Zow
Footballguy
Wow. assuming other jurisdictions follow suit, we are going to be so backlogged...Our superior courts just issued an order today that all hearings (civil and criminal) are suspended until at least April 24.
Wow. assuming other jurisdictions follow suit, we are going to be so backlogged...Our superior courts just issued an order today that all hearings (civil and criminal) are suspended until at least April 24.
I don’t even know what that means. Are hotels life sustaining? What happens to people staying in hotels if they’re deemed not to be? Out on the street? What about apartment complexes? Are the workers there going in?All PA courts shut down except for a list of "emergency" proceedings (PFA, child emergencies, etc.). On top of that, the Governor just ordered all non-life sustaining businesses shut down effective tomorrow. Legal Services are not on the "can stay open" list.
I picked the right time to retire.
What does it mean to be shut down? If the entire firm is WFH, I assume it could continue to provide services to clients?All PA courts shut down except for a list of "emergency" proceedings (PFA, child emergencies, etc.). On top of that, the Governor just ordered all non-life sustaining businesses shut down effective tomorrow. Legal Services are not on the "can stay open" list.
I picked the right time to retire.
Presumably, as long as there is no face-to-face. The actual order includes language that: "No person or entity shall operate a place of business in the Commonwealth that is not a life sustaining business regardless of whether the business is open to members of the public. This prohibition does not apply to virtual or telework operations (e.g., work from home), so long as social distancing and other mitigation measures are followed in such operations."What does it mean to be shut down? If the entire firm is WFH, I assume it could continue to provide services to clients?
I'm re-arranging and looking at my trial calendar this very moment. It's going to be ####### awful. But, that's mainly because with everything getting kicked down the line I'll likely be unable to take on as much new work as I normally would in the spring. so, the real hurt of it all will be financial.The case backlog when this is done is going to be …….. fun.
OMG, he will forever be a legend. I watched every minute of it after work as it was going on. Schiff is what I aspire to be every time I step in a courtroom.And yes, I obviously have developed a minor man crush on Schiff. I’m just always fascinated with really talented stand-up lawyers because I think it’s something that’s really hard to do well, and most people out there just don’t have the natural gift. So when I see a good one, I take note, and try to crib what I can for the future.
Essential in Illinois. But Cook County courthouses closed till 4/16 except for emergencies. I'm going nuts here at home. Having to put all of my clients off till they open back up again.Ohio - law firms are essential businesses - but not in PA![]()
I had planned on being in DC this week for my wife's Spring Break so it's been slow. But I expect (hope) next week to be busy.I am not essential but busy as hell
Our state bar told us....Ohio - law firms are essential businesses - but not in PA![]()
Please tell me a regular job that does this.I would love just a regular job where there is lots of work they need me to do, and I just do it. I don’t have to beg for work, it’s just there waiting to be done. And I don’t have to fuxking count my hours anymore.
Maddening, the whole damn thing.
I had a 10 minute video chat with my fellow department members, our Dean, and our principal.Work is slow. That’s ungood.
One client owes a lot of money and is dodging me. That’s ungood. That was my biggest matter generated last year, and as this goes south and the relationship falls apart, I have nothing meaningful to replace it with. That’s ungood.
Law firm jobs are the suck. It’s a job where you beg to get hired for the job and the job just entails begging others to hire you for jobs. For your whole life. And it’s all measured by hours.
I would love just a regular job where there is lots of work they need me to do, and I just do it. I don’t have to beg for work, it’s just there waiting to be done. And I don’t have to fuxking count my hours anymore.
Maddening, the whole damn thing.
yikes.Work has slowed. I mean the work is there I guess but the money isn’t from the clients. Just hoping this doesn’t last too long. Spending a lot of my time the last few business days negotiating with my own clients to make sure some money keeps coming in.
Yeah it’s the worst part of the job. I can handle the poor decision making, the unreasonable demands, and the unfair target of blame if things don’t go well. But man it sucks not getting paid on it or having to chase the money down.yikes.
that's why I don't represent individuals.
