chiefs2929
Footballguy
Trent Richardson is a top 5 back every week for the next 5 years barring injury. Those who do not believe so do not own him.
And those who believe it do own him.So in one league I'm in I believe he's a top 5 back, in the other I do not.Trent Richardson is a top 5 back every week for the next 5 years barring injury. Those who do not believe so do not own him.

He practiced today.Surprised no chatter on trich status vs indy. Roto world trying to create some drama with their "status unknown" headlines but im reading more positive cues elsewhere.
Make up your mind scrumpy.And those who believe it do own him.So in one league I'm in I believe he's a top 5 back, in the other I do not.Trent Richardson is a top 5 back every week for the next 5 years barring injury. Those who do not believe so do not own him.![]()
he needs to mega play against Indy this week.He practiced today.Surprised no chatter on trich status vs indy. Roto world trying to create some drama with their "status unknown" headlines but im reading more positive cues elsewhere.
Thanks!Sounds like he mega will:Trent Richardson - RB - BrownsTrent Richardson (ribs) says he's pain-free, and expects to play against the Colts.Richardson suited up for Wednesday's practice, but the Browns have yet to reveal his participation level. "In my mind I'm ready for Sunday," Richardson said. "I'll be ready to play whole game." Richardson plans to wear a flak jacket or extra padding, but it sounds like only a setback will hold him out at this point. Even at less than 100 percent, he'll be an RB1 against the Colts' leaky run defense.
S T U DSounds like he mega will:Trent Richardson - RB - BrownsTrent Richardson (ribs) says he's pain-free, and expects to play against the Colts.Richardson suited up for Wednesday's practice, but the Browns have yet to reveal his participation level. "In my mind I'm ready for Sunday," Richardson said. "I'll be ready to play whole game." Richardson plans to wear a flak jacket or extra padding, but it sounds like only a setback will hold him out at this point. Even at less than 100 percent, he'll be an RB1 against the Colts' leaky run defense.
gotta like to hear this early in the weekSounds like he mega will:Trent Richardson - RB - BrownsTrent Richardson (ribs) says he's pain-free, and expects to play against the Colts.Richardson suited up for Wednesday's practice, but the Browns have yet to reveal his participation level. "In my mind I'm ready for Sunday," Richardson said. "I'll be ready to play whole game." Richardson plans to wear a flak jacket or extra padding, but it sounds like only a setback will hold him out at this point. Even at less than 100 percent, he'll be an RB1 against the Colts' leaky run defense.
Yea, what a gamer...SOFTGood news. Richardson proving himself a gamer.
Should have just sat out, seems like every player in the NFL this year is coming back sooner than expected from injuries. Besides Jennings and Garcon.Yea, what a gamer...SOFTGood news. Richardson proving himself a gamer.
Yea, what a gamer...SOFTGood news. Richardson proving himself a gamer.

Yea, he has 4 fantasy points the last 2 weeks.Any word on TRich?
I'm concerned about his health going forward.Yea, he has 4 fantasy points the last 2 weeks.Any word on TRich?
Me too...Doesn't seem like he plays well nicked up.I'm concerned about his health going forward.Yea, he has 4 fantasy points the last 2 weeks.Any word on TRich?
he didn't play, what's to say?where are the TRich backers - they usually show up after the game.
where are the TRich backers - they usually show up after the game.
The guy is an awesome talent. Maybe my favorite player in the league to watch play.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLmm6uPLNpIInjuries are really the only thing that can slow him down. Cleveland should have let him sit this one out so he could get back to 100%.he megadidn'tSounds like he mega will:Trent Richardson - RB - BrownsTrent Richardson (ribs) says he's pain-free, and expects to play against the Colts.Richardson suited up for Wednesday's practice, but the Browns have yet to reveal his participation level. "In my mind I'm ready for Sunday," Richardson said. "I'll be ready to play whole game." Richardson plans to wear a flak jacket or extra padding, but it sounds like only a setback will hold him out at this point. Even at less than 100 percent, he'll be an RB1 against the Colts' leaky run defense.
8 carries for 8 yards isn't playing? Why do injuries against TRich not count, but when talking about every other back in the league they do? Besides that, YTD he is averaging a very mediocre 3.3 YPC and most of his TD's where the result of opportune turnovers by the Cleveland defense, which we all know should not be expected as the norm. Breaking News: Trent "I love getting stuffed" Richardson just signed an endorsement deal with Pizza Hut to promote their stuffed crust pizza.he didn't play, what's to say?where are the TRich backers - they usually show up after the game.
