tri-man 47
Footballguy
Alternative leadership?
Alternative leadership?
This is Trump's MO. Complain LOUDLY about someone else doing exactly what he intends to do.
Thereyago.Which has gone from objective to subjective.
Brilliant! <no sarcasm this time>- Well I asked for insights and you've brought some great ones.
- What you have there was from the CIA speech, and what got me about that was that it was a sort of apophatic joke - like 'I'm not telling you you have to do what I say, but heh-heh I'm telling you you have to do what I say...'. Different technique maybe but worth noting.
- I do think this is important. Trump could have learned this in his sales techniques, basically selling investors and consumers. But then what if he used this for other things?
The invitation to participate and identify seems pretty important here. It may be passive on his point, but yeah it's active on the audience's part:
Basically here Trump invites Muir and the audience to join in this dystopian vision and drop the objections based on emotion.
- Trump says what is 'smart' or who is 'smart.' In the Muir (ABC) interview he tells Muir (about the imigration EO):
Ever been dragged into a time share condo sales pitch? Maybe get stuck in a luxury car dealership sales manager's office when you just came for a look-see? The goal is to get the buyer to drop objections.
- This is easier if you identify with the speaker, if you join his vision, and getting rid of facts and opposing arguments is key.
...precisely!heh-heh I'm telling you you have to do what I say
Yep..an engaged mind that actively forms an opinion holds it better and longer than a passive mind that just accepts.It may be passive on his point, but yeah it's active on the audience's part:
It's only natural for some terror attacks to be reported on more than others. Some events resonate with the public because of scale, the horror or the "there but for the grace of God go I" factor. Stories with unambiguous good guys and bad guys play better as do those with successful (sort of) conclusions. Attacks on home soil also get much more attention than those that happen abroad, although foreign attacks that Americans can identify with (e.g. Paris, London) get more publicity.Thereyago.
And what is subjective? It's emotional. What is "under" reporting? Not talked about every day? Have the press not talked about Paris Bataclan every week? Was that not a horror?
Trump will repeat and repeat this absurdity, but what happens when he or his staff or supporters are confronted about it? It's repeated some more, like a multiplier effect.
Just look at this little fishbowl of a thread: Trump supporters 1. look at 'the outrage', 2. look who is 'outraged', 'ie 'the left' and 'the media', 3. consider the magnitude of what is discussed - terrorism especially - which is an extremely emotional issue, find grains of truth in the lie, and then commit, to Trump, over and over and over again.
Just theorizing here.
oh be quiet you poop faceThe Trumpkins need a board champion. Someone who can defend their buoy's policies and actions with the poised articulation of a Henry Ford, among a few others. There are some very solid conservative voices on this board but they don't really have a stake in this now and there is no one yet with the erudition and charisma to stand up for Trump against the braying leftists.
Hah! CNN banning someone for lying. That's rich. They're going to have ban their entire reporting staff too.Probably way behind on this:
Kellyanne Conway may be banned from CNN due to her pattern of constantly lying to journalists.
Zing!Hah! CNN banning someone for lying. That's rich. They're going to have ban their entire reporting staff too.
Makes some pretty funny results.
I doubt they'd do that. It seems silly to pay all those people and then ban them from the network.Hah! CNN banning someone for lying. That's rich. They're going to have ban their entire reporting staff too.
On that point, I doubt Spicer will bring forward examples of the attacks in Istanbul or the attack in Montreal. The examples that Spicer will bring will be attacks that will resonate with parts of the populace who will identify with the victims. This will be a shout-out for racial identification. Then next step is Trump points out that the press is against 'them' specifically. I sense this is where this is going.It's only natural for some terror attacks to be reported on more than others. Some events resonate with the public because of scale, the horror or the "there but for the grace of God go I" factor. Stories with unambiguous good guys and bad guys play better as do those with successful (sort of) conclusions. Attacks on home soil also get much more attention than those that happen abroad, although foreign attacks that Americans can identify with (e.g. Paris, London) get more publicity.
