jm192
Footballguy
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-campaign-sues-cnn-false-defamatory-statements-millions-damages
What exactly are we accomplishing?
What exactly are we accomplishing?
Last edited by a moderator:
Probably some really juicy discovery opportunities by NYT, Wapo & CNN.What exactly are we accomplishing?
They know the suits will likely be thrown out.This is apparently the article that is alleged to contain defamatory statements:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/13/opinions/mueller-report-trump-russia-opinion-noble/index.html
Does anyone want to take a crack at finding something remotely defamatory in it? I don't see anything.
(To be defamatory, a statement must be false, it must be a statement of fact rather than opinion, and in this context the author had to either know that the statement was false, or have serious doubts about its truth.)
Op-ed yesterday suggested the legal departments should push for immediate discovery instead of filing to have them dismissed. Would be fun to see how fast Trump backtracked to avoid that, but no lawyer's going to let that happen.Probably some really juicy discovery opportunities by NYT, Wapo & CNN.
Maw! Paw! Come quick! The guy on the Fox TV done said Donnie suein' the CNN! Wooo! 'Bought dang time he sued them sum#####es!They know the suits will likely be thrown out.
They just want conservative media to run with the headlines. And to try and intimidate the press.
This is apparently the statement that Trump takes issue with:
"The Trump campaign assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia's help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option on the table."
That's not defamatory. Trump was asked if he'd accept information about his opponent from a foreign country like Russia or China and he said yes. That's leaving the option on the table.
I'll bite - how is he wasting your time. (The irony of making this complaint while posting on a magic football board is not lost on me...)He’s wasting our ####### time
Maybe Trump is disputing the claim that the campaign assessed the potential risk?This is apparently the statement that Trump takes issue with:
"The Trump campaign assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia's help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option on the table."
That's not defamatory. Trump was asked if he'd accept information about his opponent from a foreign country like Russia or China and he said yes. That's leaving the option on the table.
There is 0% chance he wins this. I agree with @Dinsy Ejotuz that he is just looking to score some Fox News headlines, take a few victory laps and then drop them. I hope CNN pushes for discovery instead of dismissal. I haven't read the complaint, but I'm curious how they arrived at the damages figure.Honestly don’t even care what they wrote. If he sues them and wins, what does he get? A few million dollars? He’s a billionaire. He’s wasting our ####### time
I would think CNN has a better case at seeking damages against Trump for his repeated claims that CNN is "fake news".CNN’s actions show willful misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness, oppression and that entire want of care which raises a presumption of conscious indifference to the consequences, and accordingly the Campaign is entitled to an award of punitive damages against CNN
sue everyone! punitive damages!https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-campaign-sues-cnn-false-defamatory-statements-millions-damages
What exactly are we accomplishing?
I'll bite - how is he wasting your time. (The irony of making this complaint while posting on a magic football board is not lost on me...)
Fair enough. It’s still irritating that while we we’re dealing with the coronavirus and the stock market plummeting, he’s using this as another means to divide his attention.I'll bite - how is he wasting your time. (The irony of making this complaint while posting on a magic football board is not lost on me...)
I'm too old. Knew exactly what this was without clicking. (and is the first thing that came to mind with Urbanhack's post...)
I think you have this backwards...Fair enough. It’s still irritating that while we we’re dealing with the coronavirus and the stock market plummeting, he’s using this as another means to divide his attention.
Watch for him to use this to slip in a few SS cuts. You know, while all the old folks are distracted.Fair enough. It’s still irritating that while we we’re dealing with the coronavirus and the stock market plummeting, he’s using this as another means to divide his attention.
Example A: Trump went to the CDC today - and wore his Campaign Hat.I think you have this backwards...
The coronavirus and stock market are distracting him from what is really important: Owning Libs and getting re-elected.
And protecting his extremely thin skin.I think you have this backwards...
The coronavirus and stock market are distracting him from what is really important: Owning Libs and getting re-elected.
Thanks, I hadn't even bothered to read the claim. Trump has sued NYT, Wapo & CNN, and I'd imagine these will go the same way Nunes' suits are going, straight down theThis is apparently the statement that Trump takes issue with:
"The Trump campaign assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia's help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option on the table."
That's not defamatory. Trump was asked if he'd accept information about his opponent from a foreign country like Russia or China and he said yes. That's leaving the option on the table.
Between suing people and the whole twitter thing it sounds like he won't needing any jigsaw puzzles.I think it's nice Trump's already finding new hobbies to occupy himself with after he's out of office in January. Good for him.
Sullivan-a-#####, I can't find anything. Maybe he should have tried to versus the NY Times.This is apparently the article that is alleged to contain defamatory statements:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/13/opinions/mueller-report-trump-russia-opinion-noble/index.html
Does anyone want to take a crack at finding something remotely defamatory in it? I don't see anything.
(To be defamatory, a statement must be false, it must be a statement of fact rather than opinion, and in this context the author had to know that the statement was false, or have serious doubts about its truth.)
When he is vigorously playing the air accordion it’s a dead giveaway that he is full of ####
He also says you got to give a lot of credit to these doctors while repeatedly gesturing to himselfWhen he is vigorously playing the air accordion it’s a dead giveaway that he is full of ####
The crazy arm waving - it's like we have senile Tommy Boy for President.When he is vigorously playing the air accordion it’s a dead giveaway that he is full of ####
He’s only got three outfits to pick from:At least he got dressed up.
It is all about ego and headlines with Trump. Trump has zero aptitude for science and legal issues and steps in it everytime he tries. And to be a Trump advisor you must go along with every hairbrain thing he says.This is apparently the article that is alleged to contain defamatory statements:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/13/opinions/mueller-report-trump-russia-opinion-noble/index.html
Does anyone want to take a crack at finding something remotely defamatory in it? I don't see anything.
(To be defamatory, a statement must be false, it must be a statement of fact rather than opinion, and in this context the author had to know that the statement was false, or have serious doubts about its truth.)
Called the governor of Washington a snake, too.Example A: Trump went to the CDC today - and wore his Campaign Hat.
Pretty sure that's Brian Kemp - Governor. And yes, that does appear to be the "sweet jesus, you're a moron" look.Watch the expression on the red tie guy.
Countersuit!@jm192 I’m suing you if you don’t change the thread title to the correct spelling. Thats....I don’t know, making is all look stupid. It may be a weak case...