What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Team O Chess (1 Viewer)

Black:

First thing that comes to mind is Bh6. It might not be bad to try to open it up a little over there.

 
otello said:
Psychopav said:
I like taking with the bishop. Taking with the pawn looks like it just bottles up our bishop even more.

Otello, where do you plan to attack after taking with the pawn?
we would need to play d4 to protect the e pawn and open up for our white bishop.If we intend to play Nd6+ after they play bxc6, it may make sense to take the queen with the Rook, whereas if we took Q with pawn we would have doubled pawns. P makes a good point. How we take the Q should support our attack.
If we take with the Rook. (option A)18. Rxd3 bxc6

19. Be2

then I think they move their black bishop - Bc5, Bb4, or Bg7

they could also pull their Knight to c5 here

If we take with the Bishop (option B)

18. Bxd3 bxc6

19. O-O or Rf1

Same move options as above. Which position to we like better for an attack?

I think option B has us further along in our attack, yes?
I guess I really like the idea of getting our bishop to h5, and I don't see a good way to do that by taking the queen with the bishop. Let's look a little deeper into taking with the bishop and see what kind of attack we really do get. I'll do that tonight for a bit.
i am leaning toward taking with B.
 
Black

I like Rc8. Let's see if we can get them to make a mistake imo. I expect it will go something like this:

19.O-O Rac8 20.Rac1 Qd8 21.g5 f5

If, somewhere in there or next, they move their rook to e1 I think it's important for us to respond with our own Re8.

_____________________

White

I'm fine taking with the bishop. I prefer to taking with the rook only because it gets the bishop into the action and opens up the possibility of a castle later, if we want it.

 
White:

Let's walk through a couple scenarios (hopefully I get the notation correct...).

18. Bxd3, bxc6

19. 0-0, Bc5+

20. Kh1, 0-0

I don't see much for us here. I really like the idea of playing h4 if they castle, but it is much more effective with a Bishop on e2 or h5. I understand the desire to take the queen with the bishop because it gets him into the action, but IMO it is not nearly as powerful as taking with the rook for the following reasons: 1. We block off our rook from the d file, we do not allow ourselves the opportunity to double up our rooks (either on the f or d file), and we don't get our bishop to h5 (which is where I think it belongs).

The other scenario:

18. Rxd3, bxc6

19. Be2, Bc5 (doesn't allow us to castle, but as DB pointed out earlier, that may not be all bad.)

20. Bh5 (or Rf1), 0-0? (I'm not really sure what they do here. I think we have a pretty good attack going. They can't play Bb7 and try to 0-0-0 because we play Bxf7 then. If they 0-0 right now, I like h4. If they don't castle, we can load up pressure on the pawn at f7 by playing both rooks over to the f file.)

I just may be missing something because it appears that most people want to take with the bishop. Let me know how you see that playing out because I am just not seeing a strong attack by taking with the Bishop.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
White:

Let's walk through a couple scenarios (hopefully I get the notation correct...).

18. Bxd3, bxc6

19. 0-0, Bc5+

20. Kh1, 0-0

I don't see much for us here. I really like the idea of playing h4 if they castle, but it is much more effective with a Bishop on e2 or h5. I understand the desire to take the queen with the bishop because it gets him into the action, but IMO it is not nearly as powerful as taking with the rook for the following reasons: 1. We block off our rook from the d file, we do not allow ourselves the opportunity to double up our rooks (either on the f or d file), and we don't get our bishop to h5 (which is where I think it belongs).

The other scenario:

18. Rxd3, bxc6

19. Be2, Bb4 (doesn't allow us to castle, but as DB pointed out earlier, that may not be all bad.)

20. Bh5 (or Rf1), 0-0? (I'm not really sure what they do here. I think we have a pretty good attack going. They can't play Bb7 and try to 0-0-0 because we play Bxf7 then. If they 0-0 right now, I like h4. If they don't castle, we can load up pressure on the pawn at f7 by playing both rooks over to the f file.)

I just may be missing something because it appears that most people want to take with the bishop. Let me know how you see that playing out because I am just not seeing a strong attack by taking with the Bishop.
19...Bb4 would be a check, we'd have to move the king or the c pawn.

If we take with the bishop and don't castle, we end up here I think:

18.Bxd3 bxc6 19.Rf1 Bb4+ 20.Ke2

Not such a bad position from which to launch an attack (I think?).

