What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The *Official* Matt Leinart "whose your daddy" thread (1 Viewer)

I've been trying to inform you knuckleheads about this kid for about 9 months now...perhaps next time you'll listen.Pac10 = Conference of Champions
Anybody with a brain has known about this kid for two yearsPac 10 sucks my balls, guy
You may have known about him, but you didn't really know.Pac10 = Conference of Champions
Yeah - come over to the SEC.By the way, if the INT stands Leinart = 1 Bears Defense = 1. Let the chaos begin, the Bears now know what Leinart wants to do. Lets see how the adjustments work out. :popcorn:
14-0...waiting on those adjustments.LOL at the SEC...you mean the SEC that has an Arkansas squad that beat Auburn but got its ### handed to it by USC.Pac10 = Conference of Champions.
 
Leinart took a step forward last week. This week could be 2 steps back. Too much too soon for any rookie QB. I believe more in the Rivers type QB education obviously.
I stand corrected. Matt is ready for the NFL now. Impressive to say the least.
 
Gonna be really interesting to see how Leinart fares against the best team in the NFL (and perhaps best defense IN HISTORY)
Amazing! Arizona must therefore have the best offense IN HISTORY!! '89 49ers, '84 Redskins, 83 Dolphins, 1990 Bills...Lookout for 2006 Cardinals! :lmao:
 
Leinart took a step forward last week. This week could be 2 steps back. Too much too soon for any rookie QB. I believe more in the Rivers type QB education obviously.
I stand corrected. Matt is ready for the NFL now. Impressive to say the least.
You've been informed...we actually play offense out here on the west coast.
I am pretty sure I was familiar with how good Leinart was as an OU fan. I am also sure that your schtick was lame the first time I saw it a year ago.
 
Ahem - What happened to all the haters in the second half?

Hmm. Offense didn't score - But the defense scored twice.

Officially - "Who is your daddy now Matt?"

:)

 
:own3d:

Leinart took a step forward last week. This week could be 2 steps back. Too much too soon for any rookie QB. I believe more in the Rivers type QB education obviously.
I stand corrected. Matt is ready for the NFL now. Impressive to say the least.
You've been informed...we actually play offense out here on the west coast.
I am pretty sure I was familiar with how good Leinart was as an OU fan. I am also sure that your schtick was lame the first time I saw it a year ago.
 
I've been trying to inform you knuckleheads about this kid for about 9 months now...perhaps next time you'll listen.Pac10 = Conference of Champions
Anybody with a brain has known about this kid for two yearsPac 10 sucks my balls, guy
You may have known about him, but you didn't really know.Pac10 = Conference of Champions
Yeah - come over to the SEC.By the way, if the INT stands Leinart = 1 Bears Defense = 1. Let the chaos begin, the Bears now know what Leinart wants to do. Lets see how the adjustments work out. :popcorn:
14-0...waiting on those adjustments.LOL at the SEC...you mean the SEC that has an Arkansas squad that beat Auburn but got its ### handed to it by USC.Pac10 = Conference of Champions.
Actually, no, I'm pretty sure he was referring to the SEC that has a Tennessee squad that beat Cal like a redheaded stepchild.We get it. USC is good. I don't think anyone is arguing that point. What I love, though, is how LHUCKS, perhaps the biggest supporter of the Pac-10, can't talk about any school other than USC. He just knows if he brings up anyone other than USC he's going to get owned, so he just babbles on and on and on about USC as if the presence of one quality team makes it a good conference.Wait, did I say that LHUCKS was the "biggest" Pac-10 supporter? I'm pretty sure I meant to say "only". ;)
 
Ahem - What happened to all the haters in the second half?Hmm. Offense didn't score - But the defense scored twice.Officially - "Who is your daddy now Matt?" :)
He looked prestty good to me. I wouldn't say that he wilted.
I agree. I was impressed. We aren't talking about Chris Everett out there. He was good.I'm just saying it was nice to see the Bears D show up in the secound half too. I never thought Arizona would put up that many points though.
 
