You know that’s not a bad deal at all if you plan on going to at least 3-4 movies minimum. But like I said we are highly selective about what we choose to see on the silver screen.Regal has
Regal has a movie pass, $21.99 a month, unlimited movies. Can cancel after 3 months or 1 month, I need to read the fine print. 2 movies a month make it worthwhile. I've heard that MoviePass is making a comeback.This theater is 4 miles from my home. The Regal that is less than 2 miles wants $19 a ticket everyday regardless of the time.
Recently, I've seen Glass Onion, Triangle of Sadness, Knock at the Cabin, and a couple of others. The first 2 were good. I plan to buy a pass for the next couple of months. The Regal in Miami Beach is usually more than half empty. No problem with cell phones or noise. I also saw a movie in LA last Thanksgiving, it was fairly crowded, but no issues with the audience.
Some of this is just nostalgia for the past. I'm sure drive-ins were fun, and I enjoyed theaters too, but streaming is so, so much better. It's weird now to think about checking the newspaper (!) to see what time a certain movie was playing and having to plan your day around being in that one particular place at that one particular time. And if you missed it, you weren't seeing that movie ever unless you happened to catch it on network television. And then it was heavily edited and cropped. That sucks. It's infinitely better now.Society always messes this up.
I loved the movie theater with no parents from 6th-8th grade. Always packed with kids and sneaking into R rated movies etc.
Older people would tell stories of how great drive ins were.
Seems like there needs to be an evolution in the movie seeing experience - lots of movies failing at the box office. Maybe some type of subscription model where you get one viewing at home. Any ideas.
and I still want my butter drenched popcorn
Kind of it’s own thread but yeah parents are totally to blame for that. The world is far safer than it was 30-60 years ago and yet parents are far more protective and allow kids much less freedom.Some of this is just nostalgia for the past. I'm sure drive-ins were fun, and I enjoyed theaters too, but streaming is so, so much better. It's weird now to think about checking the newspaper (!) to see what time a certain movie was playing and having to plan your day around being in that one particular place at that one particular time. And if you missed it, you weren't seeing that movie ever unless you happened to catch it on network television. And then it was heavily edited and cropped. That sucks. It's infinitely better now.Society always messes this up.
I loved the movie theater with no parents from 6th-8th grade. Always packed with kids and sneaking into R rated movies etc.
Older people would tell stories of how great drive ins were.
Having said that, we never did come up with a way to replicate the "kids getting into trouble in a safe and socially-acceptable way" like sneaking in to see Porkys. Stuff like that was a good opportunity to bond with our friends and also experience the world as little mini-adults. Kids need to develop some independence from their parents and build strong social ties. That was a load-bearing wall that we knocked down several decades ago.
For me the reserved seating (allowing you to stroll in when the movie is starting instead of having to get there 30 minutes early so you don’t end up in the front row) and the much larger reclining seats, coupled with the ability to purchase alcohol has vastly improved the theater experience for me.
Sure, but at what cost. Each of those conveniences/enhancements comes with an additional cost.
It's gotta be a lot closer now. 4k with even a decent sound bar is way closer than 480p and some Klipsch horns in the 90s.I highly doubt your home set up is anywhere near the size and quality of the audio-visuals at a move theater.My house has more comfortable seats, a screen nearly as sharp and bright, and I can pause to go to the bathroom or rewind to hear missed dialog. What benefit does the theater have? Shoehorned in next to strangers is a plus??
i have a 11 speakers and a 110" screen...... i'm quite satisficed with the home viewing experienceI cant believe people in this thread are saying there are less distractions in a theater compared to a home theater.
I'll take the home theater any day. Sure it's not quite the same experience, but the technology has made it close enough that the positives outweigh the negatives for me. I can watch a blockbuster movie in surround, OLED while sprawled out on the comfortable sofa in my underwear. That's the movie going experience I want. I can pause whenever there areboobsinteresting things on the screen, and rewind for anything I missed. There is nobody giggling/talking/chewing on popcorn loudly right behind me.
We went yesterday. It was two of us. Got a free drink. Only got popcorn, still cost me about 50I’ll echo the ridiculous prices, and the limited number of movies that truly interest me at those prices, as the main deterrents. Plus it used to be that you had to wait a long time to see them outside the theaters, but that’s all obviously changed.
