What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Taking A Stand On Peyton Manning (1 Viewer)

Joe Bryant

Guide
Staff member
Hi Folks,

I've had a lot of email on this so I sent this out to the mailing list today. Thought it might make for something for you guys to discuss here too so David suggested I throw it here.

J

Hi Folks,

I know that many of you are heading to drafts tonight and this weekend and the one

question I keep hearing from folks is where we see Peyton Manning.

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this plays

out" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But the

reality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want to

know what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.

So here goes. This is sort of long so if you want to get the bottom line, scroll

down to the end. If you want to see how I support what I'm thinking, read on.

We told you the other day what Mike Chappell had in his excellent article but

here's a refresh.

Link: http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...5/1058/SPORTS03

Colts owner Jim Irsay conceded "it'll be close on Peyton. Only he will know if he's

ready. I think there's a good chance he will be.

"We know there's more rehab ahead, but he is on schedule. The anticipation is he'll

be ready, but it'll be close."

As for being ready for the Colts' nationally-televised opener against the Bears,

Manning offered optimism, not a guarantee.

"That is my goal, to be ready for that first game . . . it has been my goal all

along," he said in his first interaction with the media since a July 24 conference

call. "Hopefully it continues to progress up until that point."

Manning was unable to predict when he might be cleared to practice. He also didn't

know how much practice time he would need to get up to speed for the Bears game.

Manning has been working extensively with Erin Barill, the Colts' director of

rehabilitation, following Barill's exhaustive regimen.

"I've had a tough month," Manning said. "It's truly been a challenge for me,

certainly something totally different than I've had to ever experience. Just

constant rehab."

He has worked at regaining the range of motion in his left knee, done some throwing

to keep his arm in shape, is lifting weights and has been able to do some light

running. He did some light throwing at Lucas Oil Stadium and walked around the

field with a wrap on his left knee, but no noticeable limp.

"As far as when and how much time I'll need, we'll just kind of have to wait and

see for that," Manning said.

It's hard to imagine the Colts ushering in their Lucas Oil Stadium era without the

player most responsible for its existence in the starting lineup Sept. 7. Yet

Irsay insisted he has talked at length with Manning about the situation, and

stressed the importance for everyone involved to keep the bigger picture in mind.

"I just told him I want to make sure you feel 100 percent and you're ready to go

because it's a long season," Irsay said. "With the human body . . . you just don't

know for sure. But we're hopeful that he'll be able to go."

**************

When you consider this is the team owner talking about his star player being

hopefully ready for the season opener in your brand new stadium, I interpret "It'll

be close" to really mean something closer to "It's not looking too good for him

being ready in Week 1 but we haven't given up hope just yet." Or something close

to that.

And Manning himself sounds pretty guarded offering hope and optimism over any real

clear cut predictions.

The new news on the issue today is Michael Lombardi of The National Football Post

writing that the Colts are much more worried than they're letting on. He says that

Manning had a second procedure to clean out the knee but that mostly they're

worried about being able to control swelling in the knee.

Link: http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/2008/0...t-diner-talk-2/

Clipped from the Michael Lombardi article: "I talked to several people in the NFL

yesterday who know things and they assure me that Peyton Manning’s knee is a huge

concern for the Colts. Apparently Manning had to go through another procedure on

his knee to clean things out after having his bursa sac removed last month. What

is the most concerning is not the second operation (which the Colts are denying),

but that they cannot control the swelling in Manning’s knee and any physical

movement causes MORE swelling. Once he returns to the game, gets hit, has to

place a load on the knee, and drive the ball, there can be swelling. All I know

is that there is MUCH more here than meets the eye. Manning has the trainer come

over to HIS home for rehab and is rarely seen. Now, I have been with some big-time

quarterbacks in my career like Joe Montana and Rich Gannon and never have they

rehabbed from home. I thought this was not an issue and that Manning would be

back. However, after talking to my friends in the league, it’s clear that this is

a HUGE concern short- and long-term for the Colts. "

******************

I've cautioned you in the past to be leery of reports from the girlfriend's

cousin's boyfriend that "knows a guy". But Michael Lombardi is a former NFL

executive with 23 years of experience. He's not one of those guys that throws stuff

on the wall and sees what sticks. When he says he's worried, I start to get worried.

Now let's also look at the reality of the Colts schedule.

Week 1: Home vs Chicago. With all due respect to my many Bears fans, it's not out

of line to think this could be a winnable game with Jim Sorgi under center.