 
White:

Let's walk through a couple scenarios (hopefully I get the notation correct...).

18. Bxd3, bxc6

19. 0-0, Bc5+

20. Kh1, 0-0

I don't see much for us here. I really like the idea of playing h4 if they castle, but it is much more effective with a Bishop on e2 or h5. I understand the desire to take the queen with the bishop because it gets him into the action, but IMO it is not nearly as powerful as taking with the rook for the following reasons: 1. We block off our rook from the d file, we do not allow ourselves the opportunity to double up our rooks (either on the f or d file), and we don't get our bishop to h5 (which is where I think it belongs).

The other scenario:

18. Rxd3, bxc6

19. Be2, Bb4 (doesn't allow us to castle, but as DB pointed out earlier, that may not be all bad.)

20. Bh5 (or Rf1), 0-0? (I'm not really sure what they do here. I think we have a pretty good attack going. They can't play Bb7 and try to 0-0-0 because we play Bxf7 then. If they 0-0 right now, I like h4. If they don't castle, we can load up pressure on the pawn at f7 by playing both rooks over to the f file.)

I just may be missing something because it appears that most people want to take with the bishop. Let me know how you see that playing out because I am just not seeing a strong attack by taking with the Bishop.
19...Bb4 would be a check, we'd have to move the king or the c pawn.

If we take with the bishop and don't castle, we end up here I think:

18.Bxd3 bxc6 19.Rf1 Bb4+ 20.Ke2

Not such a bad position from which to launch an attack (I think?).
Yes, once again I messed up the notation. Bb4 would result in us playing c3. Bc5 is what I meant above. I changed it.

I agree it "looks" like a good position for us, but I just don't really see anything there. Try taking it 2-3 moves down the road. I have and I just don't see where we go from here.

 
I'm traveling today so won't have any time to give more input. Kutta you may have a point...I tried to play it out a bit and after they castle we'd need some sort of sac to get in there I think, with our pawns already depleted:

18.Bxd3 bxc6 19.Rf1 Bb4+ 20.Ke2 f5 21.Nd6+ Bxd6 22.exd6 O-O

 
White:

Let's walk through a couple scenarios (hopefully I get the notation correct...).

18. Bxd3, bxc6

19. 0-0, Bc5+

20. Kh1, 0-0

I don't see much for us here. I really like the idea of playing h4 if they castle, but it is much more effective with a Bishop on e2 or h5. I understand the desire to take the queen with the bishop because it gets him into the action, but IMO it is not nearly as powerful as taking with the rook for the following reasons: 1. We block off our rook from the d file, we do not allow ourselves the opportunity to double up our rooks (either on the f or d file), and we don't get our bishop to h5 (which is where I think it belongs).

The other scenario:

18. Rxd3, bxc6

19. Be2, Bc5 (doesn't allow us to castle, but as DB pointed out earlier, that may not be all bad.)

20. Bh5 (or Rf1), 0-0? (I'm not really sure what they do here. I think we have a pretty good attack going. They can't play Bb7 and try to 0-0-0 because we play Bxf7 then. If they 0-0 right now, I like h4. If they don't castle, we can load up pressure on the pawn at f7 by playing both rooks over to the f file.)

I just may be missing something because it appears that most people want to take with the bishop. Let me know how you see that playing out because I am just not seeing a strong attack by taking with the Bishop.
I've also been playing around with us taking with Rook & them moving knight on move 19

18. Rxd3 bxc6

19. Be2 Nc5 - I don't see a good response for us here.

20. Nf6+ Ke7

21. Rd6

Could play out like this, which I like....Bb7

22. Rf1 Bg7

23. Bh5 Bxf6

24. Rxf6

I'm not opposed to taking with the rook & could go either way. They are probably thinking we'll take with the bishop.

 
I think if we take with the Bishop, we need to play Rf1 rather than O-O.

I can honestly go either way on this one. I'm fine taking with either the R or the B. I think we can salvage a decent attack with either.

18. Bxd3 bxc6

19. Rf1 Be7

20. Be2 O-O

21. Bh5

 
White:

Let's walk through a couple scenarios (hopefully I get the notation correct...).

18. Bxd3, bxc6

19. 0-0, Bc5+

20. Kh1, 0-0

I don't see much for us here. I really like the idea of playing h4 if they castle, but it is much more effective with a Bishop on e2 or h5. I understand the desire to take the queen with the bishop because it gets him into the action, but IMO it is not nearly as powerful as taking with the rook for the following reasons: 1. We block off our rook from the d file, we do not allow ourselves the opportunity to double up our rooks (either on the f or d file), and we don't get our bishop to h5 (which is where I think it belongs).

