What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Lawyer Thread Where We Stop Ruining Other Threads (1 Viewer)

Woz --> To piggyback a little on Henry Ford's take: The other thing that might stretch out your damages is time. If the doctor can tell you that the brain damage is indefinite (and my somewhat limited experience with nerve damage tells me that often they can't tell you whether it'll be short-term, long-term, or forever) then you get to argue not just the severity of the injury, but the potential duration. Not only can he not smell or taste, but he may never be able to do so again. He used to enjoy wine tasting, cooking, craft beer making etc., and now he can't. Etc etc etc.
Unfortunately reports are inconclusive as to permanence.
You're not in criminal court. All you need is "more likely than not.". And anosmia is often permanent.

 
I'm desperately trying to shop a reality show involving lawyers. This could be it.
I've been saying the same thing for years. Small firm law or something. Just video every day stuff and the clients. Have to figure out the whole ethical problem still.
I think he means a team of hired gun litigators consulting with some solo and crushing some small town sap. Like kitchen nightmares with a law firm
I actually want People's Court crossed with American Gladiators.
ooh..can I shoot the tennis ball cannon?

 
I'm desperately trying to shop a reality show involving lawyers. This could be it.
I've been saying the same thing for years. Small firm law or something. Just video every day stuff and the clients. Have to figure out the whole ethical problem still.
I think he means a team of hired gun litigators consulting with some solo and crushing some small town sap. Like kitchen nightmares with a law firm
I actually want People's Court crossed with American Gladiators.
ooh..can I shoot the tennis ball cannon?
If you're one of the attorneys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This one time, at band camp...
You got a new pedometer? How many steps per day?
Typically ~8500.
Is that good?
Decent. Common daily goal is 10k. I bet lots of fat ### lawyers probably never cross 5k.
So what do you do, pace around your office?
Commute, brah.
So you walk into manhattan?

 
This one time, at band camp...
You got a new pedometer? How many steps per day?
Typically ~8500.
Is that good?
Decent. Common daily goal is 10k. I bet lots of fat ### lawyers probably never cross 5k.
So what do you do, pace around your office?
Commute, brah.
So you walk into manhattan?
Negative. But end up racking up a few miles walking from home to commute train and back, to subways, etc.

 
What a shock - Otis enters a thread to denigrate it and ends up making it all about him.
No, I made it about him. Because when he talks about himself he stops getting ####y about everything else. OtisHack®
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
If they are straightforward, I wouldn't have a problem pointing them towards Legal Shield.

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
If they are straightforward, I wouldn't have a problem pointing them towards Legal Shield.
Thanks a bunch. :thumbup:

 
Henry Ford said:
T Bell said:
What a shock - Otis enters a thread to denigrate it and ends up making it all about him.
No, I made it about him. Because when he talks about himself he stops getting ####y about everything else. OtisHack®
I just thought we should talk more about pedometers, nerds.

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
I think an estate plan for anyone owning something beyond a 1982 Chevy Citation is too important to try to save a few hundred bucks by getting a one-size-fits-all estate plan in a box.

A simple estate plan will cost them a flat fee of $1000 - $1500 with an attorney. Tell them to stop being cheapskates.

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
I think an estate plan for anyone owning something beyond a 1982 Chevy Citation is too important to try to save a few hundred bucks by getting a one-size-fits-all estate plan in a box.

A simple estate plan will cost them a flat fee of $1000 - $1500 with an attorney. Tell them to stop being cheapskates.
Do you really think an independent lawyer who's only going to charge you $1,000 is going to spend more time on a basic will/living will/poa than a lawyer you'd get through Legal Shield?

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
I think an estate plan for anyone owning something beyond a 1982 Chevy Citation is too important to try to save a few hundred bucks by getting a one-size-fits-all estate plan in a box.

A simple estate plan will cost them a flat fee of $1000 - $1500 with an attorney. Tell them to stop being cheapskates.
Do you really think an independent lawyer who's only going to charge you $1,000 is going to spend more time on a basic will/living will/poa than a lawyer you'd get through Legal Shield?
Yes.

