randall146
Footballguy
See you guys in another few weeks@Joe Bryant @David Dodds
Can we get a clarification on this? Following Dodds lead, it seems like unsubstantiated claims against public figures was okay?
See you guys in another few weeks@Joe Bryant @David Dodds
Can we get a clarification on this? Following Dodds lead, it seems like unsubstantiated claims against public figures was okay?
trump has been in bed with and laundering the money of russian mobsters connected to putin for close to 30 years. if you believe there are no "tapes" of this behavior that our IC holds, you are untethered from reality.shader said:Any proof of a single word of the above?
Because he hasn't yet filled his daily devil's advocate quota. Once he feels like he's sufficiently argued for one side he'll start arguing for the other. He must reach equilibrium.The Indestructible said:How are you able to say that the Strozk stuff looks terrible for Mueller but you can't say whether anything looks terrible for Trump?
If you were being honest, you’d admit that none of those indictments include any evidence of Russian collusion.SameSongNDance said:Trump is under investigation and his national security adviser, campaign chairman, foreign policy adviser and former aide have been indicted yet you continue to pretend that this thread is filled with a bunch of people talking about chemtrails and the illuminati. You're the literal worst.
Can we just leave these guys out of it. They have enough to deal with already.Bucky86 said:@Joe Bryant @David Dodds
Can we get a clarification on this? Following Dodds lead, it seems like unsubstantiated claims against public figures was okay?
Those texts were a gigantic nothing burger.shader said:The pro-Clinton texts look terrible for Mueller. We probably want to wait and see what the Kushner emails contain, before we try to compare them.
Yeah you're right they all lied to the FBI for ####s. Trump and his inner circle have lied about their contacts with Russian officials and those connected to the Kremlin every step of the way because they knew it was the path they'd need to take to clear their names.If you were being honest, you’d admit that none of those indictments include any evidence of Russian collusion.
Im the worst for asking for evidence for bold claims that have no basis in reality? Sorry I don’t believe in your dream world.
I thought this was about Russian influence?It's almost like this administration really couldn't care less about running a country except enriching themselves and their buddies?
You’re the one claiming the president of the USA has been laundering money for close to 30 years. Now I’m sure you don’t have a single bit of proof of this...but IM the one untethered?trump has been in bed with and laundering the money of russian mobsters connected to putin for close to 30 years. if you believe there are no "tapes" of this behavior that our IC holds, you are untethered from reality.
you need to snap back to reality soon, otherwise i fear what the cognitive dissonance will do to your brain when this all comes out.
The tommygunz of politics.timschochet said:Trump will not fire Mueller. Not now or ever.
So you are ready to jump to conclusions about the texts...but not Russia?shader said:When the Mueller investigation is over, I’ll let you know.
Yeah..such a nothing burger that Mueller immediately took that guy off the investigation.Those texts were a gigantic nothing burger.
Are you serious? There are actual text messages. There’s nothing to jump to conclusions about because the evidence is out in the open.So you are ready to jump to conclusions about the texts...but not Russia?
To remove any even thought of it being improper. So Mueller did the right thing...hence, the texts are a nothing burger royale.Yeah..such a nothing burger that Mueller immediately took that guy off the investigation.
You do know that things aren’t a nothing burger just because you say they are....
easy Shader-this is their thread; but I like how they invite discussion.Are you serious? There are actual text messages. There’s nothing to jump to conclusions about because the evidence is out in the open.
Yes...there are text messages that said what? Not a lot of anything...that’s the point.Are you serious? There are actual text messages. There’s nothing to jump to conclusions about because the evidence is out in the open.
deep breath & no personal insults..It's hard to do. You think you are right. don't be so sure, keep an open mind.Sorry, it's hard to keep track of all the ways this administration is ####### over the country
Thanks Rob I appreciate that. I am on the road at the moment but perhaps I just speak to Emin first. Seems we have some time and if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer. Could we do a call first thing next week when I am back?Yes...there are text messages that said what? Not a lot of anything...that’s the point.