The other scenario:

18. Rxd3, bxc6

19. Be2, Bc5 (doesn't allow us to castle, but as DB pointed out earlier, that may not be all bad.)

20. Bh5 (or Rf1), 0-0? (I'm not really sure what they do here. I think we have a pretty good attack going. They can't play Bb7 and try to 0-0-0 because we play Bxf7 then. If they 0-0 right now, I like h4. If they don't castle, we can load up pressure on the pawn at f7 by playing both rooks over to the f file.)

I just may be missing something because it appears that most people want to take with the bishop. Let me know how you see that playing out because I am just not seeing a strong attack by taking with the Bishop.
I've also been playing around with us taking with Rook & them moving knight on move 1918. Rxd3 bxc6

19. Be2 Nc5 - I don't see a good response for us here.

20. Nf6+ Ke7

21. Rd6

Could play out like this, which I like....Bb7

22. Rf1 Bg7

23. Bh5 Bxf6

24. Rxf6

I'm not opposed to taking with the rook & could go either way. They are probably thinking we'll take with the bishop.
I think this is good for us. Instead of 22. Rf1, I think Bf2 is really good, threatening Rd7. If they don't play Bb7, I think we get the c pawn.
 
Obviously I want to take with the rook and I don't know that a good argument has been made to not do that. But if there is one I'd love to hear it because I know we could be missing something.

 
Kutta feels more strongly about taking with the rook than I do about the bishop. I defer to his passion.

 
I'm also about 1 talisker and 4 canadian club and diets in so take that for what it's worth.

 
So for black.

Two options put forth so far. The first one forces a lot of action kingside, but maybe not to our benefit in the end.

19......Bh6

20. g5 fxg5

21. Bxg5 Bxg5

22. Nxg5 Nxg5

23. Qxg5 Rf7?

24. Kh1?

Leaves us with the option of doubling our rooks on the f file, but they can bring a lot of pressure on the g file, and also bring their bishop into h5 to aid the attack while our knight is bottled up in a more defensive position.

19.....Rac8

20. Rac1 - here pychopav Qd8, but I'm not so sure about that. Maybe Rc5?

Need some more analysis here, but I think I like this line better than exposing our kingside.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe Rac8 followed by Bh6?

19....Rac8

20. Rac1 Bh6

21. g5 fxg5

22. Bxg5 Bxg5

23. Nxg5 Rxc1

24. Rxc1? Nxg5

Probably too late in the evening to speculate so many moves ahead, but I think Rac8 needs some thought.

 
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.
why don't we play 20. Bh6, instead of g5?
 
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.
why don't we play 20. Bh6, instead of g5?
because they can play g5 then
 
kutta said:
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.
when play h4, we take with g pawn?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kutta said:
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.
when play h4, we take with g pawn?
I think so. But it gets pretty hairy over there
 
kutta said:
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.
when play h4, we take with g pawn?
I think so. But it gets pretty hairy over there\
that is my thought as well.

 
19 ... Rac8
20. Rac1, g5
21. Bg3, h5 (why not Ng6 here)
22. gxh5, Bh6

I like g5, but perhaps after Rac8.

 
Black

Don't you think they're likely to play Rc1 now? How does that change things in this discussion?

 
kutta said:
Black:

Here's an interesting line. It would work better if we could get their rook to c1 without ours on c8 though.

19 ... Rac8

20. Rac1, g5

21. Bg3, h5

22. gxh5, Bh6

We now have the threat of g4 which would win a piece. If we didn't have our rook on c8, this would be pretty cool. But right now they can play:

23. Rxc8, Rxc8

24. Qd3

And they are free. But it just feels like there could be something here getting the bishop to h6 with the double pin.

Even without all that ridiculousness, what about playing g5? It gives our knight a nice spot g6.
I think we should go Rac8 here.

19......Rac8

20. Rc1 Rxc1

21. Rxc1 g5

 
Or even better

19.... Rac8

20. Rc1 Rxc1

21. Rxc1 Bh6

22. g5 fxg5

Opens up our f file, puts pressure on the knight & pawn on f2 & f3, and has the B with a discovered bead on the Q & R.

Either way, I think Rac8 is a solid move here.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top