Lat is seemingly recovered. 6 days on a ventilator, extubated, still in the hospital but completely off oxygen now and expects to be discharged soon.David Lat, most notably founder of Above the Law and an otherwise apparently healthy 44 year old, is in critical condition. :(
You want a job drafting patents in-house I've got one for ya.Work is slow. That’s ungood.
One client owes a lot of money and is dodging me. That’s ungood. That was my biggest matter generated last year, and as this goes south and the relationship falls apart, I have nothing meaningful to replace it with. That’s ungood.
Law firm jobs are the suck. It’s a job where you beg to get hired for the job and the job just entails begging others to hire you for jobs. For your whole life. And it’s all measured by hours.
I would love just a regular job where there is lots of work they need me to do, and I just do it. I don’t have to beg for work, it’s just there waiting to be done. And I don’t have to fuxking count my hours anymore.
Maddening, the whole damn thing.
Raise your hand if you've done an oral argument via Zoom wearing jacket/tie up top and gym shorts down below.![]()
That's got to be difficult. Did you have documents/exhibits? Witnesses, court reporter, lawyers, judge all at their own separate locations?![]()
I did an evidentiary hearing this past Fridayby phone. Went surprisingly better than I expected.
Yes. Lawyers, clients/parties, and the judge all calling from separate locations (we agreed to waive a formal court reporter and just use the court's audio system for creating the record). Much of pre-hearing preparation with the client was simply to go over and explain the exhibit markings and list with correspondence numbers and to practice how I needed my client to reference his corresponding copies of the exhibits. Thankfully, the judge was pretty lenient and opposing counsel, much to her credit, was very reasonable (we called each other beforehand to see what we could stipulate to) and did not hold each other to strict foundational standards during the hearing.That's got to be difficult. Did you have documents/exhibits? Witnesses, court reporter, lawyers, judge all at their own separate locations?
lmao.Raise your hand if you've done an oral argument via Zoom wearing jacket/tie up top and gym shorts down below.![]()
My partner and I did a zoom meeting last week so we could practice and work on the presentation. We were jokingly talking about putting different props behind us depending on who our judge is. I think most kids, who are constantly taking pictures of themselves, know this instinctively, but we learned that you look better if the camera is a bit higher or at least level with your face/head, rather than looking up at your face from below. One other thing - when you are speaking, try to look at the camera on your monitor rather than at the judge's face on your screen. If you want to simulate in-person eye-contact, you need to stare right at that little camera when speaking, or, more importantly, when the judge is speaking.lmao.
Not yet. But I have a motion hearing this week that might work out that way.
I have a bankruptcy hearing next week where everyone involved including my client will be in separate locations. That should be.....awesome.
Did you check your fee agreement? I ask that because sometimes the agreements may have a minimum amount per task portion (for example, in my fee agreements there's a minimum .5 for any hearing, a minimum 1 hr. for preparation of a pleading, etc.). Or, it's also quite possible that there was more to the task than you realize. Also, while the bold isn't how I would do it, maybe what she is doing is not charging you for a number of emails then hitting them all with one .5 email charge?My divorce lawyer charged me for 30 minutes for an e-mail that couldn't have taken more than about 4 minutes. Is she trying to say that she doesn't want these e-mails? It was a fairly quick question (that my wife wanted me to ask). I don't send many e-mails, but I feel like she initially did not bill for these types of things, then maybe billed at 15 minutes, now this one at 30.
If a brief email requires a quick response, I either won't bill it or will bill the exchange at .1 (six minutes). If your question involved having to go back and review the file or perform any research, you get billed for that time. So it is possible that a one line email could be 30 minutes of time if the answer requires some digging around.My divorce lawyer charged me for 30 minutes for an e-mail that couldn't have taken more than about 4 minutes. Is she trying to say that she doesn't want these e-mails? It was a fairly quick question (that my wife wanted me to ask). I don't send many e-mails, but I feel like she initially did not bill for these types of things, then maybe billed at 15 minutes, now this one at 30.
there was no research. she basically asked me a bunch of questions back out what I was asking about. I guess it's possible that she had to go back and review my file, but either way, seemed kind of weird.If a brief email requires a quick response, I either won't bill it or will bill the exchange at .1 (six minutes). If your question involved having to go back and review the file or perform any research, you get billed for that time. So it is possible that a one line email could be 30 minutes of time if the answer requires some digging around.
