Binky once again the bet offered was about Tiger breaking the Bear's record. That could potentially, if it happens, take another 15 years. That's too long. I'd rather take my odds from tournament to tournament and win money betting against Woods. I'm not sure where you are even coming from. You offered this decade long+ bet and somehow me turning it down means I'm fishing
The premise of this thread is that Tiger has lost a step.
The Nicholson record was obviously just a toss in. How many times has it been brought up since the original post? Does it not appear Tiger has lost a step?