We have emails and details of meetings with russia that have more meat...yet you still can’t comment?
it may end without any of this coming out (though it will come out eventually). but since there's plenty of obstruction type stuff they can get him on a la nixon, and since his approval rating is spiraling, and since the GOP is going to get its precious tax cut soon, its looking increasingly likely we won't need this to be public to get this charlatan out of office. GOP gets its tax cut, they look around and see how trump is damaging the party and their reelection chances, then their support erodes along with the already eroding public support.You’re the one claiming the president of the USA has been laundering money for close to 30 years. Now I’m sure you don’t have a single bit of proof of this...but IM the one untethered?
For the record if you are accurate, I’d laugh. I’m not emotionally tied to that ego-maniac at all.
But I’ll ask you a question. How will YOU react if the Mueller investigation ends and none of the above pans out?
He watched the Fisher/Spasskey chess match live on TV in Iceland from his TV.And if only there were ANY connections to the Trump administration and Russia.
Solid integrity.To remove any even thought of it being improper. So Mueller did the right thing...hence, the texts are a nothing burger royale.
Fischer/Spassky, comrade.He watched the Fisher/Spasskey chess match live on TV in Iceland from his TV.
Wait, what? You think there’s no evidence Trump has been laundering money for decades? Trump Taj Mahal was fined for over 100 laundering violations in a year and a half in the 90s.You’re the one claiming the president of the USA has been laundering money for close to 30 years. Now I’m sure you don’t have a single bit of proof of this...but IM the one untethered?
For the record if you are accurate, I’d laugh. I’m not emotionally tied to that ego-maniac at all.
But I’ll ask you a question. How will YOU react if the Mueller investigation ends and none of the above pans out?
I'll comment. Just can't take the fact that Trump won------------so it had to do with someone. no way he winsYes...there are text messages that said what? Not a lot of anything...that’s the point.
We have emails and details of meetings with russia that have more meat...yet you still can’t comment?
'Tis the season for the triple dog dare.at this point in time I'm not sure why we even bother responding to shader. Probably time to start giving him the ren treatment.
Just to follow up on this, due to violations of anti-money-laundering laws, that casino voluntarily paid (rather than be prosecuted) almost a half million dollars in fines. For violations over a year and a half. From the early 90s.Wait, what? You think there’s no evidence Trump has been laundering money for decades? Trump Taj Mahal was fined for over 100 laundering violations in a year and a half in the 90s.
Here's a link to the letter Trump's lawyers sent to legislators. And the reason it's being sent to legislators and not a court is because it's not even remotely illegal, GSA produced them to Mueller's team willingly. It also casually mentions that 13 members of the transition team are under investigation.The Hoarse Whisperer @HoarseWisperer
Settle in, politikids. You're going to enjoy this... I've read the full letter Trump transition team attorneys sent to legislators re: Mueller obtaining their emails. It has a delicious reveal.
As we now know:
1) Mueller obtained ALL of the emails sent to/from Trump transition team accounts
2) The Trump gang only realized this after Mueller's team seemed to know all about their emails
3) This made them quite... upset
4) Thier lawyers then wrote the letter in the link to congressmen complaining about just how upsetting all of this is. Here's the classically amusing reveal in the letter...
Earlier this year, Trump appointed the top attorney at the office responsible for providing all the electronics and email accounts the Trump transition team used. That attorney's name was Richard Backler.
Now, as background, Backler was a white collar criminal defense attorney before his appointment. He helped rich criminals beat government convictions for a firm with a name you'll find familiar. Bracewell & Giuliani.
So, Trump appointed Backler and then Backler went and ensured Trump transition team attorneys that he would not allow his org (the GSA) to provide any of their emails to investigators. One problem: Backler fell ill and ultimately passed away.
So, until Mueller's crew started asking Trump aides about those emails, they had absolutely no idea Mueller had them because they thought Trump's guy on the inside was running interference for them. Let that one sink in.
Trump and his flunkies thought their friend at the GSA had locked their emails away *literally* in a vault no one could get to... They thought their bodies were all buried.
As a result, Trump's people walked into their interviews with Mueller and team with a completely false sense of confidence that he didn't know what he already knew in spades. They thought he was fishing. He was just reeling fish in.
