Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
It was a good run. He stinks.
Yeah, Belichick doesn't really know what he's doing. I'm sure you would make much more intelligent decisions as head coach.Counting on him to carry the offense, and they refuse to use Ridley, but would rather give touches to Blount = predictable failure given the lack of receiving weapons + Gronk getting all the attention.
Blount and Ridley are both 1 dimensional mediocre runningbacks.Counting on him to carry the offense, and they refuse to use Ridley, but would rather give touches to Blount = predictable failure given the lack of receiving weapons + Gronk getting all the attention.
I don't know what more shocking - 25 yards in the 1st half, or that is only his 3rd worst game.*Historically bad half from Brady, wow.
Clearly not understanding the joke, Rivers on a bye - not a shirtable offense.I should've started Rivers this week!![]()
Clearly not understanding the joke, Rivers on a bye - not a shirtable offense.I should've started Rivers this week!![]()
I empathize, but would you rather lose with Brady on your bench? I think you must start him if there are no good alternatives. Many people don't have one.In all seriousness, I can't trust him, even he has 3 straight awesome games I wouldn't be able to play him... Just awful!!
What does this mean?Clearly not understanding the joke, Rivers on a bye - not a shirtable offense.I should've started Rivers this week!![]()
![]()
There is a thread about it somewhere... Basically some guy was promoting some awful shirts on here... The bottom line is you shirt someone when they're making fantasy excuses.What does this mean?Clearly not understanding the joke, Rivers on a bye - not a shirtable offense.I should've started Rivers this week!![]()
![]()
It's a dumb joke but if you embrace it then it becomes slightly less dumb which makes it awesome.There is a thread about it somewhere... Basically some guy was promoting some awful shirts on here... The bottom line is you shirt someone when they're making fantasy excuses.What does this mean?Clearly not understanding the joke, Rivers on a bye - not a shirtable offense.I should've started Rivers this week!![]()
![]()
Technically, at the halfway mark, there will have been roughly 24 better alternatives that you could/should have been starting up until now.I empathize, but would you rather lose with Brady on your bench? I think you must start him if there are no good alternatives. Many people don't have one.In all seriousness, I can't trust him, even he has 3 straight awesome games I wouldn't be able to play him... Just awful!!
So he's an average starter in a 48-man league. You can't bench a guy like that.Technically, at the halfway mark, there will have been roughly 24 better alternatives that you could/should have been starting up until now.I empathize, but would you rather lose with Brady on your bench? I think you must start him if there are no good alternatives. Many people don't have one.In all seriousness, I can't trust him, even he has 3 straight awesome games I wouldn't be able to play him... Just awful!!
I wouldn't.So he's an average starter in a 48-man league. You can't bench a guy like that.Technically, at the halfway mark, there will have been roughly 24 better alternatives that you could/should have been starting up until now.I empathize, but would you rather lose with Brady on your bench? I think you must start him if there are no good alternatives. Many people don't have one.In all seriousness, I can't trust him, even he has 3 straight awesome games I wouldn't be able to play him... Just awful!!
Well, at least this worked out.LOL - I'll be checking this thread Sunday at 12:59 waiting final confirmation.Not fully decided yet, but as of now, I've moved Dalton into the starting position.I honestly have no clue what to think. Last 2 weeks considered benching him for Dalton, but assumed that as soon as I benched Brady, he would go off. Regretted it, obviously. Each week, I get closer and closer.
I know this is the update that the whole board has been waiting for.
I just traded for him, as I think the same thing. When the masses start panicking, that's when I like to make a move. Sometimes is doesn't work out, but I'll take my chances with a guy like Brady where history is clearly on his side. No more than two weeks ago Calvin owners on this board were jumping off buildings...look how quickly things can change.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.
FYI, that guy was just trolling...I just traded for him, as I think the same thing. When the masses start panicking, that's when I like to make a move. Sometimes is doesn't work out, but I'll take my chances with a guy like Brady where history is clearly on his side. No more than two weeks ago Calvin owners on this board were jumping off buildings...look how quickly things can change.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.
I'll go with 300+ and 3 TD's this week against PIT
Wrong.FYI, that guy was just trolling...I just traded for him, as I think the same thing. When the masses start panicking, that's when I like to make a move. Sometimes is doesn't work out, but I'll take my chances with a guy like Brady where history is clearly on his side. No more than two weeks ago Calvin owners on this board were jumping off buildings...look how quickly things can change.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.
I'll go with 300+ and 3 TD's this week against PIT
What was your trade?
Can't help but expect better numbers but with the Steelers, Panthers, Texans, and Browns coming up in 4 of the next 5 games I wouldn't count on top 10.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.
Correct, it's a troll post regardless. Calling a QB whose currently ranked 23rd overall (37th on a PPG basis) a "guaranteed top 10 play here on out" without any type of explanation is considered trolling. It also just so happens to fall in line with most of your posts on this board so it's a very fair assumption.Wrong.FYI, that guy was just trolling...I just traded for him, as I think the same thing. When the masses start panicking, that's when I like to make a move. Sometimes is doesn't work out, but I'll take my chances with a guy like Brady where history is clearly on his side. No more than two weeks ago Calvin owners on this board were jumping off buildings...look how quickly things can change.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.
I'll go with 300+ and 3 TD's this week against PIT
What was your trade?
It's like some of you fall over yourselves calling people names when you can get away with it. You should work on not being negative towards other people. I believe Brady will play better in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons have been beaten to death. You don't care about them anyway, you just want to be negative.Correct, it's a troll post regardless. Calling a QB whose currently ranked 23rd overall (37th on a PPG basis) a "guaranteed top 10 play here on out" without any type of explanation is considered trolling. It also just so happens to fall in line with most of your posts on this board so it's a very fair assumption.Wrong.FYI, that guy was just trolling...I just traded for him, as I think the same thing. When the masses start panicking, that's when I like to make a move. Sometimes is doesn't work out, but I'll take my chances with a guy like Brady where history is clearly on his side. No more than two weeks ago Calvin owners on this board were jumping off buildings...look how quickly things can change.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.
I'll go with 300+ and 3 TD's this week against PIT
What was your trade?
That might be true but Ridley is a lot better at it.Blount and Ridley are both 1 dimensional mediocre runningbacks.Counting on him to carry the offense, and they refuse to use Ridley, but would rather give touches to Blount = predictable failure given the lack of receiving weapons + Gronk getting all the attention.
Trade him to a team for the most droppable guy they have....thus, u get the droppable guy and can move on.I've never dealt with the Y! can't cut list... This is ####### ridiculous, I can't cut the guy????
Starting to look like it.Top 10 from here on out, guaranteed.