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
I think an estate plan for anyone owning something beyond a 1982 Chevy Citation is too important to try to save a few hundred bucks by getting a one-size-fits-all estate plan in a box.

A simple estate plan will cost them a flat fee of $1000 - $1500 with an attorney. Tell them to stop being cheapskates.
Do you really think an independent lawyer who's only going to charge you $1,000 is going to spend more time on a basic will/living will/poa than a lawyer you'd get through Legal Shield?
Yes.
Maybe his paralegal or secretary will.

 
Anyone here in the T&E biz? My mom and stepfather are putting together wills, living wills, etc., and she's thinking of using Legal Zoom or Legal Shield. Are these fine for stuff like this, which I assume in their case will be fairly straightforward?
Nooooooooo. Get a real lawyer, and not some paralegal either. Well worth the additional costage.

 
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.

 
Talk to me about the Financials of a solo practice. What's the cost range for malpractice insurance, understanding that it differs based on practice and location, and what percentage of your billing rate can you typically expect to be your profit/salary?

Just curious to see how this stack up against law firm partner Financials. Seems to me you must hit a cap pretty quickly particularly since you're not likely to be a boatload of hours anyway. The whole purpose of the change in part would be for lifestyle, so you're not going to want to work 80 hours a week, and you likely have to spend plenty of time doing administrative stuff and client development. And you probably can't charge large firm rates. Having zero leverage must really cap things off.

 
Talk to me about the Financials of a solo practice. What's the cost range for malpractice insurance, understanding that it differs based on practice and location, and what percentage of your billing rate can you typically expect to be your profit/salary?

Just curious to see how this stack up against law firm partner Financials. Seems to me you must hit a cap pretty quickly particularly since you're not likely to be a boatload of hours anyway. The whole purpose of the change in part would be for lifestyle, so you're not going to want to work 80 hours a week, and you likely have to spend plenty of time doing administrative stuff and client development. And you probably can't charge large firm rates. Having zero leverage must really cap things off.
My initial malpractice was ~$2200. Then I bought a laptop and desktop printer.

Rather than give you dollars, here's what I have to pay monthly:

Rent--mine includes receptionist & use of printer/copier/scanner

Internet

Lexis/Nexis

Telephone - I only have a cell phone

Website

Fax - I use internet fax

Accounting/billing software

Supplies

Marketing/advertising

Then, you have annual fees like bar dues

Last you have variable/case related costs

Postage/messenger

Filing fees

Sheriffs/process servers

Court reporters

Printing

A friend let me office with his firm for free my first four months. I put $5k into my business account the week before I opened and while I had to use some savings to pay personal expenses the first 5-6 months I have never had to dip into personal funds for the business.

 
Simple estate. . Simple will, living will and POA I charge less than 250. I consider it a service to the community.
Living trust funded with bank accounts and real estate? It seemed the way to go for my mom in Cali.
I'm not a huge fan of most trust setups that people are sold once I finally get to what they are looking to do. Now, with that most of the estate planning stuff I do is for very young people or very old people. They either have nothing or the have something but the problem is that they are close to or past the look back provisions of MediCaid (which I specifically don't handle). So most of the time if they really need a trust I give them an attorney in the area who specializes in that.

 
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).

 
Otis said:
Talk to me about the Financials of a solo practice. What's the cost range for malpractice insurance, understanding that it differs based on practice and location, and what percentage of your billing rate can you typically expect to be your profit/salary?

Just curious to see how this stack up against law firm partner Financials. Seems to me you must hit a cap pretty quickly particularly since you're not likely to be a boatload of hours anyway. The whole purpose of the change in part would be for lifestyle, so you're not going to want to work 80 hours a week, and you likely have to spend plenty of time doing administrative stuff and client development. And you probably can't charge large firm rates. Having zero leverage must really cap things off.
why solo? Why not a small, closely held firm?

