What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

TE Sam LaPorta, DET (1 Viewer)

Got a long TD on a gadget play. Was his only target of the game in what was an offensive clinic by the Lions offense. Overall his performance didn’t inspire much confidence going forward that he will be more involved in the offensive game plan - particularly since they are 4-1 doing what they’re already doing.
 
Too many weapons and he’ll likely be used in mismatch situations but good luck guessing when he may be part of the game plan. Really disappointing.
 
I had picked him up after he was actually dropped in my 10 teamer with short benches. I was stoked, felt after the BYE he'd be fully healthy and a big part of the gameplan. He might still be but they're playing so well generally, he's barely involved moving the ball. That one play was a God send but otherwise...1 whole target. Just not really needed but will it change?
 
He's emerging as the poster child against early TE for a generation of drafters

I have Kmet on the bench, will probably try to sell Sam on his name value
I thought Pitts cornered the market on that?
:lmao: that's fair but saw a lot of Rd 1/Rd 2 Sam this year, I thought pitts maxed as a Rd 3 guy

The concept of Rd 1/2 TE's was dubious anyway but in the heyday of "locks" like Tony G and Kelce you could see it (in their prime).

When you have a guy underperforming to this degree and there isn't much of an arrow pointing up in terms of his usage based on an evolved offense, its a team killer.
 
He's emerging as the poster child against early TE for a generation of drafters

I have Kmet on the bench, will probably try to sell Sam on his name value
I thought Pitts cornered the market on that?
:lmao: that's fair but saw a lot of Rd 1/Rd 2 Sam this year, I thought pitts maxed as a Rd 3 guy

The concept of Rd 1/2 TE's was dubious anyway but in the heyday of "locks" like Tony G and Kelce you could see it (in their prime).

When you have a guy underperforming to this degree and there isn't much of an arrow pointing up in terms of his usage based on an evolved offense, its a team killer.
It's a week-to-week what have you done for me lately killer. People can't seem to get past that, even dynasty players. It's part of the game.
 
He's emerging as the poster child against early TE for a generation of drafters

I have Kmet on the bench, will probably try to sell Sam on his name value
I thought Pitts cornered the market on that?
:lmao: that's fair but saw a lot of Rd 1/Rd 2 Sam this year, I thought pitts maxed as a Rd 3 guy

The concept of Rd 1/2 TE's was dubious anyway but in the heyday of "locks" like Tony G and Kelce you could see it (in their prime).

When you have a guy underperforming to this degree and there isn't much of an arrow pointing up in terms of his usage based on an evolved offense, its a team killer.
It's a week-to-week what have you done for me lately killer. People can't seem to get past that, even dynasty players. It's part of the game.
True for the one off variance. But you also gain information week to week, Jamo is not going anywhere and he's eating into LaPorta's pie.

No one is saying cut Laporta but if you drafted today, where would you take him versus September 1st?
 
He's emerging as the poster child against early TE for a generation of drafters

I have Kmet on the bench, will probably try to sell Sam on his name value
I thought Pitts cornered the market on that?
:lmao: that's fair but saw a lot of Rd 1/Rd 2 Sam this year, I thought pitts maxed as a Rd 3 guy

The concept of Rd 1/2 TE's was dubious anyway but in the heyday of "locks" like Tony G and Kelce you could see it (in their prime).

When you have a guy underperforming to this degree and there isn't much of an arrow pointing up in terms of his usage based on an evolved offense, its a team killer.
It's a week-to-week what have you done for me lately killer. People can't seem to get past that, even dynasty players. It's part of the game.
True for the one off variance. But you also gain information week to week, Jamo is not going anywhere and he's eating into LaPorta's pie.

No one is saying cut Laporta but if you drafted today, where would you take him versus September 1st?
Next week he will probably be on top of the world and in good graces.
 
He's emerging as the poster child against early TE for a generation of drafters

I have Kmet on the bench, will probably try to sell Sam on his name value
I thought Pitts cornered the market on that?
:lmao: that's fair but saw a lot of Rd 1/Rd 2 Sam this year, I thought pitts maxed as a Rd 3 guy

The concept of Rd 1/2 TE's was dubious anyway but in the heyday of "locks" like Tony G and Kelce you could see it (in their prime).

