Yeah, this is straight out of the Encyclopedia of Human Nature under; Misery Loves Company.People make calls they're not entirely comfortable with and starting fishing for other mooks to cry with in their cyber beers after a "Ryan Grant" leaves them hanging.I'm rolling with
"I'm rolling with"
and
"Who's with me?"
Who's with me?
and its not even close.upside . . . and it's not even close.
LMFAO! I can't stop seeing this EVERYWHERE on this board since you posted this! I never noticed it before, but now it's in every 5th post and every 20th thread title. Damn. It's like saying a word over and over until it sounds like you're speaking Martian.Going forward. Really? My league is retroactively playing last week again
This generally means he's around the 8-10 range...not the top of the pile. You're welcome."This guy is a top 10 QB."Big whoop. Most leagues only have 12 teams. So you are saying he is anywhere from the best starter to almost the worst starter in your fantasy league? Fascinating.
Other than Hillis last year and the one decent year that Jamal Lewis had here, they are kinda right."There is no Cleveland Browns offensive player worth starting."I swear people say it almost every year since 1999.
anderson, edwards, winslow...Other than Hillis last year and the one decent year that Jamal Lewis had here, they are kinda right."There is no Cleveland Browns offensive player worth starting."I swear people say it almost every year since 1999.![]()
How about annoying messages that are at the end of every post by someone? "<----Fantasy stud right here.""-QG"etc...just annoys me, which I am sure is their original intent."When you take out this one week" or "When you take out that one long run"It's dumb. Everything counts.<----Fantasy stud right here.
Then why not say "he's in the 8-10 range" instead of saying top 10 like there is little difference between #1 and #10?This generally means he's around the 8-10 range...not the top of the pile. You're welcome."This guy is a top 10 QB."Big whoop. Most leagues only have 12 teams. So you are saying he is anywhere from the best starter to almost the worst starter in your fantasy league? Fascinating.
I saw this a lot this year in reference to Chris Johnson and was annoyed. And then I thought, hmmm, maybe they misspelled 'doo.' Then it made sense."he's due"
:hawkscreech:Is there a term for latching on to a 3rd-string player and endlessly blabbering about his potential?
"Going forward" is the phrase I immediately thought of when I saw the thread title.In the countless threads where I see "How to you think ____ will do going forward?" I always reflexively want to post, "Better than he will do if he's going backward"I know it's barely junior high quality humor, but I can't help myself.Another annoying quibble, while not explicitly a term, is the "discussions" that clearly involve massive wishful thinking on the part of owners of a given player. This week's favorite is any poster(s) claiming that Maurice Morris is just as talented as Kevin Smith. After Sunday at 4 pm.LMFAO! I can't stop seeing this EVERYWHERE on this board since you posted this! I never noticed it before, but now it's in every 5th post and every 20th thread title. Damn. It's like saying a word over and over until it sounds like you're speaking Martian.Going forward. Really? My league is retroactively playing last week again![]()
I thought it was just me who had to stop himself about 50 times from posting that very same thing.In the countless threads where I see "How to you think ____ will do going forward?" I always reflexively want to post, "Better than he will do if he's going backward"I know it's barely junior high quality humor, but I can't help myself.
******POTENTIAL WAIVER WIRE GEM******
Sounds like someone gets a good work out in on Friday nights.beat mode