Even his "lesser" movies are interesting as all hell to me and I get something out of rewatches. I've grown to love EWS more after rewatches.See I’m glad I changed the rule now, because I wouldn’t want whoever is judging this pick to disregard the awfulness of Eyes Wide Shut.
Kubrick comes from a long line of obsessive tyrant directors who tortured those around them. They still exist today. One of the weird accepted things of directing.And Scatman Crothers. Other directors have been able to extract great performances out of their cast without subjecting them to what Kubrick did.
But whatever, Kubrick is a fine pick for #1.
He has to have the highest hit rate of any director.Even his "lesser" movies are interesting as all hell to me and I get something out of rewatches. I've grown to love EWS more after rewatches.
Looks like I've missed those stories about him. Now I feel foolish for my last few posts.Kubrick comes from a long line of obsessive tyrant directors who tortured those around them. They still exist today. One of the weird accepted things of directing.
Which part is the eyerolling part for you? The attention to detail, the photograph quality of the movies, the 100s of takes?Not really, if you consider the finished product. But when you listen to some fans citing it as a reason for him being the best, it's a little eye rolling.
Only 13 featuresHe has to have the highest hit rate of any director.
Maybe tyrant is the wrong word for Kubrick- just indifferent to people. He seems to view actors as props. He put some of them through some difficult experiences and really risked the safety of some of them. Though I don't think he was verbally abusive or intending to harm people. He just was obsessed with making everything and everyone look and sound exactly like how he saw it in his head.Looks like I've missed those stories about him. Now I feel foolish for my last few posts.
Some of the old school directors shot 13 movies in 18 months.Only 13 features
From what I've read, both are true to a point. I've heard about him calling others in the dead of night to talk about the movies and get input, but he also had in his head EXACTLY what the take is supposed to be and didn't stop until he got there. Maybe not the best way to do it, but it for sure showed up on the screen. We have directors like him on one end, and somebody like Eastwood that I believe is known for the opposite - 1 to 2 takes tops.Looks like I've missed those stories about him. Now I feel foolish for my last few posts.
Work with what ya got. Seems like a rather fortunate personality trait to have for a director.
Hit 'em with it Triple-A.
I know you are glad you get hard nippled Batman in the mix.Kinky.
For me the line would be if/when he was intentionally abusive in one form or another, like with Shelly Duvall. I don't know the Scatman story so I can't comment, but if it's like you're saying where his action directly endangered/harmed/traumatized an actor and/or crew member, than he has to come down a notch; he may have agreed to suffer for his work, but if he didn't warn those around him that they were going to suffer at his hands, that's not right.Maybe tyrant is the wrong word for Kubrick- just indifferent to people. He seems to view actors as props. He put some of them through some difficult experiences and really risked the safety of some of them. Though I don't think he was verbally abusive or intending to harm people. He just was obsessed with making everything and everyone look and sound exactly like how he saw it in his head.
It's the 100's of takes thing. And it's not really that he did it, it's that it somehow adds to his greatness. I don't agree that it does.Which part is the eyerolling part for you? The attention to detail, the photograph quality of the movies, the 100s of takes?
I think all of that is just a part of the detail and the interest in how he got there, but for me it's mostly about what I said in my right up - the overall very high level of many different genres.
No.@timschochet should we change "Slapstick comedy" to just "comedy" since we don't really have a slot for that
You are a bad man.I know you are glad you get hard nippled Batman in the mix.
I get that, and i am for sure not going to argue for that part of him. The finished product? 100%. But I am not sure any of us would know the difference in the shot if he put in shot 15 in the movie.It's the 100's of takes thing. And it's not really that he did it, it's that it somehow adds to his greatness. I don't agree that it does.
That's not even slightly true.No.
Most comedies are either slapstick or romantic.
Part of the fun of this is going to see where people put these movies. It's a reason why I didn't take a movie first. Some of the highest rated movies are in that genre, so are they all going to be spread out, and lesser gangster movies battling for that category, or do several end up there and cancel each other out?Godfather isn't even the best gangster movie.
I actually think slapstick is a very small sliver of comedies but it's your callNo.
Most comedies are either slapstick or romantic.
I think the Sisters have rattled your brain.Godfather isn't even the best gangster movie.
It's working for me on my laptop but not on my phone.Is the “go to last post you haven’t read” feature broke?
Yes, on mobile devices it appears to be. It's working on my laptop. I told Memphis about it in the upgrade thread.Is the “go to last post you haven’t read” feature broke?
I think so. When I click my notifications, instead of taking me to the post, I just get taken to the top of the thread. That seems connected.Is the “go to last post you haven’t read” feature broke?
LOL. That one took me a second.I think the Sisters have rattled your brain.
I have a philosophy in life. When drafting greatest athlete ever and Michael Jordan is there, you take him. When drafting greatest movie ever and The Godfather is there, you take it. If we do a greatest liquor draft next and I get to pick bourbon then I could die a happy man. My desert island is watching Jordan and The Godfather on loop while drinking bourbon. I win!Part of the fun of this is going to see where people put these movies. It's a reason why I didn't take a movie first. Some of the highest rated movies are in that genre, so are they all going to be spread out, and lesser gangster movies battling for that category, or do several end up there and cancel each other out?
I think you talked about it before - that's why The Old Man and the Hags knew what our first pick would be.FTR, I THINK have seen The Godfather. If so, for sure only once.
Love love love this pick.1.02 - The Godfather (Greatest movie of all time)
Im one of the few who knows the movie you’re talking about. It’ll be interesting if either of us get it.Godfather isn't even the best gangster movie.
AD's love of that movie is no secret.Im one of the few who knows the movie you’re talking about. It’ll be interesting if either of us get it.
my love is equalAD's love of that movie is no secret.
I think I'll have to get a little "cute" for this category though.
Do you think telling what the formula is would be spotlighting somehow?In an Accounting Information Systems course I teach, one of the assignments is to use technology (Excel, then Access) to determine the most popular movie of all time. The determination is not by box office receipts, but I'll say no more until the movie appears. It'll be interesting to see where it gets drafted.
Another I don't think I've seen. I guess I am not a fan of the genre.my love is equal
SInce you are up, you could take it now.Im one of the few who knows the movie you’re talking about. It’ll be interesting if either of us get it.
Yes. I erased the rest because I don't like to quote embarrassing things from people on the internet.By the by, is this a serpentine draft?
Oh ####. That was my #1 that I wrote down for the category, and had mild hopes that it would be there at the next turn.1.03 Die Hard, Action
welcome to the party, pal