Wait, they have assigned seats at movies now? I guess I haven't been to an actual theater in so long they actually changed the format.Most annoying thing I see is every movie there’s always somebody in the wrong seat. Today……two couples were in the wrong seats. More comical than annoying and it’s before the movie even starts but still………is it that difficult to notice the huge letter on the floor next to each row and then the number directly on the seat?
Most do, yeah. Not so much assigned but you choose when you pay for them.Wait, they have assigned seats at movies now? I guess I haven't been to an actual theater in so long they actually changed the format.Most annoying thing I see is every movie there’s always somebody in the wrong seat. Today……two couples were in the wrong seats. More comical than annoying and it’s before the movie even starts but still………is it that difficult to notice the huge letter on the floor next to each row and then the number directly on the seat?
Locally: in 2017, the regular ol' AMC theaters (not premium or new theaters) ripped out their old seats and installed stadium-seating recliners. Part of this move was also drastically reducing the number of patrons any one theater could hold. Used to be around 150-250. Now they range from about 50 to maybe 100.Wait, they have assigned seats at movies now? I guess I haven't been to an actual theater in so long they actually changed the format.
"Sit still and shush" can be more easily attainable at a movie theater.I cant believe people in this thread are saying there are less distractions in a theater compared to a home theater.
I'll take the home theater any day. Sure it's not quite the same experience, but the technology has made it close enough that the positives outweigh the negatives for me. I can watch a blockbuster movie in surround, OLED while sprawled out on the comfortable sofa in my underwear. That's the movie going experience I want. I can pause whenever there areboobsinteresting things on the screen, and rewind for anything I missed. There is nobody giggling/talking/chewing on popcorn loudly right behind me.
No doubt about itIt's gotta be a lot closer now. 4k with even a decent sound bar is way closer than 480p and some Klipsch horns in the 90s.I highly doubt your home set up is anywhere near the size and quality of the audio-visuals at a move theater.My house has more comfortable seats, a screen nearly as sharp and bright, and I can pause to go to the bathroom or rewind to hear missed dialog. What benefit does the theater have? Shoehorned in next to strangers is a plus??
unless the guy next to you takes a nap in his reclinerLocally: in 2017, the regular ol' AMC theaters (not premium or new theaters) ripped out their old seats and installed stadium-seating recliners. Part of this move was also drastically reducing the number of patrons any one theater could hold. Used to be around 150-250. Now they range from about 50 to maybe 100.Wait, they have assigned seats at movies now? I guess I haven't been to an actual theater in so long they actually changed the format.
When people talk about crowded theaters today, or being able to count on hearing talking, chewing, and phones during the show ... I know they are talking about a completely different kind of experience than what we now have here. Even when one of the new recliner theaters is full up ... you still feel isolated. The person closest to me other than my wife** ... they're not even within arm's reach the way our recliner theaters are laid out now. And the people immediately in front and back feel like how people three rows away felt in the old-style theaters.
** the recliners are essentially paired. I think there are a few trios and singles scattered about.
I am sure I am in the minority here but for the most part I think the movie theater cranks the sound up way too high and it can become a bit much especially in action movies. It's just too loud.
I don't mind it being loud but most of the time it's just too much.
I am sure I am in the minority here but for the most part I think the movie theater cranks the sound up way too high and it can become a bit much especially in action movies. It's just too loud.
I don't mind it being loud but most of the time it's just too much.
Don't you have a lawn to watch so you can yell at any kids that might be on it?
The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
Can't speak to the others stuff, but I don't think Netflix subscriber loss meant much. Kind of to be expected after a huge outlier number of sign-ups, many temporary, while people were stuck at home. They pretty much bounced right back. In fact 2 quarters after that loss they posted I believe their 4th largest subscriber growth ever in a quarter, trailing only three from the heart of the pandemic.
Now this is a convincing argumentthe store owner and his wife helping their new employee in Debbie Does Dallas
This doesn't make intuitive sense unless this is from sheer overspending when creating new content.The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic.
Probably either Asteroid City or Past Lives. Most fun movie? Spider-Man: Across the Spider-VerseWhat is the best movie out right now that's in theaters?
Throw in Indy and thats probably itProbably either Asteroid City or Past Lives. Most fun movie? Spider-Man: Across the Spider-VerseWhat is the best movie out right now that's in theaters?
