Eviloutsider
Footballguy
CJ2K or Richardson the rest of the year?
He has a cheap contract through 2015 and they can extend it in 2016.Although it is tough to argue that getting a 1st-rounder was enough for Trent and his workmanlike 2.9 YPC.
RichardsonCJ2K or Richardson the rest of the year?
Yeah but none of those guys have been as consistently mediocre as Richardson.No doubt TRich is under performing, but so are other RB's.
Today
Rice. 27 for 74 yds
Miller. 7 for 15 yds
P Thomas 19 for 36 yds
Bush. 13 for 44 yds
CJ2K. 10 for 17 yds
McCoy. 20 for 46 yds
MJD. 17 for 70 yds
Time will tell. Very few RB's are doing well every week.
Has to be Johnson. His schedule is really good after the next few and actually has shown an ability to not be a slow plodding BJGE clone.CJ2K or Richardson the rest of the year?
This year Rice, MJD, and CJ2K have been this consistently mediocre.Yeah but none of those guys have been as consistently mediocre as Richardson.No doubt TRich is under performing, but so are other RB's.
Today
Rice. 27 for 74 yds
Miller. 7 for 15 yds
P Thomas 19 for 36 yds
Bush. 13 for 44 yds
CJ2K. 10 for 17 yds
McCoy. 20 for 46 yds
MJD. 17 for 70 yds
Time will tell. Very few RB's are doing well every week.
Rice and TRich were the only 1st round picks of those 4, and Rice while disappointing so far, has still been outscoring TRich with 2 good games, 1 terrible game and 1 week he was out where you would have started someone else in his place.This year Rice, MJD, and CJ2K have been this consistently mediocre.Yeah but none of those guys have been as consistently mediocre as Richardson.No doubt TRich is under performing, but so are other RB's.
Today
Rice. 27 for 74 yds
Miller. 7 for 15 yds
P Thomas 19 for 36 yds
Bush. 13 for 44 yds
CJ2K. 10 for 17 yds
McCoy. 20 for 46 yds
MJD. 17 for 70 yds
Time will tell. Very few RB's are doing well every week.
Forte had a GREAT first season. He also had an above average second season that could have been better had he been used right. Richardson had a below average first season and averaged 3 YPC despite the rest of the backs averaging at least 4. His second season has been forgettable and has already been traded.He has a cheap contract through 2015 and they can extend it in 2016.Although it is tough to argue that getting a 1st-rounder was enough for Trent and his workmanlike 2.9 YPC.
Forte was just as pedestrian in his 2nd year.
consistently mediocre is about 3 pegs above richardsonYeah but none of those guys have been as consistently mediocre as Richardson.No doubt TRich is under performing, but so are other RB's.
Today
Rice. 27 for 74 yds
Miller. 7 for 15 yds
P Thomas 19 for 36 yds
Bush. 13 for 44 yds
CJ2K. 10 for 17 yds
McCoy. 20 for 46 yds
MJD. 17 for 70 yds
Time will tell. Very few RB's are doing well every week.
Fill their benches? You only have to start two players in your leagues? Sweet!Rice and TRich were the only 1st round picks of those 4, and Rice while disappointing so far, has still been outscoring TRich with 2 good games, 1 terrible game and 1 week he was out where you would have started someone else in his place.This year Rice, MJD, and CJ2K have been this consistently mediocre.Yeah but none of those guys have been as consistently mediocre as Richardson.No doubt TRich is under performing, but so are other RB's.
Today
Rice. 27 for 74 yds
Miller. 7 for 15 yds
P Thomas 19 for 36 yds
Bush. 13 for 44 yds
CJ2K. 10 for 17 yds
McCoy. 20 for 46 yds
MJD. 17 for 70 yds
Time will tell. Very few RB's are doing well every week.
MJD and CJ were 3rd-4th rounders at best that people were taking to fill their bench.
Besides Forte getting more carries their rookie years weren't too different - 3.9 to 3.6 YPC. Forte 2nd year he averaged 3.6 YPC.Forte had a GREAT first season. He also had an above average second season that could have been better had he been used right. Richardson had a below average first season and averaged 3 YPC despite the rest of the backs averaging at least 4. His second season has been forgettable and has already been traded.He has a cheap contract through 2015 and they can extend it in 2016.Although it is tough to argue that getting a 1st-rounder was enough for Trent and his workmanlike 2.9 YPC.
Forte was just as pedestrian in his 2nd year.
Forte also had runs of 51 and 61 yards his 1st two years. Richardson.....not so much.Besides Forte getting more carries their rookie years weren't too different - 3.9 to 3.6 YPC. Forte 2nd year he averaged 3.6 YPC.Forte had a GREAT first season. He also had an above average second season that could have been better had he been used right. Richardson had a below average first season and averaged 3 YPC despite the rest of the backs averaging at least 4. His second season has been forgettable and has already been traded.He has a cheap contract through 2015 and they can extend it in 2016.Although it is tough to argue that getting a 1st-rounder was enough for Trent and his workmanlike 2.9 YPC.