Great article BowieMercs!YOU MOTHER ####ING MORAN!!!
Eh, sorry, can't discuss right now; haven't read article. Goin to read article now; may be able to discuss later.![]()
![]()
It is funny and witty as hell, but, in my youth I read too much of Noam Chomsky's work. Don't follow the Chump now anymore, but enough of his fluids seeped into my mind that I don't believe the CIA is full of old lady saving pushers!William F. Buckley once famously put it, “To say that the CIA and the KGB engage in similar practices is the equivalent of saying that the man who pushes an old lady into the path of a hurtling bus is not to be distinguished from the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of a hurtling bus: on the grounds that, after all, in both cases someone is pushing old ladies around.”
Well then they would be hypocrites (no surprise).I doubt they'd do that. It seems silly to pay all those people and then ban them from the network.
KAC has been caught at using the 'Bowling Green Massacre' line more than once.Probably way behind on this:
Kellyanne Conway may be banned from CNN due to her pattern of constantly lying to journalists.
I heard an alternative fact that they're freedom fighters.Well then they would be hypocrites (no surprise).
President Trump on Saturday denounced the leaks of transcripts of his telephone conversations with leaders of Australia and Mexico as “disgraceful” and said his administration was searching “very, very hard” for the leakers.
Trump, speaking to Fox News, accused “Obama people” of giving news organizations embarrassing details of his recent tense phone conversations with his Australian and Mexican counterparts, and said that the holdovers from the Obama administration still serving on his White House and National Security Council staff were being replaced.
“It’s a disgrace that they leaked because it’s very much against our country,” Trump said, without stating why he believed that career civil servants who work in Democratic and Republican administrations were the source of the leaks.
One man's freedom fighter is another man's alternative fact terrorist.I heard an alternative fact that they're freedom fighters.
Hey fatness,The people in the audience have to be thinking "holy #### this guy is unhinged".Has this been brought up here yet?
Trump claims media covering up terrorist attacks.
If so, I apologize, I'm still at work & have not read back all the way to this morning.
Bannon will show Trump a list on Breitbart which Spicer will pass on. It'll probably include the 100% fake Thousand Muslim Mob that Burned a German Church. I posted that awhile ago and somebody got irate at the fake being exposed; I think it was Higgs. Here's the Breitbart story itself. Next time someone posts a Breitbart link, remember what lying sacks of #### they are.In a speech in front of military leaders at the US Central Command — the Pentagon agency that covers security interests in nations throughout the Middle East and Central Asia — Trump suggested the media was covering up instances of terror attacks.
"All over Europe, it's happening," Trump said. "It's gotten to a point where it's not even being reported. And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn't want to report it. They have their reasons and you understand that."
Trump didn't cite any examples of attacks that were not being reported on by the press. Asked about the assertion later, press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that the White House would offer a list of unreported attacks later.
Regarding:
Some yes...the majority, quite possibly...but I wager that a significant portion will fall for his mind ####. See my comments above.The people in the audience have to be thinking "holy #### this guy is unhinged".
Also, regarding my comments above, I seem to have misquoted him; I apologize, as I was going from a poor memory it seems.
However ..."and you understand that" ... is actually a more skilled phrase than my faulty memory of, " "...you know why" . DAMN!![]()
The rest I fully endorse!![]()
It's not me, I just hear a lot of people saying it. A lot of smart people come to me and say "I think CNN are freedom fighters." But I don't know. Maybe there's something to that, maybe not.One man's freedom fighter is another man's alternative fact terrorist.
Probably not.It's not me, I just hear a lot of people saying it. A lot of smart people come to me and say "I think CNN are freedom fighters." But I don't know. Maybe there's something to that, maybe not.