Week 2: At Minnesota. Depending on the health of Tarvaris Jackson, this one is a

tougher game. Sorgi would have to face a noisy stadium and an explosive Vikings

team.

Week 3: Home vs Jacksonville. An all important divisional game against a

Jacksonville team that should be very tough.

Week 4: Bye. This is the first week that any team will be on a bye and the Colts

catch a break being in this first group.

So here's what I think that could mean. I think for Week 1, we're now looking at a

50% or more chance that Manning does not play. That could change next week but

that's my feel on this Friday afternoon. I think the Colts will be worried about

two things:

#1. Working the knee too hard and getting into a situation where they're "chasing"

the swelling each week. They know it's a long season and they don't want to get

started on a cycle they have trouble getting off of.

#2. Mobility. Manning isn't the most mobile guy out there of course but he's

extremely good at sliding around in the pocket. People used to call that "happy

feet" until he went a decade or so of 4,000 yard seasons. The truth is his feet

and legs buy him lots of extra time moving slightly around the pocket and if he's

limited there, he could be limiting his ability to protect himself. Something the

Colts would be very hesitant to do.

So I think there's a better than 50% chance he sits week 1 and they see what Sorgi

does.

If the Colts win and Sorgi plays reasonably well, there will be plenty of pressure

for Manning to sit another week and let Sorgi get the start in Minnesota. I'm just

spitballing here but I can see the chances that Manning misses the Vikings game

being about 35-40%.

If Sorgi starts the Vikings game and doesn't fare well (very possible in my opinion)

that's where the pressure will start to mount. Let's say the Colts lose at

Minnesota and they're sitting at 1-1 heading to a huge Week 3 divisional game

against Jacksonville.

The Colts will be facing a tough decision: Do they start Manning in Week 3 or rest

him to get through the bye week and let him start Week 5? I think much of that will

be dependent on how well Sorgi played. And also of course on Manning's health. And

also on the Colts record. If they're 0-2 entering week 3, I'd say Manning starts if

he can walk. If the Colts are 1-1 and Sorgi has looked ok, it'll be a tougher

decision. If the Colts are 2-0 and Sorgi has looked very good, it'll be much easier

for the Colts to rest Manning until Week 5.

If you made me put odds on Manning missing the Week 3 game, I'd say there is about

a 20% chance he sits there.

But it really does depend on how the dominoes fall each game. Obviously, the better

Sorgi performs, the more time it buys Manning. But the Week 3 divisional game

followed by the Bye week are big factors too.

Bottom Line: As of Friday afternoon, I think there's a better than 50% chance that

Manning misses the Week 1 game. I think there's a 35-40% chance he misses Week 2.

And I think there's a 20% chance he sits for Week 3 and then starts after the bye

week in Week 5.

And remember, the NFL regular season may be 17 weeks long, but most fantasy regular

seasons are just 14 weeks long. So missing 3 games is 21% of the regular season.

That's not insignificant.

Bottom Bottom Line: Looking at the Average Draft Position (ADP) where owners are

drafting Manning, we're now more pessimistic than most owners. He's still currently

going about #12 overall which we think is too high. We already had him projected

behind Brady, Brees and Romo (at #31 overall). He'll probably remain our QB #4,

but move further down the overall list (possibly as low as 40-45 overall), but

still before Carson Palmer. It's a gamble to let him drop this far on the overall

list and it's certainly possible he goes out and has his normal season for an owner

that drafted him way later than normal and be a huge value for that owner. That

was my original feeling on him. But despite what the Colts are saying, I believe

his rehab has gone poorly and the chances are there for him to be limited this

season. Enough of a chance that we're advocating letting him fall. It's probably

not the safe prediction as it would be better to say "let's see". But it's our job

to take a stand and that's where we are right now.

Bottomest Bottom Line: Let someone else over-value Manning.

Hope you have a great rest of your day. For information on subscribing to the

Footballguys website for all our content from now until the Super Bowl, you can

check out this url: http://footballguys.com/whysubscribe.php

It's just 26.95 and we'll deliver to our folks about 50,000 pages of content this

season with the one goal of helping you win your league. Plus we have a money back

guarantee if you don't think what we offer is a good value.

Good luck to any of you folks drafting tonight and this weekend. Hope you smoke the

competition.

J

******************

Joe Bryant

Owner - www.Footballguys.com
 
One thing I didn't go into on this email was how it affects the WRs. Obviously, they take a hit too as we don't expect Sorgi to put up Manning's numbers. We'll have more on that here soon. As you know, David is always super tight on making sure everything balances there. Recievers can't catch more passes than you project the QB to complete.

