What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The FF Term I hate most is...? (1 Viewer)

"When you take out this one week" or "When you take out that one long run"

It's dumb. Everything counts.

<----Fantasy stud right here.

 
I'm rolling with

"I'm rolling with"

and

"Who's with me?"

Who's with me?
Yeah, this is straight out of the Encyclopedia of Human Nature under; Misery Loves Company.People make calls they're not entirely comfortable with and starting fishing for other mooks to cry with in their cyber beers after a "Ryan Grant" leaves them hanging.

 
Going forward. Really? My league is retroactively playing last week again
LMFAO! I can't stop seeing this EVERYWHERE on this board since you posted this! I never noticed it before, but now it's in every 5th post and every 20th thread title. Damn. It's like saying a word over and over until it sounds like you're speaking Martian. :lmao:
 
"This guy is a top 10 QB."

Big whoop. Most leagues only have 12 teams. So you are saying he is anywhere from the best starter to almost the worst starter in your fantasy league? Fascinating.

 
"This guy is a top 10 QB."Big whoop. Most leagues only have 12 teams. So you are saying he is anywhere from the best starter to almost the worst starter in your fantasy league? Fascinating.
This generally means he's around the 8-10 range...not the top of the pile. You're welcome.
 
"When you take out this one week" or "When you take out that one long run"It's dumb. Everything counts.<----Fantasy stud right here.
How about annoying messages that are at the end of every post by someone? "<----Fantasy stud right here.""-QG"etc...just annoys me, which I am sure is their original intent.
 
"This guy is a top 10 QB."Big whoop. Most leagues only have 12 teams. So you are saying he is anywhere from the best starter to almost the worst starter in your fantasy league? Fascinating.
This generally means he's around the 8-10 range...not the top of the pile. You're welcome.
Then why not say "he's in the 8-10 range" instead of saying top 10 like there is little difference between #1 and #10?
 
"Mike Shanahan said... (anything football-related)"

The man is as fickle as an eight year old girl, and now that his dumb ### kid is also in the decision-making mix it's even worse.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
November 20... About the most important time in the FF schedule...

The hate is really coming out today hahaha, I can feel the tension in the air. Love it.

ps: Tebowned.

 
Probably the term I hate most is "talented" when someone is describing a football player who is strong as a horse and fast as the wind and can jump over a house but is lousy at playing football. No, that's not talent. That's athleticism. And why people (including NFL personnel professionals) continue to be duped by raw athleticism is beyond me. Talent should be defined as level of demonstrated ability for the tasks to be performed, whatever that job is, not raw athletic ability. If you are truly a talented wide receiver, for example, that should mean you actually can catch balls thrown to you and run good routes and get open. It shouldn't mean you run a 4.4 40.

 
"Starting (blank) with confidence."

If you're confident starting anyone then you're a fool. It's fantasy football, anything that can go wrong generally does go wrong.

 
it's not a fantasy football term, but just generic sports terms.

here are two:

1) If the season ended today ... guess what, it doesn't.

2) If the game was today, he wouldn't be able to play ... It's Monday and the game is Sunday. So get back to me on Sunday.

 
Also, when there are 10+ pages threads on a guy who becomes the starting running back of an awful offense who is also a below average player himself. There should be a separate forum for desperate owners to make Chuck Norris jokes with the aforementioned below average running back's name substituted for Chuck Norris' name in the joke.

 
Going forward. Really? My league is retroactively playing last week again
LMFAO! I can't stop seeing this EVERYWHERE on this board since you posted this! I never noticed it before, but now it's in every 5th post and every 20th thread title. Damn. It's like saying a word over and over until it sounds like you're speaking Martian. :lmao:
"Going forward" is the phrase I immediately thought of when I saw the thread title.In the countless threads where I see "How to you think ____ will do going forward?" I always reflexively want to post, "Better than he will do if he's going backward"I know it's barely junior high quality humor, but I can't help myself.Another annoying quibble, while not explicitly a term, is the "discussions" that clearly involve massive wishful thinking on the part of owners of a given player. This week's favorite is any poster(s) claiming that Maurice Morris is just as talented as Kevin Smith. After Sunday at 4 pm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Should this trade be rejected?"

"If you take out the 50-yard run, [insert player] is only averaging 3 yards per carry"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One that's raging now in the "Is Gronk the best TE right now" thread ... "If player X played for team X, his stats would be so much better!!!!" ... well, it's a moot point ... who gives a crap :thumbdown:

 
In the countless threads where I see "How to you think ____ will do going forward?" I always reflexively want to post, "Better than he will do if he's going backward"I know it's barely junior high quality humor, but I can't help myself.
I thought it was just me who had to stop himself about 50 times from posting that very same thing.
 
******POTENTIAL WAIVER WIRE GEM******
:thumbup: what no love for beast?Beast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastlyBeast beastingbeat modebeastly :rolleyes:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top