Kwai Chang Caine
Footballguy
Oh man this snow is nuts. Hope he can handle it! My home team and fanatsy team depends on it!!
				
			Remember, he's a bad fit for Kelly's offense.And here we go. This is where legends are born.
Franchise QBRemember, he's a bad fit for Kelly's offense.And here we go. This is where legends are born.
Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
BS score the TD it puts you up 21.Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
I like it, I like it alotFrom a fantasy perspective, what to you all think of his matchup at Minnesota this week?
first you are a english teacher and next you say any nickname that is not the great foley cannoli is good you and me brohan you and me there is a storm a brewing take that to the bank just kidding brohanNicky FranchiseGreat Name!
My buddies and me have been going with 'Post Vick Nick' for the moment. Nickfolean Dynamite works too.first you are a english teacher and next you say any nickname that is not the great foley cannoli is good you and me brohan you and me there is a storm a brewing take that to the bank just kidding brohanNicky FranchiseGreat Name!
Really good post. I have to admit, this one post probably changed my mind about benching Foles for Rivers. I do not like rolling out half my team on Thursday Night Football. Too many eggs in one basket. Also, I'm the favorite, so a solid floor from Foles reduces some of the variance if Thursday Night is for some reason a low scoring game. I still like Rivers ceiling more but I'm warming to Foles floor. Thanks for the research MM.Re: Foles matchup...
Last 5 games Vikings are 2-2-1. Not playing bad football at all. Here is how qbs have fared against them over that stretch:
@ MIN. RGIII - 281 YDS, 3 TD, 0 INT
@SEA. Wilson - 230 YDS, 2 TD, 0 INT
@GB Flynn/Tolzien - 316 YDS, 1 TD, 0 INT (1 TD rush)
@MIN McCown - 355 YDS, 2 TD, 0 INT
@BAL. Flacco - 245 YDS, 3 TD, 3 INT
Average: 285 YDS, 2.2 TD, 0.6 INT
Multiple TDs to each of the last 5 QBs faced. Only 1 game with an INT (although they got 3 in that game)
Foles over the last 5 games averaging 270 YDS, 2.8 TD, 0.2 INT. Eagles have won all 5 games. Also has averaged 28 YDS rushing and has 2 TDs on the ground.
Start with confidence here. 270 and 2 pass TDs, as well as 20 rush yards seems like a floor. 23.5 in WCOFF scoring. Upside tremendous.
I'm going with him over Brady @ Miami this weekGoing with Foles over Stafford vs the Ravens. A lock for at least two TDs.
Kneel down and you win the game.BS score the TD it puts you up 21.Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
and you forgot the part where rhodes is out this weekRe: Foles matchup...
Last 5 games Vikings are 2-2-1. Not playing bad football at all. Here is how qbs have fared against them over that stretch:
@ MIN. RGIII - 281 YDS, 3 TD, 0 INT
@SEA. Wilson - 230 YDS, 2 TD, 0 INT
@GB Flynn/Tolzien - 316 YDS, 1 TD, 0 INT (1 TD rush)
@MIN McCown - 355 YDS, 2 TD, 0 INT
@BAL. Flacco - 245 YDS, 3 TD, 3 INT
Average: 285 YDS, 2.2 TD, 0.6 INT
Multiple TDs to each of the last 5 QBs faced. Only 1 game with an INT (although they got 3 in that game)
Foles over the last 5 games averaging 270 YDS, 2.8 TD, 0.2 INT. Eagles have won all 5 games. Also has averaged 28 YDS rushing and has 2 TDs on the ground.
Start with confidence here. 270 and 2 pass TDs, as well as 20 rush yards seems like a floor. 23.5 in WCOFF scoring. Upside tremendous.
Cause both teams were trying to score.Kneel down and you win the game.BS score the TD it puts you up 21.Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
Score and you are ahead by 3 scores with 1:50 left. Of course no one can score 3 TD's that quick. Oh wait, didn't the Minnesota-Baltimore game have 5 TD's in the last 2 plus minutes?
Aside from that, and Celek mentioned this himself, you end the game and remove the unnecessary risk of injury to your defensive players having to bat down hail marys in the snow. It's wasn't just the smart play, it was the only play. Anything else would have been selfish and stupid.Kneel down and you win the game.BS score the TD it puts you up 21.Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
Score and you are ahead by 3 scores with 1:50 left. Of course no one can score 3 TD's that quick. Oh wait, didn't the Minnesota-Baltimore game have 5 TD's in the last 2 plus minutes?
Exactly. I'm sure Kelly called the play so that they could finish running out the clock, but being a new coach, he probably told them to not score. The last thing he wants to do is come off as some brash, show off rubbing an opponent's nose in a loss by scoring a touchdown with time running out in a game they had already locked up. I guarantee Celek didn't make that decision.Cause both teams were trying to score.Kneel down and you win the game.BS score the TD it puts you up 21.Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
Score and you are ahead by 3 scores with 1:50 left. Of course no one can score 3 TD's that quick. Oh wait, didn't the Minnesota-Baltimore game have 5 TD's in the last 2 plus minutes?