J

 
thanks guys - I've been zero'ing in on Manning for a couple weeks, but I've decided to let him slide....great insight - cheers.

 
I concur.

On the other hand.....

.....does anyone have a clue on how Sorgi will do? I've totally ignored anything about him up to this point. How's his arm? Can he run the offense in a similar fashion (making the reads like Peyton does)? Does he have any extra chemistry with any of the starters? I have a feeling only a true Colts homer would know any of this.....

 
Dunno. There were pictures of the walkthrough he did a couple days ago and his knee didnt look swollen at all. Just a light wrap on it.

 
Just as something else to add to the discussion -- Jim Sorgi's regular season stats:

77/126 (61.1% completion percentage) 751 yards, 6.0 YPA, 6 TD's, 1 INT

 
Dunno. There were pictures of the walkthrough he did a couple days ago and his knee didnt look swollen at all. Just a light wrap on it.
Hi Fruitypebbles,It's hard to tell from a pic but in the one attached, it looks like it's swollen. You can't tell of course how much of that is the wrap.Jmanning_knee.jpg

 
It sure looks like Joe and David are on the money again.

I am in total agreement with their position and advice regarding Manning.

 
I think Manning will start in Week 1. He will preserve his streak, get the team an impressive lead, and then sit out the second half.

But I am impressed that Joe has actually taken a position instead of sitting on the fence.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dunno. There were pictures of the walkthrough he did a couple days ago and his knee didnt look swollen at all. Just a light wrap on it.
Hi Fruitypebbles,It's hard to tell from a pic but in the one attached, it looks like it's swollen. You can't tell of course how much of that is the wrap.

J
Have you seen this one from practice on Tuesday.http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section...mp;Profile=1217
Yes. That's what I mean about the trouble in being able to control the swelling. I think they're worried about it being an up and down thing that is triggered by activity. And he's done nothing on it really yet that'll be close to what he'll do in a game.J

 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this playsout" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But thereality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want toknow what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.....does anyone have a clue on how Sorgi will do? I've totally ignored anything about him up to this point. How's his arm? Can he run the offense in a similar fashion (making the reads like Peyton does)? Does he have any extra chemistry with any of the starters? I have a feeling only a true Colts homer would know any of this.....
As a Colts homer, I can assure you that Sorgi's arm makes Chad Pennington look like John Elway. Because of his limited reps over the years, I cannot assess his rapport with the first team but I would have to assume his limited time with them has not allowed any special chemistry to develop. The offense totally changes when he is in - no more audibles at the line of scrimmage. As a fan, I am seriosuly concerned about the offense with Manning out and that season opener will be one ugly offensive game if it is an Orton vs. Sorgi slugfest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this playsout" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But thereality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want toknow what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:lmao:
 
Wouldn't Addai take a hit too? Or does he get so much work now that it balances out?
I would think he's be alright against the Bears. Probably get 25 touches and over 100 total yards. Against the Vikings and Jags i'd be more worried if Manning's not under center.
 
I'm in total agreement with this, and not because I'm a FBG.

This has been my stance all along, buyer beware when it comes to Manning. As I've pointed out in other threads, there was way too much mystery going on with this issue and we weren't getting any "real" reports as to Manning's circumstance or progress. Plus the fact that they were hiding him away. You had to know they were hiding something.

 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this playsout" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But thereality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want toknow what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:thumbdown:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this playsout" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But thereality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want toknow what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:blackdot:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
thumbs down because you are picking at wording in an email and missing the point... HELLO!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing I didn't go into on this email was how it affects the WRs. Obviously, they take a hit too as we don't expect Sorgi to put up Manning's numbers. We'll have more on that here soon. As you know, David is always super tight on making sure everything balances there. Recievers can't catch more passes than you project the QB to complete.J
Thanks Joe. Should be interesting.PS to those asking about Sorgi. He sucks. I mean really sucks.
 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this plays

out" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But the

reality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want to

know what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:coffee:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
thumbs down because you are picking at wording in an email and missing the point... HELLO!
Listen, don't get me wrong, I appreciate Joe's effort here. I have been a longtime subscriber and I love what they do here at FBG, BUT I think that this email should have been directed towards subscribers not everyone. As I was reading it I had the feeling that Joe was putting FBG out there by taking his stand, did he have to do it, no, but he did. He wrote it in a way that suggested to me, "you guys pay us for opinions, well here's our opinion". Well I have a problem with that. It's my right as a paying customer to have a problem with that. Personally I have leaguemates who get the newsletter but don't subscribe, and I think that they should not have received the same opinions that paying customers do.I just felt that this email falls under the subscriber benefits, and not for everyone. If you disagree, that's cool. Just giving my :thumbup:

 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this playsout" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But thereality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want toknow what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:coffee:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
I could be mistaken, and I probably am, but I was under the impression that the non-paying members stopped receiving the newsletter once the premium content starts.
 