I've been trying to inform you knuckleheads about this kid for about 9 months now...perhaps next time you'll listen.Pac10 = Conference of Champions
Anybody with a brain has known about this kid for two yearsPac 10 sucks my balls, guy
You may have known about him, but you didn't really know.Pac10 = Conference of Champions
Yeah - come over to the SEC.By the way, if the INT stands Leinart = 1 Bears Defense = 1. Let the chaos begin, the Bears now know what Leinart wants to do. Lets see how the adjustments work out. :popcorn:
14-0...waiting on those adjustments.LOL at the SEC...you mean the SEC that has an Arkansas squad that beat Auburn but got its ### handed to it by USC.Pac10 = Conference of Champions.
Actually, no, I'm pretty sure he was referring to the SEC that has a Tennessee squad that beat Cal like a redheaded stepchild.We get it. USC is good. I don't think anyone is arguing that point. What I love, though, is how LHUCKS, perhaps the biggest supporter of the Pac-10, can't talk about any school other than USC. He just knows if he brings up anyone other than USC he's going to get owned, so he just babbles on and on and on about USC as if the presence of one quality team makes it a good conference.Wait, did I say that LHUCKS was the "biggest" Pac-10 supporter? I'm pretty sure I meant to say "only". ;)
Pac 10 = USC + (insert 9 lame team names here)SEC = Florida, Tennessee, LSU, Auburn, Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina + (insert 4 lame team names here)Hmmmm.....doesn't seem to take a Rocket Surgeon to figure out which conference has more Quan. :bye:
 
We're getting a bit off topic here...Maybe I can steer us back with a couple observations:

Funny how some Leinart fanatics :towelwave: (I won't mention any specific names: LHUCKS) show up well after Leinart is showing is having a pretty decent game. Make your BOLD predictions, even if they are wrong sometimes.

One game does not make a career.

I think Leinart is and will get even better, not because he went to USC or played in the PAC-10. It definitely helps that he has some good talent around him in AZ. But let's face it, the kid is talented. LHUCKS, do you have the guts to admit the same about VY?

 
We're getting a bit off topic here...Maybe I can steer us back with a couple observations:Funny how some Leinart fanatics :towelwave: (I won't mention any specific names: LHUCKS) show up well after Leinart is showing is having a pretty decent game. Make your BOLD predictions, even if they are wrong sometimes.One game does not make a career.I think Leinart is and will get even better, not because he went to USC or played in the PAC-10. It definitely helps that he has some good talent around him in AZ. But let's face it, the kid is talented. LHUCKS, do you have the guts to admit the same about VY?
Actually Leinart is as good as he is because he went to USC. The pro style offense gets QBs ready for the NFL much quicker than other systems.VY is not even close to Leinart in terms of passing ability. He can hand the ball off to T. Henry with the best of them though. :thumbup:
 
We're getting a bit off topic here...Maybe I can steer us back with a couple observations:Funny how some Leinart fanatics :towelwave: (I won't mention any specific names: LHUCKS) show up well after Leinart is showing is having a pretty decent game. Make your BOLD predictions, even if they are wrong sometimes.One game does not make a career.I think Leinart is and will get even better, not because he went to USC or played in the PAC-10. It definitely helps that he has some good talent around him in AZ. But let's face it, the kid is talented. LHUCKS, do you have the guts to admit the same about VY?
Actually Leinart is as good as he is because he went to USC. The pro style offense gets QBs ready for the NFL much quicker than other systems.VY is not even close to Leinart in terms of passing ability. He can hand the ball off to T. Henry with the best of them though. :thumbup:
You try to make peace and now this... :boxing: What I was saying is that Leinart would have been solid even IF he did not go to USC. Last time I looked there were a few good NFL Q's coming from other college programs.
 
We're getting a bit off topic here...Maybe I can steer us back with a couple observations:Funny how some Leinart fanatics :towelwave: (I won't mention any specific names: LHUCKS) show up well after Leinart is showing is having a pretty decent game. Make your BOLD predictions, even if they are wrong sometimes.One game does not make a career.I think Leinart is and will get even better, not because he went to USC or played in the PAC-10. It definitely helps that he has some good talent around him in AZ. But let's face it, the kid is talented. LHUCKS, do you have the guts to admit the same about VY?
Actually Leinart is as good as he is because he went to USC. The pro style offense gets QBs ready for the NFL much quicker than other systems.VY is not even close to Leinart in terms of passing ability. He can hand the ball off to T. Henry with the best of them though. :thumbup:
You try to make peace and now this... :boxing: What I was saying is that Leinart would have been solid even IF he did not go to USC. Last time I looked there were a few good NFL Q's coming from other college programs.
;) :thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top