I agree, 100%. Was looking for a shoulder to cry on though. Good to know there was someone else out there.Might cost me a win (had Foles in two leagues), but was the right play, and a classy, un-selfish move by CelekWill the late sit-down Celek (should have been) TD kill anyone else?
 
 Hells yea. Does a curse still count if I can't remember the last time I read a SI (Swimsuit edition doesn't count because I don't actually read it).And then Nick Foles happened
http://sinfl.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/nick-foles-sports-illustrated-cover-philadelphia-eagles.jpg
I read about number 2 a few weeks ago. It's pretty cool that he still comes off a humble as he does considering that and his success.http://ftw.usatoday.com/2013/12/nick-foles-philadelphia-eagles/
USA Today - 'Nick Foles has an incredible life based on these 7 indisputable facts'
Not a lot of the experts are putting him that high yet but I'm considering keeping him in a Keep 6 mini-dynasty. --- Would love some dyno-discussion.I think after this season Foles is almost universally considered a top-8 dynasty QB. Maybe higher.
If you put Manning into a mini-tier of his own for win-now teams only, how many QB's are you taking over Foles going forward if he finishes the season the way he's been playing?CamNot a lot of the experts are putting him that high yet but I'm considering keeping him in a Keep 6 mini-dynasty. --- Would love some dyno-discussion.I think after this season Foles is almost universally considered a top-8 dynasty QB. Maybe higher.
Stafford. My rankings need an update but I think I'll have Foles at QB7.If you put Manning into a mini-tier of his own for win-now teams only, how many QB's are you taking over Foles going forward if he finishes the season the way he's been playing?Not a lot of the experts are putting him that high yet but I'm considering keeping him in a Keep 6 mini-dynasty. --- Would love some dyno-discussion.I think after this season Foles is almost universally considered a top-8 dynasty QB. Maybe higher.
Cam
Rodgers
Brees
Luck
Wilson
Brady? Ryan? Kaepernick? RG3?
I think I was selling him short. I think you can make a case for him being top-6, if you prefer him over the four names above. Not all will--I'm not sure I do, either. But it's something to think about.
* it's late, I may have forgotten some names here.
Stafford, that's right. I'll edit that in, thanks. Still, when you out the names down and look at it, he ends up higher than you'd think. I'm in.Stafford. My rankings need an update but I think I'll have Foles at QB7.If you put Manning into a mini-tier of his own for win-now teams only, how many QB's are you taking over Foles going forward if he finishes the season the way he's been playing?Not a lot of the experts are putting him that high yet but I'm considering keeping him in a Keep 6 mini-dynasty. --- Would love some dyno-discussion.I think after this season Foles is almost universally considered a top-8 dynasty QB. Maybe higher.
Cam
Rodgers
Brees
Luck
Wilson
Brady? Ryan? Kaepernick? RG3?
I think I was selling him short. I think you can make a case for him being top-6, if you prefer him over the four names above. Not all will--I'm not sure I do, either. But it's something to think about.
* it's late, I may have forgotten some names here.
Certainly, the 120 QBR, 1 INT guys isn't sustainable but there is no reason to believe that he couldn't be a perennial 100 QBR, 30 TD guy. Foles biggest deterrence right now for FF players is his perception. People view him as a 3rd round pick so they are waiting for him to fail. It's going to take a good playoff run to erase the perceptions. The scary thing about Foles is that his offense may very well get MORE weapons next year. I can't imagine how deadly this offense would have been with a healthy Maclin added to the receiving corp.I own the guy a lot, but have no idea how to value him long-term. What he's done since Week 7 is obviously not sustainable, but there's no way to know where his ultimate level is. OTOH, he's 24. So if he manages to be a top 6-8 guy (instead of a top 1-2 guy) for the next eight years his overall value would be as good as anyone's, after Rodgers.
I came into 2013 thin at QB, so I'm holding and hoping. But I could see people both buying and selling due to the unknowns.
I think he needs to be ahead of Luck and Wilson at this point. Both QBs are on teams that want to run. Wilson, despite improving on his rookie year is probably going to throw less than 450 passes this year, while Luck's OC and HC want to be a run-first team. I would probably go:Stafford, that's right. I'll edit that in, thanks. Still, when you out the names down and look at it, he ends up higher than you'd think. I'm in.Stafford. My rankings need an update but I think I'll have Foles at QB7.If you put Manning into a mini-tier of his own for win-now teams only, how many QB's are you taking over Foles going forward if he finishes the season the way he's been playing?Not a lot of the experts are putting him that high yet but I'm considering keeping him in a Keep 6 mini-dynasty. --- Would love some dyno-discussion.I think after this season Foles is almost universally considered a top-8 dynasty QB. Maybe higher.
Cam
Rodgers
Brees
Luck
Wilson
Brady? Ryan? Kaepernick? RG3?
I think I was selling him short. I think you can make a case for him being top-6, if you prefer him over the four names above. Not all will--I'm not sure I do, either. But it's something to think about.
* it's late, I may have forgotten some names here.