 
Otis said:
Talk to me about the Financials of a solo practice. What's the cost range for malpractice insurance, understanding that it differs based on practice and location, and what percentage of your billing rate can you typically expect to be your profit/salary?

Just curious to see how this stack up against law firm partner Financials. Seems to me you must hit a cap pretty quickly particularly since you're not likely to be a boatload of hours anyway. The whole purpose of the change in part would be for lifestyle, so you're not going to want to work 80 hours a week, and you likely have to spend plenty of time doing administrative stuff and client development. And you probably can't charge large firm rates. Having zero leverage must really cap things off.
why solo? Why not a small, closely held firm?
Malpractice insurance

Rent/mortgage

Does the rent cover utilties and phone/internet

health insurance for you and your family (massive bill)

professional dues

continuing ed costs

staff if they aren't included in the rent

office supplies - paper etc... it can add up especially if you do a lot of briefs and pleadings

business cards / website / advertising

credit card - it's a nesessity if you for example practice bankruptcy

I'm sure there is more.

ETA: Bar functions... those are great

postage.... this could be huge again depending on the practice

cell phone

I'm sure I would think of more again if I keep thinking.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
This often doesn't work out well for pro se litigants.

 
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
This often doesn't work out well for pro se litigants.
It's not litigation. It's estate planning. People do it with self-serve legal products every day.

I don't have an opinion, because I have no idea how complex the estate is, but I don't see any reason why estate planning is any more complex than taxes for a large segment of the population. And lots of people do their own taxes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
This often doesn't work out well for pro se litigants.
It's not litigation. It's estate planning. People do it with self-serve legal products every day.

I don't have an opinion, because I have no idea how complex the estate is, but I don't see any reason why estate planning is any more complex than taxes for a large segment of the population. And lots of people do there own taxes.
I agree, but lots of people make small mistakes they have to correct on their taxes. The problem here is, there's no chance to correct it after you realize there's been a mistake.

 
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
This often doesn't work out well for pro se litigants.
It's not litigation. It's estate planning. People do it with self-serve legal products every day.

I don't have an opinion, because I have no idea how complex the estate is, but I don't see any reason why estate planning is any more complex than taxes for a large segment of the population. And lots of people do there own taxes.
Taxes go by strict formulas and forms that remove much of the judgment from people, particularly when people are simply W-2.

Estate planning isn't that simplified and in fact there are typically a number of different ways to set up estate plans that require you to know the subtleties of probate, tax, Medicare, and other areas of law in order to be able to optimize what you're doing.

Also, it's nice to know that if your estate plan does get royally screwed up, you can at least seek money damages from the attorney's malpractice insurance; you don't have that option with Legal Zoom.

 
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
With Legal Shield a lawyer prepares the documents. Well, at least a paralegal with a lawyer giving it a once-over. Which I suspect is what happens with most every lawyer who prepares a basic, no-frills will/poa.

 
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
This often doesn't work out well for pro se litigants.
It's not litigation. It's estate planning. People do it with self-serve legal products every day.

I don't have an opinion, because I have no idea how complex the estate is, but I don't see any reason why estate planning is any more complex than taxes for a large segment of the population. And lots of people do there own taxes.
Taxes go by strict formulas and forms that remove much of the judgment from people, particularly when people are simply W-2.

Estate planning isn't that simplified and in fact there are typically a number of different ways to set up estate plans that require you to know the subtleties of probate, tax, Medicare, and other areas of law in order to be able to optimize what you're doing.

Also, it's nice to know that if your estate plan does get royally screwed up, you can at least seek money damages from the attorney's malpractice insurance; you don't have that option with Legal Zoom.
Exactly. Akin to using a CPA. Worth it just for the CYA.

Acronyms!

 
Christo said:
krista4 said:
OK, thanks guys. I was waiting for someone to break the tie between Christo and T Bell, since I respect both of their opinions.
Thanks, I know I sometimes make that hard to do! :lmao:
:lmao: I probably only question your judgment when it comes to women's grooming.