When you have a guy underperforming to this degree and there isn't much of an arrow pointing up in terms of his usage based on an evolved offense, its a team killer.
It's a week-to-week what have you done for me lately killer. People can't seem to get past that, even dynasty players. It's part of the game.
True for the one off variance. But you also gain information week to week, Jamo is not going anywhere and he's eating into LaPorta's pie.

No one is saying cut Laporta but if you drafted today, where would you take him versus September 1st?
Next week he will probably be on top of the world and in good graces.

I sat him for Kraft this week. Still managed to win, but it is super frustrating with LaPorta. Against a Vikings team that can put up points (especially sans Hutch in DET), I am considering plugging him back in.
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Like I said, I think Jameson Williams has a lot to do with that. With ARSB being the top guy and Williams emerging, and a top running game, there are only so many balls to go around.
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Like I said, I think Jameson Williams has a lot to do with that. With ARSB being the top guy and Williams emerging, and a top running game, there are only so many balls to go around.
Surprising when Tim Patrick AND Kalif Raymond out target LaPorta as well.
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Like I said, I think Jameson Williams has a lot to do with that. With ARSB being the top guy and Williams emerging, and a top running game, there are only so many balls to go around.
Surprising when Tim Patrick AND Kalif Raymond out target LaPorta as well.
Maybe he slept with Campbell's wife......jk
 
game script wasn't good but it was pretty discouraging seeing him get 1 target coming out of the bye. thought maybe they'd make an effort to get him more involved. not buying the injury stuff, he looked pretty good on that 50 yard td.

with the cooper trade news i'm going to put in a decent bid on njoku and he'll be in my lineup this weekend if i'm able to snag him.
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Like I said, I think Jameson Williams has a lot to do with that. With ARSB being the top guy and Williams emerging, and a top running game, there are only so many balls to go around.
Surprising when Tim Patrick AND Kalif Raymond out target LaPorta as well.
Maybe he slept with Campbell's wife......jk
Well, that was in the back of my mind or possibly Goffs wife :popcorn:

Having watched the entire last couple Lions games, it seems odd that he is so uninvolved after the rookie year he had. He looked damn good on his one target though
 
Told the whole world this was going to happen. He was being drafted waaaaay too early given the impending emergence of Jameson Williams that was being drummed up all offseason long.

If you go early TE it has to be someone with a relatively clear target domination situation. I am sort of surprised people thought this guy would repeat last year's numbers with Amon-Ra Gibbs AND Jameson, along with Campbell's love for giving Monty 20+ carries a game (who can blame him?). But, I was very wrong about Kincaid who I did think was going to dominate targets. I also took a fair amount of McBride and Kelce who I strongly preferred to LaPorta (who I considered nearly undraftable).

My favorite earlish picks were Ferguson Bowers and Engram.
Anyway I'll leave now.
 
What I tried very hard to point out in the Williams thread, but to largely deaf ears, was that the logic being used to avoid Jameson was that there were too many mouths to feed. Well, by that EXACT SAME LOGIC, if Jameson was going to take an incredibly predictable next step forward and was going to be more involved as had been CONSISTENTLY been drummed up all offseason long, then doesn't that mean there are too many mouths to feed for the others as well? Why did that logic apply to Williams but not LaPorta? Williams had flashed plenty. I always thought it was more likely that Williams would take a step forward that would be perhaps big enough to make him viable and perhaps not, but that would mathematically demand touches from elsewhere and LaPorta was the obvious one for someone consistently coming off the board as TE1 and at the 1/2 turn in TEP redrafts.

To suggest that Williams wasn't going to take that next step and eat more targets always felt like more of a longshot take IMO. The market disagreed. Long time to go still and to clarify on my own point from earlier - LaPorta is still going to have mad production and could still win leagues come playoff time.
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Had an awful wide open drop last game, but still seems be in the muddied mix
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Had an awful wide open drop last game, but still seems be in the muddied mix
LaPorta had 1 catch on 1 target last game. Did the statisticians miss a target/drop for him?
 