Chip Kelly doesn't strike me as a 'take your foot off the gas' kind of coach. I'm not saying he'll be passing if they're up 38-7, but he'll certainly be passing to get to that 38.I'm starting to get nervous about starting Foles this weekend. Here's my thoughts:
Last week Foles got off to a slow start, obviously the weather played a factor. But the Lions had a 14 pt second half lead, and forced the Eagles in the second half of that game into comeback mode. Eagles ran all over the Lions in the second half and won going away. But Foles was very involved in the initial comeback.
Looking forward to the Minnesota game, Eagles run game is really cranking right now, and if they are in a position to salt away an easy win, they could ask Foles to hand it off pretty much all of the second half. The Vikings are a mess right now. Probably no AP and maybe not even Gerhart. And Carlson might also be a no-go. Matt Cassell isn't scaring anyone, and the Philly defense is highly underrated now, after a very poor first half of the season. They could shut them down early.
I see Foles getting his 150/2 by the end of the first half taking advantage of the first half, due to the awful Vikings secondary. And then game managing in the second half, finishing with a ho-hum 225/2 type game, letting Shady and Brown do the work. If Minnesota can't put pressure on the Eagles, like the Lions were able to do last week, I'm afraid that Foles upside will be limited. Still think he's a low QB1, but I am starting to doubt his upside.
Wouldnt this be a concern with almost any good team/QB against and inferior opponent?I'm starting to get nervous about starting Foles this weekend. Here's my thoughts:
Last week Foles got off to a slow start, obviously the weather played a factor. But the Lions had a 14 pt second half lead, and forced the Eagles in the second half of that game into comeback mode. Eagles ran all over the Lions in the second half and won going away. But Foles was very involved in the initial comeback.
Looking forward to the Minnesota game, Eagles run game is really cranking right now, and if they are in a position to salt away an easy win, they could ask Foles to hand it off pretty much all of the second half. The Vikings are a mess right now. Probably no AP and maybe not even Gerhart. And Carlson might also be a no-go. Matt Cassell isn't scaring anyone, and the Philly defense is highly underrated now, after a very poor first half of the season. They could shut them down early.
I see Foles getting his 150/2 by the end of the first half taking advantage of the first half, due to the awful Vikings secondary. And then game managing in the second half, finishing with a ho-hum 225/2 type game, letting Shady and Brown do the work. If Minnesota can't put pressure on the Eagles, like the Lions were able to do last week, I'm afraid that Foles upside will be limited. Still think he's a low QB1, but I am starting to doubt his upside.
You obviously are not watching too many Vikings games this year. Vikings are playing tough pretty much every week. They are not giving anything up.I'm starting to get nervous about starting Foles this weekend. Here's my thoughts:
Last week Foles got off to a slow start, obviously the weather played a factor. But the Lions had a 14 pt second half lead, and forced the Eagles in the second half of that game into comeback mode. Eagles ran all over the Lions in the second half and won going away. But Foles was very involved in the initial comeback.
Looking forward to the Minnesota game, Eagles run game is really cranking right now, and if they are in a position to salt away an easy win, they could ask Foles to hand it off pretty much all of the second half. The Vikings are a mess right now. Probably no AP and maybe not even Gerhart. And Carlson might also be a no-go. Matt Cassell isn't scaring anyone, and the Philly defense is highly underrated now, after a very poor first half of the season. They could shut them down early.
I see Foles getting his 150/2 by the end of the first half taking advantage of the first half, due to the awful Vikings secondary. And then game managing in the second half, finishing with a ho-hum 225/2 type game, letting Shady and Brown do the work. If Minnesota can't put pressure on the Eagles, like the Lions were able to do last week, I'm afraid that Foles upside will be limited. Still think he's a low QB1, but I am starting to doubt his upside.
Yes, but as of last week the Philly matchup looked only marginally superior to the Vikes. Now it looks vastly superior. I'd have the same concern if say the Broncos were facing the Vikings to be honest.Wouldnt this be a concern with almost any good team/QB against and inferior opponent?I'm starting to get nervous about starting Foles this weekend. Here's my thoughts:
Last week Foles got off to a slow start, obviously the weather played a factor. But the Lions had a 14 pt second half lead, and forced the Eagles in the second half of that game into comeback mode. Eagles ran all over the Lions in the second half and won going away. But Foles was very involved in the initial comeback.
Looking forward to the Minnesota game, Eagles run game is really cranking right now, and if they are in a position to salt away an easy win, they could ask Foles to hand it off pretty much all of the second half. The Vikings are a mess right now. Probably no AP and maybe not even Gerhart. And Carlson might also be a no-go. Matt Cassell isn't scaring anyone, and the Philly defense is highly underrated now, after a very poor first half of the season. They could shut them down early.
I see Foles getting his 150/2 by the end of the first half taking advantage of the first half, due to the awful Vikings secondary. And then game managing in the second half, finishing with a ho-hum 225/2 type game, letting Shady and Brown do the work. If Minnesota can't put pressure on the Eagles, like the Lions were able to do last week, I'm afraid that Foles upside will be limited. Still think he's a low QB1, but I am starting to doubt his upside.