Or the cynical side of me says that your lawyer's caseload is getting light and she's going to bill every single minute she can at this point.
Or, at the very least, not give out "breaks" like she may have in the past where business wasn't an issue.If a brief email requires a quick response, I either won't bill it or will bill the exchange at .1 (six minutes). If your question involved having to go back and review the file or perform any research, you get billed for that time. So it is possible that a one line email could be 30 minutes of time if the answer requires some digging around.
Or the cynical side of me says that your lawyer's caseload is getting light and she's going to bill every single minute she can at this point.
If things keep going the way they are for the next month or so I may need to.you guys can just pm your bills for .5 hours.
The system is going to hault. And then, when it resumes, we're going to be working 80 hrs./week.I had a status call on a case where we have a jury trial in June, which we obviously knew was not going to happen. The judge gave a convincing statement as to why he is not expecting to hold any jury trials until summer of 2021. Paraphrasing, there won't be any jury trial until a vaccine exists, and that is highly unlikely to happen before Spring of '21. He said he'd give us a date this fall/winter, but the lawyers all agreed that's so unlikely to happen, we decided it would be better to get on his summer '21 calendar now because its going to be a very busy time once things open back up.
With low interest rates, I think insurance companies are more willing to settle. But with no trial dates on the calendar, incentive is low.
The first thing to do is get a copy of the contract and read it. You don't need a lawyer for this. Look for a clause named "Force Majeure" - its probably a 50/50 chance there will be one in a contract like this. That may give you an out. There may be other contract clauses that give you an out. Apart from the contract language, and certainly not wanting to give legal advice in this context, if I had to give off-the-cuff advice to a client in this situation I would tell them to not pay the second installment and demand a refund. There is a general contractual concept regarding impossibility that I think would apply in this case. It is legally impossible for them to deliver what they agreed to provide under current circumstances. I have several clients in somewhat similar circumstances right now and I'm advising them, as a general proposition, its going to be very difficult to enforce contractual obligations that involve things like travelling and breaking shelter-in-place orders.My wife's family has a legal issue related to Covid-19. Every year they rent a beach house in the Outer Banks, NC. My wife's parents live in Virginia and are 84 and 94. This years contract was signed last year, and the rental is to begin May 24 and a down payment has been paid. The balance for the second week is due April 24. Dare County is currently closed to all tourists. I can't imagine they'll want to open everything up and have people flocking there from Boston, NY, Chicago, etc., like our family, but it is a real possibility. The rental company says there is no refunds and that they must pay the second payment or be in breach of the lease.
They aren't really sure what to do here. Virginia is under shelter in place until mid June, and even if they weren't, nobody in the family wants the 90 year old parents traveling anywhere any time soon. The sunk costs so far is $4k with another $4k due this week. They are leaning to not paying the second half, but aren't sure what that will mean legally. Is a "contract lawyer" the best person to consult in regards to this? Thanks.
Thank you! This is a big help.The first thing to do is get a copy of the contract and read it. You don't need a lawyer for this. Look for a clause named "Force Majeure" - its probably a 50/50 chance there will be one in a contract like this. That may give you an out. There may be other contract clauses that give you an out. Apart from the contract language, and certainly not wanting to give legal advice in this context, if I had to give off-the-cuff advice to a client in this situation I would tell them to not pay the second installment and demand a refund. There is a general contractual concept regarding impossibility that I think would apply in this case. It is legally impossible for them to deliver what they agreed to provide under current circumstances. I have several clients in somewhat similar circumstances right now and I'm advising them, as a general proposition, its going to be very difficult to enforce contractual obligations that involve things like travelling and breaking shelter-in-place orders.