I sent my Mom note saying that, while she could probably use Legal Shield, a bunch of people recommended hiring someone, and she seemed relieved at the idea. She's not trying to be cheap but it's more a question of her feeling like she should be able to handle it herself (it runs in the family).
With Legal Shield a lawyer prepares the documents. Well, at least a paralegal with a lawyer giving it a once-over. Which I suspect is what happens with most every lawyer who prepares a basic, no-frills will/poa.
Oh. I hadn't really looked into it. Don't know why that wouldn't work, then.

I suggested that she go talk to my cousin, who works at a small-ish firm in her area and might do these things or have someone in the firm who does. She seemed to like that idea. I'll reinforce that Legal Shield might work, too.

 
About 8 years ago my dad, a Vietnam combat veteran, filed a claim with the VA seeking benefits for a medical condition that is linked to Agent Orange exposure. They denied his original claim and there were appeals and remands and a lot of "hurry up and wait" for the next 4 or 5 years. A few years ago it was set for appeal to the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in DC. I took his file and went through it and we worked on his appeal together. We put together an argument that I thought was pretty good. The hours I spent learning about this stuff...crazy. But this is my dad, you know, and this was a chance for me to have HIS back for a change.

I wrote the brief for the DC court and we won a remand in which the Court took apart the VA for the way it handled the case to that point. That was about a year and a half ago. The case went back to the VA, who solicited a separate medical opinion from a VA doc who hadn't yet reviewed the case. Fresh eyes, I guess. That doctor gave an opinion and two weeks ago I submitted our brief in response and our final argument. Today, while I played hooky and watched the Tigers get a well-earned Opening Day win, my dad called:

"Hey," he said. "We beat 'em."

Ok, his language might have been a little more colorful.

This one was so personal I can't even...I could quit doing this job tomorrow or I could do it for another 100 years, but I can't imagine ever being happier or more proud of a win. I can't explain what it means to me to come through for somebody who's come through for me so many times.

I don't mean to crow or get into a look-at-me thing. Just wanted to share that because these are the kinds of things that make all of the BS we often encounter in this job so very effing worth it. They can be few and far between, but I'm going to live on this one for a good while. Today was a good day.

 
About 8 years ago my dad, a Vietnam combat veteran, filed a claim with the VA seeking benefits for a medical condition that is linked to Agent Orange exposure. They denied his original claim and there were appeals and remands and a lot of "hurry up and wait" for the next 4 or 5 years. A few years ago it was set for appeal to the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in DC. I took his file and went through it and we worked on his appeal together. We put together an argument that I thought was pretty good. The hours I spent learning about this stuff...crazy. But this is my dad, you know, and this was a chance for me to have HIS back for a change.

I wrote the brief for the DC court and we won a remand in which the Court took apart the VA for the way it handled the case to that point. That was about a year and a half ago. The case went back to the VA, who solicited a separate medical opinion from a VA doc who hadn't yet reviewed the case. Fresh eyes, I guess. That doctor gave an opinion and two weeks ago I submitted our brief in response and our final argument. Today, while I played hooky and watched the Tigers get a well-earned Opening Day win, my dad called:

"Hey," he said. "We beat 'em."

Ok, his language might have been a little more colorful.

This one was so personal I can't even...I could quit doing this job tomorrow or I could do it for another 100 years, but I can't imagine ever being happier or more proud of a win. I can't explain what it means to me to come through for somebody who's come through for me so many times.

I don't mean to crow or get into a look-at-me thing. Just wanted to share that because these are the kinds of things that make all of the BS we often encounter in this job so very effing worth it. They can be few and far between, but I'm going to live on this one for a good while. Today was a good day.
Congrats! I'm working on one of these appeals right now. Hope we can get that kind of result too.

 
Thanks guys.

Hey, thecatch, I'm far from an expert on this stuff but feel free to shoot me a PM and if there's anything I have to share that can help you I'd be more than happy.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top