Weebs210
Footballguy
Reported.Normally I'd make a joke about being surprised he could even read. However, that would get me banned.
Reported.Normally I'd make a joke about being surprised he could even read. However, that would get me banned.
And the same people that complained Obama was inexperienced voted Trump. There is no shortage of hypocrisy in the GOP and Trump supporters.Exactly. I don't care what Trump does in the bedroom or anyone else. But the hypocritical people who did care for the last 25 years should be called out for their hypocrisy for giving Trump a pass.
So no answer to my question, then?The cnn brain washing is hilarious to read through in this thread. Always good for a chuckle.
Any example? Or just blatant trolling?The cnn brain washing is hilarious to read through in this thread. Always good for a chuckle.
How does that answer the question? You referenced cnn brainwashing in here.Turn the TV on?
Giving the kid a chance...but yeah.Winner
Come on, he's obviously referring to those CNN "apple" commercials that have brainwashed people to believe that facts are facts and calling them something else doesn't change them. You know that you've fallen for this--you simply refuse to believe that is an apple, just because you're brainwashed.Any example? Or just blatant trolling?The cnn brain washing is hilarious to read through in this thread. Always good for a chuckle.
This is a false assertion.Back to the "if he doesn't agree with our echo chamber he must be a troll".
???cnn brain washing is hilarious to read through in this thread
Technically you're not disagreeing with anything anyone has asserted.Back to the "if he doesn't agree with our echo chamber he must be a troll".
One example? Sure.This is a false assertion.
What i stated was trolling was you making a blanket statement about posters here...then when asked for an example being unable to back it up.
You are now playing the victim card...which seems like even more trolling.
How about another shot...care to cite an example of
???
Lousy example. Didn't this just get proved out as originally and actually correct?Weebs210 said:
Ok, a few things here. This is now twice you have answered the question by posting something that has nothing to do with the assertion you made. The assertion you made was that there was CNN brainwashing you were reading through in this thread.Weebs210 said:
Oh, not looking to convince him...but expose his trolling more as an example of it having nothing to do with an echo chamber.I'm sure you guys will convince weebs this time, and show him the error of his ridiculous ways. Please keep quoting him so I can see his nonsense
How does this show that anybody was "brainwashed"?Weebs210 said:
By posting articles with non existent sources and the readers (you guys) taking it as fact.How does this show that anybody was "brainwashed"?
Eh, I think it's good to do this every week or so, if for no other reason than to show @Joe Bryant and the other powers that be that we've gone above and beyond to have the sort of civil, issue-based discussion they blame both sides for not having. The last few pages of failed attempts at dialogue with @Weebs210 and @Bozeman Bruiser are a pretty good representation of what always happens when we try to engage "across the aisle" on substance since Trump. Hard to imagine reading it and still thinking both sides are to blame for the "problem."I'm sure you guys will convince weebs this time, and show him the error of his ridiculous ways. Please keep quoting him so I can see his nonsense
Continuing to engage with the same three trolls over and over is pointless and just encourages them.Eh, I think it's good to do this every week or so, if for no other reason than to show @Joe Bryant and the other powers that be that we've gone above and beyond to have the sort of civil, issue-based discussion they blame both sides for not having. The last few pages of failed attempts at dialogue with @Weebs210 and @Bozeman Bruiser are a pretty good representation of what always happens when we try to engage "across the aisle" on substance since Trump. Hard to imagine reading it and still thinking both sides are to blame for the "problem."
I don't think it's pointless to do it every once in a blue moon, for the reasons I explained and because I'm always happy to give people second chances. They responded (or more accurately, didn't respond) exactly like I thought they would. So back to our regularly scheduled program, no harm doneContinuing to engage with the same three trolls over and over is pointless and just encourages them.
Seems you posted an article that turns out to be false in a way. The original CNN article was not from non-existent sources.By posting articles with non existent sources and the readers (you guys) taking it as fact.