Holy hell, slow your roll. As far as I can tell, GreenNGold has one post in this thread. He pointed out that Richardson has a pathetic 3.3 ypc, which is a fact. He asked why Richardson gets a complete pass for stinking while injured when no other players do, which is a good question. He claims that Richardson's scores have been inordinately aided by opportune takeaways, which is a very interesting claim. As far as I can tell, he's brought the closest thing to analysis on a page where some people are just claiming we should pretend Richardson never saw the field. What, you're freaking out because he made the Pizza Hut joke? Have you ever ventured into any thread pertaining to a currently struggling player before? That's pretty much par for the course. I fail to see how that constitutes trolling, unless you're Mr. Richardson or one of his immediate relatives. We got some people way too emotionally invested in Trent Richardson here right now.There's a thread on the first page or two entitled "what happened to the Shark Pool?" The answer is ****ty and inconsistent moderation. The fact that an obvious, horrible troll like GreenNGold isn't banned or even warned for his "contributions" is a giant blinking ****ing neon sign pointing to the issues in the Shark Pool. A symptom of a serious issue that is killing the value of this place. And it's 100% fixable. The desire and give-a-#### just don't seem to be there.
Check the front page. There's an entire Richardson thread also started by him.Link: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=651204Holy hell, slow your roll. As far as I can tell, GreenNGold has one post in this thread. He pointed out that Richardson has a pathetic 3.3 ypc, which is a fact. He asked why Richardson gets a complete pass for stinking while injured when no other players do, which is a good question. He claims that Richardson's scores have been inordinately aided by opportune takeaways, which is a very interesting claim. As far as I can tell, he's brought the closest thing to analysis on a page where some people are just claiming we should pretend Richardson never saw the field. What, you're freaking out because he made the Pizza Hut joke? Have you ever ventured into any thread pertaining to a currently struggling player before? That's pretty much par for the course. I fail to see how that constitutes trolling, unless you're Mr. Richardson or one of his immediate relatives.There's a thread on the first page or two entitled "what happened to the Shark Pool?"
The answer is ****ty and inconsistent moderation. The fact that an obvious, horrible troll like GreenNGold isn't banned or even warned for his "contributions" is a giant blinking ****ing neon sign pointing to the issues in the Shark Pool. A symptom of a serious issue that is killing the value of this place.
And it's 100% fixable. The desire and give-a-#### just don't seem to be there.
We got some people way too emotionally invested in Trent Richardson here right now.
Check the front page. There's an entire Richardson thread also started by him.Link: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=651204Holy hell, slow your roll. As far as I can tell, GreenNGold has one post in this thread. He pointed out that Richardson has a pathetic 3.3 ypc, which is a fact. He asked why Richardson gets a complete pass for stinking while injured when no other players do, which is a good question. He claims that Richardson's scores have been inordinately aided by opportune takeaways, which is a very interesting claim. As far as I can tell, he's brought the closest thing to analysis on a page where some people are just claiming we should pretend Richardson never saw the field. What, you're freaking out because he made the Pizza Hut joke? Have you ever ventured into any thread pertaining to a currently struggling player before? That's pretty much par for the course. I fail to see how that constitutes trolling, unless you're Mr. Richardson or one of his immediate relatives.There's a thread on the first page or two entitled "what happened to the Shark Pool?"
The answer is ****ty and inconsistent moderation. The fact that an obvious, horrible troll like GreenNGold isn't banned or even warned for his "contributions" is a giant blinking ****ing neon sign pointing to the issues in the Shark Pool. A symptom of a serious issue that is killing the value of this place.
And it's 100% fixable. The desire and give-a-#### just don't seem to be there.
I haven't seen anything he wrote but I imagine you look like the bigger of the tools with your whinning
We got some people way too emotionally invested in Trent Richardson here right now.
The only time he's really posted this season, has been when Richardson has struggled. He's a clear and obvious troll, and I used him as an example of a larger problem.
Love your contributions here man. But get the full context before you jump.