Maybe for the paying customers Joe can send out another email telling us Manning owners who to target for weeks 1-4 as a low priced backup.

 
:thumbup:

This is spot on.

Not because it is guaranteed you (Joe) will be correct. But that in looking at mitigating your draft risk it is not worth getting Manning based on a % upside he may have over others. You're much better getting someone "safer" and grabbing another top flight QB later in the draft who may outperform Manning anyway.

I'd still have Wayne over any other WR though.

 
Just as something else to add to the discussion -- Jim Sorgi's regular season stats:77/126 (61.1% completion percentage) 751 yards, 6.0 YPA, 6 TD's, 1 INT
Also keep in mind that those numbers mostly came with Harrison and Wayne on the sidelines.If Manning misses time, I wouldn't be shocked at all if Sorgi was a borderline top-10 QB in the meantime.
 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this plays

out" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But the

reality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want to

know what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:thumbup:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
thumbs down because you are picking at wording in an email and missing the point... HELLO!
Listen, don't get me wrong, I appreciate Joe's effort here. I have been a longtime subscriber and I love what they do here at FBG, BUT I think that this email should have been directed towards subscribers not everyone. As I was reading it I had the feeling that Joe was putting FBG out there by taking his stand, did he have to do it, no, but he did. He wrote it in a way that suggested to me, "you guys pay us for opinions, well here's our opinion". Well I have a problem with that. It's my right as a paying customer to have a problem with that. Personally I have leaguemates who get the newsletter but don't subscribe, and I think that they should not have received the same opinions that paying customers do.I just felt that this email falls under the subscriber benefits, and not for everyone. If you disagree, that's cool. Just giving my :wall:
Guys, it's a business. This email probably just landed FBG's another 100-200 "on-the-fence" subscribers. That's real money.
 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this plays

out" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But the

reality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want to

know what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:thumbup:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
thumbs down because you are picking at wording in an email and missing the point... HELLO!
Listen, don't get me wrong, I appreciate Joe's effort here. I have been a longtime subscriber and I love what they do here at FBG, BUT I think that this email should have been directed towards subscribers not everyone. As I was reading it I had the feeling that Joe was putting FBG out there by taking his stand, did he have to do it, no, but he did. He wrote it in a way that suggested to me, "you guys pay us for opinions, well here's our opinion". Well I have a problem with that. It's my right as a paying customer to have a problem with that. Personally I have leaguemates who get the newsletter but don't subscribe, and I think that they should not have received the same opinions that paying customers do.I just felt that this email falls under the subscriber benefits, and not for everyone. If you disagree, that's cool. Just giving my :wall:
Guys, it's a business. This email probably just landed FBG's another 100-200 "on-the-fence" subscribers. That's real money.
Starbucks does the same thing.link:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/msconnections/1583426856/

 
I'm in total agreement with this, and not because I'm a FBG.This has been my stance all along, buyer beware when it comes to Manning. As I've pointed out in other threads, there was way too much mystery going on with this issue and we weren't getting any "real" reports as to Manning's circumstance or progress. Plus the fact that they were hiding him away. You had to know they were hiding something.
I'm not sure what everyone expects from the Colts. Do you want them to come out and say that they are 100% sure Manning will start the opener? No way they can do that based on the fact that he's not 100% yet. They are hopeful. They also haven't ruled him out of the last preseason game, which I think says a lot. I don't blame Manning for "hiding". I'd hide too if every word out of everyone's mouth will be about his injury. The guy is rehabbing, he has been on the practice field for walkthroughs. He is ON SCHEDULE. What I love the most from the blog article is that it says " However, after talking to my friends in the league, it’s clear that this is a HUGE concern short- and long-term for the Colts.". LOL. How is this a long term concern. Did his leg fall off or something? I hope this drops Wayne down to my 2.07 pick, and Manning to 3.06. I'll take them both with a smile on my face.
 
