy leronlimab must beat a median recovery time of 11 days.  Anecdotal results from the UCLA study on critical patients showed that the average time of hospitalization was 5 days.  The anecdotal data using a patient population more severe shows that leronlimab could really make a dent in the length of hospital stays.  In fact, leronlimab could turn the tide in this war against COVID-19.  If the FDA sees fit to approve a very safe drug on the verge of HIV approval then the world will have a drug that arrests the disease progression, prevents people from dying, gets people out of the hospital, and could eventually turn this economy around.

The next readout is in the CD12 trial for severe COVID-19 patients.  CytoDyn has requested the Drug Safety Monitoring Committee to review the progress.  If these mild to moderate results translate to the severe group there is a very real chance that they will pull a “Fauci” and deem it unethical to continue with the placebo arm.  In the severe group mortality is being measured, and if the placebo group closely resembles the SOC there will be deaths.  The number of deaths in the control arm will be compared to the number of deaths in the active drug arm.  

It seems abundantly clear there is a statistically significant reduction in SAEs in the mild to moderate group.  Assuming there is also a significant reduction in SAEs in the severe group there will be a corresponding reduction of death in the active arm. It’s important to highlight that SAEs in the severe group are more likely to translate into death so lowering the number of SAEs is tantamount to lowering the death rate.  Based on this logic investors should be prepared for an FDA decision on approval, Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD), or a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) leading to approval.        

 INVESTMENT SUMMARY

It’s very clear from these trial results that leronlimab is on the pathway to expedited FDA approval.  Within weeks it’s possible if not probable that leronlimab will be the first drug approved in COVID-19.  The worldwide pandemic has necessitated the development of a treatment for COVID-19 while the race for vaccine candidates continues as Moderna (NASDAQ: MRNA), Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), and AstraZeneca (NYSE: AZN) jockey for position.  Leronlimab has the ability to get people out of the hospital.  It is a simple subcutaneous shot that is very easily administered.  Overall it’s a game changer in the war against COVID-19, and is a much more viable treatment than remdesivir.  After the STAT News report, $10 billion of market cap flowed into GILD on news that they had a viable therapeutic.  Using this same benchmark for valuation it is anticipated that CYDY will gravitate to the $25 price target as the market anticipates approval.  CYDY is not a one trick pony and has a platform technology that would likely expand indications in HIV, cancer, NASH, Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and other immunological diseases.  Many of these indications overlap GILD’s current pipeline, perplexing many CYDY shareholders who thought GILD was going to purchase CYDY.  It seems clear that CYDY has intentions to develop its own pipeline, forge licensing deals, pursue a NASDAQ listing in the coming weeks, and compete head to head against GILD starting with remdesivir.      

From Insider Financial, whoever tf that is.
Post the link plz

 
My bottom line is no chance I’m selling on this.
You and I sold a bit yesterday to cover ourselves. I’m the same way and I’m letting it roll. Funny thing is I have about the same number of shares I had when it went to $10 so really only sold extras I bought after the bear raid. It was enough to make me comfortable going forward. If it does somehow get to $10+, I’ll probably sell another chunk to book a nice profit and see where it goes. If the results are great enough to get approval then it may blow by $10, who knows.

 
Mine has not had an update ina while, either. Unsure of it as a source at this point>

https://www.boerse-berlin.com/index.php/Shares?isin=US23283M1018

Note disclaimer on their page:

OTC-QB and OTC-BB are US-American off-exchange trading platforms. The companies listed there are not subject to the regulations of an American exchange but have to fulfil disclosure obligations towards the American exchange supervisory body SEC. Both markets are therefore accepted as “recognized markets” for secondary listings.

Despite the transparency obligations on the home market it cannot be prevented in all cases that disreputable market participants try to influence trade in fraudulent ways. Regarding OTC-QB and OTC-BB Börse Berlin has made the experience that such influencing may not only take place at Börse Berlin alone, but also simultaneously at the American trading venue.
Take this link for a German exchange: https://www.boerse-stuttgart.de/de-de/produkte/aktien/stuttgart/a0yha5-cytodyn-inc------dl--01

 
Unless your expectations were complete cure, they were good.
My expectations were results showing efficacy.  I was and still am disappointed we didn’t get those but these results are indeed impressive the more one mulls them over.

No SAEs from leronlimab.  More than 50% less SAE’s in trial vs placebo despite twice the patients.  That is meaningful and strongly suggests good efficacy because otherwise how to explain the fewer events?

 
It's not a coincidence. SAEs are defined by events such as death, hospitalization, etc.  Obviously a placebo isn't going to cause these types of events (there isn't toxicity associated with a sugar pill).  Thus, the only explanation for the SAEs to actually be lower in the drug group is if the drug prevents these occurrences from happening.  Good news but still need to see the efficacy results for confirmation.  
I mean, it depends on how much lower. Back of hand calculations, since 21.4% of placebo patients had SAEs but only 8.9% of the drug patients did, that’s statistically significant at the 5% (but not 1%) level. If two more drug patients had SAEs (so 21.4% vs 12.5%), it’s no longer significant at 5%. So the difference between significance and insignificance is razor thin with such a small group.

 
It would taste better if people weren't ####ting in the dining room
We were expecting red meat but instead got a pasta appetizer.  After the disappointment wears off the quality of the dish becomes apparent.

its good news.  Leaves me wanting my main course but it’s really good. 

 
So, noob here.

I moved some dough yesterday to a cash position to try and buy some more today. I know I'm late to the party overall, but that's neither here or there. I'm learning here.

Is it better to have the order in now before the market opens or wait a bit? 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top