Completely agree with this, Cameron has got to go IMO.Not really Torrey's fault.
Reasons:
1. Ike Taylor
2. Not one of those six passes was catchable.
3. Flacco stinks (see above).
4. The offensive coordinator has absolutely zero imagination. God forbid you line him up in the slot, put him into motion, etc.
KY
This. I don't know if he has a problem with physical corners or if Flacco is hoping for a jump ball or PI.Was it me or was every target tonight thrown about 10 feet over Torrey's head?
Ooooooof.I'd really like to get Lloyd at WR27 and I wouldn't mind waiting to WR36 to see how Rice can do with Flynn. I feel like Meachem at WR32 presents more upside, as well.
Seems like a necessary bump in a Torrey Smith thread.'SacramentoBob said:Ooooooof.I'd really like to get Lloyd at WR27 and I wouldn't mind waiting to WR36 to see how Rice can do with Flynn. I feel like Meachem at WR32 presents more upside, as well.
The guy is a tool bag. I've called him out a few times for constantly trolling so I guess he's getting me back by bumping my speculation from June as if I strictly followed it two months later...On topic, Torrey may have had a bad game, but he's still WR16 in my non-PPR leagues. Given where most of us probably landed him, we can't really complain. To put things in perspective, he's 0.20 points behind Welker and ahead of Dez, Wallace, Fitzgerald...Seems like a necessary bump in a Torrey Smith thread.'SacramentoBob said:Ooooooof.I'd really like to get Lloyd at WR27 and I wouldn't mind waiting to WR36 to see how Rice can do with Flynn. I feel like Meachem at WR32 presents more upside, as well.
Bad OC and bad QB. If you throw a competent CB on him there is almost no chance of him having a good day. I wish his playoff schedule didn't look so enticing or else I'd feel comfortable with him riding the pine the rest of the season.Why don't they ever throw the ball to this guy on slants or crossing routes??? Seems like it's always a 15 to 20 yard out or just a deep fade.
I remember seeing Smith run one of those routes earlier in the year. But he ended up scoring a touchdown on it. Back to the drawing board!Why don't they ever throw the ball to this guy on slants or crossing routes??? Seems like it's always a 15 to 20 yard out or just a deep fade.
But it's the inconsistency that kills. If he scored 12 points every week then I'd start him every week.The guy is a tool bag. I've called him out a few times for constantly trolling so I guess he's getting me back by bumping my speculation from June as if I strictly followed it two months later...On topic, Torrey may have had a bad game, but he's still WR16 in my non-PPR leagues. Given where most of us probably landed him, we can't really complain. To put things in perspective, he's 0.20 points behind Welker and ahead of Dez, Wallace, Fitzgerald...Seems like a necessary bump in a Torrey Smith thread.'SacramentoBob said:Ooooooof.I'd really like to get Lloyd at WR27 and I wouldn't mind waiting to WR36 to see how Rice can do with Flynn. I feel like Meachem at WR32 presents more upside, as well.
Yeah, Fucco was awful. Elite level QB myass, he's the only one who believes it.Smith was setup perfect for a long TD on that deep post, but Flacco didn't lead him yet again.'CurlyDumps said:Was it me or was every target tonight thrown about 10 feet over Torrey's head?
I won't defend Flacco, but I think in the case of last night, once the Ravens got the lead, it seemed like Flacco's main goal was to not turn it over. It seems like the Ravens knew that with Leftwich hurt, turning the ball over was the only way they'd lose. So, when a DB had good coverage, he just heaved it way over Smith's head instead of taking a chance of it being picked.'mr roboto said:This. I don't know if he has a problem with physical corners or if Flacco is hoping for a jump ball or PI.'CurlyDumps said:Was it me or was every target tonight thrown about 10 feet over Torrey's head?
If they felt confident with their lead against the Steelers, why did they keep passing? 32 passing attempts vs 22 rushing?I won't defend Flacco, but I think in the case of last night, once the Ravens got the lead, it seemed like Flacco's main goal was to not turn it over. It seems like the Ravens knew that with Leftwich hurt, turning the ball over was the only way they'd lose. So, when a DB had good coverage, he just heaved it way over Smith's head instead of taking a chance of it being picked.'mr roboto said:This. I don't know if he has a problem with physical corners or if Flacco is hoping for a jump ball or PI.'CurlyDumps said:Was it me or was every target tonight thrown about 10 feet over Torrey's head?
.......yeah, but the passing game was on fire!Cause the running game was going nowhere?
Exactly. Plus, most of Flacco's throws later in the game were non-dangerous ones; he wasn't taking chances. Even on the 3rd down after the 2-minute warning, it is obvious that he was told to go down and take the sack if no one was open (so the clock would keep running).Cause the running game was going nowhere?
Sucked in againg and benched him for Golden Tate. I hate ff.... Should I bump this in the 'never bench your studs' thread?hes great against soft secondaries... go check it out.6 targets tonight and no grabs. Why do I continue to be sucked in by this guy?
He's not really a stud. Think most folks drafted him as a WR2 or WR3 (where I took him - 7th round) with upside. When you take that into consideration, he's had a decent year. Only one bad clunker, last week with Ike Taylor covering him. He had a few other weeks where he didn't do much but managed a TD or two.Sucked in againg and benched him for Golden Tate. I hate ff.... Should I bump this in the 'never bench your studs' thread?hes great against soft secondaries... go check it out.6 targets tonight and no grabs. Why do I continue to be sucked in by this guy?