Yeah I think several of them at this point hope to just be bought out or will sell parts for money. It’s all just going to end up back where it started with a model similar to cable.The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
Can't speak to the others stuff, but I don't think Netflix subscriber loss meant much. Kind of to be expected after a huge outlier number of sign-ups, many temporary, while people were stuck at home. They pretty much bounced right back. In fact 2 quarters after that loss they posted I believe their 4th largest subscriber growth ever in a quarter, trailing only three from the heart of the pandemic.
Netflix juiced their numbers by cracking down on shared logins. Thats unlikely to help them longterm growth-wise and alienated a lot of now former customers too. All the other streamers treat their channels either as loss leaders (like Apple or D+) and/or are cutting back massively on content production or selling things off in an effort to get profitable (WB & Paramount). Streaming is here to stay but it’s definitely about to change and/or likely consolidate down the number of options.
People seemed to like Guardians 3 and Super Mario, those are still out. Is The Flash good? Depends who you ask. Kids probably like Elemental or Little Mermaid.Probably either Asteroid City or Past Lives. Most fun movie? Spider-Man: Across the Spider-VerseWhat is the best movie out right now that's in theaters?
The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
Can't speak to the others stuff, but I don't think Netflix subscriber loss meant much. Kind of to be expected after a huge outlier number of sign-ups, many temporary, while people were stuck at home. They pretty much bounced right back. In fact 2 quarters after that loss they posted I believe their 4th largest subscriber growth ever in a quarter, trailing only three from the heart of the pandemic.
Netflix juiced their numbers by cracking down on shared logins. Thats unlikely to help them longterm growth-wise and alienated a lot of now former customers too. All the other streamers treat their channels either as loss leaders (like Apple or D+) and/or are cutting back massively on content production or selling things off in an effort to get profitable (WB & Paramount). Streaming is here to stay but it’s definitely about to change and/or likely consolidate down the number of options.
FYP. And the answer is ... yes.Is this thethreadforum where old guys come to complain about stuff and talk about how things were better "back in my day"?
Yeah, I think Netflix could make half as many TV shows as they are, and no one would notice.Like all things but especially these streaming businesses they'll all hit a point of diminishing returns on new subscriber sign-ups eventually (how many people do you know that don't already have Netflix) and they'll have to keep increasing revenue by increasing margins.
Throw in Indy and thats probably itProbably either Asteroid City or Past Lives. Most fun movie? Spider-Man: Across the Spider-VerseWhat is the best movie out right now that's in theaters?
Last time I was in the theater, I noticed someone that had a portable teleprompter thing that provided closed captioning. It plugged into the armrest with a arm on it so you could adjust it to whatever position you want. I think you just have to request when buying the ticket, or possibly just when entering the theater. I imagine not all theaters provide this feature but it seemed pretty neat.I watch most of my TV with CC on, I just have a hard time with the loudness of current movies, I can't always follow what is being said. I know that is something I can't get in a theater.
That sounds high n all but they went into the "we're movie makers" business and everytime I see the cost of a movie it's an absurd amount.The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
That was reported on a website, can’t remember which one and it was the losses they report for streaming. I mean Prime (which is its own beast) spend a billion on a terrible LOTR series hardly anyone watched. These people are crazy how they spend.That sounds high n all but they went into the "we're movie makers" business and everytime I see the cost of a movie it's an absurd amount.The total reported streaming losses for Disney/Hulu , Discovery/HBO/Max, Peacock and Paramount is something like $20 billion since the pandemic. Netflix has been in a panic for about a year now as they have seen for the first time ever a decline in subscribers.I think streaming services are only struggling because they were at a fortunate time where they could try things and some of those ideas didn't work out. Their base business model is as secure as could be and an easy shift to go back to being quite profitable.
There may be some smaller brands that can't handle it but none of the big dogs should be concerned here.
Any idea what they made on just their streaming services?
If they spend 50 bil on an Adam Sandler movie that never makes the theater...I'm not sure they should be in that business.
The market is pretty saturated and they're the endpoint not the beginning(theater). How many new subscribers can Netflix even gain?
Sandler's movies (and more movies of that type) should be pretty cheap to make and I believe they rate very well for Netflix (FWIW). Not sure if the monetization works out right, but just looking at surface info ... I'd think Netflix would want to bankroll as many Sandler films as he can crank out.If they spend 50 bil on an Adam Sandler movie that never makes the theater
Wait ... what?I mean Prime (which is its own beast) spend a billion on a terrible LOTR series hardly anyone watched.