Forte was just as pedestrian in his 2nd year.
Here's a link to what people were saying about Forte.
how did ingram look at 'bama and where was he drafted?Had a hunch this would happen against a pretty tough Seattle team and people would be quick to dance on his grave.
I want to see what he does in the next 4-5 games before I get too carried away. Have to believe there are better days ahead.
3.1 YPC would mean he's possibly the worst starting RB in the league and so bad that he probably doesn't belong in the NFL.
Can't reconcile that with his draft slot and how good he looked at Bama, so I'm thinking there will be some big games somewhere in the next 11 weeks.
Honestly, nowhere near as good as Richardson, and so far nowhere near as good even in the NFL. Ingram, blehhow did ingram look at 'bama and where was he drafted?Had a hunch this would happen against a pretty tough Seattle team and people would be quick to dance on his grave.
I want to see what he does in the next 4-5 games before I get too carried away. Have to believe there are better days ahead.
3.1 YPC would mean he's possibly the worst starting RB in the league and so bad that he probably doesn't belong in the NFL.
Can't reconcile that with his draft slot and how good he looked at Bama, so I'm thinking there will be some big games somewhere in the next 11 weeks.
Not as good as Richardson.how did ingram look at 'bama and where was he drafted?Had a hunch this would happen against a pretty tough Seattle team and people would be quick to dance on his grave.
I want to see what he does in the next 4-5 games before I get too carried away. Have to believe there are better days ahead.
3.1 YPC would mean he's possibly the worst starting RB in the league and so bad that he probably doesn't belong in the NFL.
Can't reconcile that with his draft slot and how good he looked at Bama, so I'm thinking there will be some big games somewhere in the next 11 weeks.
Saints vs. Browns/ColtsRichardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
Saints aren't a great team to run for. Especially for Ingram. In one play, out the next. I'd take running for the Colts in particular over the Saints any day.Saints vs. Browns/ColtsRichardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
Even if Trent can put together a BJGE-esque few years for the Colts they'll be happy with the trade. They don't need him to be ADP, just move the chains and get in the end zone.3. The Trent Richardson trade.
Trich is still very young and even if the trade doesn't pay off immediately, it might down the road. If they win the super bowl in the next 5 years with him emerging as a serious running threat no one will question the trade. Too early to judge it.
Not for a first round pick; not for a RB. Not only will they not be happy with BJGE production - they won't put up with it for long. Not when better options are so numerous.Even if Trent can put together a BJGE-esque few years for the Colts they'll be happy with the trade. They don't need him to be ADP, just move the chains and get in the end zone.3. The Trent Richardson trade.
Trich is still very young and even if the trade doesn't pay off immediately, it might down the road. If they win the super bowl in the next 5 years with him emerging as a serious running threat no one will question the trade. Too early to judge it.
Yeah Sproles sucksSaints aren't a great team to run for. Especially for Ingram. In one play, out the next. I'd take running for the Colts in particular over the Saints any day.Saints vs. Browns/ColtsRichardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
Yeah, cause they use him as a rb.Yeah Sproles sucksSaints aren't a great team to run for. Especially for Ingram. In one play, out the next. I'd take running for the Colts in particular over the Saints any day.Saints vs. Browns/ColtsRichardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
Ah Umm...you forgot the Dallas/Minny Hershel Walker trade.....Walker had some good games for Minny but Dallas went on to dominate the 90's. (3 super bowl wins? I can't remember...)There are only 3 cases of stud RBs getting traded in the middle of a season.
1. The Colts traded away All Pro Cornelius Bennett, their first round pick, 2 second round picks, and an RB for Eric Dickerson. Dickerson was a stud immediately with the Colts posting dominant numbers.
2. The Cardinals traded away their leading rusher of the past 6 seasons, Ottis Anderson, in the middle of the season for a 2nd and a 7th from the Giants in 1986. The trade was a disaster for the Giants in 1986. Anderson did nothing. The trade ultimately paid off in 1990 as Anderson was the main RB in the power running game that won the Super Bowl.
3. The Trent Richardson trade.
Trich is still very young and even if the trade doesn't pay off immediately, it might down the road. If they win the super bowl in the next 5 years with him emerging as a serious running threat no one will question the trade. Too early to judge it.
too bad Ingram is so one-dimensional then. just shows lack of talent overall.Yeah, cause they use him as a rb.Yeah Sproles sucksSaints aren't a great team to run for. Especially for Ingram. In one play, out the next. I'd take running for the Colts in particular over the Saints any day.Saints vs. Browns/ColtsRichardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
4. Hershel Walker.There are only 3 cases of stud RBs getting traded in the middle of a season.
1. The Colts traded away All Pro Cornelius Bennett, their first round pick, 2 second round picks, and an RB for Eric Dickerson. Dickerson was a stud immediately with the Colts posting dominant numbers.