The only time I get called a troll, is when people like you run out of facts in your TRich pipe dream. If you want to debate, let's debate. Yet, you need to resort to name calling as soon as you are in the wrong. Debate some of the facts I have posted in this thread (or my other thread if you want to take the debate there -- although I agree I was overly harsh in a few posts there and won't repeat those mistakes). But stop the name calling and let's stick to the facts. Or should I call you a troll? When TRich is compared to Reggie Bush the first thing every TRich fanboy brings up is Reggie Bush's injury. Why should this be any different? As of right now, Reggie Bush is the proven and better back. Yes, that could change, but it hasn't yet.Check the front page. There's an entire Richardson thread also started by him.Link: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=651204Holy hell, slow your roll. As far as I can tell, GreenNGold has one post in this thread. He pointed out that Richardson has a pathetic 3.3 ypc, which is a fact. He asked why Richardson gets a complete pass for stinking while injured when no other players do, which is a good question. He claims that Richardson's scores have been inordinately aided by opportune takeaways, which is a very interesting claim. As far as I can tell, he's brought the closest thing to analysis on a page where some people are just claiming we should pretend Richardson never saw the field. What, you're freaking out because he made the Pizza Hut joke? Have you ever ventured into any thread pertaining to a currently struggling player before? That's pretty much par for the course. I fail to see how that constitutes trolling, unless you're Mr. Richardson or one of his immediate relatives.There's a thread on the first page or two entitled "what happened to the Shark Pool?"
The answer is ****ty and inconsistent moderation. The fact that an obvious, horrible troll like GreenNGold isn't banned or even warned for his "contributions" is a giant blinking ****ing neon sign pointing to the issues in the Shark Pool. A symptom of a serious issue that is killing the value of this place.
And it's 100% fixable. The desire and give-a-#### just don't seem to be there.
We got some people way too emotionally invested in Trent Richardson here right now.
The only time he's really posted this season, has been when Richardson has struggled. He's a clear and obvious troll, and I used him as an example of a larger problem.
Love your contributions here man. But get the full context before you jump.
I agree it is pointless, other than that when he has done good I have acknowledged the other side's points, and any time I say anything even slightly adverse I have been called a troll. Good day.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds. It's very obvious. I linked your thread chronicling this behavior. I'm not putting you on ignore, so if it makes you feel better your "facts" and "stats" and your mad debate skillz are being read and considered. I just have no desire to actually engage you in discussion, because its pointless.
Just go away...seriously. Less trolls the better.8 carries for 8 yards isn't playing? Why do injuries against TRich not count, but when talking about every other back in the league they do? Besides that, YTD he is averaging a very mediocre 3.3 YPC and most of his TD's where the result of opportune turnovers by the Cleveland defense, which we all know should not be expected as the norm. Breaking News: Trent "I love getting stuffed" Richardson just signed an endorsement deal with Pizza Hut to promote their stuffed crust pizza.he didn't play, what's to say?where are the TRich backers - they usually show up after the game.
If that makes him a troll, then is everyone who pops up when he succeeds but disappears when he struggles also a troll?Look, the guy might be a huge anti-fanboy, but that's not substantively different than being a huge fanboy, and it provides some much-needed balance given FBGs over-the-top love affair with him (people were telling me I was crazy earlier in this thread for not trading Ray Rice for Richardson, as if such an opinion were simply incomprehensible). And I have yet to see anyone engage with his major points yet- the 3.3 ypc, the fluky TD totals, the nagging injuries. I think he's wrong and agree that Rich is a talent, but think his supporters need a healthy dose of perspective if they're all so certain he's the next Adrian Peterson and not the next Steven Jackson.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds.
why did he even play if its worse than we think he probably set himself back further by stressing itTrent Richardson told reporters following Sunday's loss that his rib cartilage injury is worse than people think."The injury I have is much bigger than what folks think it is, and I don’t want to do anything to hurt the team," said Richardson, who conceded coach Pat Shurmur did the "smart" thing by benching him at halftime against the Colts. "I’m not myself out there right now. You look at me, I guess I’m not running hard like I’m used to, so I’m not out there right now. So it is worse than what people think it is." Shurmur insisted Richardson emerged from Sunday's loss "no worse for wear."Maybe he just needs to take the next week off to get healthy?