Can you imagine the freakout that must have occurred in Trumpland when they realized their cleanup guy hadn't actually done the cleanup after all? Alllllllll of the things they thought they had buried were not only not buried; Mueller had them in writing!
While this is just conjecture, I suspect the entire Trump orbit just realized that Mueller has a trove that entirely hangs them out to dry AND brings them down for obstruction and lying to Mueller to boot.
Trump appointed a Giuliani guy to protect him from Mueller... ...and then the guy went and died just as Mueller was coming a'calling. Trump must be losing his freaking mind... ...even more panicked: Jared Kushner. Mueller is gonna roast them all.
Note: Trump team knew Beckler had died. They didn’t know he had failed to lock down their electronics and emails - and didn’t know GSA staff had produced them all without telling anyone.
One more note: as the letter in the link lays out, Beckler was incapacitated by August. He was hospitalized when Mueller’s crew came a’knockin’.
Then you will just get started!shader said:When the Mueller investigation is over, I’ll let you know.
Sorry if I Hipple this but my guess is it's a political remedy, not a legal one.Dinsy Ejotuz said:How is a letter to Congress the legal remedy here? If they were serious, and not grandstanding for PR purposes, wouldn't a court be the place to turn?
My initial assumption is that Mueller is clowning them as they play with their 1D Rubik's "Cube", but someone please educate me on this:
Shader, this is the problem. You act ‘above it all’ and ‘impartial’ but often you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.Wait, what? You think there’s no evidence Trump has been laundering money for decades? Trump Taj Mahal was fined for over 100 laundering violations in a year and a half in the 90s.
That's his shtickShader, this is the problem. You act ‘above it all’ and ‘impartial’ but often you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.
It takes 10 seconds to realize Team Trump considers the emails "private records." It's kind of incredible what they're admitting to there - it says Beckler was going to treat the records as private. So basically Team Trump thought that they had put GSA records under lock & key. That's really funny, especially considering their defense of Flynn was that he was acting in a normal, pre-governmental policy making fashion. Can't have it both ways.I usually hate these game theory/long chain type tweets but this one is good. I'll try to condense it to make it more readable.
Here's a link to the letter Trump's lawyers sent to legislators. And the reason it's being sent to legislators and not a court is because it's not even remotely illegal, GSA produced them to Mueller's team willingly. It also casually mentions that 13 members of the transition team are under investigation.
Beckler worked for Giuliani then. Seems pretty clear.Earlier this year, Trump appointed the top attorney at the office responsible for providing all the electronics and email accounts the Trump transition team used. That attorney's name was Richard Backler.
Now, as background, Backler was a white collar criminal defense attorney before his appointment. He helped rich criminals beat government convictions for a firm with a name you'll find familiar. Bracewell & Giuliani.
You have to wonder how many more perjury charges he'll end up getting from the line of questioning regarding these emails.Bucky86 said:
I regret that I have but one like to give for my country.Shader, this is the problem. You act ‘above it all’ and ‘impartial’ but often you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.
Damn, yeah. They need to decide who gets to keep that. Can't have multiple people with the same act.He and Matsuki do the same thing. :ignore:
Doubt they bother with perjury.You have to wonder how many more perjury charges he'll end up getting from the line of questioning regarding these emails.
First they are in fact public records since there is no executive privilege since Trump wasn’t President yet. The second part would be if they were talking with their attorneys. That could possibly be privileged, but there is a process to manage that conflict and if it ever gets to court, they can argue in front of a judge.Are we 100% that e-mails held by GSA are always public?
Also, are activities/interview/testimony related to a Special Counsel in front of a judge? i.e. what oversight is there that Mueller has the right to these e-mails?
I suppose that the executive branch could classify them as secret or top secret so that they wouldn't be made public. But they would still be admissible in court, I imagine.First they are in fact public records since there is no executive privilege since Trump wasn’t President yet. The second part would be if they were talking with their attorneys. That could possibly be privileged, but there is a process to manage that conflict and if it ever gets to court, they can argue in front of a judge.