GoBirds
Footballguy
False.You seem to enjoy attacking me personally. It’s unnecessary. If you have evidence that refutes what I wrote, which makes it “glaringly wrong”, go ahead and post it. If I’m wrong I will own up to it.
False.You seem to enjoy attacking me personally. It’s unnecessary. If you have evidence that refutes what I wrote, which makes it “glaringly wrong”, go ahead and post it. If I’m wrong I will own up to it.
You seem to enjoy attacking me personally. It’s unnecessary. If you have evidence that refutes what I wrote, which makes it “glaringly wrong”, go ahead and post it. If I’m wrong I will own up to it.
Go ahead and try me. I wrote that no prognosticator predicted that the Afghan army would collapse within a few days of our withdrawal. Do you have evidence to the contrary?False.
The news has not said the exact opposite. I’ve been reading it pretty closely. There were plenty of warnings that the Afghan Army would collapse “quickly” but the timing is vague. I made the exact same warning 6 years ago on the first post of this thread- go back and look. But quickly doesn’t mean a few days, and that’s the root of the matter. Again if I’m wrong about this one of you guys show me, and I will acknowledge it as “emphatically” as I’ve written this.It's your emphatic statements that are the issue.
The news says the exact opposite.
News across the spectrum.
If you can't see it, I'm not helping you.
He didn't attack youYou seem to enjoy attacking me personally. It’s unnecessary. If you have evidence that refutes what I wrote, which makes it “glaringly wrong”, go ahead and post it. If I’m wrong I will own up to it.
The news has not said the exact opposite. I’ve been reading it pretty closely. There were plenty of warnings that the Afghan Army would collapse “quickly” but the timing is vague. I made the exact same warning 6 years ago on the first post of this thread- go back and look. But quickly doesn’t mean a few days, and that’s the root of the matter. Again if I’m wrong about this one of you guys show me, and I will acknowledge it as “emphatically” as I’ve written this.
Lol I can’t decide what it means because it’s a vague term. When I used it in the OP I meant a few months or years- I was thinking of the South Vietnam model.You're no expert.
I won't let you emphatically decide what the word 'quickly' means.
This seems like a bad reason to count her out for 2024. Hillary Clinton was a bad and disingenuous candidate in 2008, ran a poor campaign in 2008, yet still won the nomination in 2016 (then proceeded to be a bad candidate and run an even worse campaign in the 2016 general election).identikit said:Kamala was a horribly disingenuous candidate and ran a dreadfully dysfunctional campaign.
She would have flamed out no matter.
Lol I can’t decide what it means because it’s a vague term. When I used it in the OP I meant a few months or years- I was thinking of the South Vietnam model.
If anyone predicted a few days I think they would have stated so.
Honestly, this is semantics. 60 minutes or 60 hours or 60 days. It doesn't matter. There were plenty of people at the upper eschelons of our government advising Biden that the Taliban would take over the country. Prudence dictates removal of civilians and allies first, removal of hardware so it doesn't fall into the hands of the enemy, effective coordination of transfer of control of Bagram Air Base (letting the Afghan gov't know that you are killing the power for whatever reason), then after all this happens, removal of armed forces. He did none of this. He knew there was a non-zero chance that the installed government would collapse and he did nothing to mitigate the risks to Americans and Afghas that helped us. He went on TV and basically laughed off the idea that the Taliban would sweep theough the country even though behind closed doors (and for years prior) the feeling was that the Afghan forces were a joke. You're wrong on this. Whatever your definition of "quickly" means, the order of this pullout was done completely backwards, Americans will die becuase of it and it didn't have to happen that way. Whether its hubris, idiocy, not trusting your supposed advisors, it really doesn't matter. Biden ####ed this up and he did so with galling efficiency.The news has not said the exact opposite. I’ve been reading it pretty closely. There were plenty of warnings that the Afghan Army would collapse “quickly” but the timing is vague. I made the exact same warning 6 years ago on the first post of this thread- go back and look. But quickly doesn’t mean a few days, and that’s the root of the matter. Again if I’m wrong about this one of you guys show me, and I will acknowledge it as “emphatically” as I’ve written this.
This seems like a bad reason to count her out for 2024. Hillary Clinton was a bad and disingenuous candidate in 2008, ran a poor campaign in 2008, yet still won the nomination in 2016 (then proceeded to be a bad candidate and run an even worse campaign in the 2016 general election).