I was with you until I got here. Are you talking about health vs. injury? Good situation vs. bad situation? To me, there is very little difference between ADP and SJax other than situation. Obviously, SJax is the better receiver and Peterson probably had a bit more top end speed, but from an overall talent standpoint I see them as equal. And FWIW, I think it is way too early to put Richardson in the same conversation as those two. At this point, if I had to lean one way or another, I'd say he's not their caliber. But I wouldn't rule it out. I expected him to struggle this year on this team. If this team can take some steps in the right direction, I think he could be top 5 in a year or two. But given the poor surrounding cast, it is very hard to tell how good he is.If that makes him a troll, then is everyone who pops up when he succeeds but disappears when he struggles also a troll?Look, the guy might be a huge anti-fanboy, but that's not substantively different than being a huge fanboy, and it provides some much-needed balance given FBGs over-the-top love affair with him (people were telling me I was crazy earlier in this thread for not trading Ray Rice for Richardson, as if such an opinion were simply incomprehensible). And I have yet to see anyone engage with his major points yet- the 3.3 ypc, the fluky TD totals, the nagging injuries. I think he's wrong and agree that Rich is a talent, but think his supporters need a healthy dose of perspective if they're all so certain he's the next Adrian Peterson and not the next Steven Jackson.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds.
I really hope so too!I just hope that Chris Johnson's big game is enough to help me get Richardson straight up after two subpar performances.
I was referring to situation. People assume that super-talented backs are guaranteed a Peterson-like career. Sometimes, instead, they get a Stephen Jackson career. Even if Richardson's fans are right and he's the most talented RB in the league, if the Browns don't improve, that might not mean anything more than a string of low-end rb1, high-end rb2 seasons. Certainly a great career, but not nearly what his supporters are hoping for. Richardson has a lot more downside than some people are admitting right now.I was with you until I got here. Are you talking about health vs. injury? Good situation vs. bad situation? To me, there is very little difference between ADP and SJax other than situation. Obviously, SJax is the better receiver and Peterson probably had a bit more top end speed, but from an overall talent standpoint I see them as equal. And FWIW, I think it is way too early to put Richardson in the same conversation as those two. At this point, if I had to lean one way or another, I'd say he's not their caliber. But I wouldn't rule it out. I expected him to struggle this year on this team. If this team can take some steps in the right direction, I think he could be top 5 in a year or two. But given the poor surrounding cast, it is very hard to tell how good he is.If that makes him a troll, then is everyone who pops up when he succeeds but disappears when he struggles also a troll?Look, the guy might be a huge anti-fanboy, but that's not substantively different than being a huge fanboy, and it provides some much-needed balance given FBGs over-the-top love affair with him (people were telling me I was crazy earlier in this thread for not trading Ray Rice for Richardson, as if such an opinion were simply incomprehensible). And I have yet to see anyone engage with his major points yet- the 3.3 ypc, the fluky TD totals, the nagging injuries. I think he's wrong and agree that Rich is a talent, but think his supporters need a healthy dose of perspective if they're all so certain he's the next Adrian Peterson and not the next Steven Jackson.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds.
You're not a troll because of your opinions. You're a troll because you can't discuss them without being a condescending ****.I agree it is pointless, other than that when he has done good I have acknowledged the other side's points, and any time I say anything even slightly adverse I have been called a troll. Good day.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds. It's very obvious. I linked your thread chronicling this behavior. I'm not putting you on ignore, so if it makes you feel better your "facts" and "stats" and your mad debate skillz are being read and considered. I just have no desire to actually engage you in discussion, because its pointless.
+1You're not a troll because of your opinions. You're a troll because you can't discuss them without being a condescending ****.I agree it is pointless, other than that when he has done good I have acknowledged the other side's points, and any time I say anything even slightly adverse I have been called a troll. Good day.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds. It's very obvious. I linked your thread chronicling this behavior. I'm not putting you on ignore, so if it makes you feel better your "facts" and "stats" and your mad debate skillz are being read and considered. I just have no desire to actually engage you in discussion, because its pointless.
Can say exactly the same for each of you. +1Would you like to discuss something relevant like his 3.3 YPC or just keep calling me names?+1You're not a troll because of your opinions. You're a troll because you can't discuss them without being a condescending ****.I agree it is pointless, other than that when he has done good I have acknowledged the other side's points, and any time I say anything even slightly adverse I have been called a troll. Good day.I have no desire to "debate" you. You pop up when he struggles and disappear for the most part when he succeeds. It's very obvious. I linked your thread chronicling this behavior. I'm not putting you on ignore, so if it makes you feel better your "facts" and "stats" and your mad debate skillz are being read and considered. I just have no desire to actually engage you in discussion, because its pointless.
That's not very open minded.I have no interest discussing anything with you, ever.