I am officially off the fence on my TO or Wayne pick.
Haha me too. i was thinking about Wayne vs Owens at the pool for 30 minutes... i think Wayne will still end the yaer a top10 WR, but if both had healthy QBs, they are def. both locks for Top5 WR production. Now just TO is a lock, and Randy mOss & Fitzgerald too IMO to be top5 "for sure"
 
Are you serious? You're really crying because some guys in your league got some news that a guy on a website thinks there is a 50% chance of playing the first week? If the report was that Peytonis out the first 4 weeks then I can see your point, but someone's speculation on an injury, your just being silly. You're allowed to think on your own and draw your own conlcusions and if the guys in your league beat you because of that email then you need more help then this website can provide. I appreciate Joe sending out emails like this, and I am not a subscriber, but if his opinions turn out to be true than i ammore likely to buck up and become a paid member.

Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this plays

out" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But the

reality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want to

know what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:unsure:
Why the thumbsdown? I mean Joe even said "you don't pay us". His words not mine. Newsletter subscribers don't pay anything. He could have written from a different angle that's all.
thumbs down because you are picking at wording in an email and missing the point... HELLO!
Listen, don't get me wrong, I appreciate Joe's effort here. I have been a longtime subscriber and I love what they do here at FBG, BUT I think that this email should have been directed towards subscribers not everyone. As I was reading it I had the feeling that Joe was putting FBG out there by taking his stand, did he have to do it, no, but he did. He wrote it in a way that suggested to me, "you guys pay us for opinions, well here's our opinion". Well I have a problem with that. It's my right as a paying customer to have a problem with that. Personally I have leaguemates who get the newsletter but don't subscribe, and I think that they should not have received the same opinions that paying customers do.I just felt that this email falls under the subscriber benefits, and not for everyone. If you disagree, that's cool. Just giving my :2cents:
 
Only problem that I have with this email is that I feel it should have been for subscribers only, especially after Joe says this:

It'd be nice if I could throw out the "it'll be interesting to see how this playsout" or the "we'll know a lot more next week." Those are true statements. But thereality is that you don't pay us $26.95 a season to sit on the fence. You want toknow what where we are on Manning RIGHT NOW.
Why send this to everyone Joe when you reference the payment thing??? I know that there are many subscribers to the newsletter that are not subscribers to content. I appreciate the "stand" but delivered poorly.
:unsure:
 
This is good stuff and all, but I'm curious as to why there has been essentially NO talk on Tom Brady at all. He hasn't played in a preseason game yet and he still has whatever leg issue that he has going on, right? I know that he practiced once or twice this week, but he's obviously not playing yet again tonight. Shouldn't we start to get a little concerned about Brady's real state of health?

 
regardless if joe is right or wrong, the well thought out analysis with links and rationalizations simply provide me with more food for thought when it comes to MY draft. i appreciate the amount of work that went into composing that email, because in a mere matter of minutes i get to discern through all of joe's analysis and then make a decision for MYSELF. that's why i pay for the subscription.

 
Mobility. Manning isn't the most mobile guy out there of course but he's

extremely good at sliding around in the pocket. People used to call that "happy

feet" until he went a decade or so of 4,000 yard seasons. The truth is his feet

and legs buy him lots of extra time moving slightly around the pocket and if he's

limited there, he could be limiting his ability to protect himself.
Something else to keep in mind along this line of thinking.Inability to slide in the pocket is a concern, but so is doing all the little things that don't look like much. The stretch play, for example, is a staple of Indy's offense. First with Edge, and now with Addai. It's not as easy as it looks. You have to basically sprint to a designated spot to allow the RB to get as wide as possible. A bum knee is really gonna screw up the timing. I'd be surprised if he could run that play at all, unless it morphed into him pitching the ball instead. But then it's impossible to sell the play fake off of that same action, something at which Manning excels. This injury will affect a lot more than pocket mobility.

 
red said:
regardless if joe is right or wrong, the well thought out analysis with links and rationalizations simply provide me with more food for thought when it comes to MY draft. i appreciate the amount of work that went into composing that email, because in a mere matter of minutes i get to discern through all of joe's analysis and then make a decision for MYSELF. that's why i pay for the subscription.
Thanks a lot, red. Your response was exactly what I was hoping for there. Thanks for letting me know.J
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As someone that has really bad knees, I was already leary of Manning. There are all sorts of nicks, bruises, sprains, etc that these guys play with all season long. However, the knee is a bit more compilicated. I had to have the same knee scoped three times before the tiny piece of cartilage that was causing the swelling was finally removed. Assuming what Michael Lombardi says above is true that they are having a hard time controlling the swelling, I think there is major reason for concern. And, let's not forget that we are talking about the same organization that downplayed another one of their marquee player's knee injuries just last season. The extent of Harrison's injury was held extremely under wraps.