Shockingly that catch was a fade...7-14431 yarder in OT to setup the game winning FG
He had a 54 yarder earlier in the game in which he was a slight loss of footing away from taking a drag route to the house. Last year we was a one trick pony, this year he is running most of the routes. He showed great ball skills to adjust to the ball on that 31 yarder in OT- something we saw very little of last year when all he was good for was catching a bomb in stride. Since I mentioned deep balls, it is frustrating to see Flacco consistently underthrow him this year.Shockingly that catch was a fade...7-14431 yarder in OT to setup the game winning FG
Did that analysis take into account Ike Taylor?The analysis i did today shows that his best games are at home. his last for games hes averaged 16 fp/game at home.
I just telling you what the numbers saying, obviously you cant say all cornerbacks are the same. What I took away from the @Pit game was that it was a close game and Flacco didnt want to risk throwing into bracket coverage. They new after the first half that they would win the game if they didnt screw up. if Pit can move the ball more this week expect baltimore to change to a more pass happy offense than last time. If I had to put a number on projections I would say 7-9 points, which is the lower range of what flacco and smith do at home. the washington and denver matchups the following 2 weeks don't look half bad eitherDid that analysis take into account Ike Taylor?The analysis i did today shows that his best games are at home. his last for games hes averaged 16 fp/game at home.
Completely agree with this analysis.All things being equal, the stupid OC will be safe vs. sorry...which will hurt Smith. Especially against Pit and Ike Taylor. Understanding that Pit's either going with an ineffective Batch or a banged up Ben, I'd say the odds that Baltimore's offense plays it conservative is high.Not good for T. Smith. I'm benching him.KYI just telling you what the numbers saying, obviously you cant say all cornerbacks are the same. What I took away from the @Pit game was that it was a close game and Flacco didnt want to risk throwing into bracket coverage. They new after the first half that they would win the game if they didnt screw up. if Pit can move the ball more this week expect baltimore to change to a more pass happy offense than last time. If I had to put a number on projections I would say 7-9 points, which is the lower range of what flacco and smith do at home. the washington and denver matchups the following 2 weeks don't look half bad eitherDid that analysis take into account Ike Taylor?The analysis i did today shows that his best games are at home. his last for games hes averaged 16 fp/game at home.
I really don't see it.Pit is #1 vs. WRs.Ike will be on T. Smith.They had a guy run underneath all his routes previously. Result: Flacco airmailing everything.If I had confidence that their offensive strategists would actually do something clever with Smith I'd think about starting him.If Big Ben is out they will be risk averse and just try and grind out a win. Rice, Rice, Rice.KYThe Ravens have scored 184 points in 5 home games - 37 ppg. They've scored 99 points in 6 road games - 16.5 ppg.They run the no-huddle at home extensively and rack up huge points. They've pretty much completely stopped using it on the road, and actually used it for 0 snaps at San Diego last week.Nobody's sure exactly why, though I think the O Line's inability to figure out protections when faced with crowd noise seems to be part of it. Not that there was a ton of noise at San Diego last week.I doubt the Ravens match their home scoring average this week, though they did put up 35 at home vs. Pittsburgh last year, but I would expect Smith to be a decent WR2 even against the Steelers.
This is pretty much my feelings about Torrey this week as well. I'm very surprised to say the least at how high some of the experts have him this week.I really don't see it.Pit is #1 vs. WRs.Ike will be on T. Smith.They had a guy run underneath all his routes previously. Result: Flacco airmailing everything.If I had confidence that their offensive strategists would actually do something clever with Smith I'd think about starting him.If Big Ben is out they will be risk averse and just try and grind out a win. Rice, Rice, Rice.KYThe Ravens have scored 184 points in 5 home games - 37 ppg. They've scored 99 points in 6 road games - 16.5 ppg.They run the no-huddle at home extensively and rack up huge points. They've pretty much completely stopped using it on the road, and actually used it for 0 snaps at San Diego last week.Nobody's sure exactly why, though I think the O Line's inability to figure out protections when faced with crowd noise seems to be part of it. Not that there was a ton of noise at San Diego last week.I doubt the Ravens match their home scoring average this week, though they did put up 35 at home vs. Pittsburgh last year, but I would expect Smith to be a decent WR2 even against the Steelers.
I will contend that it's folly to assume that whatever happened in the 1st game of a divisional rivalry will happen again in the rematch.This is pretty much my feelings about Torrey this week as well. I'm very surprised to say the least at how high some of the experts have him this week.I really don't see it.Pit is #1 vs. WRs.Ike will be on T. Smith.They had a guy run underneath all his routes previously. Result: Flacco airmailing everything.If I had confidence that their offensive strategists would actually do something clever with Smith I'd think about starting him.If Big Ben is out they will be risk averse and just try and grind out a win. Rice, Rice, Rice.KYThe Ravens have scored 184 points in 5 home games - 37 ppg. They've scored 99 points in 6 road games - 16.5 ppg.They run the no-huddle at home extensively and rack up huge points. They've pretty much completely stopped using it on the road, and actually used it for 0 snaps at San Diego last week.Nobody's sure exactly why, though I think the O Line's inability to figure out protections when faced with crowd noise seems to be part of it. Not that there was a ton of noise at San Diego last week.I doubt the Ravens match their home scoring average this week, though they did put up 35 at home vs. Pittsburgh last year, but I would expect Smith to be a decent WR2 even against the Steelers.