Willow trees do not have deep roots.Kal El said:Willow trees are flexible, with deep roots that can grow almost anywhere. Personally, I’d need to see more from her, but she has an edge over every GOP candidate thus far for me.
I heard him the other day. He’s the most compelling critic of Biden that I’ve heard on this issue. I mentioned that a few days ago in this thread.This Army vet was on a lot of networks in the past few days....
Matt Zeller:
"For months, there has been an army of advocates that have been pleading with the Biden administration that this exact scenario was going to transpire," Zeller said. "We had been warning them that the Taliban were on the verge of taking over; that Afghanistan was going to collapse faster than Washington could respond to it."
https://www.wxxinews.org/post/army-veteran-says-us-needs-do-more-help-afghan-interpreters
I'm calling him an expert.
I heard him the other day. He’s the most compelling critic of Biden that I’ve heard on this issue. I mentioned that a few days ago in this thread.
But even Zeller did not predict a few days. Granted he came the closest to it. And if some of his other statements (particularly the accusation that we deliberately betrayed our allies there) turn out to be true I will have to retract my defense of Biden. I’m waiting to learn more.
It’s certainly not semantics. If you think your allies are going to last a while you don’t evacuate all civilians first because that would be demoralizing. You also don’t keep control of airbases because that too would be demoralizing, the pullout was performed logically based on the idea that our allies were going to be in charge of the country for a while.Honestly, this is semantics. 60 minutes or 60 hours or 60 days. It doesn't matter. There were plenty of people at the upper eschelons of our government advising Biden that the Taliban would take over the country. Prudence dictates removal of civilians and allies first, removal of hardware so it doesn't fall into the hands of the enemy, effective coordination of transfer of control of Bagram Air Base (letting the Afghan gov't know that you are killing the power for whatever reason), then after all this happens, removal of armed forces. He did none of this. He knew there was a non-zero chance that the installed government would collapse and he did nothing to mitigate the risks to Americans and Afghas that helped us. He went on TV and basically laughed off the idea that the Taliban would sweep theough the country even though behind closed doors (and for years prior) the feeling was that the Afghan forces were a joke. You're wrong on this. Whatever your definition of "quickly" means, the order of this pullout was done completely backwards, Americans will die becuase of it and it didn't have to happen that way. Whether its hubris, idiocy, not trusting your supposed advisors, it really doesn't matter. Biden ####ed this up and he did so with galling efficiency.
Please tell your brother that I love him and wish him well but this is Monday morning quarterbacking. If you believe that the Afghan army is not going to surrender immediately, and if your goal is to delay the surrender, then you do not act in the sequence he’s describing. You act the way Biden did.I asked my brother, DW, about his views on this, sort of by way of testing his mental acuity. His statements, paraphrased:
The lesson from the Titanic is that the unsinkable can adn does sink, and much faster thatn experts predict. Be prepared for things to hapen quickly. Second lesson from Titanic, women and childre first, then servants adn men, then the crew. Thrid lesson, have the lifeboat drill organizedd so as to not waste th erescue resources available.
The lesson from hurican evacuations is that there arfe always some who will ignore the warnings and will then expect rescue from thier own idiocy. the warning is one's rescue. Not heeding the warnings is rfefusing rescue adn after so doing one is not entitled to rescue, even if they are Amereicans.
Lessons from military retreats in history. Evacuate civilians, and noncombatant friends. Next secure and remove all useful rfesources for one's enemies. lastly withdraw military personnel in a fighting retreat.
The gist of all of this, according to him. Evacuate all noncombatant firends and all civillians while the military is in place. women and children first. Evacuate all useful eqwuipment which is noncombat capable. Wire for destruction all equipment which will not be capable of evacution much like wiring a bridge for demo to cover a retreat. in this case do so with thermite, followed by explosives which can be remotely denotated. Lastly withdarw combat personnel with air coverage, live and drone, covering the final retreat. Leave nothing militarily useful behind. Wave goodbye.
DW does not undersand how this sequence of events was not followed in this instance.
greenmountaingoat said:Decision to leave: A+, should/could have happened years ago. Never was a good time, never would have been. I give him credit for being willing to follow through on the "right thing."
Execution of plan to leave: F-
USA military is still head and tail above the rest IMO. No one can win hearts and minds and build a nation from the shattered souls of the frightened and unwilling. Betting odds favor self-immolation well before our military is second to anyone.