To be fair, a lot of people have tried to kill Al-Rimi and failed. They don't usually kill a dozen civilians and an 8-year-old American girl in the process, but they do all fail to get it done.I thought Trump was the badass terrorist hunter/killer? He's now being taunted by the guy he tried to kill in Yemen. I thought America was supposed to get sick of winning?
Of course you are. Hillary had an email server, so it's okSo am I hearing Trump right when he says the media should sensationalize terrorist attacks more? I mean really? I think most of you here can kind of game that out and see it works right into the hands of our enemies. Am I missing something?
Was that the one next to the Vagisil and Monistat in bathroom closet?Of course you are. Hillary had an email server, so it's ok
One man's freedom fighter is another man's alternative fact terrorist.
Sounds like a lot of the Scott Adams Master Persuader angle- Well I asked for insights and you've brought some great ones.
- What you have there was from the CIA speech, and what got me about that was that it was a sort of apophatic joke - like 'I'm not telling you you have to do what I say, but heh-heh I'm telling you you have to do what I say...'. Different technique maybe but worth noting.
- I do think this is important. Trump could have learned this in his sales techniques, basically selling investors and consumers. But then what if he used this for other things?
The invitation to participate and identify seems pretty important here. It may be passive on his point, but yeah it's active on the audience's part:
Basically here Trump invites Muir and the audience to join in this dystopian vision and drop the objections based on emotion.
- Trump says what is 'smart' or who is 'smart.' In the Muir (ABC) interview he tells Muir (about the imigration EO):
Ever been dragged into a time share condo sales pitch? Maybe get stuck in a luxury car dealership sales manager's office when you just came for a look-see? The goal is to get the buyer to drop objections.
- This is easier if you identify with the speaker, if you join his vision, and getting rid of facts and opposing arguments is key.
We just did a very Assad-Putin tactic by taking out electricity for all of Raqqa.We are buddying up and defending Putin. Putin is protecting and suppprting Assad. Last year Assad ran an extermination factory killing 13,000 civilians. But yeah, keep defending Putin.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/human-slaughterhouse-mass-hangings-and-extermination-at-saydnaya-prison-syria?page=show
At least it wasn't next to a bottle of Propecia and a sample jar of fresh urine, I guess.Was that the one next to the Vagisil and Monistat in bathroom closet?
Scott Adams was posted approvingly by Trump supporters in 2015-16 IIRC, maybe it is. That's the part where we're supposed to applaud Trump for his amazing deviousness in manipulating everyone.Sounds like a lot of the Scott Adams Master Persuader angle
True. With HRC, at least she would be able to wipe the server down with creme to cure it of any nasties.At least it wasn't next to a bottle of Propecia and a sample jar of fresh urine, I guess.
And he's been delivering. Missing every now and then is something I can live with.Yeah, but Trump promised a lot of winning.
Trump does't have a problem with this. He specifically said he was going after a terrorist's family, and he did. Mission Accomplished.To be fair, a lot of people have tried to kill Al-Rimi and failed. They don't usually kill a dozen civilians and an 8-year-old American girl in the process, but they do all fail to get it done.
I'm curious what shows up at the top of Trump's replies when he goes back in to admire his brilliance.
That particular terrorist is already dead.Trump does't have a problem with this. He specifically said he was going after a terrorist's family, and he did. Mission Accomplished.
WHEW! Before I clicked the links, I thought I had more than 1 drunken night of cow slaughter!
I believe he promised that America would be winning. So far we're doing gangbusters in court.Yeah, but Trump promised a lot of winning.
I'm not sure he knows, or cares, and I don't think we should make assumptions of either.That particular terrorist is already dead.
Right. As if being a life-long con-artist is a praiseworthy attribute or one we should have as presidenScott Adams was posted approvingly by Trump supporters in 2015-16 IIRC, maybe it is. That's the part where we're supposed to applaud Trump for his amazing deviousness in manipulating everyone.
A bunch of people here aren't even using their real names!It's a shame we can't ban people on this board for lying.