***COPING MECHANISM ALERT***Weebs210 said:The cnn brain washing is hilarious to read through in this thread. Always good for a chuckle.
Care to link where anyone was brainwashed by those dates? Or that it was ever done on purpose?
So half truth reporting is okay with you as long as it has to do with Russia and Trump?Seems you posted an article that turns out to be false in a way. The original CNN article was not from non-existent sources.
And the facts within the story were not fully retracted and turned out to be true.
You seem to be making the point that you have been brainwashed to believe something despite the facts saying otherwise.
Which half truth? You should read the actual redaction, and what has come out since then.So half truth reporting is okay with you as long as it has to do with Russia and Trump?
sure, if one person did it once in a while. but several people a day just can't resist. This whole page is nothing but people engaging with trolls.I don't think it's pointless to do it every once in a blue moon, for the reasons I explained and because I'm always happy to give people second chances. They responded (or more accurately, didn't respond) exactly like I thought they would. So back to our regularly scheduled program, no harm done
Echo, echo...Now batting for Pedro Borboun, Manny MotaWeebs210 said:Back to the "if he doesn't agree with our echo chamber he must be a troll".
I don't think that's true, I think most of the time they stay away and we have a good discussion. But you're right, the point has been made enough to last us a while now.sure, if one person did it once in a while. but several people a day just can't resist. This whole page is nothing but people engaging with trolls.
Okay, but what's the endgame here?Eh, I think it's good to do this every week or so, if for no other reason than to show @Joe Bryant and the other powers that be that we've gone above and beyond to have the sort of civil, issue-based discussion they blame both sides for not having. The last few pages of failed attempts at dialogue with @Weebs210 and @Bozeman Bruiser are a pretty good representation of what always happens when we try to engage "across the aisle" on substance since Trump. Hard to imagine reading it and still thinking both sides are to blame for the "problem."
Basically. There’s always the remote possibility that someone will actually answer my question in good faith, too. I certainly wouldn’t mind that.documentation
I guess I just don't see how documentation helps. Joe is a pretty consistent guy and we see how he views everyone's posts. I respect the effort by you guys, I just don't believe in any benefit.Basically. There’s always the remote possibility that someone will actually answer my question in good faith, too. I certainly wouldn’t mind that.
Since Trump has made over 2,000 false or misleading claims, I suppose we can say his supporters are brainwashed as well then.By posting articles with non existent sources and the readers (you guys) taking it as fact.
One day, when Weebs runs for president, Jake Tapper will put up screenshots of this thread and ask why Weebs ran from the hard questions, and you'll thank Tobias.I guess I just don't see how documentation helps. Joe is a pretty consistent guy and we see how he views everyone's posts. I respect the effort by you guys, I just don't believe in any benefit.
or unable to discern truthSince Trump has made over 2,000 false or misleading claims, I suppose we can say his supporters are brainwashed as well then.
True, here it is on Yahoo.Maurile Tremblay said:This doesn’t seem like a great response to a book excerpt, IMO. Who cares where a book excerpt is published?
At his age, it might be a death in prison sentence.Manafort trial date set in EDVA.
- Apparently Manafort is serious about his dual venue strategy. This gets him in for a shot in VA, avoids D.C. and allows him to narrow the charges in front of him. It also carries risks such as costs and losing early and increasing his sentence.
You think we're so innocent?Russia is responsible for a chemical attack on the streets of the UK. What is Trump going to say or do about it?
Reminds me of Carlos Marcello, 'Just a simple tomato farmer'...
So basically this article - which spins the dossier into a super secret joint FBI-DNC-Soros plot - will get picked up by HSCI and Nunes who will then poop out a Phase III memo.
I think you're joking, but it's probably 50/50. Typically FOX News picks up a story like that, then the Comrades in the House run with it.So basically this article - which spins the dossier into a super secret joint FBI-DNC-Soros plot - will get picked up by HSCI and Nunes who will then poop out a Phase III memo.