MSM should be eviscerating Biden over this. Don't know if they are or not but should be. The speech was fine-ish. Gave himself cover sold why "decision to leave" was right but sheesh, there's no way execution couldn't have been handled better and he cowered on that one.
You’re clinging to scraps
Dude sucks and is getting suckier by the week
This seems like a bad reason to count her out for 2024. Hillary Clinton was a bad and disingenuous candidate in 2008, ran a poor campaign in 2008, yet still won the nomination in 2016 (then proceeded to be a bad candidate and run an even worse campaign in the 2016 general election).
Demoralizing? FFS we're talking about American lives. You get them out first, period. The idea that you leave some (maybe as many as 10,000?) in harms way to make sure you don't demoralize an army you've been training for 15 years is....insane.It’s certainly not semantics. If you think your allies are going to last a while you don’t evacuate all civilians first because that would be demoralizing. You also don’t keep control of airbases because that too would be demoralizing, the pullout was performed logically based on the idea that our allies were going to be in charge of the country for a while.
OK, I don't know that I agree with that, but assume for sake of argument that did happen. Does that invalidate my premise that just because Harris isn't a good candidate and ran a poor primary campaign in 2020 that she couldn't be the D nominee in 2024? It literally happened 5 years ago. Why couldn't it happen again?She didn't really "win" the nomination. The Democratic national committee colluded with her to sabotage her opponents to gift her the nomination.
He says its Wednesday morning, he played defense and not quarterback, but he will take and appreciates the good wishes. Even in decline he remains a pill.Please tell your brother that I love him and wish him well but this is Monday morning quarterbacking. If you believe that the Afghan army is not going to surrender immediately, and if your goal is to delay the surrender, then you do not act in the sequence he’s describing. You act the way Biden did.
OK, I don't know that I agree with that, but assume for sake of argument that did happen. Does that invalidate my premise that just because Harris isn't a good candidate and ran a poor primary campaign in 2020 that she couldn't be the D nominee in 2024? It literally happened 5 years ago. Why couldn't it happen again?
Not trying to pick nits and I've never served so take my BS with a grain of salt but I think it's general practice to leave most of the stuff behind because it's cost prohibitive to ship it all back. Yes we try to bring back the high tech stuff but the equipment and people movers usually stay, do they not?Agree. It was always the case that he could have pulled the civil service out, and the weaponry, prior to withdrawing troops. That was the safe play.
He owns this cluster####. No wAy around it. Terrible leadership.
My original post was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, just noting that HRC was a trainwreck in 2008, yet then in 2016... However, as much as I hope it doesn't happen, I could absolutely see the Democrats, who are kind of known for pulling defeat from the jaws of victory, trotting Harris out there in 2024.Could it happen? Sure. Is it likely? No. The Dems know she's a horrible candidate. She couldn't even get out of the first round of the playoffs on her own. The only reasons she's VP now have nothing to do with competency or likability.
Yes, we typically leave everything because it isn't cost effective to bring anything back with us. Hard drives are destroyed and anything classified gets burned.Not trying to pick nits and I've never served so take my BS with a grain of salt but I think it's general practice to leave most of the stuff behind because it's cost prohibitive to ship it all back. Yes we try to bring back the high tech stuff but the equipment and people movers usually stay, do they not?
Let's hope Harris wins the nomination - that paves the way for President Haley.This seems like a bad reason to count her out for 2024. Hillary Clinton was a bad and disingenuous candidate in 2008, ran a poor campaign in 2008, yet still won the nomination in 2016 (then proceeded to be a bad candidate and run an even worse campaign in the 2016 general election).
I tell you, reading comprehension goes downhill fast when I don’t pay attention. They’re widespread but shallow, and super hardy. Totally read that wrong, and I’ll put this L next to the others I’ve collected over the years.Willow trees do not have deep roots.
I was referring to the branches, but I hear you. Lord knows most of my posts are edited because I read them after I post and dive back in to fix something.I tell you, reading comprehension goes downhill fast when I don’t pay attention. They’re widespread but shallow, and super hardy. Totally read that wrong, and I’ll put this L next to the others I’ve collected over the years.
That’s a big negative.Trump is actually looking pretty good now. Didn't think anyone could do that, but Joe and Kamala rose to the challenge!
Unbelievable.
Yeah..this notion that any of this makes Trump look good seem odd to me (as does the numerous references here and elsewhere to "at least no mean tweets").That’s a big negative.