2. The Cardinals traded away their leading rusher of the past 6 seasons, Ottis Anderson, in the middle of the season for a 2nd and a 7th from the Giants in 1986. The trade was a disaster for the Giants in 1986. Anderson did nothing. The trade ultimately paid off in 1990 as Anderson was the main RB in the power running game that won the Super Bowl.
3. The Trent Richardson trade.
Trich is still very young and even if the trade doesn't pay off immediately, it might down the road. If they win the super bowl in the next 5 years with him emerging as a serious running threat no one will question the trade. Too early to judge it.
Trent has a lower cap number than BJGE and the Pats went 14-2 with him in 2010.Not for a first round pick; not for a RB. Not only will they not be happy with BJGE production - they won't put up with it for long. Not when better options are so numerous.Even if Trent can put together a BJGE-esque few years for the Colts they'll be happy with the trade. They don't need him to be ADP, just move the chains and get in the end zone.3. The Trent Richardson trade.
Trich is still very young and even if the trade doesn't pay off immediately, it might down the road. If they win the super bowl in the next 5 years with him emerging as a serious running threat no one will question the trade. Too early to judge it.
absolutely the Browns made a good trade. Though I am of the opinion that the vast majority of RBs are not worth a 1st rounder.i can't move this guy in my Idp dynasty.
thinking the Browns may have made a good trade.
Totally valid, because that's the only time he's looked crappy thus far in his career. Oh wait...Do a lot of RBs do well against the Seattle D?
glllllll with that. Unless you meant "I already sold high at the end of last year." Or by high you meant "pennies on the dollar."sell high at the end of the yr for me
GTFO of here. Happy with a BJGE level player for a 1st round pick? Multiple BJGEs are available in the middle / late rounds of every single draft -- the Colts grabbed one last year in the 4th named Vick Ballard.Even if Trent can put together a BJGE-esque few years for the Colts they'll be happy with the trade. They don't need him to be ADP, just move the chains and get in the end zone.3. The Trent Richardson trade.
Trich is still very young and even if the trade doesn't pay off immediately, it might down the road. If they win the super bowl in the next 5 years with him emerging as a serious running threat no one will question the trade. Too early to judge it.
Is it that he is cut so much slack or is it that he's firmly in everyone's fantasy rear view mirror at this point? TRich is the fantasy atrocity du jour.Richardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
We've reached a milestone folks! We've officially moved on from "he has hurt ribs" and "bad team" to "the coaches are holding him back."At some point you gotta think they will run a play where they do more than just have him slam up the middle. No counters, no draws, no screens, nothing but dive plays.
Then Brown comes in and immediately he gets draws and screens.
Two different coaching staffs too, lol.We've reached a milestone folks! We've officially moved on from "he has hurt ribs" and "bad team" to "the coaches are holding him back."At some point you gotta think they will run a play where they do more than just have him slam up the middle. No counters, no draws, no screens, nothing but dive plays.
Then Brown comes in and immediately he gets draws and screens.
The Browns have tons of cap room and the hit is just on this year cap.They also took a massive $10M cap hit. The Browns are paying just $400k less for McGahee than Trent this year.And the Browns, who've become incredibly compelling since the trade, got a 1st-round pick for him.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/trent-richardson-trade-was-genius-move-for-browns-2013-10#ixzz2gzoFrchO
$6.7M on next year's cap.The Browns have tons of cap room and the hit is just on this year cap.They also took a massive $10M cap hit. The Browns are paying just $400k less for McGahee than Trent this year.And the Browns, who've become incredibly compelling since the trade, got a 1st-round pick for him.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/trent-richardson-trade-was-genius-move-for-browns-2013-10#ixzz2gzoFrchO
I'd rather run for the team whose opponents key big time on the pass. the Colts are close to that, but Luck still is not Brees.Saints aren't a great team to run for. Especially for Ingram. In one play, out the next. I'd take running for the Colts in particular over the Saints any day.Saints vs. Browns/ColtsRichardson gets cut so much slack compared to Ingram.
Career carries and YPC
Ingram 295 carries 3.8 YPC
Richardson 331 carries 3.5 YPC
Think it was a shotgun draw and Brown is being used as the 3rd down guy.iamkoza said:what's with the donald brown vulture?... was trent tired or something, or is that going to be come a thing moving forward? I didnt catch any of this game so i didnt see if other goal line plays had donald brown on the field