I mean, they score a ton and win, so it's not like they are "mis-using" him or something.
It just sucks for fantasy owners
 
What I tried very hard to point out in the Williams thread, but to largely deaf ears, was that the logic being used to avoid Jameson was that there were too many mouths to feed. Well, by that EXACT SAME LOGIC, if Jameson was going to take an incredibly predictable next step forward and was going to be more involved as had been CONSISTENTLY been drummed up all offseason long, then doesn't that mean there are too many mouths to feed for the others as well? Why did that logic apply to Williams but not LaPorta? Williams had flashed plenty. I always thought it was more likely that Williams would take a step forward that would be perhaps big enough to make him viable and perhaps not, but that would mathematically demand touches from elsewhere and LaPorta was the obvious one for someone consistently coming off the board as TE1 and at the 1/2 turn in TEP redrafts.

To suggest that Williams wasn't going to take that next step and eat more targets always felt like more of a longshot take IMO. The market disagreed. Long time to go still and to clarify on my own point from earlier - LaPorta is still going to have mad production and could still win leagues come playoff time.
People didn't consider that Goff would be throwing less as well. He's not chucking it every game.
 
What I tried very hard to point out in the Williams thread, but to largely deaf ears, was that the logic being used to avoid Jameson was that there were too many mouths to feed. Well, by that EXACT SAME LOGIC, if Jameson was going to take an incredibly predictable next step forward and was going to be more involved as had been CONSISTENTLY been drummed up all offseason long, then doesn't that mean there are too many mouths to feed for the others as well? Why did that logic apply to Williams but not LaPorta? Williams had flashed plenty. I always thought it was more likely that Williams would take a step forward that would be perhaps big enough to make him viable and perhaps not, but that would mathematically demand touches from elsewhere and LaPorta was the obvious one for someone consistently coming off the board as TE1 and at the 1/2 turn in TEP redrafts.

To suggest that Williams wasn't going to take that next step and eat more targets always felt like more of a longshot take IMO. The market disagreed. Long time to go still and to clarify on my own point from earlier - LaPorta is still going to have mad production and could still win leagues come playoff time.
People didn't consider that Goff would be throwing less as well. He's not chucking it every game.
That idea was discussed a *lot* in the Williams thread, and for good reason, but it never made sense why that same logic wasn't being applied to LaPorta at all.
 
The lack of targets for the entire year so far is...........weird
The emergence of Jameson Williams has probably contributed to that. Not to mention the running game.
I get that, but 15 targets in 5 games?

Plus he has caught 13 of them and averaging 15 yards a catch, so not like he is dropping passes or catching 5 yard dump offs. Guy is really good. Very perplexing
Like I said, I think Jameson Williams has a lot to do with that. With ARSB being the top guy and Williams emerging, and a top running game, there are only so many balls to go around.

I think it's mostly the running game. Williams isn't getting any targets either.
 
Sam LaPorta wasn't using his arm much to put his socks on in the locker room after the game. He wouldn't say exactly what the diagnosis on his left shoulder was, but said tests after the game showed "nothing major."

Dan Campbell said they’ll monitor day to day. Doesn’t look like a 4 week injury but he might miss the Jags game.
 
Not practicing for the 3rd straight day.

All their other weapons are healthy; I expect him to be declared out on the 4pm practice report.
 
Walk through only today so the Practice Report is an estimate.

Laporta was a FP and is trending toward returning this week.
 
Walk through only today so the Practice Report is an estimate.

Laporta was a FP and is trending toward returning this week.
Wonder how much he actually plays with the Thanksgiving game coming up.

He’s good to go, shouldn’t be any limitations. Generally they’re either go or no go, never known Campbell to worry about pitch counts. If someone’s not ready to go all out he’ll give him another week off.

4 games in 18 days. Last week & this week they’ve started the week off with a walkthrough instead of practice. Campbell said these guys have played together enough he’s comfortable focusing more on recovery by switching the schedule up to keep everyone fresh.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top