Still going on about his stolen election. Who knows how he was getting out of Afghanistan but he negotiated with these dudes, released Taliban for prisons, was saying he would be out by May, etc.
Didn't Trump get the current Taliban leader released in 2018?That’s a big negative.
Still going on about his stolen election. Who knows how he was getting out of Afghanistan but he negotiated with these dudes, released Taliban for prisons, was saying he would be out by May, etc.
From what I have seen flights are going out. Capability to get something like 1000 out a day. However, the guy who said this also alluded to Taliban being all over the area which may limit the ability for people to reach the airport. Lots of unknowns. Was a TV interview so no link and I am paraphrasing.I asked yesterday and still can't find info.
Are people getting past the perimeter of the airport to get inside? Reports were that the Taliban had it surrounded and weren't letting anyone in.
I heard a report yesterday of a flight that could hold around 150 people and it only had like 17 people on it.From what I have seen flights are going out. Capability to get something like 1000 out a day. However, the guy who said this also alluded to Taliban being all over the area which may limit the ability for people to reach the airport. Lots of unknowns. Was a TV interview so no link and I am paraphrasing.
They were the first couple days. People getting though every crack in the perimeter. The US has the perimeter under control from the inside of HKIA.I asked yesterday and still can't find info.
Are people getting past the perimeter of the airport to get inside? Reports were that the Taliban had it surrounded and weren't letting anyone in.
You're pretty close for what we know. The goal is to get 3-5K out a day but we are falling behind that goal for a bunch of reasons.From what I have seen flights are going out. Capability to get something like 1000 out a day. However, the guy who said this also alluded to Taliban being all over the area which may limit the ability for people to reach the airport. Lots of unknowns. Was a TV interview so no link and I am paraphrasing.
FLASHBACK: In February 2020, Donald Trump discussed how he empowered the Taliban to take over Afghanistan after America's departureTrump is actually looking pretty good now. Didn't think anyone could do that, but Joe and Kamala rose to the challenge!
Unbelievable.
That’s crazy. Moving that many people in normal circumstances would present serious challenges. Can’t imagine this #### show.I heard a report yesterday of a flight that could hold around 150 people and it only had like 17 people on it.
This is true. Some planes are departing empty.I heard a report yesterday of a flight that could hold around 150 people and it only had like 17 people on it.
Rumor is the state department had up to 40k submissions for evacuation over the last week. As of right now, there is no way to tell which are viable/legitimate requests and which aren't. Unsure how many are actually Americans or qualify for a special visa.Is there any place to find reliable information about how many Americans remain in Afghanistan and who they are?
The embassy told everyone to leave in April. Obviously we have essential personnel that didn't have that option. But why were so many unable or unwilling to leave prior to this?
From April 27
"U.S. citizens wishing to depart Afghanistan should leave as soon as possible on available commercial flights."
We’ll be hearing stories of “terrorists” who were able to get on these planes. I’m guessing they are already written.This is true. Some planes are departing empty.
https://www.politico.eu/article/netherlands-evacuation-afghanistan-airplane-kabul-airport/
Holdups "processing" people is all I'm hearing, but that doesn't make a lot of sense to me on the surface.
Yep. To be clear, trying to get info. Not victim blame. Thanks for sharing your perspective.So it's not all on the people for not getting out. They were mislead.
That would bring me backLet's hope Harris wins the nomination - that paves the way for President Haley.
Maybe then we'll finally have adults in the room.
I was wondering where Trump was getting the 40,000 numberRumor is the state department had up to 40k submissions for evacuation over the last week. As of right now, there is no way to tell which are viable/legitimate requests and which aren't. Unsure how many are actually Americans or qualify for a special visa.
While the embassy did tell people they should potentially leave country, the embassy also said they would remain open which they were unable to do. Joe Biden was also telling everyone the government has everything under control and they are safe. So it's not all on the people for not getting out. They were mislead.
Let's hope Harris wins the nomination - that paves the way for President Haley.
Maybe then we'll finally have adults in the room.
Did some digging and some of the "processing" holdup is on the destination country end. They have to be willing to take them temporarily and if the evacuated person doesn't qualify for an American Visa then that person becomes the country they are in's problem. This pre-processing is being done to maintain good will with neighboring countries.We’ll be hearing stories of “terrorists” who were able to get on these planes. I’m guessing they are already written.