 
Just how important do you guys think the consecutive game streak is to Manning? If he knows he should probably sit out a game or two to be cautious, would the streak change that thinking? Or is it totally in the hands of the medical staff?

 
red said:
regardless if joe is right or wrong, the well thought out analysis with links and rationalizations simply provide me with more food for thought when it comes to MY draft. i appreciate the amount of work that went into composing that email, because in a mere matter of minutes i get to discern through all of joe's analysis and then make a decision for MYSELF. that's why i pay for the subscription.
Thanks a lot, red. Your response was exactly what I was hoping for there. Thanks for letting me know.J
I'm not going to read every post, but even if it was said before, Joe- this is exactly what I want for my $$. When I read that email I thought: "Maybe I'll agree- maybe I won't, maybe FBG is right- maybe they aren't, but one thing is for sure: that is exactly what I want from a footballguys subscription. :lmao: :thumbup: ;)
 
from a pure medical standpoint, IMO, if Peyton's knee had that much swelling in it, then why is he not in the training room, and out on the field?

Too much speculation is out there.

Here you have a franchise QB, walking around on the field with a wrap on his knee and people are commenting on the fact that it looks swollen......

If the knee were in that bad of shape, I highly doubt you would see him on the field at all.

 
A different perspective...

Dungy: Manning still on schedule

By Mike Chappell

Posted: August 15, 2008Read Comments(1)Recommend (1)E-mail Print Share Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Yahoo Google A A TERRE HAUTE, Ind. -- Peyton Manning's latest progress report mirrors his previous ones: He's on schedule.

That was the update offered Thursday by Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy regarding the health of his starting quarterback. When the Colts break training camp this morning at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Manning will have missed all 25 full-squad workouts.

He has neither talked with the media nor been on hand for any practice sessions while he continues his recovery from July 14 surgery on his left knee to remove an infected bursa sac.

"He's doing exactly what he thought he would do,'' Dungy said. "He's rehabbing, (regaining) the range of motion, doing what they're asking him to do.

"He's throwing some. He's lifting. He's staying active. At some point he'll get the OK (to practice).''

Rookie tight end Tom Santi had a similar procedure two weeks before Manning's operation and he began running after practice on Tuesday. Dungy said Santi "is about ready to come back and practice and I would imagine Peyton will be a couple of weeks behind him.''

That would indicate Manning might not be cleared to practice until Aug. 25, which would be in line with the originally stated recovery time of four to six weeks.

Manning Still On Schedule

 
I've cautioned you in the past to be leery of reports from the girlfriend's cousin's boyfriend that "knows a guy".
Come on Joe - you are from Knoxville - you HAVE to know someone who has this info ! Wait - are you the cousin's boyfriend? :moneybag: Great note and it reminded me to re-up for the subscription - keep up the great work as always!
 
Listen, don't get me wrong, I appreciate Joe's effort here. I have been a longtime subscriber and I love what they do here at FBG, BUT I think that this email should have been directed towards subscribers not everyone. As I was reading it I had the feeling that Joe was putting FBG out there by taking his stand, did he have to do it, no, but he did. He wrote it in a way that suggested to me, "you guys pay us for opinions, well here's our opinion". Well I have a problem with that. It's my right as a paying customer to have a problem with that. Personally I have leaguemates who get the newsletter but don't subscribe, and I think that they should not have received the same opinions that paying customers do.

I just felt that this email falls under the subscriber benefits, and not for everyone. If you disagree, that's cool. Just giving my :moneybag:
Ah. I tell you what, I think it might be to FBG's benefit to give an example of what people can expect if they bridge the gap from newsletter recipients to paying subscribers. It's a form of advertising, and this particular instance is the perfect time to offer up a slice of what they have to offer, because it isn't going to break anybody's season at this point but it does show just how much thought it put into all things fantasy football.
 
"He's doing exactly what he thought he would do,'' Dungy said. "He's rehabbing, (regaining) the range of motion, doing what they're asking him to do."He's throwing some. He's lifting. He's staying active. At some point he'll get the OK (to practice).''
Live and learn. I trust nothing Dungy says publicly. Eight weeks in a row last year, he made it sound like Harrison was almost ready to play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top