While it's not my practice area, a significant division of the attorneys in my office handle contract work and represent commercial tenants/lessees (as well as some commercial lessors). This issue has been the primary topic of our regular officewide collaboration meetings. The bold is the argument being made for tenants who just want out of the lease (it sounds like the impact of the CARES Act and just general sensibility is thankfully generally prevailing in situations where neither party wants to substantially breach or terminate the lease but instead just needs some understandable temporary relief on some of the financial terms). Push back has been pretty aggressive (and arguably harsh) with the argument that the commercial lessor hasn't made the decision to implement the restrictions and, in say a restaurant example, the lessor is providing what they're contractually bound to - a location set up to be a restaurant.The first thing to do is get a copy of the contract and read it. You don't need a lawyer for this. Look for a clause named "Force Majeure" - its probably a 50/50 chance there will be one in a contract like this. That may give you an out. There may be other contract clauses that give you an out. Apart from the contract language, and certainly not wanting to give legal advice in this context, if I had to give off-the-cuff advice to a client in this situation I would tell them to not pay the second installment and demand a refund. There is a general contractual concept regarding impossibility that I think would apply in this case. It is legally impossible for them to deliver what they agreed to provide under current circumstances. I have several clients in somewhat similar circumstances right now and I'm advising them, as a general proposition, its going to be very difficult to enforce contractual obligations that involve things like travelling and breaking shelter-in-place orders.
I agree with CM for the most part and would look forward to getting the guys that you are speaking about (pushing back) in a courtroom when this is all over. Especially under New Jersey law.Zow said:While it's not my practice area, a significant division of the attorneys in my office handle contract work and represent commercial tenants/lessees (as well as some commercial lessors). This issue has been the primary topic of our regular officewide collaboration meetings. The bold is the argument being made for tenants who just want out of the lease (it sounds like the impact of the CARES Act and just general sensibility is thankfully generally prevailing in situations where neither party wants to substantially breach or terminate the lease but instead just needs some understandable temporary relief on some of the financial terms). Push back has been pretty aggressive (and arguably harsh) with the argument that the commercial lessor hasn't made the decision to implement the restrictions and, in say a restaurant example, the lessor is providing what they're contractually bound to - a location set up to be a restaurant.
I haven't seen any actual litigation results yet, but it's a curious issue.
Again, not my area (I've done a number of evictions representing landlords but that's mainly just doing the actual representation for the landlords where it's almost always a simple nonpayment factual issue), but as I understand it AZ is a bit more favorable to landlords/lessors than most states. So, I'm not so sure how this plays out in my jurisdiction. Honestly some help from the other two branches would be useful at this point I think.I agree with CM for the most part and would look forward to getting the guys that you are speaking about (pushing back) in a courtroom when this is all over. Especially under New Jersey law.
One issue is that both CARES and many state emergency orders directly address commercial and residential leases, so those are a somewhat different animal at this time as contrasted with general commercial contracts. I assume a one-off vacation rental would not be impacted by those emergency orders/statutes, but that would also be something to consider.Zow said:While it's not my practice area, a significant division of the attorneys in my office handle contract work and represent commercial tenants/lessees (as well as some commercial lessors). This issue has been the primary topic of our regular officewide collaboration meetings. The bold is the argument being made for tenants who just want out of the lease (it sounds like the impact of the CARES Act and just general sensibility is thankfully generally prevailing in situations where neither party wants to substantially breach or terminate the lease but instead just needs some understandable temporary relief on some of the financial terms). Push back has been pretty aggressive (and arguably harsh) with the argument that the commercial lessor hasn't made the decision to implement the restrictions and, in say a restaurant example, the lessor is providing what they're contractually bound to - a location set up to be a restaurant.CletiusMaximus said:The first thing to do is get a copy of the contract and read it. You don't need a lawyer for this. Look for a clause named "Force Majeure" - its probably a 50/50 chance there will be one in a contract like this. That may give you an out. There may be other contract clauses that give you an out. Apart from the contract language, and certainly not wanting to give legal advice in this context, if I had to give off-the-cuff advice to a client in this situation I would tell them to not pay the second installment and demand a refund. There is a general contractual concept regarding impossibility that I think would apply in this case. It is legally impossible for them to deliver what they agreed to provide under current circumstances. I have several clients in somewhat similar circumstances right now and I'm advising them, as a general proposition, its going to be very difficult to enforce contractual obligations that involve things like travelling and breaking shelter-in-place orders.
I haven't seen any actual litigation results yet, but it's a curious issue.